The archives contain:
User talk:Beardo/Archive 1 2006 - 2007
User talk:Beardo/Archive 2 - deleted images
User talk:Beardo/Archive 3 - admin stuff - dismbiguation, general notices
User talk:Beardo/Archive 4 -

For T. Casey Brennan's stories, see User talk:Beardo/Archive TCB

I know that you've been here for a while but I welcome anyway

Welcome!

Hello, Beardo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place ((helpme)) on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

—-- That Guy, From That Show! ^(talk) 2006-02-19 21:52Z

In response to commetary at Dan Donovan I've created two working drafts of new articles here. Please check these against what you know and leave commentary at either Dan Donovan or my talk page. Thanks much! Dan, the CowMan 04:37, 13 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Alright, I've pushed the changes out, relinked the related articles, and made Dan Donovan a disambiguation page.

>Are you looking to join the tribe of dans ?

I think that I'm already there. :)

Have a great day sir. Dan, the CowMan 08:07, 13 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Can you add some context to the "culo del mundo" affirmation in the Moa article? (Or remove the comment altogether) As it it now it hardly seems encyclopedic... Qyd ^(talk)04:14, 21 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No, never made it past Marti. But I heard talk about Moa. Is it true that Sherritt sold its intrests in Moa to a chinese company? (this rumour circulated last autumn). Other places that would qualify for the description would be the red earth woods in Casillo, or the mosquito infested swamps in Majaguillar... That would be in Cuba, in the wide world, I'm sure there's far worse places. Qyd ^(talk)16:59, 22 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

About the Sherrit Bussines it's just a rumour here in Cuba, and I think it will be just that, no official talk about that... about the "culo del mundo" thats an offensive expresion here in Cuba and is common to call that way at any small rural town in Cuba, but is only used in an offensive way. I live in Holguín, ask me anything u wanna know KatKiller 07:54, 13 February 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, i'm from Centro Habana, Cuba, and i visited the article about San Miguel de Padrón, and found your nick... read the article that i made about Centro Habana municipality and tell me how you see it. It needs an extension. Bye

Sorry, i forgot to sign my post on your talkpage.. that was my first comment on wikipedia, but i'm learning fast ZorphDark

Hi Again!! I made the X-Alfonso cuban's musician page, if you know about he, please let's grow up the article, however, please, read it and make all change that you consider... Bye & thanks ZorphDark

Thanks for your reviews!!! Bye ZorphDark

Thanks for the vote, however, I wanted to let you know I broke etiquette a little bit and modified your vote. I moved the vote to where the others were; if you clicked 'discuss' in the merge header, it brought you here. Just letting you know. -- RevRagnarok ^{Talk Contrib Reverts} 10:48, 3 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've since watched the film again. What strikes me is the contrast between the film's violent scenes and all those outside of it (I'm including the pseudo-rape on the stairway with "violent scenes"). Maybe I'm not used to watching candid small-town folk interact, but the reality of the intensely violent scenes (and even their dialogue) contrasts massively between everything else. You mentioned "mythic" - could you extrapolate on that?

Hi Beardo, I can't much on the response in Cuba other than the odd Alarcon quote. Any thoughts as this needs to be presented?--Zleitzen 22:42, 2 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Beardo, I think I may have cured your concerns over the redirect, but I'm not sure. Have a look and see if you think I've done it. Budgiekiller 12:50, 1 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nice catch on the Multiple Man creators and artists. Good call. Bhissong 16:05, 3 September 2006 (UTC)bhissongReply[reply]

Hi Beardo

• A Fresa y chocolate page is essential, Beardo. I can't believe it's taken that long to for wikipedia to get round to it! It would also complement a minor tussle I'm having on the Gay rights in Cuba page which I felt wasn't up to date or accurate on first viewing.
• I think I replied on the Central Bank of Cuba page on that topic, feel free to start a banking in Cuba page.
• I wouldn't worry about the El Benny article - as long as it's NPOV. But be prepared for a battle with the deletionists. I've had to rescue a few of these from those who believe non-English speaking movies are not important. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clase Z "Tropical".
• I understand your points concerning the allegations of tourist apartheid in Cuba. I had to fight to get it to "tourist apartheid", it actually read simply "apartheid in Cuba" at first which was even worse! I think it was set up after a dispute over "Israeli apartheid" - anything that anyone could find that was described as "apartheid" somewhere got a page.--Zleitzen 03:22, 4 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Z - you were up late if you're in the UK.

Sorry - I'd missed your response on banking. Yes, I am sure that the National Bank deserves a page.

El Benny - maybe I'll start with the director and star. (The star just won an award at Locarno Film Festival - so perhaps he'll be our first article on an actor who is still in Cuba. (Though Jorge Perugorria deserves one, too.)) Of course, short films tend to have a harder time than full-length features.

btw - a number of geographical pages have links to a Spanish language site www.guije.com. This seems to be referring to a pre-1976 (possibly pre-1959) status. I wonder how best to dscribe that.

-- Beardo 05:08, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for changing those damn film director categories that I messed up, I'm an idiot with practical matters as you may have noticed. As for staying up late - put it down to an erratic sleep pattern, a very demanding 6 month old bairn (and the other 3 monsters), and a welcome extended break from this place [1] with no work commitments other than to check emails! Editing this thing is a welcome diversion and keeps the brain ticking over. --Zleitzen 04:29, 5 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, Each Dawn I Die was banned in Australia - Banned films. Thanks. User:Lugnuts

Hi Beardo,

Thanks for adding Jorge Luis Sanchez. Here is the Cuban website's section for directors (they are in alaphabetical order on the right side)

http://www.cubacine.cu/realizad/index.htm

Dreamer 11:48, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

I don't know who rattled the anon's cage on that talk page! But there is an element of practicality about the comments in the sense of this: Having added the POV template, which is perfectly acceptable, you really would need to offer suggestions on how to make the page NPOV. I understand entirely why you believe the page to be POV, but how do you propose to change this?--Zleitzen 09:05, 8 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'll try, thanks for the vote of confidence.May the Edit be with you. T-borg (drop me a line) 21:11, 8 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Beardo. Thanks for the welcome. I replied to you on my talk page before I could figure out how to navigate to yours. In response to your question, I think I will try to edit a couple of more pages on the particular Cuban films that I think have not received sufficient critical/public attention. I did a whole bunch of writing and research and interviews on this stuff as an undergraduate and am happy to find a place to publicize some of it. In particular, I'm planning to refine some of the Madagascar entry (add some links and stuff), add some stuff on Enrique Colina, and generally look through the piles of essays i've got sitting around in my hard-drive to see what else might be useful/interesting.

oh, and you're right. i certainly did not mean to flag that as a minor edit...newbie screw up. Aaronshaw 22:30, 9 September 2006 (UTC) [[2]]Reply[reply]

So, I cited the two relevant sources for the vast majority of the stuff I put up on the Madagascar page. There are still a couple of details that I learned from a personal interview with the director, though. I could cut them, but am not really distressed to have them in the public domain...I'm sure they showed up in an interview in a Cuban newspaper at some point in the early 90's. However, I also don't want to evade the GFDL or Wikipedia's requirements in any way...

what would you recommend?Aaronshaw 04:38, 10 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--JStalk 06:31, 17 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Discussion is ongoing on Wikipedia:Copyright problems/Other. Please come help us figure out what to do with this. --Robth^Talk 06:23, 25 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Beardo, when writing up a new piece on a Cuban actor - could you add the name to the List of Cubans page under the appropriate headings, that page needs beefing up. Thanks.--Zleitzen 16:09, 19 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re:List of Cubans. I had a go at moving obvious Cuban-Americans to the List of Cuban-Americans - these were people that were either born in the US, or had relocated so long ago at such a young age that they had made no impact on Cuban life, their careers were synonomous with the US. I maybe wrong. Beyond that I don't know and I don't feel like I'm a good enough judge to make the call, especially with the baseball players as I know nothing about that sporting culture. The occupations sections do need further sorting out. But it's a tedious task.--Zleitzen 22:26, 19 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please participate in the poll I've set up at Talk:Syd_Barrett#Poll_on_keeping_a_paragraph_on_Mental_Illness_or_deleting_it TheQuandry 17:20, 22 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I couldn't track down the original reference last night but will do so and tidy up when I can find time. Ghmyrtle 11:23, 24 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Was just browsing through and looked this over.

Yes, this is true, as I have myself been relayed this information from family sources however, I think it would be rather difficult to provide citations as, Mirta's family is very hush-hush on this subject. She returned recently to be with Fidelito. I found it VERY interesting. Would never have guessed.

Hey man, do you have any photographs that you could release into CC or GFDL that would improve the 'healthcare in Cuba' article? Hospitals/Ambulances etc. - Francis Tyers · 12:05, 9 October 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is a form message being sent to all WikiProject Disambiguation participants. I recently left a proposed banner idea on the WikiProject Disambiguation talk page and I would appreciate any input you could provide. Before it can be approved or denied, I would prefer a lot of feedback from multiple participants in the project. So if you have the time please join in the discussion to help improve the WikiProject. Keep up the good work in link repair and thanks for your time. Nehrams2020 21:50, 9 October 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Beardo, I think their might indeed be a bit of a mix-up at Simon Fraser (general). I'd like your help in clearing up the matter, if you're still interested in the article. File:Icons-flag-scotland.png Canæn File:Icons-flag-scotland.png 01:36, 29 October 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's not immediately apparent whether WP:RM is policy, guideline, or something else, but it's definitely bad form to unilaterally move a page like The Apprentice without discussion. The wording of my warning to him was not my own but that of ((MP3)), a standard warning template for just such an occaision. Perhaps it is a bit too harsh in tone, but it does appear that he was attempting to promote "his" article over the original by redirecting the page to The Apprentice (UK). -Anþony 10:40, 23 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I guess it was because most of the credits on that page were fore Pete and I didn't know which ones were for Oliver. The Splendiferous Gegiford 14:19, 27 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Why? Please inform me beforehand.

Best regards, dear DearBrit.

Yours truly, Ludvikus 17:33, 29 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Good work Beardo. Whenever I've tried to ask for protection, its been like pulling teeth. I have no idea why the Cuba page was semi-protected for so long before - nearly 6 months. Regardless of how noble some users believe the policy of allowing unregistered users to edit articles is, it successfully reduced stress levels to near zero, and allowed the page to improve gradually and organically for the better. For the above and other long term improvements to the Cuba articles - I award you with this brand new barn star created by my more computer literate daughter for such a purpose!

		The José Martí Barnstar
		For long service to Cuban related articles

By the way, have you taken a look at the Cuba portal yet? A work in progress.--Zleitzen 08:30, 1 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

See Talk:Tango TV for my suggestion as to how to proceed, and let me know how I can help. Andrewa 15:42, 1 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ah, yes that's quite useful. I've put it in a subcategory of Category:Science fiction by franchise, but I'm not sure if that's the correct place or not. Feel free to change it. Bob talk 11:31, 9 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hmm, that's a good point. I don't know really, it was the closest I could find, but you're correct that it isn't really a franchise. I've placed it in Category:Categories named after people, so perhaps that could replace it. Bob talk 22:56, 9 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

See Talk:Tango TV#Where to now. Comments welcome of course. Andrewa 19:43, 10 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks Beardo. It seems self-evident to me that the category and its implementation were flawed. But as we learn here, everyone has a different view, and a different idea of what they expect to find in an encyclopedia.--Zleitzen 01:28, 12 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear Beardo, would you mind helping me in correcting the links about Charles Gray the actor? Str1977 ^{(smile back)} 13:47, 13 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

All right, I have done it myself. Only a few ambiguous Charles Grays are linking to the disambig page:

• one with a house in Colchester
• one with a grave on Wikipedia:Find-A-Grave_famous_people/G/Gr

If you can solve these, please do so. Cheers, Str1977 ^{(smile back)} 14:42, 13 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Beardo. Check the 'edits history' of the Cuba & Fidel Castro discussion pages. There maybe an EJ imposter among us (I've notified 'EJ' himself, of possible impersonators). GoodDay 02:00, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

***************

By this edit [3], you removed an anon user's comment on the talk page. That comment was actually an attempt to alert registered users of vandalism on the main page (which is semi-protected). --Beardo 16:04, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for the note Beardo and sorry for the inconvenience. Cheers. -- Szvest ^{Wiki me up ®} 16:44, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I hope (if it's EJ), he'll choose another IP address. The IP address in question is indanger of being possibley banned. GoodDay 19:06, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your suspicions were right, it is EJ afterall. Furthermore, he's begun his blogs again. If he continues, I just might report him again. GoodDay 21:53, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I understand 'EJ' is knowledgeable and a source of information. However that dosen't give him permission to blog the 'talk' pages. If he wants to blog, let him create an account & then blog on his own 'talk' page. I've nothing personal against EJ, but if everyone (registered & unregistered) blogged article 'talk pages', there'd be little room left for what they're actually for. Blogging on public 'talk pages' are frowned upon by Wikipedia. GoodDay 00:46, 15 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Beardo, I'm seeking your guys (Zleitzen, Polaris999 & Goatboy95)'s support in a request to Administrators to allow Blogging on public Discussion (Talk) pages. I've called on you particular users, as you've like me have conversed -positively OR negatively- with 'El Jigue'. IF Administrators consent to this proposal- blog away, IF not - then I'll seek a 1-year ban on EJ, who currently is begining to blog again. I too am pro-democracy, the sooner Fidel is dead the better. That's not the issue however. So, how about it? GoodDay 20:03, 17 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

How about focussing our attention and efforts on more important matters? -- Polaris999 21:13, 17 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Aren't WIKIPEDIA policies & rules important too? Help me guys; help me to help 'EJ'. GoodDay 21:59, 17 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Agreed, Beardo. For futher discussion on this topic, go to GoodDay's Discussion page. GoodDay 22:49, 17 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

See Zleitzen. I've ended the debate, will go along with Consensus interpretation of rules. Also I've apologised to 'EJ' on his 'current' IP address Discussion page. GoodDay 01:18, 18 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Did I dream it, or did I read somewhere that you wrote that Cesar Romero was descended from Jose Marti?--Zleitzen 04:20, 15 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Indeed yes - see http://www.historyofcuba.com/history/funfacts/CesarRom.htm . It is mentioned in both the Cesar Romero and José Martí articles. As part of the 150th (?) anniversary celebrations, two ladies came to Cuba to visit, who were described as descendants of Marti through his daughter, without questioning - though it seems there is no confirmation that she was his. Oddly http://www.cubanow.net/global/loader.php?secc=5&cont=stories/num11/01.htm describes them as Romero's daughters - but our article indicates that he was a confirmed bachelor. Perhaps they were his nieces ? -- Beardo 04:34, 15 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Beardo:

There is an article (circa 1950s) in Bohemia on Cesar Romero in which this was accepted. What one would like to see is a DNA analysis of Marti's genome. From memory there seems to be an inference that Marti's family was from Majorca and the last name is included among the "San Benito" (e.g. of Jewish descent). One wonders if he had Cohenim sequences El Jigue 1-2-07

Doesn't founder seem to imply sole founder? I suppose it is more middle ground to say founder than co-founder, but it still has its own implications. I guess there's also "a founder", but I don't know if that's any better since it makes the implication he might not be the only one. Owen 11:51, 20 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Merry Christmas!

Best wishes to my fellow wikipedian Beardo! From Zleitzen

Can you prove what you're saying? If so, your observations are quite valuable. We're told that night-club bouncers in Cuba systematically block entrance to Cuban nationals - but do they ask for passports? If they're simply going by their own predujices, then the real state of affairs is "wealth apartheid", the same thing we live under. PalestineRemembered 12:12, 31 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

thanks for your welcome on my discussion page~ I see that you live in cuba in habana!!! good I go two times in cuba do you work in cuba?

Felinafr 14:24, 9 January 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

yes really? and what was the name of the video ? do you work there for a long time? and what do you do? (if not indiscrete) I really like Cuba you are lucky to work there.

Felinafr 19:10, 12 January 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

excuse me an other question jejeje I see one video but bad quality on you tube of clan 537 - los pistoleros, I don't know if you can because of your connexion in cuba to internet, but if you cant put it in good quality on "you tube" or "dailymotion", I will be really happy.

Felinafr 22:43, 12 January 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Errr sorry I think I reverted one edit too much. My bad. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Esurnir (talk • contribs) at 19:00, 11 January 2007

A mayor éminence gris of Cuban history is best known as Fabio Grobart (although his original name is Polish). His importance in founding the Cuban (Stalinist) communist party is/was(:>) recognized by Fidel Castro:

Castro, F. 1965 (accessed 1-9-07) Pursc Central Committ Presentation, Havana's Chaplin Theater -Havana Domestic Radio - Speech Report_Nbr- Fbis - Date- 19651004 -Text- Castro Refers To Cuban Refugees, Guevara {http://lanic.utexas.edu/la/cb/cuba/castro/1965/19651004],

the Rand thinktank [www.rand.org/pubs/research_memoranda/2006/RM4994.pdf],

and Jewish History experts: Asís, Moisés 2000 (accessed 1-8-07) Judaism in Cuba 1959-1999 ICCAS Occasional Paper Series, http://www6.miami.edu/iccas/AsisJUDAISMCUBA-New.pdf. “By 1925, there were 8,000 Jews in Cuba (some 2,700 sephardic, 5,200 ashkenazic, and 100 Americans). Four ashkenazic Jews were in the small group that founded the first Communist Party of Cuba in 1925: Grimberg, Vasserman, Simjovich aka Grobart, and Gurbich. They opposed the religious and community life of the other Jews.”

Evidence has been presented to link Grobart to the Leon Trotsky assassination, and less strong evidence to the Julio Antonio Mella assassination.

Although the party Grobart helped found was not the first Cuban communist party, it is considered as such by the present Cuban government.

His son(?) Fabio Grobart Sunshine has a number of publications and is highly placed among the Cuban Nomenclatura.

I am preparing a major footnote in my book on Grobart and I am will to share some (but not all (:>) citations) to this major figure in Cuban history. Could somebody be so kind as too open such an article El Jigue 1-12-07 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 208.65.188.149 (talk) 19:55, 12 January 2007 (UTC).Reply[reply]

Beardo did quite and bit more then took a rest from Fabio Grobart you may want to take another look at it. Thank you. El Jigue 1-14-06

Have you see this Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Scouting/Translations#Project_mediator_offer? English Subtitle 22:11, 23 January 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for removing the boxes from those articles - as you can see in the history I've been trying to remove them for a while now but kept getting reverted and eventually blocked for it.--90.240.140.197 00:24, 5 February 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Beardo, can you check syntax of images captions that I upload and posted on Havana page? Thanks a lot... ZorphDark

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		I, A mcmurray, hearby award you, Beardo this Barnstar of Diligence for your due diligence in ensuring the accuracy of the information in the article Metal Highway Bridges of Fulton County Thematic Resources and all of its realted sub-articles.A mcmurray 07:28, 10 February 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Beardo, I think you must delete that reference to Moa as "el culo del mundo" it means in English "the arse of the world" and it's pretty offensive if any wikipedian user from Moa see that article maybe will get very angry, because you are ofending them telling their town is called the arse of the world, and that's not true, as I know. KatKiller 08:11, 13 February 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, thanks for your talk, go and check 4 my answers, first I think that the Holguin tree section in Holguín article must not be there, it have nothing to do with that Cuban city or province and it is not consistent... and second I'll try to contribute with some scientific information about the Ataxia in Holguín... I'll try to help w/ a good article ... another thing: I can see you're interested in Cuban Cinema, I know someone who could help you w/ some good info, she is a kind of Cuban cinema specialist but can only talk in Spanish and basic English: Here is her link, she is completly new in Wiki... but knows a lot about Cuban cinema....well... hope you'll be in touch...KatKiller 07:07, 17 February 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

WP:Album specifies that "prepositions ("to", "over", "through")" are not to be capitalised. Spearhead 10:25, 18 February 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Here's something for your mantlepiece, Beardo. Add to it if you can!

I have a challenge for you also, Beardo. To find as many interesting facts around the Cuban articles as possible to add to the rotating content section of this page Portal:Cuba/DYK. If we get enough we could have 5 for each day of the month on automatic rotation. Are you able to rise to such a challenge?-- Zleitzen^(talk) 04:10, 23 February 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hola! Gracias por la bienvenida, puedes escribir en inglés o español, pero preferentemente en el último, veo que tienes varias cosas de cine, ya veremos como intercambiar ya que dedico gran parte de mi carrera al estudio de cine cubano, así que cuando quieras nos ponemos en contacto. Saludos BethFK —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 201.220.222.140 (talk) 04:12, 26 February 2007 (UTC).Reply[reply]

Hi.. I was wondering if you could get me a definition of ABOGADO-NOTARIO.. I know the literal translation is Attorney-Notary, but what is the difference between that and a plain lawyer? Since you are in Cuba I thought maybe you could inform me or maybe you could make an article on it? My family is full of abogado-notarios (pre-1960), but I was wondering what were the duties or powers they had and the process one had to go through to become one. Is there a listing somewhere in the Ministry of Justice of all the abogados-notarios in cuba? I know its a lot to ask, but I was curious. Callelinea 15:19, 17 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

hello there, thank you for your message. That's odd, the talk page did not get moved along with article back then, I thought it would always do so automatically. I have moved it to Talk:Elizabeth Stuart, I hope that is what you asked for. Thank you for bringing that problem up. sincerely Gryffindor 22:58, 17 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I notice that you have moved Meissen to the controversial section of WP:RM. I left the following comment to support that it is not so and was a move done in error (I have changed some of it with clarifications):

There was no consensus for a move to Meißen nine months ago (that cannot be applied to a restorative move to Meissen since using the non-consensus only rationalizes the "argument" that the move to Meißen is wrong). Also, this current move to Meißen is erroneously attributed to a convention. The use of Meissen in English is dominate and if anything, suggesting that a restoration from a move in error is controversial is itself controversial :P If the opposite were the case (moving Meissen to Meißen), that would not be supported by any of Wikipedia's conventions, not even the current conventions for German place names.

In summary:

• The Meissen → Meißen request nine months ago did not occur because there was no consensus
• The Meissen → Meißen move occured recently but is not supported by any cited convention
• The Meißen → Meissen request cannot surely be argued against on the basis of a failed move request of Meissen → Meißen when the current request is restorative and non-controversial in that Meissen is the dominate English usage.
• And indeed, the argument that the non-consensus outcome of Meissen → Meißen nine months ago precludes a restorative move of Meißen → Meissen makes no sense: Meissen → Meißen should not have occurred anyway if that was the case :P

Cheers! Charles 01:46, 12 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Conversely, the present move was done with no discussion and is not supported by any convention. A restorative move is in order. If it had still been an issue, it would have continued to be discussed. Controversiality cannot be said to have permanence. Charles 02:00, 12 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, To assist global anti-counterfeiting efforts you may wish to consider marking images of banknotes you upload as "Specimen" in some way, if those banknotes represent legal tender.ShakespeareFan00 17:53, 28 June 2007 (UTC) Reply[reply]

Thanks for your note. The image came from the Cuban Central Bank's website, so I guess they aren't worried about forgeries. The image quality is not really good enough to copy, and anyway 3 pesos are worth about 13.5 cents US money, so it would probably cost more to forge one than it is worth. -- Beardo 02:48, 29 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ah. OK. If it's from an offical site. You might want to add your comments above to the rationale though, Your discretion :) ShakespeareFan00 09:38, 29 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I added a comment on the talk page re the reputation of Marianao (Havana, Cuba) in case you are interested. --121.209.163.1 13:11, 8 July 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I respectfully draw your attention to my recent comments at horse slaughter, whose title change you opposed. BrainyBabe 16:41, 9 July 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Honestly, even I am not sure how it is spelled.. If I look it up on the internet I find it spelled both ways.. I'm going to go with the y at the end now because I see it spelled that way more often from actual Cuban government sources. Callelinea 23:48, 21 July 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just wondering why you tagged this article as db-author, since the original author of the article neither blanked the page or requested its deletion. It was already tagged as db-bio anyway. Darksun 17:32, 8 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

According to The World Gazetteer, Koyampattur or Koyampatur are alternate names for Coimbatore. [5] Reinis^talk 16:24, 10 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

All those Maytags are confusing, I hope we have them all correct. My family lived in Cuba from 1910-1914. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 04:44, 14 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yup, before my time. Here is the story: [6] Do you know if it is possible to get birth certificates for Cuban births, I have several family members that were born there.

Ha! Americans still cannot travel to Cuba, unless they were born there. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 05:27, 14 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Heya Beardo,

As you and Duggy are the most active contributors to the Conan the Barbarian Talk Page, I would like to solicit your opinion on the subject of cutting or revamping the "In popular culture" section of the article.

Regards,

Flask —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 23:52, 25 September 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Ahmed Shah (Hockey), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Ahmed Shah (Hockey) is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Ahmed Shah (Hockey), please affix the template ((hangon)) to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 07:31, 27 October 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I posted the following on the talk page, but as yet have had no response. Perhaps you can explain it to me?

I've read the above discussions with interest, and I can understand how it could be titled "rear admiral" or "Rear Admiral", but I can not understand how the above discussion resulted in "Rear admiral". The most quoted example is "Rear Admiral X is a rear admiral". "Rear admiral X is a Rear admiral" was never justified, or even advocated, yet that's what the article ended up being called. Can someone explain this to me please? Pdfpdf 14:32, 30 September 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks in anticipation of your reply, Pdfpdf 12:25, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

i've recently put in a lenghty article on Cuba in Angola and put additions to that end into verious other places (cuba history etc). i'm long from done, my article raised a lot of opposition, and i'd appreciate your help.Sundar1 (talk) 18:32, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ranger-26-03-66.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:03, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Beardo, the Havana wikipage lately has seen an increased number of vandalism, is there any way to temporarily lock it? Await for your help, Thanks. DanishWolf (talk) 02:32, 8 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Beardo...I am currently in the process of writing a user box for all of the colleges that are part of Oxbridge. This template is meant to replace your current college template. Please take a look at the work in progress and comment on it. My main concerns are college abbreviations and color choice. I am using scarf colors for the colleges. Thank you. - LA @ 17:38, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I was wondering if you could give your imput on this article. Thanks. Callelinea (talk) 23:37, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have nominated Category:Jim Steinman productions (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Songs produced by Jim Steinman (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Bencherlite^Talk 15:52, 30 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Lucy Russell (actress) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding ((hangon)) to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. PamD (talk) 13:38, 26 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm looking for folks to help convert Respect Threads to wiki formatting on Project Fanboy: WikiFans. Respect Threads, showcase scans of feats performed by comic book characters and have gained an audience on several comic book message boards. A few other wiki editors and myself are trying to convert them from the unprofessional look of a bunch of posts on a message board to the formatting common with WikiMedia wiki's. To view an example of what we're doing, here is a link to Respect Silver Surfer.

I was wondering if you might have time to contribute your comic book knowledge and/or scans of comic book characters performing feats, and help us out with our Respect Articles project?Millennium Cowboy (talk) 02:13, 27 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Jeremy Theobald hasn't been copied from anywhere - I wrote most of it from scratch. Fences and windows (talk) 00:22, 2 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

— Navy  Blue  ^{formerly iDosh} 20:56, 2 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. I've altered your "merge" template so that when you click "discuss" it takes you to his talk page where we have already posted, rather than the "honeymoon murders" talk page. I was inclined just to do the redirect, but I checked with the closing admin from the AfD and was advised to post on the talk page and give it a week to see if there were any objections. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 09:05, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've changed the redirect back to Hurricane Gustav (2008). Among other things, Wikipedia should follow the "principle of least astonishment". 99% of readers typing "Hurricane Gustav" into the search box want information on the hurricane that is happening now. Let's send them directly to that article, not force them to click again, after scanning down a disambiguation page.

In October or November, assuming that this Hurricane Gustav doesn't become as famous as the 2005 Hurricane Katrina, then I have much less objection to changing the redirect back, to point to the disambiguation page. But at the moment I have a very strong opinion that we should not punish readers by forcing them into disambiguation pages out of some sense of fairness for a bunch of Wikipedia articles, or a desire to give equality to all hurricanes named Gustav. (You might take a look at WP:DAB, which says that the most important things get treated differently than less important things.) -- John Broughton (♫♫) 23:29, 30 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Rosie Vela, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((dated prod)) notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- Jeandré, 2008-10-04t09:22z 09:22, 4 October 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have nominated Rosie Vela, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosie Vela (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. -- Jeandré, 2008-10-04t16:10z 16:10, 4 October 2008 (UTC) -- Jeandré, 2008-10-04t16:10z 16:10, 4 October 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Hans Bauer (screenwriter) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding ((hangon)) to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Bongomatic 09:04, 9 November 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry if I was a bit snippy in the edit summary - I hadn't read yours at the time. Potaje can be pretty much any Cuban or Spanish soup that includes potatoes as a major ingredient, while sopa is Spanish for the more general "soup". Thus sopa is the correct term for black bean soup, as potatoes are generally not involved. Zeng8r (talk) 19:28, 14 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re Culture of Cuba#housing: Can you give a reference source to support the present version? (for example, a reference to the present Cuban law on property). Can you clarify what 'owns' means in this context? For example, in some countries there is a distinction between freehold and leasehold ownership. Although space is at a premium in these overview articles, the topic deserves a slightly fuller treatment than it has at present. Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:10, 20 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I do not know your the reason for changing Moreno to Marino, but I presume because the name "Marino" was used once in one of the episode. However I put the source in (a book written by the producers Ian Sander and Kim Moses), because it officially stated "Moreno" in all parts of the book. If you change that, that would make the reference I put in as incorrect, therefore please change to the reference that says her name is "Marino". I am done with reverting this (it was several times changed and reverted), so I'll leave the others to decide. Please see the talk page. w.tanoto-soegiri (talk) 08:53, 24 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Forgive me for blaming you too early. Very rude of me. just checked the edit history and it was not you who changed it to Marino in the first place. I noted that you changed "Andrea Marino" article redirect. However a help would be appreciated to decide whether to use Marino or Moreno. Apologiesw.tanoto-soegiri (talk) 08:58, 24 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please ignore my earlier message. I found a solution. The problem is that in the episodes, it uses Marino, while in writings such as book and internet, it uses Moreno. w.tanoto-soegiri (talk) 09:11, 24 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I thought you might be interested that I answered your old question at Talk:We Own the Night#Music. Hoof Hearted (talk) 20:18, 6 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Beardo. You have new messages at Talk:No Sleep till Brooklyn.
Message added 22:38, 27 December 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 22:38, 27 December 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Beardo! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 1,714 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the ((unreferencedBLP)) tag. Here is the article:

1. Tito Gomez (painter) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Iron Maiden (blues rock band). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iron Maiden (blues rock band). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:16, 31 January 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I had the article you created, American Prayer (song), merged into American Prayer (Bono song). It appears that you accidentally created an article on the same subject using a slightly less disambiguated title. The other article is about a year older and even before i edited it it was larger. Also as there is a Jim Morrison song & album that while not exactly of the same title is commonly known by the same title the disambiguation to the principle songwriter is done. If you have anything more to add please do. Your previous edits are retained in the history of the merged article. I would like to thank you for your reference to wired.com as it does counter the otherwise overly praise-filed comments from other media outlets and it is not somewhere i would have thought to look for a reference. delirious & lost ☯ ^~нuɢѕ~ 04:26, 8 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Bellamy210.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:55, 13 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 05:08, 20 June 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bashereyre (talk) 20:00, 24 October 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

When is this being completed. The article says by December. It is now December so we should either have an exact date for this month or something for next year. Sorry that I did not put a specific comment, but I manually tagged about 50 -100 articles for this same problem while fix the categories on about 10,000 articles. Vegaswikian (talk) 20:34, 10 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Lurex (attractant) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seems non-notable due to a lack of independent reliable sources discussing the topic except exceptionally transiently.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - Jarry1250 ^{[Deliberation needed]} 17:55, 20 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there! I removed a fact tag you added to Virginia Eliza Clemm Poe because a source has already been provided (not in the lede where it was tagged, but in the main part of the article). I see your point, however, that "Ligeia" was published a bit early for it to be heavily influenced by a then-healthy Virginia. I suppose one could argue that the frequent revisions and republications, including the addition of the poem "The Conqueror Worm" were influenced by her illness. With that said, however, I would not oppose its removal from the article as an example. --Midnightdreary (talk) 11:08, 1 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Are the same thing of course but have different names. Hence my disambiguation page over redirect for Taylor Peak. GNIS database indicates about a dozen Taylor PEAK and more than 50 Taylor MOUNTAIN so we use correct title for these according to GNIS and topographic maps. I can ensure each disambiguation page has the correct data and perhaps link with a see also each of the two disambiguation pages to each other.MONGO 11:44, 21 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Ron Watts (music), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Eastlaw ^talk ⁄ _contribs 11:03, 24 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Do you remember asking this [7]?

I have an answer for you but it may be disappointing. I visited the Piscina Mirabilis last week while on holiday in Campania, and my guide convinced me that it was never a cistern in the first place. In his view, it is much more likely that the vast concrete pillars that are the most prominent feature are nothing more than foundations for a villa, or an extension to a villa. The place is very hilly, and anyone with enough money and grand ambitions for his villa might well have resorted to such construction. The pillars seem far too massive if all they had to do was support a roof.

So far as my guide and I are aware, there is no reference to such a cistern in any contemporary sources; apparently the name was coined in the C18th. Certainly there are several holes at the top of the uphill side that could have admitted water from an aqueduct, but the course of the Aqua Augusta has never been traced. Equally, there is a hole in the middle of the bottom of the opposite wall that could have been an outlet, but there's no evidence that it was - no pipes or channels to a castellum aquae. In my view, one of the most damning facts - I'm sorry now I didn't take a photo, but I was short of space on my camera's memory card - is that the supposed outlet is right at the bottom of the wall, not some way up as it should be for a cistern that would be expected to function as a settling tank. Finally, there is, I was told, another similar structure not very far away on the other side of the hill.

I'm sure that such a large, dark, cool space would have been a useful storage space for the inhabitants of the villa above, but I have seen no convincing evidence it was ever a cistern. I'm keen to get to the bottom of this and update the article accordingly, but right now I'm struggling to find suitable sources. Philip Trueman (talk) 15:48, 26 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

of course it was a cistern. The waterproof cement used everywhere and the architecture is identical to Roman cisterns elsewhere. Hope that guide is not still spreading fake news.Rjdeadly (talk) 08:29, 21 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Crystal Clear (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:GNG and WP:NSONGS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 19:01, 25 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If Eisner's testimony was relevant to the case, could you please work it into the article? Otherwise, it doesn't belong where it is. Also, if you work it in, you can [[ ]] him where you do so, and then the see also is not needed. PraeceptorIP (talk) 16:56, 28 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Beardo, just saw your edits at Talk:Ten Little Indians, glad I'm not the only editor who can get into all sorts of bother for what should be an easy edit, here's some energy food. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:26, 27 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi!

We are students writing an article on User:Thelmadatter/Carnival of Chimalhuacan The carnival of chimalhuacan as a part of our class Academic Discourse amd writing at the Tec de Monterrey. Since you are and experieced Wikipedian and have an interest in these kinds of topics, we would like to know if you could take a few moments to take a look at the artice and give us a feedback. Thank you for your time.--Oslo.ana (talk) 21:26, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey! I saw that you edited the article Black Mirror and thought maybe you would be interested in this new user category I created?-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 05:20, 28 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The referenced earlier discussion is in that talk section, dated in 2011. It was just never acted upon. With those two discussing editors, and my vote, there are three in favour (at least). But as an unregistered editor, per Jimmy, while I have a voice, I haven't the right to take the action. Please do, thanks. 2601:246:C700:9B0:882C:FD18:E946:D29E (talk) 04:30, 23 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I will assume good faith on your part with regard to your recent edits. However, the symphonic rock article was deleted a long time ago as lacking reliable sources to qualify as either a separate genre or sub-genre from progressive rock. The progressive rock article is a GA reviewed article, so please don't make unsourced changes to definitions without sources and discussion. Thanks. Rodericksilly (talk) 00:28, 29 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for keeping us informed regarding Cuba since 2006! RenaatPeeters (talk) 23:09, 27 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, Beardo. Please don't make edits like this. The link to the redirect is intentional, in accordance with WP:D#HOWTODAB, and assists in identifying links to disambiguation pages that should be excluded from maintenance reports. Thanks! --R'n'B (call me Russ) 13:45, 8 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Waterson Family: A Mighty River of Song, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Kirkpatrick.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 20 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If we're going by the discog page, Rust Never Sleeps should be categorized as a studio album as well as Life, no? The attributes of the two (all new material, mostly live with two studio tracks) are quite similar. Personally, I'm still of the mind that each is a live album simply because greater than half of their content was performed live, but I'm interested to hear your thoughts. 24JGM (talk) 01:07, 23 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Dan Dare stories, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brian Lewis.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Elliott (director) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Elliott (director) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Thebiguglyalien (talk) 20:25, 1 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article D. C. Thomson (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page is not required: David Couper Thomson is linked in the lead of DC Thomson

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]