This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 50 | Archive 51 | Archive 52 | Archive 53 | Archive 54 | Archive 55 | → | Archive 60 |
Greetings, Bkonrad. I've started a discussion about your most recent edit to the In the Dark disambiguation page. It's at Talk:In the Dark#Piping and redirects. Feel free to join in there. Thanks. — Mudwater (Talk) 22:46, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello Bkonrad, I noticed your revert of my recent edit. Please note the correct spelling of Rue de la Chevre = Rue de la Chèvre, so I am going to change this again. Thanks. Lotje (talk) 14:47, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
I agree there is no ambiguity, but tell that to these people Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Anthropology#Human_race.28s.29. I made the disambiguation page to avoid having three hatnotes on top of the page human.·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 16:35, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
I appreciate you making the fixes on the articles linking to Southern (country subdivision). I don't know how that page got on the Disambiguation Challenge list. Thanks again, SchreiberBike (talk) 04:52, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited | |
---|---|
Yours, Maximilianklein (talk) 04:10, 1 December 2012 (UTC) |
Hi Bkonrad, you have adviced me to proposed a multipage requested move on the Talk:Musa and Talk:Ibrahim. I would like to wait for a day or two to see if someone shows up. On similar note if no buddy shows up whether opposing or favouring the proposal for a week or so is it going to be wiser to make the move or there is still a need for consensus. -- Ibrahim ebi (talk) 14:31, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
Actually, the dumb bot on that page keeps re-adding that notice only because the database has been lagging for the past few days. All incoming links are from one nav template, which has been fixed days ago; there is nothing else for the human editor to fix on that page anymore—removing the notice saves everyone time, is all. What bots are not supposed to do, however, is to repeat edits after being explicitly reverted. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); December 13, 2012; 14:13 (UTC)
Ooh, my bad i guess i was wrong making the move. Anyways Its been 10 days for the second move request. Should the one making the move ask for an uninvolved editor to review the request? or what is the procedure of closing the request? or is there a specific time after which its been closed? -- Ibrahim ebi (talk) 17:34, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
I am misunderstanding something I think. I thought generally DAB pages do not need the (disambiguation) that is the reason i made a direct around that. what did i miss? JGVR (talk) 22:54, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
JGVR (talk) 23:02, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
I have restored my edit at Hitler (disambiguation) which you blanked. My reasons for the clean-up were specified in the edit summary. If making changes to another user's contributions, please in future use the edit summary because a plain "undo" is not an act of good faith. If you would like to discuss the problem you had with my amendment, please do so here, on the article talk or on my talk. Thank you. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 21:12, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for the corrections on 911 (disambiguation). I had overlooked the no-piping rule. --Austrian (talk) 23:26, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited State of Deseret, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Wilson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 1 January 2013 (UTC)