Hello, Blacephalon and a belated welcome to Wikipedia! I see that you've already been around awhile and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help one get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions, you can ask me on my talk page, or place ((helpme)) on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are interested in learning more about contributing, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Red Director (talk) 15:48, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hello, I'm Pkbwcgs. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Americium— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:49, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Americium. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:51, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wasn't me Porygon-Z 18:55, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

needs to show independent notability to be spun off from the list of pokemeon.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Porygon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Porygon, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((db-self))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:24, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Porygon-Z474! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:24, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Porygon-Z474! You created a thread called Help with code at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing ((bots|deny=Muninnbot)) (ban this bot) or ((nobots)) (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ok Porygon-Z474 (talk) 18:05, 14 June 2019‎ (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Atsme was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Porygon is believed to be unpopular and rare because it is costly, the former of which speaks to its notability. Chart refers to it as almost mythical.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Porygon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Porygon, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((db-self))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Atsme (talk) 08:24, 7 July 2019‎ (UTC)[reply]

Ah thank you. Although it is rare, It does have a good amount of info behind it. Not to mention we can merge the denno senshi porygon episode to the porygon article. I you can help me that would great. Also I have hatched Porygon and encountered multiple in the wild, so I'm not sure that's right. Porygon-Z (talk) 04:33, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to help. My first suggestion is to read Wikipedia:Notability (video games). If you need to modify the context or direction of the article, or even if you need to rename the article, that can be done. Make a list of reliable sources in your sandbox you can use to cite the material and establish notability. ^Atsme _Talk 📧 12:01, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Porygon-Z474! You created a thread called Ultra Beast worlds at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing ((bots|deny=Muninnbot)) (ban this bot) or ((nobots)) (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In a recent edit to the page 2019 Hong Kong anti-extradition bill protests, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Citobun (talk) 06:59, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Porygon-Z474! You created a thread called Baldis Basics in Education and learning at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing ((bots|deny=Muninnbot)) (ban this bot) or ((nobots)) (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Blacephalon. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Interstellarity (talk) 00:15, 17 October 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((teahouse talkback)) template).[reply]

Hi Porygon-Z474! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 00:40, Thursday, October 17, 2019 (UTC)

Sorry for the untimely response, but gumshoe also means agent, not the totem Pokèmon gumshoos, funny thing is that I am a avid pokemon lover, just like you Keep in touch Gumshoe97 (talk) 11:33, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I saw you article on porygon, and it is a shame it didn't get published, but can I help you make it better, and then lets see if it gets published! Gumshoe97 (talk) 19:42, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Porygon-Z474! You created a thread called Pictures at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing ((bots|deny=Muninnbot)) (ban this bot) or ((nobots)) (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I couldn't respond, i had been blocked as a false positive. BTW i can help you Gumshoe97 (talk) 20:09, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Porygon-Z474! You created a thread called Badges at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing ((bots|deny=Muninnbot)) (ban this bot) or ((nobots)) (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have submitted your draft for review!Gumshoe97 (talk) 21:36, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh thank you! I hope it gets accepted! Porygon-Z (talk) 12:05, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How have you been, I have good news, the draft has been accepted into wikiproject pokemon! but I am still waiting for the article to be reviewed. Gumshoe97 (talk) 01:35, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my hecc! Thank you! I've tried twice to no effect. How do you do it? Porygon-Z (talk) 03:55, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Blacephalon. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 18:15, 25 November 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((teahouse talkback)) template).[reply]

I have some bad news, the article is not going to be reviewed for 4 months! and at first they had told me that it would take 2! Another silly thing I found was, that it said there about 3k articles waiting to be reviewed, and then I look at the list of editors reviewing the articles, and there were about 4k editors (not that i counted) reviewing the articles. Gumshoe97 (talk) 00:19, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Damn. Well I guess it will happen sooner or later. Can I see the final product at least? UB Blacephalon (talk) 03:54, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Thanks! for the tips and appreciation you left on my talk page! James The Bond 007 (talk) 13:19, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold,

I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.

For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord."

Luke 2:10-11 (King James Version)

James The Bond 007 (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas.

This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.

Spread the cheer by adding ((Subst:Xmas4)) to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thank you for the WikiLove you put on my talk page! James The Bond 007 (talk) 18:12, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! UB Blacephalon (talk) 18:17, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
5		Veronica Chater (talk)	Add sources
181		2019 deaths in the United States (talk)	Add sources
307		Meowth (talk)	Add sources
4,226		Mexican–American War (talk)	Add sources
5,961		Toronto (talk)	Add sources
262		Greninja (talk)	Add sources
38		Staggered conformation (talk)	Cleanup
89		Caesium fluoride (talk)	Cleanup
325		Detik.com (talk)	Cleanup
57		2019 Sri Lanka floods (talk)	Expand
5,465		Pokémon (video game series) (talk)	Expand
145		Unown (talk)	Expand
494		Cumbia (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
14		Albany High School (California) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
138		Synthesis of precious metals (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,729		Electron configuration (talk)	Merge
378		Nilotic peoples (talk)	Merge
8		Extragalactic cosmic ray (talk)	Merge
34		Michael Robertson (businessman) (talk)	Wikify
292		Mii (talk)	Wikify
1,642		Dmitri Mendeleev (talk)	Wikify
9		Nontrigonal pnictogen compounds (talk)	Orphan
4		Julie Ezold (talk)	Orphan
6		Extinct isotopes of superheavy elements (talk)	Orphan
3		Zorg, Algeria (talk)	Stub
70		Congener (chemistry) (talk)	Stub
129		Joule per mole (talk)	Stub
94		PokéPark 2: Wonders Beyond (talk)	Stub
147		Oxygen fluoride (talk)	Stub
6		Love Is Alright Tonite (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:38, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--Sir Bond 007 (James The Bond 007) (talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding ((subst:Happy holidays)) to their talk page with a friendly message.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Recent block of User:James The Bond 007.

Ahoy! Welcome aboard the SS Wikipedia, it do be yer captain speaking! You are hereby commissioned into CaptainEek's crew as a deckhand. If ye be crafty and good at catching sources, it won't be long before you graduate with a captainship of yer own. I see that you'd like to catch yerself a brand new article...aye that do be the most tricky business in the whole of the 'pedia.

Nah but seriously, glad to have you as an adoptee, you look like you care and want to get more involved. I'm excited to work with you. To make an article from scratch, as you have expressed interest in doing, is one of the hardest tasks on Wikipedia. It all comes down to notability (anything I link you should probably take a glance at or read in-depth, they are Wikipedia's core policies). As a baseline, an article ought meet the general notability guideline, which says that subjects require significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources. It is this step that is the hardest, and that the most people mess up. There are specific notability criteria for certain categories, such as for people, for academics, for places, etc. If sources do not exist, a subject is just not notable. So that's your first challenge! Pick a subject or two that you might want to write about. Then try to find at least 5 reliable and independent sources about the subject. Think books, scientific papers, news articles, high quality websites etc. Once you've found some, link them here and I'll tell you how good those sources are, and we can help decide whether the subject is notable. And before creating a new page, always make sure it doesn't already exist :) Whenever you want me to look at something, make sure you ping me or drop a note on my talk page. Smooth sailing, Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 22:32, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again, Cap'n! I'll try my best! UB Blacephalon (talk) 13:09, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Blacephalon! You created a thread called Adoption at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing ((bots|deny=Muninnbot)) (ban this bot) or ((nobots)) (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:10, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Blacephalon! You created a thread called Porygon2 and Porygon-Z article publication at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing ((bots|deny=Muninnbot)) (ban this bot) or ((nobots)) (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to WP:IAR, and start a WP:DISCUSSFORK here rather than add to Wikipedia:Teahouse#Borax.

If you're interested in chemistry and haven't signed up to Periodic Videos, you really should.

My gut feeling from reading boron is that any synthesis might involve a fair bit of trial and error. For the electrolytic method: what voltage? what concentration? what electrodes? and the result sounds meh. The thermal method described by Prof. Poliakoff (borax + Mg powder) looks more straightforward (and fun), but I'd want a fume hood and glasses, and would experiment on under one-gram scale. I'd recommend a crucible, an iron tripod, a pipeclay ring and a Bunsen burner. Work out the stoichiometry of the reaction, and use the reactants in those proportions. Do take care: several chemists lost bits of themselves trying something for the first time.

One thing you can safely try with borax is the borax bead test, now hopelessly obsolete. I was taught it, purely as a demonstration, in the 1960s. It was never much use except for some first row transition elements, which can give pretty colours. Your first tests will almost inevitably produce beads in disappointing shades of black. Where that article says tiny, it means tiny (probably submilligram). Narky Blert (talk) 21:52, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well I only have limited resources because I have crystal sodium tetraborate (I don't know how much I got it from chemistry kit but it seems like a good amount) and I want elemental boron out of it but through household means. And I have subscribed and watched almost every video they posted. UB Blacephalon (talk) 04:55, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As a former ChemNerd who somehow managed to not lose bits of himself or his residence, I am really concerned. I've known at least two experienced, professional chemists who were not so lucky. One owned a retail chemical business that he managed to burn down when he made a simple mis-calculation. The other was a university professor who blew up his lab. I've known amateurs that have lost limbs. While NB is clearly right in stressing limitation on size, please don't rely only on short, imprecise, discussions (that are out of scope for an encyclopedia's talk pages, BTW) when contemplating an experiment that can endanger your life and that of others. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 17:04, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am not so worried about my life because if I know what's going to happen and I know the result, I will take to it accordingly. I do know quite a bit of knowledge about most chemicals and if i don't, i will look them up somehow. For instance a video told me to either use HCl acid ( which I previously know as a chemical that will melt fingers off) or boric acid (which I'm not familiar with so if I have to, I will research it so I know what I'm handling). I'm also 17 and know the chemistry of the periodic table by heart. Read my userpage for more info about me. UB Blacephalon (talk) 20:12, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I got a degree in chemistry 50 years ago and had a career in information technology in order not to blow myself up, because I had seen too many explosions in the chemistry lab. I never tried to extract elemental boron, which, being a light metalloid, is funny stuff. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:31, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I agree! I'm trying to extract boron from crystal borax (I think) and the chemistry of boron is quite fascinating! I got my borax from a chemistry kit but I don't know how to get pure boron from it. I'm not expecting much but hey, some is some. I would like to know if the more Am I put in a plastic bag, first, am I safe, and second, how dangerous is it? UB Blacephalon (talk) 14:43, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Blacephalon! You created a thread called Borax at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing ((bots|deny=Muninnbot)) (ban this bot) or ((nobots)) (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Your "Division by 0" thread has mercifully been archived here. Did the question ever get answered to your satisfaction?

Cheers! -- ToE 04:11, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ToE: Heh, yeah. Show this to other people! UB Blacephalon (talk) 16:31, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand. -- ToE 01:37, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note that both an IP user and I attempted to address your last question shortly before the section was archived. -- ToE 01:41, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ToE::I understand that you attempted to answer my question and I thank you for helping. And now I get the reason why the answer is the way it is. I just said that because I've heard others say it's 0 or 1. I thought maybe if I show it to other people, maybe they'll get it too, ya know? UB Blacephalon (talk) 21:01, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Blacephalon! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Article Publication, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing ((bots|deny=Muninnbot)) here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Blacephalon! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Zinc sulfide, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing ((bots|deny=Muninnbot)) here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Blacephalon! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Gen 8 Pokemon, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing ((bots|deny=Muninnbot)) here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Blacephalon! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Porygon Article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing ((bots|deny=Muninnbot)) here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Blacephalon

Thank you for volunteering as a Host at the Teahouse. Wikipedia is a community of people working together to make knowledge free. You are an important part of that effort! By joining as a Host, and by following our expectations, you are helping new users to get started here at Wikipedia, and aiding more experienced users who just have a question about how something works. We appreciate your willingness to help!

Here are some links you may find helpful as a Host:

• Useful scripts you can install to make responding easier,
• templates to use and, of course:
• the question forum itself.

Editors who have signed up as hosts, but who have not contributed at the Teahouse for six months or so may be removed from the list of hosts.

As you are relatively new, could I ask you to make sure you remember to welcome everyone personally to the Teahouse, and only reply to those questions you are really confident in answering. Many thanks again, Nick Moyes (talk) 21:31, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Of course but im not that good at Wikicode so I hope thats okay! UB Blacephalon (talk) 00:46, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Blacephalon! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Wikipedia time and day, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing ((bots|deny=Muninnbot)) here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Blacephalon! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Wikicode, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing ((bots|deny=Muninnbot)) here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Blacephalon! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Infobox and article help, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing ((bots|deny=Muninnbot)) here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Blacephalon! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Notifications about talk pages, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing ((bots|deny=Muninnbot)) here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Blacephalon/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Blacephalon/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:21, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Blacephalon! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Americium in smoke detectors, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing ((bots|deny=Muninnbot)) here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Blacephalon! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Dark Deception, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing ((bots|deny=Muninnbot)) here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Blacephalon! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 01:39, Saturday, March 20, 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Blacephalon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:29, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
65		Physical organic chemistry (talk)	Add sources
1,772		Natural science (talk)	Add sources
1,744		Branches of science (talk)	Add sources
1,057		History of video games (talk)	Add sources
79		General chemistry (talk)	Add sources
74		Nanochemistry (talk)	Add sources
2,151		Video game industry (talk)	Cleanup
39		Nonviolent video game (talk)	Cleanup
341		Quantum chemistry (talk)	Cleanup
1,707		Martinique (talk)	Expand
1,236		Chemical reaction (talk)	Expand
117		Video games in the United States (talk)	Expand
100		Falling-sand game (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
819		Glossary of video game terms (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
646		Video game development (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,190		Video game console (talk)	Merge
852		Home video game console (talk)	Merge
46		Alkane stereochemistry (talk)	Merge
200		Sim racing (talk)	Wikify
401		Video game music (talk)	Wikify
401		Tactical shooter (talk)	Wikify
3		Alexander Monath (talk)	Orphan
2		August Udoh (talk)	Orphan
7		Birkali (talk)	Orphan
9		Gerry O'Reilly (talk)	Stub
10		Carbochemistry (talk)	Stub
37		Biophysical chemistry (talk)	Stub
190		Semantic Scholar (talk)	Stub
54		Soil chemistry (talk)	Stub
10		Video games in Malaysia (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:47, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Blacephalon! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Help with creating new page, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing ((bots|deny=Muninnbot)) here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

Although you've not been very active at all there recently, I see you're still currently listed as a host at the Teahouse. So I wanted to make sure you're aware of the imminent rollout of new Growth Team Features which every new account will be getting by default. Each users will soon see a new 'Homepage' tab next to their User page. It contains two main elements which might impact on your involvement - and you'd be welcome to get involved and help out directly with one of them.

• Firstly, they will be offered a range of 'suggested edits', and encouraged to make simple improvements to pages that interest them. (Being aware of this feature would be helpful for all Teahouse hosts if you're likely to offer advice on tasks for them to start out doing.)
• There's also a 'Your impact' box to show them how many people have seen the pages they've just edited.
• Finally, each new user is randomly assigned a 'mentor' from a list of friendly, experienced editors, like yourself. If they get stuck, they can ask a question directly to them via a Your mentor box, and hopefully get a swift, friendly answer from that mentor. Currently, this feature is given to 2% of new users, but it's set to increase to around 10% in the very near future.

To spread the load on our current list of around 65 mentors, I'm reaching out to ask if you'd like to help out and sign up as one? The workload is relatively small; User Panini! reports receiving four questions a month, on average, all of which were simple ones of the type we already get at the Teahouse, whilst I've had just one in the last 3 weeks. To view a list of every question asked of all mentors over the last 14 days, click here.

If becoming a mentor and being available to help new users on their first few days here interests you - just as have done at the Teahouse in the past - then please consider signing up at Growth Team features/Mentor list. But please only do so if you are genuinely willing to be available to help. Existing users can already 'opt-in' to seeing the Newcomer Homepage features via their Preferences.

Thank you! Nick Moyes (talk) 11:57, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will definitely try these features out as soon as possible. Thank you for your concern! UB Blacephalon (talk) 13:29, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! —Remember, I'murmate — I'ma editor2022 ^{(🗣️💬 |📖📚)} 23:08, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I reverted your edit to Pokemon Scarlet and Violet because, while I do agree the region will probably be based on Spain (my suspicions come from the trailer and the starter names, 2 of which have partial meaning in Spanish), Nintendo has not confirmed that yet, and neither have RSes. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 02:27, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Blaze Wolf Hi! Well why don't we say that its most likely that it will be based in Spain or the Iberian peninsula? Or something to the effect of "we don't know for sure, but we think its going to be based in Spain" kinda thing? UB Blacephalon (talk) 12:59, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(your ping failed) Because Wikipedia doesn't speculate things. See WP:CRYSTALBALL. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:15, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blaze Wolf Oops lol. Hmm...Then why don't we ask Gamefreak or Niantic? I bet Niantic would give us a wierd answer.... UB Blacephalon (talk) 15:00, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(to ping me you use curly brackets instead of square brackets, like this: ((u|Blacephalon)) ) We could, however game companies usually won't tell us stuff like this until they're ready to reveal it to the public. Also, they probably wouldn't even answer us. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:04, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blaze Wolf Sorry, it's been a while since I talked to people on here! Anyway, I could talk to Niantic through Pokemon GO, but like you said I probably wouldn't get very far. Guess we just have to wait and see, huh? UB Blacephalon (talk) 15:10, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I- what? How on earth would you be able to talk to a company like Niantic through a game they made? Even then, Niantic has nothing to do with these games. They've only made Pokemon GO (I don't think they had anything to do with Let's Go Pikachu & Eevee). Gamefreak has pretty much always handled the mainline Pokemon games (with the exception of BDSP which was handled by Ilca) ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:14, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The same way you can complain to them, except this time I would pick General Questions. Even still, I don't think I would get anywhere with them but Ill still try. Since this is a mainline game, the trailer was one of the weirdest trailers due to it not giving us much info. UB Blacephalon (talk) 15:26, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. I don't think they respond to those, if at all. And like I said, Niantic probably wouldn't even know the answer because they have nothing to do with gen 9. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:27, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well they would have to include Gen 9 pokemon at some point in Pokemon GO but who knows when that'll be. UB Blacephalon (talk) 16:09, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That will probably be after Gen 9 comes out. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 16:55, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As a side note, an answer provided privately does not count as a reliable source, because it is not verifiable. So emailing a company for an answer wouldn't work. It needs to be public at a minimum, and ideally published in a reliable source. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 19:47, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that is true (unless for whatever reason you work at a company that is deemed an RS and you email the company and then write an article about that answer, but then that would probably be a COI). ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:55, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Huh. So then what can we say about it then? Nothing? UB Blacephalon (talk) 12:57, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For the time being, you are correct: nothing. Wait until a reliable source publishes something about it. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 20:12, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aww....God only know when thatll be. UB Blacephalon (talk) 13:07, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hi i need to create a page for advocate general of police .Ima a government employee of state government and authorised to create page on behalf of advocate general of punjab, India

Pleasew guide how can i do that --Loveneetsingh123 (talk) 15:52, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Loveneetsingh123 I'd advise going into the sandbox tab next to your talk tab. There, you can hopefully create your own page if you have enough evidence and citations. UB Blacephalon (talk) 12:03, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi .. I want to change of images of actor shafi sir kindly help me to edit images. I have wonderful pics of shafi sir --M786R (talk) 13:02, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

M786RTo Edit or add images, go into the source code. If there are other pictures there, You can add or change them to your pictures using that same code with your file. UB Blacephalon (talk) 12:01, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Blacephelon,

I want to ask you how should I layout a chemistry equation in an article. 

Thank you , DorisLangBismuthLover --DorisLangBismuthLover (talk) 00:51, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DorisLangBismuthLover Just use => (an equal sign and a greater than arrow) for equals. Its almost lie a normal equation. Like H2 + O2 => H2O +O. UB Blacephalon (talk) 14:14, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! DorisLangBismuthLover (talk) 20:00, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Be my pal. Tell me, am I a good man?” --Return to Monkey Island (talk) 17:38, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are only as good as a man as you say you are. Your opinion matters too! UB Blacephalon (talk) 12:02, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am still hoping to publish Mabel Brailsford entry on Wikipedia. I have corrected all the marked errors. How can I get it up on Wiki? --Wendytibbs (talk) 16:09, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Whats your favorite pokemon?

XaviSV (talk) 00:36, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zygarde and Blacephalon UB Blacephalon (talk) 23:00, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Blacephalon ... I didn't know we got mentors. Does this mean we're paired forever? ;)

I'm very new to doing Wikipedia editing, so I may find out answers to a few questions that have arisen for me so far, but one that I'm particularly curious about is making comments. I know when I've looked at other articles in Wikipedia that I've sometimes seen a comment like, "Reference needed," but when I tried to make that very comment in an article on deforestation, I could find only a feature called INVISIBLE COMMENT ... and sure enough, it was invisible when I reviewed my edits before publishing. Can you shed any light on all this? --Augnablik (talk) 11:39, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that the article I think was scrapped. Not sure though, but if you can find the person who did that you can ask him. UB Blacephalon (talk) 23:02, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Another question ... these little side tabs on the right side of my screen are in the way of my seeing everything on the lines of the text. I can't find a way to move the side tab away from the margin. Is there one? Surely this must be something many Wikipedia editors would like to know. --Augnablik (talk) 11:43, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What does it say? UB Blacephalon (talk) 23:12, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I hope I'm not overusing you today, but so many questions keep coming up. I edited 3 articles and after this last one I got a most maddening message saying that some program called ClueBot removed all my edits. Since there was a way to find out why, I went and checked out why this happened. I disagree with almost all, if not all, the reasons given.

Do some authors attach this bot to their articles so they'll be less likely to be overridden?

I hope I can put my edits back and avoid ClueBot doing this same thing all over again. --Augnablik (talk) 12:42, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Asked and answered at Teahouse. David notMD (talk) 20:12, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

our page has a wrong image that urgently needs to be deleted. We tried speedy deletion however no help. Please gudie. --SubhashreeJ (talk) 16:20, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the welcome, Blacephalon. I look forward to your answers to my questions at some point. Meanwhile, I did get quite a bit of help in the Teahouse. --Augnablik (talk) 07:48, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm looking forward to participating in Wikipedia. I am a bit overwhelmed. I want to create a page that I think will be considered COI. I am mentioned on a page, and I want to create a link from the page I'm mentioned on to info about myself and my project. Most of the other people mentioned on the page have links to themselves and or their projects and were backed by large companies with publicists. I was and am independent. I have publications that have featured my work and have won quite a few awards. I was the first woman to receive a nomination in this award. Do you have suggestions on how I proceed? --Visualrefraction (talk) 14:19, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi why do I exist --Deedeemegadoodoo1989 (talk) 05:08, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What kind of question is that? You exist because of fate! UB Blacephalon (talk) 22:59, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I want to create my player profile as a football player... What can I do --Fawaze Beya Jafar (talk) 15:01, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you are an actual football player you can center it around that. If you want to become one you can alter you bio to say that. UB Blacephalon (talk) 23:07, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello what is mentor? --P.0.01853T.7x (talk) 08:43, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A mentor is someone who can help you with things like editing Wikipedia and other stuff. UB Blacephalon (talk) 23:05, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Blacephalon, I would like to know if it is possible, and if so how to add a demonym for a city --Alexandrov Zalotov (talk) 08:36, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To do that, simply follow grammar rules. Depending on what city your naming of course. Like New York would be a New Yorker. UB Blacephalon (talk) 23:09, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rusty4321! Also hello Blacephalon!

I believe I have an area I can submit a lot of legitimate data to Wikipedia for, including many references to independent sources. There are a number of authors within the fields of both astrology and astronomy who have been publishing seminal works in their fields for decades. I do not personally *know* them or have personal connections with them, but I am familiar enough with their work to be able to cite and connect their work for encyclopedic use on Wikipedia. I am surprised many of them do not have an existing page, since some of their titles have been cited for years and continue to be cited by others in the expansion of both of these fields. I am wondering if either of you (Rusty4321 or Blacephalon) have any advice on creating these specific kinds of articles (both for authors and their written/produced works). I am reading through Wikipedia documentation and following as many guidelines as I can, but I would also like to see if either of you have advice since I see you are listed as my mentors. Thank you --UnpopularFusionist (talk) 23:46, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rusty4321: Pinging Rusty for the user. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:17, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The only thing I can say is that you'll need to cite every source you can find in the article. Hope this helps! UB Blacephalon (talk) 23:04, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. How can I write a biography about someone? --Rocky Maps (talk) 08:46, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You will need a lot of sources to do that. Make sure accuracy and credibility are main sources. UB Blacephalon (talk) 05:13, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of generation III Pokémon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Primordial. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:12, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding [1], see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Abbreviations#Contractions. Wikipedia does not use contractions in articles. They are a more informal writing style than Wikipedia uses. PrimeHunter (talk) 02:45, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@PrimeHunter But this isn't part of the article as its a list. It also should be in our own words so it doesn't look like it was ripped straight off of Bulbapedia. UB Blacephalon (talk) 18:46, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists are articles and the same rules apply. If the text is based on a copyrighted source then making contractions is an insignificant change which can hardly be called rewording. It must be changed far more and it is not a valid excuse for making contractions against the manual of style. PrimeHunter (talk) 19:08, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense. It just feels... off putting it in that style. UB Blacephalon (talk) 20:25, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I see in a recent addition to some Pokemon list articles you included material from webpages that are available under a compatible Creative Commons Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. It's also required under the terms of the license. Regardless of the copyright issue, adding unsourced in-universe content to Wikipedia articles is not a good idea. That's what Fandom is for.

Bulbapedia is not compatibly licensed, so it's not okay to copy from there. To do so is a violation of our copyright policy. — Diannaa (talk) 14:45, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So I have to source it. Alright that's fine. I'll just source IGN which is reliable according to wikipedia. UB Blacephalon (talk) 17:45, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also you have to not copy from Fandom unless the copying is properly attributed. This can be done via the use of templates such as those listed at Template:Creative Commons text attribution notice. Each individual webpage you copy from requires such a template. Also, no copying at all from websites that are not compatibly licensed. Please let me know if you have any questions. — Diannaa (talk) 18:22, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've actually gotten this from a Google Docs page I've done. I've combined every entry into my own words. Does that still count? UB Blacephalon (talk) 23:56, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Blacephalon,

The lists of Pokémon by generation articles contain a large volume of information in the 'notes' column which appears to not be sourced and/or below the threshold for notability due to being detailed in-universe information.

I have opened a discussion in the teahouse before making any changes to avoid edit wars and agree on the appropriate actions for these articles. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Teahouse#Notes_in_the_lists_of_Pok%C3%A9mon_by_generation_(e.g.,_List_of_generation_I_Pok%C3%A9mon) [which will likely be included in archive 1198 if this link is no longer active].

As you are one of the people who has contributed strongly to these articles over the years (see https://xtools.wmcloud.org/authorship/en.wikipedia.org/List_of_generation_I_Pok%C3%A9mon , https://xtools.wmcloud.org/authorship/en.wikipedia.org/List_of_generation_II_Pok%C3%A9mon , etc. which list you amongst the top authors of these pages' content), I want to keep you informed so that there is a consensus for any significant changes to these page moving forwards.

Best regards, Shazback (talk) 16:28, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Group 9 element. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted ((copied)) template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:02, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have done so, though I'm unsure if i did it correctly. Please check if done right. Thank you. UB Blacephalon (talk) 18:52, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, that's not right. The correct way to do it is via your edit summary, like I did here. — Diannaa (talk) 19:15, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh it's supposed to go in the edit summary not the actual article? UB Blacephalon (talk) 15:35, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Correct. — Diannaa (talk) 17:13, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh Ok. Thank you! UB Blacephalon (talk) 02:21, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Blacephalon! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 02:37, Sunday, December 3, 2023 (UTC)

Hi Blacephalon. You forgot to sign your edit here and here. On some pages, your edit will not be followed up with a signature unless you use the ~~~~. Example: AfD discussions and wikiproject pages. Though your sign will appear if you reply to someone. Jeraxmoira (talk) 12:10, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Jeraxmoira.

Whoops! Thanks for catching that. I was aware that even if you dont put it it will still sign it for you. UB Blacephalon (talk) 21:02, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]