This user may have left Wikipedia. Bless sins has not edited Wikipedia since 13 January 2021. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome! Please keep messages relevant and to the topic. Remember that I reserve the right to maintain order on this talk page by removing personal attacks, moving comments to proper sections and archiving as often as I see fit. In general, if you have a habit of removing my comments from your talk page, then I'll reciprocate. If the comment is regarding a specific article, leave it on that article's talk page (though you may contact me here if I haven't responded back on the article in days).

Leave a message at the bottom of a section, or start a section at the bottom of the page, or e-mail me. For discussions up till 13 June, 2008, please see my archives.

Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:16, 16 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Idolatry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shirk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 22 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:41, 23 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@NinjaRobotPirate:Is there a list of "more stringent set of rules". There is Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/India-Pakistan#Principles, but it is quite similar to other wikipedia policies.Bless sins (talk) 18:14, 26 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

By default, any articles about an India-Pakistan conflict are under extended confirmed protection (see this discussion). Beyond that, individual pages can have specific restrictions, such as 1RR, but this is always advised in an edit notice when editing the page. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:28, 26 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am reminding you once again that you are editing The Citizenship (Amendment) Bill, 2019, a topic covered by discretionary sanctions. Edit warring and stone walling on the talk page do not bode well. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 18:55, 12 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sir can you pls put pakiistan claim on 2019 balakot airstrike page . 67.171.90.94 (talk) 06:18, 28 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 28 February 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2019 India–Pakistan standoff, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:10, 28 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please read WP:OVERCITE and WP:PRIMARY, only add reliable third party sources and do not add to many sources. Infobox generally dont need sources. The refs for content in infobox should be added in the article to support the same content in the article body. Please let me know if you have any questions. --DBigXrayᗙ 12:05, 28 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What exactly are you referring to?Bless sins (talk) 15:35, 28 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent editing history at Balakot shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. DBigXrayᗙ 05:42, 3 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Are you saying that you have not made any reverts?Bless sins (talk) 05:42, 3 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• #India,_Pakistan,_and_Afghanistan_discretionary_sanctions, I see that you have already been notified. So you may be subjected to WP:AC/DS should you choose to continue this disruptive behavior. --DBigXrayᗙ 05:49, 3 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@NinjaRobotPirate: Can you please comment about the discretionary sanctions with respect to the above message? For example, extended-confirmed protection doesn't apply to and editor like me (I am older than 30 days and have made more than 50 edits). So what additional sanctions would apply in this because beyond the usual Wikipedia policies.Bless sins (talk) 05:54, 3 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's all in WP:AC/DS. The biggest thing is that admins can topic ban people who edit disruptively. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:00, 3 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@NinjaRobotPirate: How can I seek dispute resolution in this case? Is it still the usual Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard, or are there any methods special to the India-Pakistan domain? How do you advise proceeding in this case? Bless sins (talk) 06:03, 3 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Anything in WP:DR – there's nothing special about the dispute resolution methods. WP:NPOVN might help if you think there are issues of undue weight. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:20, 3 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please could you add citations in the correct format or at least with a few more details in a similar way to other citations on the page? I am referring to your edit here on 2019 India–Pakistan standoff. Thanks. DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 22:40, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@DiplomatTesterMan: that can be done. Is there a tool that can automate this task?Bless sins (talk) 02:30, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What about this[1]?Bless sins (talk) 02:36, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Seems ok. Y There are tools which Wikipedia does provide for this such as ProveIt and Citation expander which can be added through the preferences section. But many users still prefer to do it manually. DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 10:09, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019 Pulwama attack, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dossier (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 12 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for your help re the edit war. Could you impartially consider whether the individual in question should be reported. They keep deleting my comments on their talk page pleading with them to stop deleting my contributions. Cheers Mozzie (talk) 16:03, 15 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent editing history at Balakot shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
This is another warning. Please explain on the talk page what has been here for weeks ? you are simply censoring reliably sourced content with misleading edit summaries DBigXrayᗙ 17:41, 27 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please stop putting the edit war template on my talk page, especially when you are involved in the edit war yourself. I'm kindly requesting you never to use that template here again.

I have made several comments on the talk page yet each time have received no response from you. See this section: Talk:Balakot#Unintentional_removal_of_content?.Bless sins (talk) 17:44, 27 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Specifically, please read this policy, Wikipedia:Edit_warring#What_to_do_if_you_see_edit-warring_behavior:

Avoid posting a generic warning template if you are actively involved in the edit war yourself; it can be seen as aggressive.

You are doing exactly that. Please never do that on my talk page again.Bless sins (talk) 17:52, 27 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Muslim_writers_and_poets Lightburst (talk) 00:44, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Geography and cartography in medieval Islam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Muslim writers and poets until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Afd Lightburst (talk) 00:45, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:37, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Citizenship (Amendment) Bill, 2019; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Kautilya3 (talk) 18:53, 12 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IB (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:46, 14 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Bless sins. You have new messages at Talk:Citizenship_(Amendment)_Act,_2019#Background.
Message added 15:24, 26 December 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Hi Bless, thanks for your work. We have made some progress and MSW has shared some proposed version(s). I will review it and respond. It will be helpful if you also review that content and share your concerns if any so that we may work towards Consensus and get this resolved. regards. Happy Holidays! ᗙ DBigXrayᗙ 15:24, 26 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord teamReply[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:04, 1 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:34, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord teamReply[reply]

The first one was transwikied; the AFD should have linked to it, but there was an error in the link. The correct link is https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Non-Islamic_views_of_Muhammad&action=history. Because I shouldn't go restoring large amounts of content deleted at AFD, I won't restore the second one, but you can find the content at https://wikivisually.com/wiki/User:SheriffIsInTown/Praise_and_veneration_of_Prophet_Muhammad. I'm not objecting to your request — I found it by looking at the deleted page and searching Google for a phrase from the deleted page, so you couldn't possibly have found it that way. Nyttend (talk) 12:08, 11 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:22, 31 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 11:27, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Bless sins, I have read the GA review of the mosque and it was approved as a GA in 2008, when the mosque was just a project and not built yet. The mosque was opened in 2017 and inaugurated in 2018. At least the latter was a major event for the mosque. I was inclined to list the article for a GA reassessment but there I saw I should ask the main contributor for advice. I'd be relieved if you could update the article a bit.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 01:45, 7 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]