Hi BoldLuis! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:08, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks !!!! :-)--BoldLuis (talk) 10:36, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Surgical mask, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:01, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Math tag. Since you had some involvement with the Math tag redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 20:21, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

I noticed your recent edit to Wikipedia:Advanced template coding does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! —⁠andrybak (talk) 22:44, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Y. BoldLuis (talk) 09:44, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm RexxS. An edit that you recently made to Wikipedia:Manual of Style seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! RexxS (talk) 13:26, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		The Instructor's Barnstar
		This Barnstar is awarded to Wikipedians who have performed stellar work in the area of instruction & help for other editors. Thank you for improving and cleaning up template-related help and documentation pages. —⁠andrybak (talk) 12:05, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Andrybak: Thank you a lot.

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Regrowing vegetable. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 17#Regrowing vegetable until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:58, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Edit pane. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 19#Edit pane until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:50, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• At Paned window you need to separate out those references to what they actually refer to, and not just glom them together. Also the edit pane you used to illustrate, is a poor example for several reasons: (1) As a reader of Wikipedia it might be confusing and seen as a part of Wikipedia and not seen as a "pane" at all. (2) it goes all across the text pane and does not look like a sample. See, e.g., how they did it here. (3) Is this what you mean by an edit pane? I get that as an integral part of my whole edit screen. And when I press preview I get my whole window replaced, not a panel or a box. --Bejnar (talk) 15:22, 31 May 2020

1 and 2 Put at your choice. It is a poor Wikipedia article and for sure can be improved. In any case, the place to see it is the talk page in the article. I am more experienced with templates. If you have more experience with image, can improve it.

3. You said: "The other usage is as a place were edits are made prior to being executed by the programme, much like the edit tab in Wikipedia, except as a "pane" that leaves the original open while editing takes place". In edit code, when I press in preview, I have a preview pane and an edit code pane. It is not a panel, as you say now. It is a pane. Read the references. I learned reading them. BoldLuis (talk) 16:12, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect EXo Platform. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 1#EXo Platform until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:05, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I have done a "What links here" and seen:

It looks like important, related to virtual workspace and could merit an own section and article.BoldLuis (talk) 23:10, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BoldLuis! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Draft:Back Market/2, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing ((bots|deny=Muninnbot)) here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Auxiliary aid. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 7#Auxiliary aid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 01:18, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Read this in another language • Subscription list

This edition of the Editing newsletter includes information the Wikipedia:Talk pages project, an effort to help contributors communicate on wiki more easily. The central project page is on MediaWiki.org.

• Reply tool: This is available as a Beta Feature at the four partner wikis (Arabic, Dutch, French, and Hungarian Wikipedias). The Beta Feature will get new features soon. The new features include writing comments in a new visual editing mode and pinging other users by typing @. You can test the new features on the Beta Cluster. Some other wikis will have a chance to try the Beta Feature in the coming months.
• New requirements for user signatures: Soon, users will not be able to save invalid custom signatures in Special:Preferences. This will reduce signature spoofing, prevent page corruption, and make new talk page tools more reliable. Most editors will not be affected.
• New discussion tool: The Editing team is beginning work on a simpler process for starting new discussions. You can see the initial design on the project page.
• Research on the use of talk pages: The Editing team worked with the Wikimedia research team to study how talk pages help editors improve articles. We learned that new editors who use talk pages make more edits to the main namespace than new editors who don't use talk pages.

– Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:11, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Whatamidoing (WMF):: Thanks.BoldLuis (talk) 09:52, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seven years ago this week, the Editing team made the visual editor available by default to all logged-in editors using the desktop site at the English Wikipedia. Here's what happened since its introduction:

• The 50 millionth edit using the visual editor on desktop was made this year. More than 10 million edits have been made here at the English Wikipedia.
• More than 2 million new articles have been created in the visual editor. More than 600,000 of these new articles were created during 2019.
• Almost 5 million edits on the mobile site have been made with the visual editor. Most of these edits have been made since the Editing team started improving the mobile visual editor in 2018.
• The proportion of all edits made using the visual editor has been increasing every year.
• Editors have made more than 7 million edits in the 2017 wikitext editor, including starting 600,000 new articles in it. The 2017 wikitext editor is VisualEditor's built-in wikitext mode. You can enable it in your preferences.
• On 17 November 2019, the first edit from outer space was made in the mobile visual editor.
• In 2019, 35% of the edits by newcomers, and half of their first edits, were made using the visual editor. This percentage has been increasing every year since the tool became available.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 02:05, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter

Reply tool

The Reply tool has been available as a Beta Feature at the Arabic, Dutch, French and Hungarian Wikipedias since 31 March 2020. The first analysis showed positive results.

• More than 300 editors used the Reply tool at these four Wikipedias. They posted more than 7,400 replies during the study period.
• Of the people who posted a comment with the Reply tool, about 70% of them used the tool multiple times. About 60% of them used it on multiple days.
• Comments from Wikipedia editors are positive. One said, أعتقد أن الأداة تقدم فائدة ملحوظة؛ فهي تختصر الوقت لتقديم رد بدلًا من التنقل بالفأرة إلى وصلة تعديل القسم أو الصفحة، التي تكون بعيدة عن التعليق الأخير في الغالب، ويصل المساهم لصندوق التعديل بسرعة باستخدام الأداة. ("I think the tool has a significant impact; it saves time to reply while the classic way is to move with a mouse to the Edit link to edit the section or the page which is generally far away from the comment. And the user reaches to the edit box so quickly to use the Reply tool.")[1]

The Editing team released the Reply tool as a Beta Feature at eight other Wikipedias in early August. Those Wikipedias are in the Chinese, Czech, Georgian, Serbian, Sorani Kurdish, Swedish, Catalan, and Korean languages. If you would like to use the Reply tool at your wiki, please tell User talk:Whatamidoing (WMF).

The Reply tool is still in active development. Per request from the Dutch Wikipedia and other editors, you will be able to customize the edit summary. (The default edit summary is "Reply".) A "ping" feature is available in the Reply tool's visual editing mode. This feature searches for usernames. Per request from the Arabic Wikipedia, each wiki will be able to set its own preferred symbol for pinging editors. Per request from editors at the Japanese and Hungarian Wikipedias, each wiki can define a preferred signature prefix in the page MediaWiki:Discussiontools-signature-prefix. For example, some languages omit spaces before signatures. Other communities want to add a dash or a non-breaking space.

New requirements for user signatures

• The new requirements for custom user signatures began on 6 July 2020. If you try to create a custom signature that does not meet the requirements, you will get an error message.
• Existing custom signatures that do not meet the new requirements will be unaffected temporarily. Eventually, all custom signatures will need to meet the new requirements. You can check your signature and see lists of active editors whose custom signatures need to be corrected. Volunteers have been contacting editors who need to change their custom signatures. If you need to change your custom signature, then please read the help page.

Next: New discussion tool

Next, the team will be working on a tool for quickly and easily starting a new discussion section to a talk page. To follow the development of this new tool, please put the New Discussion Tool project page on your watchlist.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:47, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Agroecology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Green Deal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:01, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BoldLuis. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "es".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:13, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just discovered Project Deaf for the first time and would love to connect. I’m one of the co-founders of wikiBlind and I am working to bridge gaps. I’m also enthusiastic about connecting deafblind peeps into the open knowledge movements. There are so many ways to help!

I haven’t known anyone in wikiProject Deaf, and would love to connect. Pick a platform - you can probably find me as Dr Mel Ganus

More about us on our meta page - which wikiblind.org should get you to. I’m doing lots of outreach - very happy to find you! DrMel (talk) 04:47, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@DrMel:. Hi, DrMel, pleased to find you here. I tried to see wikiblind.org, but browser says it does not exist. Happy to see growing the projects for blind people!! :-) --BoldLuis (talk) 10:25, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter

Reply tool

The Reply tool is available at most other Wikipedias.

• The Reply tool has been deployed as an opt-out preference to all editors at the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedias.
• It is also available as a Beta Feature at almost all Wikipedias except for the English, Russian, and German-language Wikipedias. If it is not available at your wiki, you can request it by following these simple instructions.

Research notes:

• As of January 2021, more than 3,500 editors have used the Reply tool to post about 70,000 comments.
• There is preliminary data from the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedia on the Reply tool. Junior Contributors who use the Reply tool are more likely to publish the comments that they start writing than those who use full-page wikitext editing.[2]
• The Editing and Parsing teams have significantly reduced the number of edits that affect other parts of the page. About 0.3% of edits did this during the last month.[3] Some of the remaining changes are automatic corrections for Special:LintErrors.
• A large A/B test will start soon.[4] This is part of the process to offer the Reply tool to everyone. During this test, half of all editors at 24 Wikipedias (not including the English Wikipedia) will have the Reply tool automatically enabled, and half will not. Editors at those Wikipeedias can still turn it on or off for their own accounts in Special:Preferences.

New discussion tool

The new tool for starting new discussions (new sections) will join the Discussion tools in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-betafeatures at the end of January. You can try the tool for yourself.[5] You can leave feedback in this thread or on the talk page.

Next: Notifications

During Talk pages consultation 2019, editors said that it should be easier to know about new activity in conversations they are interested in. The Notifications project is just beginning. What would help you become aware of new comments? What's working with the current system? Which pages at your wiki should the team look at? Please post your advice at mw:Talk:Talk pages project/Notifications.

–Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 01:02, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

PKCS 11

added a link pointing to Token

Votebot

added a link pointing to Bot

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Advanced electronic signature

added a link pointing to Token

PKCS 11

added a link pointing to Token

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Washington State Department of Health, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page N95.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Luis, and thanks for your contributions. Below are a few editing suggestions to make it easier for you and others to collaborate on the encyclopedia. Please preview, consolidate, and summarize your edits:

• Try to consolidate your edits, at least at the section level, to avoid cluttering the page's edit history; this makes it easier for your fellow editors to understand your intentions, and makes it easier for those monitoring activity on the article.
  • The show preview button (beside the "publish changes" button) is helpful for this; use it to view your changes incrementally before finally saving the page once you're satisfied with your edits.
• Please remember to explain each edit with an edit summary (box above the "publish changes" button).

Thanks in advance for considering these suggestions. Eric ^talk 15:27, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --BoldLuis (talk) 15:31, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter

Earlier this year, the Editing team ran a large study of the Reply Tool. The main goal was to find out whether the Reply Tool helped newer editors communicate on wiki. The second goal was to see whether the comments that newer editors made using the tool needed to be reverted more frequently than comments newer editors made with the existing wikitext page editor.

The key results were:

• Newer editors who had automatic ("default on") access to the Reply tool were more likely to post a comment on a talk page.
• The comments that newer editors made with the Reply Tool were also less likely to be reverted than the comments that newer editors made with page editing.

These results give the Editing team confidence that the tool is helpful.

Looking ahead

The team is planning to make the Reply tool available to everyone as an opt-out preference in the coming months. This has already happened at the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedias.

The next step is to resolve a technical challenge. Then, they will deploy the Reply tool first to the Wikipedias that participated in the study. After that, they will deploy it, in stages, to the other Wikipedias and all WMF-hosted wikis.

You can turn on "Discussion Tools" in Beta Features now. After you get the Reply tool, you can change your preferences at any time in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.

–Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)

00:27, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lota (vessel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puja.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Segura, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Arroyo and Barbel.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Template:User:BoldLuis/tlxl. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 22#Template:User:BoldLuis/tlxl until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 22:17, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Kcal has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:30, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Seahorse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Curl.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Check-in, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Booking.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read this in another language • Subscription list for the multilingual newsletter • Local subscription list

The New topic tool helps editors create new ==Sections== on discussion pages. New editors are more successful with this new tool. You can read the report. Soon, the Editing team will offer this to all editors at most WMF-hosted wikis. You can join the discussion about this tool for the English Wikipedia is at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Enabling the New Topic Tool by default. You will be able to turn it off in the tool or at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.

The Editing team plans to change the appearance of talk pages. These are separate from the changes made by the mw:Desktop improvements project and will appear in both Vector 2010 and Vector 2022. The goal is to add some information and make discussions look visibly different from encyclopedia articles. You can see some ideas at Wikipedia talk:Talk pages project#Prototype Ready for Feedback.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)

23:14, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

@Whatamidoing (WMF): Thank you for the info.--BoldLuis (talk) 12:39, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter

The new [subscribe] button notifies people when someone replies to their comments. It helps newcomers get answers to their questions. People reply sooner. You can read the report. The Editing team is turning this tool on for everyone. You will be able to turn it off in your preferences.

–Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 00:35, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cutc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:10, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Initialisation and Support Application and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 28#Initialisation and Support Application until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. MB 03:09, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nvidia Jetson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maker.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Electric van, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 12:24, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Mahsa Amini requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Repetitive with Category:Mahsa Amini protests

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Miha2020 (talk) 13:42, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on EverybodyWiki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MrOllie (talk) 13:13, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @BoldLuis,

Thank you so much for your kind words and encouragement on my Talk page! It means a lot. BlueBlack (talk) 15:27, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• ;-) Good work. --BoldLuis (talk) 12:32, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A few things:

• You have to disclose any previous or alternate accounts in your election statements (if you do not have any other accounts, then please say as much)
• You must confirm that you will fully comply with the criteria for access to non-public data and are willing to sign the Foundation's non-public information confidentiality agreement
• Once you've done the above, you should copy the following code to here here:
  • |((Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022/Candidates/((subst:REVISIONUSER))/Statement))

Cheers and good luck if you decide to continue! –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 21:33, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MJL:

Smasongarrison has given you a fresh pie! Pies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a fresh pie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Bon appétit!†

Thanks. --BoldLuis (talk) 13:01, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you made this edit [6] attempting to comply with MJLs comments above, but you've placed it in the section for others to ask questions of you once that phase of the election has started, so it is not transcluding into your candidate statement on the election page.

This is rather awkward, as I am currently on the committee myself, but I feel it really needs to be said: My advice to you would be to seriously consider if you know exactly what it is you are doing in running in this election. Arbitrators are expected to have high levels of knowledge of Wikipedia policy as well as the internal culture of the project, so being a jurist is simply not relevant. The fact that you apparently were not aware of that gives the strong impression that you put your name forward without having much of an idea what you were actually nominating yourself for. I'm not saying these things to be cruel, I'm trying to help you avoid a colossal waste of your time and energy over the next month. Withdrawing your candidacy now is your best option. If you are still interested in running, you can spend some time over the next year getting to know what it is the committee actually does and how it operates, and try again later. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:31, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since I see you have not been on English Wikipedia in some time, you are now receiving questions from users at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022/Candidates/BoldLuis/Questions that could continue for the next two weeks. You will want to review that page regularly for new questions. Izno (talk) 17:52, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I was wrong, it wasn't a waste of your time, as you opted to ignore the entire process and therefore came in dead last with -465 votes. Other users took the time to ask you questions in order to judge your suitability for the position, and your apparent refusal to engage in any way whatsoever is an insult to them and to the community as a whole. Please be more considerate in the future, Beeblebrox (talk) 23:25, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - please can you explain why you made this edit? Thanks in advance. Girth Summit _(blether) 14:17, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mahsa Amini has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 14:10, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Global Alliance for Banking on Values has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you.  ‑ Iridescent 06:50, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello BoldLuis, I noticed that you have not answered any of the questions on your ArbCom Cantidate Page, Please try to do so before the election period ends. Keep in mind that there are seven (7) hours at the time of this message until the period ends. Cheers. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 16:11, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Truck-related lists has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DB1729^talk 15:40, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter

This newsletter includes two key updates about the Editing team's work:

1. The Editing team will finish adding new features to the Talk pages project and deploy it.
2. They are beginning a new project, Edit check.

Talk pages project

The Editing team is nearly finished with this first phase of the Talk pages project. Nearly all new features are available now in the Beta Feature for Discussion tools.

It will show information about how active a discussion is, such as the date of the most recent comment. There will soon be a new "Add topic" button. You will be able to turn them off at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion. Please tell them what you think.

An A/B test for Discussion tools on the mobile site has finished. Editors were more successful with Discussion tools. The Editing team is enabling these features for all editors on the mobile site.

New Project: Edit Check

The Editing team is beginning a project to help new editors of Wikipedia. It will help people identify some problems before they click "Publish changes". The first tool will encourage people to add references when they add new content. Please watch that page for more information. You can join a conference call on 3 March 2023 to learn more.

–Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:19, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ecocide has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:33, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Agricultural waste, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Residue and Stem.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of busiest cruise ports by passengers

added links pointing to Port of Victoria and Port of Marseille

Philipsburg, Sint Maarten

added links pointing to Booth and Screening

San Miguel de Cozumel

added a link pointing to Voyager

Skopelos

added a link pointing to Coach

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BoldLuis. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Avalon Ventures, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the ((request edit)) template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. I'm surprised to see an article this promotional from an editor who has been editing for as long as you. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 03:08, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nuance Communications, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Margin, Footer and Header.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Avalon Ventures, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Loksmythe (talk) 05:03, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Page scaling has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 6 § Page scaling until a consensus is reached. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:30, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Soft energy technology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Riad.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, saw your edits to Intensive agriculture but noticed that you didn't have any edit summaries -- this creates two challenges, first it wasn't clear what you were trying to achieve with the edits without the edit summaries. Second, those edits that you did make changed the scope of the article quite a bit -- agroextractivism is more related to industrial agriculture than to intensive agriculture, but probably should be an independent article itself -- and the differentiation of the concepts is limited within the articles themselves. I hope you keep editing agricultural topics -- its a knowledge gap on the wikis with very few editors Sadads (talk) 12:17, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Salvage for Victory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dump.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Praudio has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Praudio until a consensus is reached. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 05:05, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kibbutz volunteer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pocket money.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Rail bycicle carrier car requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ––– GMH Melbourne 05:16, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Women's rights movement indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:23, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fossil fuel vehicle phase-out has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 04:32, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Natural gas phase-out has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 04:42, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Oil phase-out has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 04:44, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fuels infrastructure phase-out has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 04:52, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Fossil fuel vehicles indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:39, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fuel subsidies has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:14, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fuels phase-out has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:17, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]