Thanks for uploading Image:GB-Definition-Map.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:05, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

I've added the appropriate tag: ((PD-USGov-Interior-NPS))

Argyriou 01:25, 8 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Final_Project.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Butseriouslyfolks 05:05, 21 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion (((db-...))) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. SwisterTwister talk 20:13, 28 June 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Bplewe. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Bplewe. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. I see in a recent addition to Map symbol you included material from a webpage that is available under a compatible Creative Commons Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — 🎄 Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:12, 22 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Cartography

added a link pointing to Gestalt

Figure-ground (cartography)

added a link pointing to Arthur Robinson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 15 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cartography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gestalt.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 22 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Map

added a link pointing to Gestalt

Terrain cartography

added a link pointing to Salmon River

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 29 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Choropleth map, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Skew.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 8 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chorochromatic map, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raster.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 17 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dot distribution map, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Opacity.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Friction of distance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Movement.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 29 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I know it's a little bit slow but I've just found at least 5 articles that you fixed up they are now at least a C class article from whatever state they were in - all are probably B class and maybe more, but I've not got enough grounding in the subject myself to assess them properly - sorry. Anyway it looks a good job, and if I get some spare time I might manage to learn enough by reading the references.

		The Geography Barnstar
		I think this is well deserved

Keep up the good work, EdwardLane (talk) 19:50, 15 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Raster graphics

added links pointing to CCD and PNG

Vector graphics

added a link pointing to Transportation network

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 25 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Data model (GIS), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Contour.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 5 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please notice the corrections to your writing that I made in this edit, removing capital letters and boldface text:

1. Terms such as polygon mesh and voxel are not capitalized if they are not at the beginning of a sentence, even if they are only preceded by a grammatical article.
2. Do not use boldface text to emphasize terms (see MOS:NOBOLD). On Wikipedia, boldface text is reserved for special uses such as article title terms, redirect terms, headings, and description lists (MOS:DLIST). You could convert the lists into description list format if you want, since that format seems to be appropriate for what you are doing. Otherwise, boldface text should not be used.

If you would follow these guidelines, then it would prevent creating more work for other editors like me who have to correct your work.

Also, it is very unusual to pre-write (draft) sections of an article within hidden comments as you are doing in Data model (GIS). I would strongly advise against doing that, as it can confuse other editors who start editing the page for the first time and don't know what is going on in the hidden comments. Pre-writing is usually done in a text editor or in a sandbox or in draft namespace.

Thanks for all your work on the GIS articles! Biogeographist (talk) 12:51, 5 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Geographical feature, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Discrete and New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 30 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Call for presentations for WikiConference North America 2022 and OpenStreetMap US's Mapping USA This is a call for presentations by EOD, Sunday, October 15, for WikiConference North America (Nov 11-13), held jointly with OpenStreetMap US's Mapping USA. We encourage you to please submit your Wikipedia and Wikimedia proposals at Wikiconference:2022/Submissions or OpenStreetMap US proposals at Call for Proposals: WikiConference North America + Mapping USA. We are sending this mass message to you because we deduced that you may be in North America and interested in maps in Wikimedia or Wikipedia, OpenStreetMap, or OpenHistoricalMaps. We are looking for lightning talks in particular on Friday, Nov 11. Some suggestions: Cultural similarities and differences, for instance OpenStreetMap and Wikivoyage (map and describe what you know) versus Wikipedia (verify with citations) Type of licensing for each project and how they differ: OpenStreetMap, Commons, Wikidata, and Wikipedia The flow of information from one project into another, and how maps are generated How OpenHistoricalMap works and possible interactions with Wikimedia projects Your ideas! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:31, 1 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

WikiConference North America 2022 will be virtual, November 11-13. We will hold it jointly with OpenStreetMap US's Mapping USA. Our theme this year is open knowledge allies. Registration is now open here! Please register by the 10th so that we can set everyone up online on our platform. Like last year, we are planning on using Hopin. Our schedule is will be finalized and available in the next few days. We have an exciting line-up of sessions related to Wikimedia, OpenStreetMap, and the intersection of the two. Stay tuned! Local meet-ups will occur in Indianapolis and New York City - if you are available and interested in attending either of these, you can find more details here. If you want to connect with other participants or have questions, please join our Telegram channel here.

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello,

I see that you have been working for years on the GIS pages, and I'm a big fan.

I've been trying to improve general geography pages, especially the main geography page, but my interest is mostly in GIS. My current GIS project here is a bit bold and I could use more eyes.

A lot of my dissertation work has involved WebGIS, and when I saw there wasn't a page I moved to fix that. My understanding from the literature is that: GIS>Distributed GIS>Internet GIS>Web GIS> Web mapping (and other Web Map Service). Where all internet is distributed GIS, and all Web GIS is Internet GIS. This image here on the GIS Lounge recreates one of Pinde Fu's figures from the ESRI book Getting to Know Web GIS and demonstrates what I mean.

In our GIS classes, we are having to emphasize a lot of Web GIS, web services, etc. to students so I think these are really important pages to where the discipline is headed. Based on literature, I'm confident that Internet GIS was and still is a separate concept from Web GIS, and as worthy of a page as many of the stubs I've seen. Unfortunately, it seems that the Web is starting to get the same problem as computer cartography and GIS, where people use the two interchangeably.

I created pages for both internet GIS and Web GIS, and my next will be Mobile GIS (I am a bit shocked that isn't already a page). The issue is that Distributed GIS, web mapping, and digital mapping still need substantial improvements, and the pages I've made need a lot of work as well. Ideally, I'd want them all to flow neatly together with the main GIS pages, and have also made categories to try and keep everything organized.

I'd like to get other peoples eyes on these and you know what you're doing. GeogSage (talk) 01:16, 6 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey, I noticed some of your recent edits. Thanks for doing that; the GIS "section" of Wikipedia needs a lot of work and I was worried that I would be doing this all alone (which I am completely unqualified to do).

Although I've been doing web mapping since 1994, I'd prefer to have someone other than me take charge of those pages, so thanks. I agree with your formulation as far as technical definitions go, although on the surface it seems like each of the circles is like 80% of the one containing it, and the edge cases are hidden if not few. Would you put Cloud GIS as a form of Web GIS? I would argue that if I am in ArcGIS Pro and add a layer from ArcGIS Online (or WFS or WMS), I am doing Internet GIS but not Web GIS (even though the data is likely traveling via HTTP). If I am in QGIS and add a layer from my PostgreSQL/PostGIS server, I am doing Distributed GIS but not Internet GIS. Is that how you see it?

I'm happy to look at your pages if you don't mind some edits. In turn, I would love more edits on the pages I have added/overhauled. I'm happy with the work I've done, but they sound very much like my lectures and could use more broad viewpoints. Bplewe (talk) 16:49, 6 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I reviewed your CV a bit. You are an editor of the Geographic Information Science and Technology Body of Knowledge, and an author of a lot of early online GIS literature, I can assure you that you are many times more qualified than me (or most people) to write on these topics. I wish more in our discipline were willing to spend the time to properly define the topics, I would think ESRI itself would want to make sure that the pages were clear and well cited (even if they used their own sources).

You are right that at the moment, most of the higher-order distributed GIS pages are mostly edge cases compared to what they contain (Web GIS IS the elephant in the room). Most GIS organizations that I’ve worked with tend to have a large local distributed GIS that contains all the important stuff and isn’t open to the public. During the pandemic, we used VPNs to link in to that over the internet beause the Web wasn’t secure enough. WebGIS through ArcGIS Online is really just how we host the final products that are meant to be public facing. Because it is public-facing, WebGIS is the most obvious tool, but I would speculate that local and internet GIS is ubiquitous within organizations. Further, while the Web is currently the most popular way to use the internet, and while that does not look like it will change in the immediate future, in thirty years I would not be surprised if something different from the World Wide Web was being widely used over the internet.

HTTP is a protocol the Web is built on, so you are right and can use it without it being WebGIS. I would have to look at if ESRI is using any Web protocols to host their ArcGIS Online layers. PostgreSQL/PostGIS server on QGIS is distributed GIS, but I believe can be Internet GIS if you use the internet infrastructure to access it through a VPN. At least based on my understanding

Cloud GIS is an interesting term. I have minimal practical experience with using it, and mostly just know about it from Petersons book “Mapping in the Cloud.” Trying to understand how it fits into the big picture of GIS, I’m drawn to the term “Internet of Things” and of course, cloud computing. I would need to do a lot of literature review to feel confident speaking on this, but I believe Cloud GIS can be distributed, internet, or web GIS, or a combination of them. The most interesting thing that is specific to cloud computing in general is that it is very closely related to mobile mapping and mobile GIS.

Other people editing the pages would be great, and is the goal. On the internet GIS talk page, one user wrote “ This new Internet GIS article created last September, mostly by a single enthusiast, needs to be renamed and/or merged.” I’m confident that it is worthy of a page and a separate concept from Web GIS, and Web Mapping, but the accusation of being a “single enthusiast” would be shaken with more editors. I’d like feedback that is a bit more productive then deleting or merging a page on a topic that is extensively documented in the literature. I will be sure to see if I can inject some citations into your pages as I go forward. My advisors have had me do deep dives into GIS history for a few papers we’re working on, so I have a good amount of stuff on Zotero (I edit Wikipedia mostly to help motivate me to read and summarize the literature. Several of the pages I’ve made are in large part just my personal notes on the topics cleaned up a bit).

GeogSage ^{(⚔Chat?⚔)} 03:21, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited GIS file format, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ESRI.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Geodatabase (Esri), is not suitable as written to remain published. While it appears to be notable, it needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. There are large sections which are wholly uncited. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:26, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello,

Sorry to creep Bplewe, following your talk from previous convo. I will drop some sources for you for general verification on the draft that you can take or leave, geodatabases are obviously a huge part of GIS. Thanks Onel5969 for your advice.

GeogSage ^{(⚔Chat?⚔)} 17:29, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks. It's hard to produced an unbiased article on a vendor-specific product without just citing the vendor's sources over and over again. The 6 or 7 GIS textbooks that I usually use all mention geodatabases but are remarkably superficial. Bplewe (talk) 21:02, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ESRI documentation is the best for any software vendor I've ever seen. ESRI Press books are pretty great. The best non ESRI source I have in my personal library on geodatabases is the PACKT publishing book on geodatabases by Hussein that I included.^[1]

Amazon link is here if you wanted to take a look. GeogSage ^{(⚔Chat?⚔)} 00:52, 24 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks. Fortunately, my library has access to the ebook version of Nasser. I'll take a look. Bplewe (talk) 03:59, 24 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Onel5969@Bplewe

I believe that the page Draft:Geodatabase (Esri) has been improved significantly. I added an application section that cites several peer-reviewed journals and outside sources. This is in addition to the numerous Esri press textbooks that were challenged as biases by other editors.

There has been some controversy regarding its notability. While some other editors are of the opinion it would be better shifted into another page (they are suggesting the main page for Esri), I disagree and think that it is definitely notable enough as a file type to warrant a separate page. I have argued on the talk page there that there are numerous precedents set on Wikipedia for proprietary file extensions/software having their own page separate from the main company page, however repeatedly others have said that other pages aren't taken into consideration (I really find that unrealistic but rules are rules).

Anyway, I think that it is ready to be resubmitted for publication, however I'm not the originator and others have expressed other opinions. Just messaging here to tell Bplewe that I would support them pressing the "Resubmit" button, and request feedback from One15969 on the issue. Thanks! GeogSage ^{(⚔Chat?⚔)} 18:38, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Geodatabase (Esri). Thanks! Stuartyeates (talk) 06:50, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Their publications or what they say about themselves cannot be used to establish notability and should only be used sparingly.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Geodatabase (Esri) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 15:41, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Bplewe! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 15:41, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to GIS file format, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Per WP:TITLEDAB, the title "GIS file format" has only single meaning so adding parentheses is considered unnecessary. Thank you! Vitaium (talk) 13:57, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]