Ah yes, that's my mistake! I somehow found you are trying to add 3000 BC, actually I was trying to remove that line (you can see edit summary Followers accept the Bhagavada Gita as historical fact and date it to 3102 BC. - Unreferenced!. So, aim of your edit and my edit was same! --Tito Dutta (Message) 16:35, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
Join the discussion! Tito Dutta (Message) 17:04, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
At least new message has been posted here: Talk:Bhagavad_Gita#Can_we_please_get_rid_of_this_image_from_the_article.3F --Tito Dutta ✉ 21:24, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
At least one new message has been posted Talk:Bhagavad_Gita. --Tito Dutta ✉ 22:29, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
For your works in Bhagavad Gita article. -- Tito Dutta ✉ 22:38, 9 July 2012 (UTC) |
Hello,
an SPI report has been made where you are involved. I am little bit surprised to see this SPI report, but, I neither support nor oppose it. Try to defend yourself if possible Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thigle --Tito Dutta ✉ 00:10, 2 August 2012 (UTC)