Started pageBruin2 (talk) 21:17, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_New_Orleans#How_does_one_add_to_project_page_list.3F WhisperToMe (talk) 23:53, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I have drafted a new article ([User:Bruin2/Vasco_Road_(California)]) and would appreciate some feedback regarding its suitability for upload. I realize that it needs a map, at least, but I have no capability to produce one.

• I reccomend moving this article to WP:AFC and tagging it for review if you want people to take a look at it and consider it. -- Crazysane (^T/_C\^D) 14:21, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

((helpme)) I followed your recommendation. The proposed article was moved on September 1. There have been no comments to date. I would like to move it to the main area, since there will be links to several other articles. Please advise how to proceed. Thanks. Bruin2 (talk) 14:31, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ref. Wikipedia:AFC/User:Bruin2/Vasco Road (California)  Chzz  ►  14:42, 23 September 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Hi there.

Could you please edit the page, and put the following code as the first line, then save it;

((subst:AFC submission/submit))

That will mark it for a review, which should happen within a few days. Thanks,  Chzz  ►  14:47, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Now in Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vasco Road (California) and awaiting review.  Chzz  ►  17:27, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:USS Mississippi (BB-41) 1947-48.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:28, 2 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 17:28, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Corrected Bruin2 (talk) 18:14, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vasco Road (California). If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text ((subst:AFC submission/submit)) to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you.  Chzz  ►  23:49, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vasco Road (California), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

• Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!  Chzz  ►  17:02, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bruin2. You have new messages at Arxiloxos's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

William G. Skelly, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

• The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
• Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!

[[CharlieEchoTango]] 01:52, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your efforts on Tulsa-related articles; it was certainly a pleasure to see William Skelly come to life this week. If sports topics interest you, one article that is screaming out for help is Tulsa Golden Hurricane football, in which there is currently a four-decade gap between 1968's infamous 100-6 loss to Houston and the record-breaking win in the 2008 GMAC Bowl. More generally, the history of the University of Tulsa is a topic in need of elaboration--this came to my attention after the death of Ben Graf Henneke, and while I was writing an article about him, I collected some sources on other TU presidents, but now I don't have as much research and writing time as I would like, so I would be more than happy to share the research with you if you're interested. Best regards, --Arxiloxos (talk) 20:19, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for your post. It's good to hear that somebody noticed.

I'd be pleased to collaborate with you on this or other Tulsa articles. I would defer to others on the Golden Hurricane history. The period you indicated occurred after I moved away from the area, so I have nothing special to contribute. However, I have begun collecting factoids about the early history when TU was formed from the old Kendall College. So, one of my current interests is to expand the Tulsa University History section. Maybe we could move the Tulsa University article up another notch on the quality scale. Bruin2 (talk) 22:37, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Fair enough, and thanks for the response. The Oklahoma Encyclopedia article about TU is a useful outline, but I have a feeling that there are some significant gaps in its recounting of the school's history. Some months ago (while working on the article about Henneke), I collected a bunch of links to articles about TU's history since the presidency of C.I. Pontius, and then ran out of time to do more heavy research. I've put all of that on a workpage, User:Arxiloxos/University of Tulsa history references, and you should feel free to make use of this material as you see fit. (Technical note: The "formatted references" in the bottom section are displayed the way they are -- with a $ sign in lieu of the correct opening symbol < -- so that you can see the content of the footnote; otherwise they wouldn't display on the page. When you want to use one of those footnotes in an article, just copy it and change the $ back to a < and it should work.) Best, --Arxiloxos (talk) 00:28, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• • Hi Arxiloxos. Thanks for offering me an opportunity to use your Tulsa University notes to move the article along. It's taken a long time, but I wanted to fill in a more complete list of former presidents of the university. That's done, although information about each individual's significance to the school is pretty sparse for most of the earlier ones. Please take a look at the article and let me know what you think. Bruin2 (talk) 14:43, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thank you for the note and for your efforts; I am glad to see those sources being put to some use. Your continuing efforts on Tulsa topics are most appreciated. I have much less time to spend on Wikipedia these days, and am glad to see you (and hopefully others) carrying the load. Best,--Arxiloxos (talk) 15:51, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

		The Modest Barnstar
		Thanks for your recent contributions! 129.49.72.78 (talk) 22:12, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed your User:Bruin2/W. R. Holway (Engineer) article since it's already listed in several categories. If you don't want the article to appear in categories before it's ready, put a colon in after the square braces and before the word Category, e.g. [[:Category:Massachusetts Institute of Technology alumni]]. You'll still get a blue link to validate the category, but it won't get listed in the cat. Take that colon out when you move the article to the main space.

Some comments on the article:

• I'd move the notable achievements earlier in the intro, and move the routine bio to later sections.
• Also I'd rename the article w/o the "(Engineer)". Parenthetical titles are to be used for disambiguation and I couldn't find another W.R. in wikipedia to worry about.

Couple more thoughts:

• Add ((WPBIO|living=no)) to the article's discussion page, with suitable additional parameters.
• I see there are a few unlinked references to W. R. already in Wikipedia that will need linking.

--J Clear (talk) 00:25, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• • Thanks for your helpful comments. I'm ready to move the article to AfC.I think I have addressed all of them except the parenthetical addition to the title. I have no objection to removing that, but I think the action has to be taken by a Wikipedia administrator.Bruin2 (talk) 14:46, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming you're able to move the article from the User: space, you should be able to rename it at the same time and eliminate the (). Never used AfC, so don't know if there's something different about that process. If you have a good article and you feel it doesn't violate any of the pillars (too much), then you could just move it to the mainspace directly. Be bold, as they say. --J Clear (talk) 21:54, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nice job on this article by the way. It was a redlink the day I created Pensacola Dam but not the next day.--NortyNort (Holla) 09:59, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Very nice work on Holway. I've massaged the article somewhat, to fit various obscure criteria at places like MOS:BIO, and I added a little bit of additional information. I'd also echo what User:J Clear said above: now that you're an established editor, I'm not sure that there's any particular benefit in your putting your new articles through the extra step of AfC: you can just take them directly from your user space to mainspace when you feel they're ready.

I also wanted to ask you about the footnote format you're using, with all of the external links placed at the end of the cites rather than linked directly in the footnote text. Is there a reason you prefer to do it this way? If you look around in the footnotes of other articles, you'll note that they're usually done so that the reader can click directly on the name of the source to get to the external link.

For example:

• Kirby Lee Davis, "These Walls: Spavinaw watershed in Tulsa", The Journal Record (Oklahoma City), July 24, 2009.

rather than

• Davis, Kirby Lee. The Journal Record (Oklahoma City). "These Walls: Spavinaw watershed in Tulsa" July 24, 2009.[1]

This also has the benefit the double numbering of the footnotes (one at the beginning, one at the end, sometimes with different numbers), which some readers may find distracting. I don't think there's any rule that requires one of the other, just something to consider. You might also want to look at the footnote generator available at http://toolserver.org/~magnus/makeref.php There's no rule that you have to use the templates generated by that engine (and I personally find them a bit annoying at times), but many experienced editors do use them and find them helpful.

Again, great work. Best, --Arxiloxos (talk) 17:10, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hiyas there Bruin2!

I just removed the User talk:Bruin2/William G. Skelly page you marked for removal. If you need more userpage deletions, it may be more convenient to tag them with the ((db-u1)) template. This will place the article in the relevant deletion categories so that it can easily be spotted by people currently doing cleanups. The template equally saves you the hassle of having to type an explanation along with the helpme template(helpme based deletion request are fine as well, but the DB template is likely more convenient). Just to let you know :). Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 17:54, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Bruin2/Pierce Block (Tulsa) has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pierce Block (Tulsa), this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 16:20, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pierce Block, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

• You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the Help desk or on the reviewer's talk page
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

 Chzz  ►  09:38, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This has been sent to you requesting that you respond to whether or not you are still an active member of WikiProject Oklahoma Please respond Here By following the instructions.

--Dcheagle 09:27, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Dcheagle. Thanks for your message. I thought I was already on the Oklahoma active list. Apparently not, so I have readded my name. I have primarily worked on Tulsa Task Force topics, and have not paid close attention to broader Oklahoma issues. Bruin2 (talk) 17:05, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 18:46, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/History of Texas City, Texas.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk or via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Shearonink (talk) 22:51, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bruin2. You have new messages at Shearonink's talk page.
Message added 12:26, 20 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.[reply]

Shearonink (talk) 12:26, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you are greatly expanding the Oklahoma Hall of Fame article and adding information about being inducted to the inductees' wiki pages. However, I see that in many places, instead of sourcing your addition, you are simply directly linking to a .pdf file.

<ref>((cite web | url=http://www.oklahomaheritage.com/HallofFame/ByName/tabid/89/Default.aspx | title=Oklahoma Hall of Fame | accessdate=November 16, 2012))</ref>

That markup is a reference to the list of hall of fame inductees, accessed on November 16, 2012. Adding that, or something similar, would be great. ZybthRanger ^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:47, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm about to review Fred S. Clinton is there anything that you would like me to point at for improvement.--Dcheagle • talk • contribs 18:24, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. If you have questions or comments about the Clinton article, please add them below. I recall seeing a little more description about Clinton's role in the Sue Bland oil well, but I don't have it at hand right now. It's not really relevant to his medical practice, but it helps show his widespread involvement in Tulsa's early history and development. Bruin2 (talk) 22:07, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(Tablet edit) Ive compiled a list of things that could be done to improve the article which I will post here once I return to my home computer. For now I have up'd the page to start class.--Dcheagle • talk • contribs 22:32, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Overton James, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 12:53, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What evidence do you have that the location of this site is now in Oklahoma? I cannot find anything to substantiate that claim. Backspace (talk) 02:07, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Backspace. You are correct. I haven't relocated such a source and don't recall why I didn't put in a citation at the time. I conclude it was a gross error on my part and apologize for that. Thank you for catching it and letting me know. I appreciate that. I deleted the incorrect statement and the link to category "Oklahoma in the American Civil War." Bruin2 (talk) 16:12, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oklahoma Ordnance Works, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kilopi (talk) 11:39, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have raised a question at Talk:Overton James regarding the article you helped create on former Chickasaw Nation Governor Overton James relating to the article I previously created on current Chickasaw Nation Governor Bill Anoatubby. Please feel free to read my comments on the aforementioned Talk page for more details. --TommyBoy (talk) 06:31, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On 16 April 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Doaksville, Choctaw Nation, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Doaksville, Choctaw Nation, was the largest town in the Indian Territory in 1850? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Doaksville, Choctaw Nation. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I'm about to review Isparhecher. I'm just stopping by to ask if there is anything you are looking for it this review.--Dcheagle • talk • contribs 06:41, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dcheagle,

Thanks for volunteering to review Isparhecher. I don't know whether the person who added the banner had something specific in mind for the subject page, as there was no further information. I have not been successful finding much about Isparhecher's early life, so if you can find anything, that would be a big help. Bruin2 (talk) 14:38, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Okheric, Thanks for your comments on my proposal to merge the two subject articles. I'm glad to see that some Wikipedian has taken an interest. I plan to move forward on this, though it may take a couple of weeks to do so, because I have some other commitments right now. Bruin2 (talk) 22:33, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Bruin2/Evan Jones (missionary) has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Evan Jones (missionary), this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 07:19, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Good Article rejection notes are on the talk page and at least one objective hasn't been met, which is to expand the lead. For a large article like this, a larger lead is needed to reflect the article's full content. Okheric (talk) 00:53, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments on the subject article. I have expanded the summary section. I think it covers Ross' life, but I hope I didn't go overboard and make the section too long. Please have another look and let me know whether it now seems to satisfy the requirements. I appreciate your help. Bruin2 (talk) 04:44, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Much better. Thanks. I am not sure whether or not it is too long now, but it certainly is no longer too short. You might use the peer reviewer tool on it once before submitting it for Good Article status again. Okheric (talk) 01:23, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/History of Texas City, Texas, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:06, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Following up on our March, 2013 discussion at Talk:Overton James, I recently came across information on the Chickasaw Nation Governor's website which seems to suggest that he served as Governor until 1987. Please see the aforementioned Talk page for more details. --TommyBoy (talk) 05:12, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Evolution of Tulsa's Skyline has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notably topic lacking citations

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dcheagle • talk • contribs 19:15, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	For your excellent Oklahoma articles. Richard Apple (talk) 21:30, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed that you asked about getting John Ross (Cherokee chief) GA nominated again. I have however after looking over the article found a few issues that would need to be fixed before s possible nomination could pass. If you would like I can list the issues I've found so they can be fixed. Once the issues are fixed I think John Ross could strongly pass a GA review.--Dcheagle • talk • contribs 04:38, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate your posting your list of issues, so this article can move forward. Thanks for your review. Bruin2 (talk) 15:53, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok let me go over the article with once more to make sure I don't miss anything and then I will post the list where would you like me to post the list here or on articles talk page?--Dcheagle • talk • contribs 17:15, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article you are working on Coalgate, Oklahoma, has two history sections. Okheric (talk) 21:24, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The articles that you are marking as "C" rating...are not "C" rated, because they don't meet the first sentence of the "C" description, which is "The article is substantial". Those articles are NOT substantial! See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Oklahoma/Assessment#Quality_scale • Sbmeirow • Talk • 13:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:WikiProject Cities/US Guideline for guideline for US City articles. Notice how little those Oklahoma articles have compared to this guideline....thus is why they aren't "substantial" nor "C" rated. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 13:25, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you are working on the county articles and thought I would offer an idea. Instead of listing the cities, it seems like the preference in terms of how they are treated in GA and FA articles is paragraph form with a bit more detail under a subsection entitled Communities under Geography. What do you think of trying to do this in the county articles? I have done it for one or two, but thought I would seek your input before going further. Okheric (talk) 15:42, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for soliciting my input on your suggestion. I see no downside to listing communities contained by the county under the Geography section. I have some reservations about the paragraph format, since many counties have quite a few communities. I do favor subdividing the community list into Cities and towns; Unincorporated communities; Census designated places and Ghost towns or former communities. See Cherokee County, Oklahoma for example. You said that you had tried the paragraph form for a few counties, so could you send me a link for these. I want to be sure I understand what you are recommending. Cheers. Bruin2 (talk) 00:28, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Woodward County, Oklahoma Okheric (talk) 16:44, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Rogers County, Oklahoma Okheric (talk) 16:46, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Ames crater at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Maile (talk) 23:52, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Robert Galbreath, Jr. at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 04:50, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aye Bruin2, thanks for your review of Template:Did you know nominations/1930 Graf Zeppelin stamps and your kind words about the article. Just thought I'd pass on some advice about reviewing. Instead of outlining all the various points, in full wording and in list form, you might want to summarize things a bit and just make the statement with a couple of sentences. e.g. Instead of saying:

• It was nominated within 5 days of completion;
• It exceeds the minimum 1500 characters length requirement.;
• The hook is short enough and meets formatting guidelines;
• etc...

You could have said:
Article is long enough, hook is interesting, short enough and sourced. Was expanded fivefold less than five days before nomination. No MOS issues, images all check out, no copyvios and no duplicate or disambig links. Good to go.
You also don't have to mention "neutral and does not comment negatively on living people" unless they are issues that need to be corrected. This is the way most reviewers do it, and it takes up much less space. That's my opinion anyway. Again, much thanks for your time and effort. GREATLY appreciated. All the best. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 19:27, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Opinions are needed at RfC about Media Viewer being the default image viewer. Please help in the effort and pass this notice on. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 20:15, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thanks for reviewing Template:Did you know nominations/United States Custom House (San Ysidro, California). There may be a problem with your review, though: part of the review process is to approve the hook, especially to verify that the hook is cited in the article. You approved the nomination, but you also expressed some doubts about the hook: whether it was cited, or whether it was even true. I suspect they will raise questions about that when they come to move the DYK into the queue, because right now it is confusing. Could you please take a look at my comment at the nomination, and then either indicate that the hook is OK, or else change your review from "approval" to something less than approval - something that acknowledges you have questions about the hook? Thanks, and sorry to have to bother you about this! (P.S. Any additional comments from you should be added below my comment; you shouldn't change your initial review.) --MelanieN (talk) 14:39, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On 22 June 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Woodward Park (Tulsa), which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that as of April 2014, the rose rosette virus had killed at least two-thirds of the roses in the Tulsa Rose Garden? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Woodward Park (Tulsa). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:23, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On 25 June 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Robert Galbreath, Jr., which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Robert Galbreath, Jr., was called the "Oil King of the Southwest" after discovering and drilling the first productive wells in the Glenn Pool oil field, the largest in Oklahoma? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Robert Galbreath, Jr.. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like I need to ask you to take one more look at Template:Did you know nominations/United States Custom House (San Ysidro, California). Several alternate hooks have been proposed; people need to know if you approve the alt hooks. It would be helpful if you would state a preference for which hook you like the best, although if you don't have a preference, you can leave the choice of a hook up to the person who promotes the article to the queue. Thanks! --MelanieN (talk) 18:19, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Never move a page from article space to your own userspace. If you want to work on the page with editing the actual page, then copy, not move it. Bgwhite (talk) 05:35, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Philcade Building at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Chris Troutman (talk) 05:10, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bruin2/Alsuma, Oklahoma, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

j⚛e decker^talk 14:04, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work! You are welcome to create articles outside of AfC of course! --j⚛e decker^talk 14:12, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Carnegie Library (Guthrie, Oklahoma) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

Please see new note on DYK template. Yoninah (talk) 21:17, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On 17 August 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Philcade Building, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Mr. & Mrs. Waite Phillips lived in the penthouse of the Philcade Building after donating their mansion to the city of Tulsa to become the Philbrook Art Museum? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Philcade Building. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 12:02, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	The article could use an image and some more inline cites, but overall I want to say nice work with Te Ata Fisher! Tina Gasturich (talk) 21:14, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 August 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Carnegie Library (Guthrie, Oklahoma), which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Andrew Carnegie objected to his grant money being used for amenities such as a dome, public meeting room, and fireplaces in the Guthrie, Oklahoma Carnegie Library? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Carnegie Library (Guthrie, Oklahoma). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Thanks for your contribution Victuallers (talk) 00:26, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Lake Murray Meteorite at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 01:01, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On 1 September 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lake Murray Meteorite, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Lake Murray Meteorite, discovered in 1933, is the largest Class IIAB octahedrite found in Oklahoma and the fifth largest found in the world? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lake Murray Meteorite. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On 17 September 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Guthrie Historic District (Guthrie, Oklahoma), which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Guthrie Historic District was created to preserve architecturally significant structures built when Guthrie was the capital of Oklahoma Territory and the first capital of the state of Oklahoma? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:04, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and thanks for entering the sub contest - not sure if you saw the rules but the idea is to expand and reference stubs quite a bit. Thus articles like Adair Park (Stilwell, Oklahoma) and Arrowhead State Park need to be expanded quite a bit, and ones like Anadarko Basin and Adamson, Oklahoma are too big to begin with. Not sure what you want to do, but expanding those and removing ones that are too big in the first place of the list would be helpful. There is a really cool tool called this script (most accurate) or this one or this tool. Cheers, Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:34, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cas Liber. Thanks for your comments and corrections. Yes, I did read the rules, but obviously I did not understand them. I am working now to undo all of the stubs that I thought met the rather vague requirements for Start class. Perhaps there are more precise definitions for moving an article from Stub to Start somewhere in Wikipedia that I have not found. I am still puzzled about how an article can be too big to make such a move. Hereafter, I intend to leave judgments about quality and importance to the administrators, as I don't want to create additional work for someone else to clean up. I'll just stick with adding to content whenever I find something tha might be useful to an article. Bruin2 (talk) 16:47, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The lines between stub and start can be very woolly, and really the templates are supposed to be a pretty loose guide. They are of very little importance to readers and have been used by me as shorthand for what is essentially a contest about improving some of the shortest or nearly-shortest-lacking-referenced articles here. If you want help adding the above tools to the left-hand column I can help, though it is a bit involved, otherwise no big deal. cheers, Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:05, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi Bruin. A quick note to say that as of this evening you've got 30 points - there's three days still to go, so if you've any more to add please get them in soon :-). I've gone through your list and about a dozen of them are still eligible for the contest with a bit of expansion - the rest were generally too large to begin with to qualify for the contest. Thanks for the contributions! Andrew Gray (talk) 22:53, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

		The Oklahoma Barnstar
		We say "A-YIP-I-O-EE-AY" for your many contributions on Oklahoma topics, including your recent creation of Oil Capital Historic District (Tulsa, Oklahoma) --Arxiloxos (talk) 16:03, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Arxiloxos, Thank you very much for the Oklahoma Barnstar Award. That was a wonderful surprise and I am very proud of it. Bruin2 (talk) 22:20, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

		The Stub Barnstar
		To Bruin2, thanks for getting involved in the Stub Contest and having a go. Cheers,Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:20, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bruin,

I have left a driveby comment on the above DYK nomination. I believe it would behoove you to address the concern I commented upon. Once you have done that, I may be interested in completing a review of the article in question. Quirks in history, such as this incident, fascinate me.

Thank you.

Georgejdorner (talk) 15:36, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bruin,

I have just reviewed the above. Unfortunately, it seems to have failed DYK nomination because it was not expanded 5 times. If you have some other provision of DYK under which it qualifies, please call it to my attention, and I will re-review.

Please do not be discouraged by this failure. There is a knack to DYK that may take a couple of attempts to master.

Georgejdorner (talk) 14:26, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Georgejdorner, I may be mistaken, but I thought the 5X expansion applied only to articles that were previously posted in mainspace. Pe the article History, I started it in my user space back on September 9, when it had 3772 bytes. The article had 10,700 bytes when it moved from User space Bruin2 to mainspace on October 5. So, I think it meets the new article criterion. Does this satisfy the expansion criterion or have I misintepreted it?

I am looking for the proper citations you requested. Bruin2 (talk) 18:05, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bruin2, I wasn't sure whether you'd noticed, but there has been further action on the DYK review. You are quite correct that the article is considered new as of when it was moved to mainspace, and that it is clearly new enough and long enough for DYK—I'm afraid that Georgejdorner wasn't aware of that aspect of the newness rules. However, there are other issues that need addressing, beyond the as yet unmodified sourcing. Please stop by soon; it has been over nine days. Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:45, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BlueMoonset, I am happy to see there is still interest and activity on this article. Thanks to you and Georgejdorner for resolving the timeliness issue. I've been sidetracked by a couple of other issues the past few days, but would like to resume moving this forward. I plan get back to fixing the references cited by Georgejdorner this evening. Bruin2 (talk) 15:56, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bruin2, it's been more than another week, and the basic issue behind the "term paper" designation has not yet been addressed. This is critical: the template seems justified, and it means the article doesn't qualify for DYK in its present form. Are you planning to rework the article soon so it's more encyclopedic? Please respond to review issues on the DYK review itself. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:00, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BlueMoonset, I have rearranged the text of the article to move the description of the specific assault immediately after the summary paragraph. I think this addresses the organizational issue you had mentioned. The background discussion now comes next. Would you please look at today's revision to see whether this resolves the term paper issue? I had previously added a couple more in-line citations to the text. I look forward to your comments. Thanks for your help. Bruin2 (talk) 21:11, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bruin2. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/St. Thomas Chapel.
Message added 23:57, 4 November 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

APK whisper in my ear 23:57, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's been over a week since I left the above message. If you're not going to respond on the nomination, can you let me know so I can have someone else look at it? Thank you. APK whisper in my ear 06:29, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Adah Robinson at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Doug Coldwell (talk) 22:18, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good to Go = sorry for mistake.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 23:36, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creek Council Oak Tree, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:42, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bruin2, Did you do a QPQ for the DYK? I fixed your citations. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! I am trying to move this along. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:36, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bruin2 If you did the QPQ I would be pleased to give this an affirmative review. It's older than the hills. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:11, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. I did a QPQ which you can find at Template:Did you know nominations/Cape Santiago. It was a little challenging to locate, but I did find it. Apparently the nominator lost interest in the DYK, but the nomination page still existed today on Wikipedia. If that one is not satisfactory, please look at one of the other DYK reviews listed on my user page. Bruin2 (talk) 22:03, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently they are now moving on this. I would have reviewed it, but they seem to think I am some sort of cocreator. If you choose to make me one, please let me know. I would be grateful. 20:27, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

I've done a major rewrite. Still needs some polishing I think. Please take a look and see if we can reorder this some more. One paragraph needs a citation. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 00:54, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bruin2, All paragraphs have citations with the small exception of the first paragraph in the "Background" section. Someone will complain about this. Find a citation, please. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:36, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Added a proposed alternate hook, which would need your approval. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:01, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bruin2, I think the first paragraph under Background needs, as I've recently said on the nomination page, a citation for the Civil War info (the uncontested control of the river and feasibility of resupplying via it), not for the stearn-mounted paddlewheel or the wood-fired boiler. This is now the oldest outstanding DYK nomination, so you need to do something about this soon. Given the broad nature of the claim, I would hope it was easily confirmed in a secondary source. Thanks for taking care of this one outstanding matter. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:50, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Creek Council Oak Tree at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:33, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On 13 December 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Adah Robinson, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that controversy still exists over whether Adah Robinson or Bruce Goff deserves the primary credit for designing Boston Avenue Methodist Church (pictured) in Tulsa, Oklahoma? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Adah Robinson. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mike V • Talk 07:14, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On 20 December 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Creek Council Oak Tree, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the modern city of Tulsa, Oklahoma was founded in 1836, when the Lochapoka Creeks created the town of talasi at the Creek Council Oak Tree in Indian Territory? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Creek Council Oak Tree. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Harrias ^talk 12:02, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi- I notice you've done some editing on this one recently. Various folks have noticed that the name of the battle is incorrect (listing it as "Middle Boggy Depot.") I did a review of this in talk and proposed changing the name. I wondered if you might care to comment? Red Harvest (talk) 05:01, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 January 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ambush of the steamboat J. R. Williams, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the only naval battle ever fought in Oklahoma was the ambush of the steamboat J. R. Williams on the Arkansas River in 1864? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ambush of the steamboat J. R. Williams. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 January 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Livermore Carnegie Library and Park, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Livermore, California's Carnegie Library started with just 250 books? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Livermore Carnegie Library and Park. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 March 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Marsh Creek State Park (California), which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that no date has been specified for admitting the public to California's Marsh Creek State Park, although the park was formally named on January 27, 2012? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Marsh Creek State Park (California). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:57, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of John Smith Zink at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Relentlessly (talk) 13:06, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 30 March 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jack Zink, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Jack Zink was a mechanical engineer who received 35 patents for combustion equipment inventions, and was noted for his achievements in business, car racing, and philanthropy? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 12:02, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi Bruin2, I noticed your username on the list of active editors on WikiProject Oklahoma, so I'm hoping you might be interested in helping out on an article I'm working on. I'm seeking some improvements to the article for Aubrey McClendon, an Oklahoman businessman who is CEO of natural gas company American Energy Partners, LP and founding CEO of Chesapeake Energy Corporation, and I'm looking for editors to review my suggestions.

Up front, I should say, I am working as a paid consultant to Mr. McClendon, so I'm not making any edits and instead hoping to discuss changes here due to my conflict of interest. An editor has already reviewed my proposed new draft for the article and was largely positive, although they did have concerns about one section. Unfortunately, they've not been back online since I asked if they could give more details so that I can work on updating the draft. Unfortunately, they've been offline for a few weeks now, so I'm hoping that others can review it, too. If you're able to, it would be much appreciated if you can take a look at what I'm proposing and share any feedback. Thanks, 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 19:14, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, I'm still looking for help with this article and would love your input if you have time. No worries if not, just wanted to give you a quick ping to see if you were available. 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 14:47, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

James H. McBirney, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:21, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 26 October 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chilly McIntosh, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Chilly McIntosh, who was nearly assassinated for agreeing to sell Creek tribal lands, later became a respected and influential figure in the Creek Nation? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chilly McIntosh. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:13, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TWL users! We hope JSTOR has been a useful resource for your work. We're organizing a cleanup drive to correct dead links to JSTOR articles – these require JSTOR access and cannot easily be corrected by bot. We'd love for you to jump in and help out!

Sent of behalf of Nikkimaria for The Wikipedia Library's JSTOR using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:18, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of John Martin (judge) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 23:27, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bruin2, your response is needed on the nomination page. Please give this your prompt attention. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:11, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Chilly McIntosh at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with ((db-g7)), or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 07:40, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 11 December 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John Martin (judge), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that John Martin, the first Chief Justice of the Cherokee Supreme Court, had no formal legal training? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Martin (judge). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Did you Know? ...that Kathryn J. Whitmire was only 35 years old and a widow when she was elected as the first woman mayor of Houston, Texas?

ALT1 ...that the election of Kathryn J. Whitmire as mayor heralded a major change in the political structure of Houston, Texas?

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Kathryn J. Whitmire at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with ((db-g7)), or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 13:40, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Finis Alonzo Crutchfield, Jr. at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with ((db-g7)), or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 16:50, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 4 January 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kathryn J. Whitmire, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 1981 election of Kathryn J. Whitmire as mayor heralded a major change in the city politics of Houston, Texas? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kathryn J. Whitmire. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bruin2. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Royal Stag.
Message added 17:38, 19 January 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Human3015 ^{It will rain}  17:38, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Finis Alonzo Crutchfield, Jr. at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 22:41, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bruin2, there are new issues that you need to address. Please stop by as soon as possible. Many thanks! BlueMoonset (talk) 04:42, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There's a new question that you need to answer, so please stop by soon. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:42, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback you requested has been given. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is the oldest nomination at DYK. As such, it needs more prompt attention than you are giving it. We expect to hear from you the next time you edit. Thank you for your attention here. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:25, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The reviewer has pointed out that the original issues surrounding OR have not been addressed in three weeks, and recommends closing the nomination. If you wish to avoid this, prompt action is needed. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:58, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A new post from the reviewer, responding to your latest post. Please stop by again. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:39, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Camp Napoleon Council at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 04:42, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bruin2, I just noticed that you drafted a reply to this review in your sandbox, though you haven't posted it anywhere. To answer your question about the expansion, the DYK rules WP:DYK state the following, in the Eligibility criteria, under 2) Long enough, subsection b): DYK articles may freely reuse public domain text per Wikipedia's usual policy, with proper attribution. However, because the emphasis at DYK is on new and original content, text copied verbatim from public domain sources, or which closely paraphrases such sources, is excluded both from the 1,500 minimum character count for new articles, and from the ×5 expansion count for ×5 expanded articles. Since the Text of the Compact, Signatories, and marker inscription are all quoted—that is to say, copied directly from other sources rather than original—it does not count, and wouldn't even if the material was not in the public domain or otherwise free. (If it weren't PD or free, of course, that large a quote would be forbidden under WP:NFCC rules.) The same is true for all lists and tables, which are not considered prose by DYK: the DYK character count only counts prose characters. As Cwmhiraeth notes, the current expansion is from 1359 (prior to January 8) to 3191 prose characters. Given the base of 1359, you would need an article that was 6795 prose characters long to get to a 5x expansion, or another 3604 characters. If you think you can (and wish to) accomplish such an expansion in a timely fashion, please let us know right away. Otherwise, I don't see any choice but to close the nomination. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:47, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Guy T. McBride and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:46, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Bruin2, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 TT me 01:46, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 17 March 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Finis Alonzo Crutchfield, Jr., which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Finis Alonzo Crutchfield, Jr. is credited with bringing the televangelist Oral Roberts into the United Methodist Church in 1968? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Finis Alonzo Crutchfield, Jr.. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of St. Joseph's Catholic Church (Krebs, Oklahoma) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Random86 (talk) 07:53, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if you know, but I did a further review of this nomination. Random86 (talk) 04:05, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Will Rogers Memorial, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a 2016 law making the Will Rogers Memorial Museum (pictured) a part of the Oklahoma Historical Society (OHS) also requires the Governor to appoint a direct descendant of Rogers to the OHS board? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Will Rogers Memorial. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:24, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 25 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article St. Joseph's Catholic Church (Krebs, Oklahoma), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the bell in the tower of St. Joseph's Catholic Church is the only item saved after the first church building burned down in 1902? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/St. Joseph's Catholic Church (Krebs, Oklahoma). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:10, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Pawnee Agency and Boarding School Historic District at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ~ Rob^Talk 16:35, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bruin2, last call to address the issues on this nomination. Thank you for giving this your prompt attention. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:29, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Canadian County, Oklahoma may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• county, the Canadian River drains about 32 percent and the Cimarron River drains about 27 percent (mostly in the northeastern part of the county. About 1 percent of the county is drained by Sugar

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:26, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Canadian County, Oklahoma may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• county, the Canadian River drains about 32 percent and the Cimarron River drains about 27 percent (mostly in the northeastern part of the county. About 1 percent of the county is drained by Sugar
• county about ((convert|8|miles|km)) north of the southeastern corner. The river length is about [[convert|76|miles. The elevation drops from ((convert|1420|feet|m)) at the entry to about ((convert|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:21, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Canadian County, Oklahoma may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• county, the Canadian River drains about 32 percent and the Cimarron River drains about 27 percent (mostly in the northeastern part of the county. About 1 percent of the county is drained by Sugar
• Dead Indian, Uncle John, Cottonwood, Soldier and Deer Creeks. The Washita River flows more than [[convert|20|miles|km)) south of the county, but drains about {{convert|5|mi2|km2}] in the southwest corner of Canadian County.<ref>Mogg, ''et. al''., p.18.</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:34, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I noticed that you used a few "et al's" in your referencing. You are a very experienced editor with several barnstars so I am in no way criticizing your great edits, but if you'd like me to show you a workaround to avoid using et al (which is generally avoided) please let me know and I can post it in my sandbox. All the best. Magnolia677 (talk) 08:48, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Linda Hogan page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I added a mention of your hard work improving Mangum, Oklahoma at Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:48, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Would you consider moving the archaeology material to the Fourche Maline culture article and expanding it? Since there is already an article about that and this one is supposed ot be about the river. Heiro 17:26, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment. I will make the move you suggested. Somehow, I had missed the FM Culture article previously. Will take some time to incorporate the new info, as part of the section is already covered by the existing article. I will also rename the existing Fourche Maline article to include River in the title, to clarify the topic for other readers.Bruin2 (talk) 23:43, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

		The Oklahoma Barnstar
		I see you already have one, but I think you deserve another because of your work on Oklahoma and the 50,000 Challenge. MB298 (talk) 06:24, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bruin2. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Black Dog (Osage chief). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:59, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Black Dog (Osage chief), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Smmurphy^(Talk) 15:21, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For excellent work bringing drafts of Oklahoma Supreme Court Justices (state and territorial) up to mainspace quality. bd2412 T 20:33, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Robert D. Simms page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 24 December 2016 (UTC) Fixed error & deleted message[reply]

James Pepper Henry, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 23:05, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey.

Just wanted to see whether you would be interested in adopting the article Carolyn Mary Skelly, since, back in 2011, you created the article about her father William Skelly. Bobbykelleyfl, who is claiming to be her great great grandson, already created the article, and he has done a good job with it, but since there is a conflict of interest, I was wondering whether you'd be able to assist him. The article isn't bad as it is, just needs some minor fixes.

As someone who believes in being welcoming to new editors, I took it upon myself to message him regarding that, but it seems he's either too frustrated, or just giving up.

Thanks in advance.

Regards,

LoMStalk 23:25, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cornelius Hurst, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:42, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Chabot Space and Science Center into Redwood Regional Park. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted ((copied)) template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:13, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all your work on the McClellan–Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. I made a few edits to the table, and will try to find a way to shoehorn Wilbur D. Mills Dam into the article (it's officially part of the system but has no locks). Cheers! Magnolia677 (talk) 00:25, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I am currently revamping the UCSF project. I created lots of pages and added a lot of content, but there is so much still to do. I saw that you are part of the SFBA task force, so I thought you might be interested and I wanted to invite you to collaborate once more. In particular, we need to add content, do maintenance, and we really would benefit from pictures, so if you are in SF and could help that would be great. Thanks!Eccekevin (talk) 15:08, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bruin2! We are looking for editors to join WikiProject University of California, San Francisco, an outreach effort which aims to support development of UCSF related articles in Wikipedia. We thought you might be interested, and hope that you will join us. If you are interested in joining, please visit the project page, and add your name to the list of participants, check out our To Do list, and join the discussion on our talk page. Thanks!!!

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Guy T. McBride, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. Originally, I had submitted this article as a draft, but was notified that the reviewer considered the subject lacked notability. I then revised the draft in an effort to clarify why I thought the subject was sufficiently noteworthy to appear in Wikipedia. I resubmitted my revised version in January 2017, expecting it would either be approved and moved to the mainspace, or else I would learn specifically what criteria the reviewer used to make his/her ruling. However, I have heard nothing since.

I still believe the article is appropriate for Wikipedia, even if the subject may be useful and interesting to a limited subset of readers. (Dr. McBride made major contributions to the modern education of engineers.) I still believe it is worthy of publication on Wikipedia. Do you recommend that I retrieve it from the Draft space and go ahead with posting it on mainspace? I see no value leaving it in draftspace. Thanks for your help. Bruin2 (talk) 22:10, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm curious where you got that this was built in 1912. The NRHP nomination form doesn't give a date, and the source you added says it was built before 1907. kennethaw88 • talk 05:31, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see now, the other nomination form does say 1912. Never mind. kennethaw88 • talk 18:08, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://www.ebparks.org/Parks/Crown_Beach. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:02, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Tassajara Creek Regional Park, Bruin2!

Wikipedia editor Hydronium Hydroxide just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Well, I won't tag for notability despite its apparent obscurity. https://landscapeperformance.org/case-study-briefs/tassajara-creek-restoration has some leads...

To reply, leave a comment on Hydronium Hydroxide's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 11:35, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thankyou for your participation in the challenge series or/and contests. In November The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There will be over $4000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. If this would appeal to you and you think you'd be interested in contributing new articles on women during this month for your region or wherever please sign up in the participants section. The articles done may also count towards the ongoing challenge. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate and raise money to buy books about women for others to use, this is also fine. Help would also be appreciated in drawing up the lists of missing articles. If you think of any missing articles please add them to the sub lists by continent at Missing articles. Thankyou, and if taking part, good luck!♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:53, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Just a quick comment: ((Photo requested)) does not accept a date parameter, so it should be added either by itself (ex: ((Photo requested))) or with an existing parameter such as |in= (ex: ((Photo requested|in=Contra Costa County, California)). For context, I am referring to your and my edits here. Cheers, -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 23:10, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I had originally intended to write a lot more about the agency as part of my Oklahoma earthquake-related efforts, but I guess I never got around to it. The article is a lot better than it originally was, so thanks for your contributions! Master of Time (talk) 02:31, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Dablink fixed in text of article. Bruin2 (talk) 06:08, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Oscar A. Mitscher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Osage (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dablink fixed in text of article.Bruin2 (talk) 15:46, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your improvements to this article. I hope it'll be promoted to Good article status one day. Keep up the great work! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 15:47, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blackjack Mountain (Oklahoma), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rich and Winding Stair (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of megachurches in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Episcopal Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Purcell, Oklahoma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cleveland County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brainerd Mission, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages David Brown and Catherine Brown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Long Point, Texas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gay Hill, Texas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Barkeep49. BD2412, thanks for creating Edwin R. McNeill!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. It seems clear that he was a real person. However I would suggest that neither of your sites, particularly the Miner one is WP:RS (that one simply seems to be a collective family research site). I would recommend checking out Google books which has some sources verifying his existence. While that trades unreliable sources for primary sources I would suggest that might be a positive overall trade.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 21:04, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Graeme Bartlett. Bruin2, thanks for creating Brian Jack Goree!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. We need independent reliable writings too, such as newspaper articles on the topic

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:50, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited E. Bay Mitchell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Garrett (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bruin2,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged James P. Garrett for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 18:50, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Cwmhiraeth. Bruin2, thanks for creating Robert D. Bell!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This article needs a lead section outlining why he is notable.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:20, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article P. Thomas Thornbrugh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails notability guidelines for WP:BIO. Only referenced, notable event is decision in HP law case. WP:BLP1E

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ifnord (talk) 14:00, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Clarksville, Texas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shiloh, Texas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of disasters in the United States by death toll, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cedar Fire (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed error Bruin2 (talk) 14:35, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Link corrected

Hello, I'm Stesmo. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, University of Tulsa College of Law, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Stesmo (talk) 03:40, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I noticed that you accidentally have Lance Cargill twice on the 50,000 challenge main page. Thought I let you know in case you have another contribution to swap it with :) --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 04:08, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Thomas L. Kivisto, please make sure that the category page actually exists. In some cases, it may be appropriate to create a new category in accordance with Wikipedia's categorization guidelines, but it is usually better to use the most specific available existing category. It is never appropriate to leave a page categorised in a non-existent category, i.e. one whose link displays in red. You may find it helpful to use the gadget HotCat, which tests whether a category exists before saving a change. Thank you. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:00, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BrownHairedGirl,

Thanks for your message and for picking up on my error. I have corrected that this morning. I think I was working on that article edit too late last night. (I should know better by now) Bruin2 (talk) 15:47, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Bruin2/Samuel W. Hayes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Bruin2/Samuel W. Hayes, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((db-self))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 21:23, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ted Owens (basketball), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John McLeod (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:39, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Byars, Oklahoma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oklahoma Central Railroad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:28, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bruin2,

Thanks for creating John H. Pitchford! I edit here too, under the username Doomsdayer520 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Thank you for your new article on John H. Pitchford. However, please read the Wikipedia guidelines at WP:EXIST and WP:JUDGE. Your article needs much more information on whether Pitchford played some sort of notable role in history, beyond merely repeating basic information about his existence.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Doomsdayer520)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 00:22, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bruin2,

I am a sporadically active Wikipedia editor. I've never used the "Talk" function before, please excuse any unintended errors. My Wiki handle is kibiusa. I'm writing because I want to expand the stub on Bishop John H. Burt. I see that you added some biographical information, which was then reverted, something to do with copyright issues. i don't want to have the same problem. Could you take a moment to explain your understanding of why your post got reverted and how to avoid that? Thanks! kibi (talk) 16:33, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, C. H. Elting, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. Find a Grave is not a reliable source. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:02, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

needs more sourcing

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jesse James Dunn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jesse James Dunn, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((db-self))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:38, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Bruin2/Denver Davison and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Bruin2/Denver Davison, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((db-self))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 16:58, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Bruin2/Denver Davison. Thanks! Bkissin (talk) 17:22, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	US Banknote Contest
	November-December 2019
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Tulsa Club Building, from its old location at User:Bruin2/Tulsa Club Building. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 03:57, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tulsa Club Building, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 13:34, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Tulsa Club Building at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with ((db-g7)), or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 10:18, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tahlequah, Oklahoma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Martin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:45, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of people from Tulsa, Oklahoma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Wolf (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:41, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bruin2, you created this DYK nomination back on October 26, but never transcluded it. I've only just noticed this today, two months later.

What would you like to do? We can still transclude and process the nomination, even at this late date. If so, you will need to provide a QPQ review, since you have more than five prior DYK credits. If you prefer, we can close the nomination; it's up to you.

Please let me know as soon as possible your plans for this; I'd like to proceed one way or the other before the end of the year. Many thanks, and I hope you're having a happy holiday season. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:15, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays, Blue Moonset

Thanks so much for this reminder. I had wondered why my DYK nomination had disappeared from the list, after I had received an acceptance for the main article. Now, I realize that my attempt needed a QPQ, which I have not done. I definitely wish to move the Tulsa Club Building DYK nomination forward. Thanks for your assurance that this is still possible. This is now my first priority - superseding some other articles that I have been working on in the meantime. I will try to post something before New Year's Day, 2019. Sorry about my failure to realize that I needed to generate a new QPQ. Bruin2 (talk) 01:12, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bruin2, I was happy to rescue you this, given your assurance that you would give it your first priority. It has already been reviewed, yet you haven't responded even though it has been over seven days, the typical time period expected for such responses. Given the original delay—this is from October—it will need prompt attention if you wish to pursue the nomination. I hope you will be able to give it your attention very soon. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:35, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Tulsa Club Building at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --evrik ^(talk) 22:44, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Census QuickFacts
• Social Capital Variables Spreadsheet for 2014, PennState College of Agricultural Sciences, Northeast Regional Center for Rural Development
• Social Capital Project: Social Capital Index Data spreadsheet accompanying the U.S. Congress, Joint Economic Committee, Social Capital Project. “The Geography of Social Capital in America.” Report prepared by the Vice Chairman’s staff, 115th Cong., 2nd Sess. (April 2018)
• Religious statistics by county
• PeakVisor, search for "X County" to find high points in a county
• ebird, gives bird species lists for each county
• Midwest Herbaria, search to generate plant species lists for each county
• Mycoportal, search to generate fungus and bryophyte species lists
• NASS QuickStats database, gives agricultural figures by county for many data points
• bestplaces.net--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 21:44, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bruin2. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Tulsa Club Building.
Message added 23:47, 8 January 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 23:47, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CatcherStorm was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:A.G.C. Bierer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:A.G.C. Bierer, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((db-self))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CatcherStorm ^talk 06:35, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anchor D Ranch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beaver River (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:08, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bruin2

Thank you for creating Tulsa Club Building.

User:Doomsdayer520, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for this new article. Note that the entire second paragraph needs citations. That paragraph could also be an unnecessarily-detailed rehash of the history section below.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Doomsdayer520)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:42, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jesse James Dunn, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tulsa Club Building, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Tulsa Club Building suffered four major fires in 2010, including three in a two-week period, yet remained strong enough to allow conversion to a hotel instead of demolition? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tulsa Club Building. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:C. H. Elting, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jesse James Dunn, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 09:20, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Denver Davison, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 19:12, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel W. Hayes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 20:56, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

C. H. Elting, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 22:57, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just FYI, I've added an unreliable sources tag to this page. Findagrave is typically considered unreliable as it relies on user submitted content and thus should be avoided as much as possible. Adding a link to it as an external link is okay though. Cheers. Sulfurboy (talk) 23:00, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A.G.C. Bierer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Etzedek24 ^{(I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record)} 04:09, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Geralyn Wolf, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Reed (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:03, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Ben Arnold (judge), which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I suggest that you edit the existing draft and submit that rather than creating multiple copies of the same article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Bruin2/Ben Arnold judge) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Bruin2/Ben Arnold judge), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 00:03, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited University of Oklahoma College of Law, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ben Arnold (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John B. Harrison, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:39, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bruin2, I have removed 2 names that you have added to Wikipedia:The 50,000 Challenge because the articles have redlink. Perhaps you can put the articles back once they have been created. Thanks, SWP13 (talk) 10:17, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Arnold (judge), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 23:40, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I found your page in new page review and it looks like you intended to create a userspace draft. I moved it over for you and will end the new page review process. If you don't want that, simply speedy the page. FalconK (talk) 05:32, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bruin2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Leon B. Senter".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:48, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bruin2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "John G. Clark".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:05, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bruin2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "James H. Gordon".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:38, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Frank E. Gillette, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 11:24, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Arco Building, Tulsa, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 23:25, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bruin2. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Henry W. Scott (judge), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 21:38, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. I had already received a warning yesterday, so I completed some minor additions and moved the page to the article area from the Draft space. You can find it there now. Bruin2 (talk) 23:22, 13 February 2021 (UTC) ::[reply]

Hello, Bruin2. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Dana Kuehn, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bruin2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Orel Busby, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:33, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bruin2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bruin2/Gerard Clancy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bruin2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gerard Clancy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:12, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bruin2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Arco Building, Tulsa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Byron, California, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Brentwood and John Marsh.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 12 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Leon B. Senter, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that as the first licensed architect in Oklahoma, Leon B. Senter held "License Number 1" for forty years, from 1925 until his death? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Leon B. Senter. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Leon B. Senter), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on DYK for C. I. Pontius requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kaseng55 (talk) 22:30, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bruin2,

This page looked like it was just misplaced so I moved it to User:Bruin2/DYK for C. I. Pontius. Thanks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:42, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

::Thanks for your speedy attention to my recent article C. I. Pontius and the start of a DYK for the same article. After reading your comments here, I can see that I did not adequately explain why I believe the subject is worth some additional work. I would much prefer reverting it to User:Draft status, rather than deleting it. That has already been done for the related DYK.

The subject of the article, President Pontius, played a very significant role in the history of Tulsa University and the city businessman in which it was located. Thus, I believe it meets the criterion for notability. At the time he accepted the position, most well-regarded colleges and universities in the country believed that the top executive should have at least a doctoral degree in some academic field. But, the Great Depression was in full swing nationwide, as well as in Tulsa, and the TU trustees were concerned that the school could fail, as many other such institutions already had. They believed that the head of the school needed the skills and knowledge of an astute business executive to prevent a financial collapse, and that this was more important than diplomas to save the school. Hence, they selected Pontius as the new chief executive. Their choice proved to be successful. Not only did he raise large amounts of money from new donors, he corrected some organizational problems that many academic leaders had overlooked, and that kept TU on a sound financial footing for many succeeding administrations. He won the confidence of faculty, students, and other community leaders. He is remembered even now as TU's longest-serving leader. I am convinced that his biography belongs on Wikipedia.Bruin2 (talk) 18:04, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Tulsa, Oklahoma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Three Forks.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bruin2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Arco Building".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:24, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bruin2! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:00, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bruin2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Janet K. Levit, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bruin2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joseph Paschal Twyman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:06, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bruin2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Joseph Paschal Twyman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:08, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]