Hi! I'm leaving you this message because you are listed as a Wikipedian connected with Rice University. The Wikipedia Ambassador Program is currently looking for Campus Ambassadors to help with Wikipedia assignments at another Houston school, which will be participating in the Public Policy Initiative for the Spring 2011 semester. The role of Campus Ambassadors will be to provide face-to-face training and support for students on Wikipedia-related skills (how to edit articles, how to add references, etc.). This includes doing in-class presentations, running workshops and labs, possibly holding office hours, and in general providing in-person mentorship for students.

Prior Wikipedia skills are not required for the role, as training will be provided for all Campus Ambassadors (although, of course, being an experienced editor is a plus).

If you live in Houston and you are interested in being a Wikipedia Campus Ambassador, or know someone else from the area who might be, please email me or leave a message on my talk page.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 20:36, 29 December 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Xiaomi Tech requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Pesky (talk …stalk!) 08:08, 12 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Symbian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Japanese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 8 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The term "Intel-compatible" is commonly used to refer to x86 processors. ViperSnake151  Talk  14:37, 7 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sleipnir (web browser), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:04, 4 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Messier 32, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Local group (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 18 July 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Soft serve may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• bīngqílín))), (((zh|c=軟雪糕|j= jyun⁵ syut⁸ gou¹))) and ((zh|c=霜淇淋))) are the Chinese terms used in [[Mainland China]], [[Hong Kong]] and [[Taiwan]] respectively.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:20, 28 July 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Thanks for clarifying that. Zach Vega (talk to me) 17:32, 25 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to IPhone 5S may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• • '''Model A1533 (GSM)/Model A1533 (CDMA)'''(Excluding China version<ref>[http://mobile.it168.com/a2013/0913/1533/000001533927.shtml 7个版本到底买哪个？ iPhone5s型号解析</ref>):<br />

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:50, 29 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

LeWa OS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Compile, TCL, OTA, MTK and THL

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 9 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Windows XP, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Weibo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 17 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of writing systems may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[trinary]] code of dashes, dots, and silence, whether transmitted by electricity, light, or sound) representing characters in the Latin alphabet.
• | <2?

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:53, 25 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Absolute Solitude may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {cite web|author=名前 |url=http://otakomu.jp/archives/54221.html |title=【SAO、AW】作者・川原礫先生の新シリーズ「絶対ナル孤独(仮）」が今年の夏頃に刊行！ &#124; オタク.com |publisher=Otakomu.jp |date=2014-02-27 |accessdate=2014-06-18))</

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:57, 18 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of longest novels may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:44, 19 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please stop adding the grammatically incorrect statement in Flash Player about tablet usage in Japan or something. You seem to be from Japan which is why the sentence may be relevant to you in your country but not so for the rest of the world. Please stop adding it or start a discussion on the talk page first. Multiple editors feel the statement doesn't belong in the article. -- Wonderfl ^(reply) 06:50, 18 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Project Loon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LTE. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 9 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Chapel page, your edit caused an empty citation error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 10 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Literary language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sichuanese. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 20 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I think you're somewhat missing the point here. There are two quite clearly distinct topics, both covered by a substantial literature, so there is no doubt at all that both of them could be written up at book length or more. That is all that is required for two articles to exist. We hope that editors with suitable knowledge will take the time to improve the articles; meanwhile, what we have written is correct, and indicates there is room for more. There is no future at all in attempting to merge the topics. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:12, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ilyushin Il-96, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gangway. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 11 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, C933103. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi! You reverted my edit about Air India flight. You said "this is not the longest non-stop /route/". As I understand from the article (which was also published in authoritative The Telegraph) the distance flown is calculated along the great circle, though trans-Pacific route is not the shorter part of the great circle between Delhi and San Francisco, but the longer one. Nevertheless the distance flown is the longest one, and return flight let you make round-the-world journey, so don't you think it's worth mentioning in the article? Pride4 (talk) 13:44, 19 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The name of this article has been the subject of discussion on its talk page, ending in October 2012. It was moved to "Phone connector (audio)" as a result of consensus. Why did you take it upon yourself to move it without discussion? Jeh (talk) 02:59, 14 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Phone connector. Since you had some involvement with the Phone connector redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Jeh (talk) 05:10, 14 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Dawnseeker2000 15:04, 29 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello my friend. I just checked into it to see. These links tell a tale:

• https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/everipedia.com
• https://everipedia.org/wiki/Donald%20Trump/advanced_edit/history/
• https://everipedia.org/wiki/Matt%20Damon/advanced_edit/history/
• https://everipedia.org/wiki/Pizza/advanced_edit/history/

It looks like it never took off. The attraction was supposed to be how it would differ from Wikipedia. Alas, it seems few people helped the articles diverge. People may have visited it for a while, but that has trailed off. Considering Alexa, it appears that it is a failed experiment and is unlikely to attract new media coverage. I doubt it will ever be notable.

Just thought I'd drop by with the links so you can make your own decision. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:01, 20 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, C933103. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 7 April 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sword Art Online, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Reki Kawahara, author of the successful Sword Art Online, planned to submit the draft for the light novel series to a 2002 competition, but refrained because it exceeded the page limit? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sword Art Online. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 7 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. We (the Research Team at Wikimedia Foundation) are building an algorithm that will align Wikipedia article sections across languages. For improving this algorithm we need the help of multilingual Wikipedia editors to provide true statements to the algorithm. You are contacted because based on your Babel template and/or content translation tool usage you know at least two of the following languages: ar (Arabic), fr (French), ja (Japanese), en (English), es (Spanish), ru (Russian).

(Note: by clicking the links in the following paragraph, you will be taken to Google spreadsheet.) If you'd like to help us with translating a subset of the section titles on or before 2018-05-06, please read and follow the instructions. If you see instructions in another language, please scroll down to find your preferred language. If you have questions about this message, you can contact us via Diego. Thank you! :) --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:49, 23 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:15, 15 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello @C933103:, thanks a lot for your photo File:Opening Ceremony of a re-education camp in Lopnur County.jpg. I feel the 6th photo Here can show the inside view of Xinjiang reeducation camps. But I found this photo in other places likeHere， HereandHere, could you please upload this photo in a correct way? We can put the photo in the paragraph of Detainees, the name can be "Detainees were listening speeches in number 4 re-education camp in Lop County, Xinjiang, April, 2017", thanks again over this matter.--KAAN777 (talk) 10:22, 25 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@KAAN777: According to the watermark, it seems like those photo were originally published by a Tencent Wechat MP Platform public account named XJSFXZ, can you find/access the original Wechat MP article (If it is still available), archive it using archive.org or archive.is services, and then give me the link? C933103 (talk) 13:47, 25 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@C933103:,I searched for the mentioned news above in the XJSFXZ's official Wechat account, but it is not available now.--KAAN777 (talk) 16:44, 25 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@C933103:, thanks for your photo File:Xinjiang Re-education Camp Lopnur County.jpg. The county name here should be Lop County, Lopnur and Lop are different counties in Xinjiang, so does it possible to change the county's name in the image to Lop County? Furthermore, it is better we upload this photo for public use, it also can be used in other language wiki pages.--KAAN777 (talk) 10:01, 26 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@KAAN777: I have added the request rename template onto the file description page, it will be renamed once someone with required right come across and process the image. And then, because the image is copyrighted, it is impossible to upload them onto wikimedia commons directly under the current system due to legality reason. If you want to use the image on other wikis, then you should check those wikis' rule on fair use copyrighted image, and if they allow such practice, adhere to those guidelines strictly. Generally speaking, you can try to look at those templates I used to upload the image onto English Wikipedia, find the foreign language version of those templates on foreign language wikis, and then fill in the templates according to instruction using description of the file I uploaded as example when uploading the media onto those foreign wiki. Remember to upload to the "local" wiki site instead of the "commons" for these fair use copyrighted media. Also, note that there should be at little as possible images of this nature on each Wikipedia article. See also Wikipedia:Non-free_content. C933103 (talk) 10:25, 26 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:27, 31 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Panasonic P-02C, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 19:51, 3 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, C933103. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I'm contacting you because you were involved in discussions about non-notable and unsourced content on List of bitcoin forks. I'd appreciate your input on the talk page in the section Contentious revert by Primefac. Thanks, Fresheneesz (talk) 22:03, 25 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the blockchain and cryptocurrencies. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. Primefac (talk) 19:03, 26 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is currently a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding the discussion we're having on List of bitcoin forks. Please give your opinion. Fresheneesz (talk) 04:09, 11 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Criticism of Huawei, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page UFS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 16 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I removed your addition of a non-free image of a television programme to Video game addiction. There is no commentary and discussion on the specific work (not the content of the screenshot, but the program from which it originated), which is required in order to meet WP:NFCC #8 requirements. ViperSnake151  Talk  04:12, 28 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@ViperSnake151: The way I understand the WP:NFCC #8 requirements is that how the image would enhance readers' understanding on the topic, not how the image source is directly relevant to the article subject. Is there any other explanation/example/legal advise that suggest discussion of a specific work that an image originate must be necessary to meet the contextual significance requirement?C933103 (talk) 05:19, 28 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is a common interpretation per WP:NFCI. The specific scenarios relevant here are either video screenshots "For critical commentary and discussion of the work in question (i.e., films, television programs, and music videos)." or "Images that are themselves subject of commentary.". It fails the first because the specific CCTV program is not discussed, and the second because the specific scene in this specific program is not a subject of commentary. ViperSnake151  Talk  05:26, 28 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I see.C933103 (talk) 05:41, 28 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Who profit from web addict teenagers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 14:46, 29 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It is being treated as all one issue by media. The timing is not coincidental. Stop trying to remove certain sides in violation of WP:NPOV: this is part of a larger pattern of the US government clearly doing everything it can to keep Huawei out of the market. ViperSnake151  Talk  21:38, 7 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@ViperSnake151: According to my understanding, The timing of various actions taken by American government against Huawei in the past May are indeed not coincidental. However, that is a consequence of those actions being delayed to after trade talk collapse. And none of those action are related to security of 5G network (nominally they are related to "national security", as in supplying parts to Iran could boost Iran's ability to damage American interest, but that's not about 5G), so even if you link them all together they are still not related to 5G network security. C933103 (talk) 03:44, 8 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Opening Ceremony of a re-education camp in Lopnur County.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Njzjz (talk) 01:06, 11 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Substitute holiday has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is basically a dicdef

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:05, 26 January 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Can we discuss the individual sources on the article's talk page in more detail instead of discussing the phrasing through edit summaries? Best, Dekimasuよ! 07:19, 25 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of the 2019–20 coronavirus outbreak in December 2019 – January 2020, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Face mask (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 2 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ComicFesta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ComicFesta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HenryCrun15 (talk) 01:41, 27 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The file File:Xinjiang Re-education Camp Lop County.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

"cannot discover free alternative" is not a reason to use non-free content. Free images can be obtained by other methods such as self-shooting or seeking authorization.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. #ForeverLove — FRDian ^{你一定要好好的} 13:42, 20 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Xinjiang Re-education Camp Lop County.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. SCP-2000 16:19, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Have emailed you about this. --Jim Killock (talk) 18:51, 11 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@JimKillock: I have received your email and I see that's indeed a good path to move forward, hopefully it can result in a change in how they view it.C933103 (talk) 00:21, 12 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Sangdeboeuf (talk) 22:49, 24 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Sangdeboeuf:I was thinking about how to conclude the controversy in a single or two paragraph but have been failing at using appropriate words to describe it. I think additional words are necessary there as it absolutely doesn't read right in the public controversy section to introduce this US-centric subject to reader with UK's and Australia's perspective first. Do you have any idea on how to fix it?C933103 (talk) 23:04, 24 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

As I said on the talk page, the first step is to find reliable, secondary sources that are about the controversy and independent of it, rather than opinion essays that are examples of said controversy. --Sangdeboeuf (talk) 23:16, 24 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That is also something I personally find quite difficult on such a highly politicized topic, maybe I should try to switch to a different search engine? C933103 (talk) 23:21, 24 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

We may have to wait for such sources to emerge. Until then we should refrain from evaluating and interpreting the controversy ourselves in the article. --Sangdeboeuf (talk) 23:38, 24 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Newimpartial (talk) 12:46, 11 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent editing history at Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Newimpartial (talk) 16:59, 11 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Generation (disambiguation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Life cycle.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 9 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Rongbatsa Agreement, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:25, 17 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Rongbatsa Agreement, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Edward-Woodrow (talk) 16:02, 15 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]