This account is a suspected sockpuppet of College railman (talk · contribs · logs) and has been blocked indefinitely. Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may also be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Hello, I'm MPS1992. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Mary Kay Letourneau, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! MPS1992 (talk) 22:55, 28 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mackenzie High School (Michigan), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 04:04, 29 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

you recently made two edits to Debra Lafave with references. Neither of the urls in these references are valid. Please correct the references, or I will have to remove the edits. Thanks. --rogerd (talk) 22:48, 7 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of school shootings in the United States. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. When reverted, follow BRD. Don't just dismiss others objections and reinstate your preferred version. You do not get to decide unilaterally what will be in any article. Neither do I, but new additions that are contested stay out until a consensus is formed. John from Idegon (talk) 20:41, 28 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Cadeken. You have new messages at John from Idegon's talk page.
Message added 02:18, 29 July 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please make sure you add valid websites. The last two edits you've made linked to sites with invalid https certificates, meaning nobody should access the sites. --Yamla (talk) 22:09, 5 January 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Green Haven Correctional Facility, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Chambers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:19, 20 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. Your recent edit to Washington State Penitentiary appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Meters (talk) 23:17, 24 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your other account is blocked indefinitely. Stop editing from this account, as it is against policy. Otherwise this account will be blocked. Sundayclose (talk) 17:58, 25 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please point to the SPI investigation that proved this. Lacking that, you really really need to remove this. You cannot make unevidenced accusations and an administrator recently warned you about it. Further, you are not an administrator, so you cannot tell a user he will be blocked. The strongest statement you could make is "will likely be blocked", and without some linked evidence, you cannot even say that. It's seems fairly clear on overlap you are likely correct, but that's not our call. That's for the checkusers to decide. You need to file the report. I don't want to see you blocked. John from Idegon (talk) 21:14, 25 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You're right. Although I have no doubt it's a sock, I will take it to SPI if there is another edit. Sundayclose (talk) 00:25, 26 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This account was created separately from college railman so my account here is not a sock puppet. I do not know why it says it is from the same account but it is not. Cadeken (talk) 22:48, 28 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wow....that was obtuse. John from Idegon (talk) 02:56, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Obtuse yea true Cadeken (talk) 01:24, 22 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Federal Correctional Institution, Elkton. Sundayclose (talk) 03:22, 22 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cadeken. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text ((unblock|Your reason here ~~~~)) below. ST47 (talk) 02:43, 24 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cadeken. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text ((unblock|Your reason here ~~~~)) below. TheSandDoctor Talk 13:35, 10 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]