Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Amy Jackson may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• now based in [[London]] travelling to [[Chennai]] and other places around the world for work.<ref>"[https://twitter.com/i_am_amyjackson Amy Jackson," ''Twitter'', 06 March 2014.</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:20, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Iraqi insurgency (2011–present) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ((flagdeco|Iraq|1991)) [[Free Iraqi Army]]<<ref name="aljazeera.com">http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2012/11/20121112193038751565.
• *10 August, Kurdish forces retook Mahmour and Gwer from ISIS.<ref>[http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2014/08/11/236000/us-airstrikes-helped-but-kurds.html U.S. airstrikes

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:29, 12 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

we don't use Pro-gov sources for government advance.Alhanuty (talk) 04:38, 18 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Josh3580. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Survivor: San Juan del Sur  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  —Josh3580_talk/hist 07:21, 16 December 2014 (UTC) Reply[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Survivor: Caramoan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Gloss 07:27, 16 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Amala (actress). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Yamaguchi先生 19:43, 6 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Sudesh Berry has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the ((prod blp)) tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 16:07, 3 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Amala (actress). Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please be mindful to include a source when making material changes to any article, taking special care to source all changes when dealing with WP:BLP articles. This is now the fourth time you have been reminded of our policy on verifiability. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you require assistance. Continued changes in this manner will result in a suspension of editing privileges. Yamaguchi先生 00:01, 8 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. Tradedia^talk 09:11, 28 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]