Welcome!

Hello, Catmoongirl, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place ((helpme)) before the question. Again, welcome! --Flammingo^Hey 09:38, 1 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Another moongirl! And on vandal patrol as well. Welcome to Wikipedia. :) --Moonriddengirl 14:27, 16 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Well, it was bad enough that an employee started the article, but this other editor can't seem to get it through his head that a paragraph in a 400 page book isn't necessarily legitimate criticism, especially from an author with an avowed bone to pick (said individual hasn't even bothered to learn how to cite, which I thinks knocks his input value down a few more notches).

I'm tempted to just throw the whole section out, especially since it's one incident from roughly 25 years ago, if not more - Manly Hall has been dead for 17 years, and his main works of Masonic interest are much older than that; he was writing as early as 1923. J.S.M. Ward I've never even heard of, actually. Basically, we have a standard POV warrior. MSJapan 15:27, 16 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

For adding the citation to the Matt Bentley site. So are you a fan of wrestling? I'm guessing so, lol.

Hey Catmoongirl, on your page you stated that "Since I'm still a little new with Wikipedia, I've been sticking to reverting vandalism and trying to learn how to better contribute to articles."

Here is my question, "How do you go about finding vandalism"? Do you constantly visit pages and look at the history? Or, is there a way to be notified if someone makes a change? Thanks for the info. gordo

I would be happy to show you how to to update your user page if you would like. Leave a message on my talk page. have a great day! Qwazywabbit 16:46, 17 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey There!! nice user page  :) Qwazywabbit^{Msg me} 21:50, 18 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You own a Russian Blue, too? Awesome! (You have a cute 1!) I have A russian blue and a russian white. Happy editing! --LifeloverElena 02:43, 20 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not undo my edits regarding to Porifera section. The section that I fixed and that you messed up again had the following problems.

1. sponges are not the most primitive metazoans. They are extant, and while they have some primitive characteristics, the phylum Placozoa is argued to be as or more "primitive", if you will.

2. Sponges are still considered to be sister to Eumetazoa, that is what "basal means, so the next sentence is incorrect.

3. The paper from Werner Muellers group which is cited as evidence that sponges are the most basal metazoans shows no such thing, nor does it have priority on the topic.

4. sponges are not thought to be remotely similar to Volvox or an other volvocacean alga - the protists to which they are similar are the choanoflagellates.

5. Inclusion of sponge cell dissociation and re-aggregation is inappropriate in the introductory paragraph of the "taxonomy" section.

What exactly are your credentials with respect to this topic? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.175.45.83 (talk) 03:15, August 20, 2007 (UTC)

Hello!

I am contacting all registered wikipedia editors and admins that have contributed to the Snaps (game) article to let them know the page is now being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy.

If you wish, please share your thoughts at this article's entry on the Articles for deletion page. I look forward to any comments or thoughts you have on this manner! --Brian_{(view my history)}/^{(How am I doing?)} 06:59, 12 September 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I put in a request for comment on the section currently titled "Very Different From Hippies and Grateful Dead Fans" due to the reversions by the section's author. I have added a POV tag, the RfC and also reported him for 3RR violation due to the arbitrariness of his stance. If you care to, would you check the talk section and the section in question and add your comments? Thanks! Wildhartlivie 07:20, 25 October 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, Catmoongirl. You are cordially invited to join the Genetics WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to genetics. We've noticed that you have an interest in the field, and may be interested in joining Wikipedia's dedicated collaborative effort. We look forward to working with you in the project! – Liveste (talk • edits) 13:50, 10 May 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You are receiving this automated message because your userpage appears in Category:Wikipedians interested in genetics.

I-LoVe-ChOcYz (talk) 02:25, 3 August 2008 (UTC) Hey there, I'm Rochelle and I was wondering how you got your page so like it is!!!Reply[reply]

I'm a really big cat fanatic and I absoulutely love Persian Blues, and Himilayans!! I'm also a slickser for Tabbys!! Plase reply it would be nice to chat!!

Thankyou, Rochelle I-LoVe-ChOcYz (talk) 02:25, 3 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've seen your picture in commons, you're wonderful :-) Cheers Jeriby (talk) 00:20, 11 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

WikiWomen Unite!

Hi Catmoongirl! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative. As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by: Liking the WikiWomen's Collaborative on Facebook and share your tips, projects, and connect with other WikiWomen Join the conversation on our Twitter feed Reading and writing for our blog channel We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can participate! Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 23:24, 9 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]