A claim that someone was involved in a rape, as you have added at the Mitch Davis requires a strong reliable and verifiable source to supportthe claim. Without appropriate sourcing, the claim will be removed. Alansohn (talk) 03:35, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This source has been confirmed and by Alansohn removing it, they are removing facts. They did not experience the rape and they are not allowed to do this even if they dislike it. It says so in the rules.

What source? 98.248.32.178 (talk) 03:40, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was the victim and Mitch Davis was the instigator of this rape. Any sexual act occuring to a person or persons under the age of 14 is an automatic rape charge. Secondly, I filed the complaint with the bishopric counsel ( see Mormon excommunication ) and they are in the process of trying to find a way across state lines. My name is Carolyn Jaska and I am Mitch's first cousin. It is important that people know that someone who is promoting the LDS church know that a person of this low caliber is representing them.

You shouldn't be editing the article at all. 98.248.32.178 (talk) 03:50, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't said he's guilty but I can provide documentation, and I don't have to show it to you. You ignore all the wrong information in other articles but when the truth is provided for one, you need the need to remove it? You are not an admin, so you need to stop deleting this, and seriously get a life.

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Mitch Davis. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 04:17, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been indefinitely blocked for the addition of unsourced, libelous information. If you would like to appeal this, follow the instructions on the block message you are now receiving. alphachimp 04:20, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]