🌸
🌱
The article F102 highway (Nigeria) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No explanation or sources to why this is notable.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
@SamX, thanks for your recent work at CCI. If you're wondering about any particular articles, feel free to ask me. I may be able to provide either where I got information from, or tell you if I remember closely paraphrasing or writing from scratch. Not sure if this will be useful, but I'd like to make the CCI as easy as possible for everyone. Chamaemelum (talk) 03:41, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi Chamaemelum,
Your offer to help out with the CCI is greatly appreciated, and I've decided to take you up on it. I don't have any questions about specific articles yet, but I do have some more general questions that will help me determine the proper strategy for working through your CCI:
Answering these questions would make my work much easier. I'm pretty busy with university coursework at the moment and your CCI is a fairly complex case compared to some others, so I've been spending time working through simpler cases. Progress on your CCI will probably be slow and incremental, but I'll try my best to get it closed sometime in the next six months or so. Again, I really appreciate your offer to help out.
Thanks, — SamX [talk · contribs] 01:39, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Chamaemelum (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am requesting an appeal of my site-ban on July 13, 2023. After reflecting on the discussions and feedback provided, I would like to sincerely apologize for the disruption I have caused. It was never my intention to be a detriment to Wikipedia. I admit that I made mistakes in my approach, such as arguing instead of collaborating, and making overly bold edits without proper discussion. I realize that my actions, while well-intentioned, ended up consuming a disproportionate amount of volunteer time and energy.
I’ve internalized the feedback I’ve received. If given another opportunity, I commit to:
1. Slowing down my editing pace and making smaller, incremental changes
2. Promptly dropping disagreements if consensus is not emerging in my favor
3. Focusing intently on collaboration and discussion on talk pages before making substantive edits (or, preferably, just avoiding making edits that might require this)
4. Contributing to less controversial topics to rebuild trust
5. Familiarizing myself with guidelines more before editing
Wikipedia is an incredible and fun project. I want to be a productive contributor, so I’m asking for a second chance to demonstrate that I can contribute positively. I am ready to abide by any extra conditions necessary to allow a return to editing.
The catalyst to this request, though, isn’t a desire to edit pages as usual, but to clean up and fix existing pages I’ve created or edited in the past. (I don’t want to add content; I want to fix my own old edits–though being allowed to edit more broadly would be welcome of course too.) Thank you all for considering. I appreciate it, and I will respect the outcome of this appeal.
Chamaemelum (talk) 01:17, 27 April 2024 (UTC)Notes:
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
((Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Hello,
I am requesting an appeal of my site-ban on July 13, 2023. After reflecting on the discussions and feedback provided, I would like to sincerely apologize for the disruption I have caused. It was never my intention to be a detriment to Wikipedia. I admit that I made mistakes in my approach, such as arguing instead of collaborating, and making overly bold edits without proper discussion. I realize that my actions, while well-intentioned, ended up consuming a disproportionate amount of volunteer time and energy.
I’ve internalized the feedback I’ve received. If given another opportunity, I commit to:
1. Slowing down my editing pace and making smaller, incremental changes
2. Promptly dropping disagreements if consensus is not emerging in my favor
3. Focusing intently on collaboration and discussion on talk pages before making substantive edits (or, preferably, just avoiding making edits that might require this)
4. Contributing to less controversial topics to rebuild trust
5. Familiarizing myself with guidelines more before editing
Wikipedia is an incredible and fun project. I want to be a productive contributor, so I’m asking for a second chance to demonstrate that I can contribute positively. I am ready to abide by any extra conditions necessary to allow a return to editing.
The catalyst to this request, though, isn’t a desire to edit pages as usual, but to clean up and fix existing pages I’ve created or edited in the past. (I don’t want to add content; I want to fix my own old edits–though being allowed to edit more broadly would be welcome of course too.)
Thank you all for considering. I appreciate it, and I will respect the outcome of this appeal.
<span style="color:darkblue;"><b>[[User:Chamaemelum|<span style="color:green;">Chamaemelum</span>]]</b></span> (<span style="color:red;"><i>[[User talk:Chamaemelum|<span style="color:purple;">talk</span>]]</i></span>) 01:17, 27 April 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~))
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting ((subst:Decline reason here))
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
((unblock reviewed |1=Hello,
I am requesting an appeal of my site-ban on July 13, 2023. After reflecting on the discussions and feedback provided, I would like to sincerely apologize for the disruption I have caused. It was never my intention to be a detriment to Wikipedia. I admit that I made mistakes in my approach, such as arguing instead of collaborating, and making overly bold edits without proper discussion. I realize that my actions, while well-intentioned, ended up consuming a disproportionate amount of volunteer time and energy.
I’ve internalized the feedback I’ve received. If given another opportunity, I commit to:
1. Slowing down my editing pace and making smaller, incremental changes
2. Promptly dropping disagreements if consensus is not emerging in my favor
3. Focusing intently on collaboration and discussion on talk pages before making substantive edits (or, preferably, just avoiding making edits that might require this)
4. Contributing to less controversial topics to rebuild trust
5. Familiarizing myself with guidelines more before editing
Wikipedia is an incredible and fun project. I want to be a productive contributor, so I’m asking for a second chance to demonstrate that I can contribute positively. I am ready to abide by any extra conditions necessary to allow a return to editing.
The catalyst to this request, though, isn’t a desire to edit pages as usual, but to clean up and fix existing pages I’ve created or edited in the past. (I don’t want to add content; I want to fix my own old edits–though being allowed to edit more broadly would be welcome of course too.)
Thank you all for considering. I appreciate it, and I will respect the outcome of this appeal.
<span style="color:darkblue;"><b>[[User:Chamaemelum|<span style="color:green;">Chamaemelum</span>]]</b></span> (<span style="color:red;"><i>[[User talk:Chamaemelum|<span style="color:purple;">talk</span>]]</i></span>) 01:17, 27 April 2024 (UTC) |decline = ((subst:Decline reason here)) ~~~~))
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
((unblock reviewed |1=Hello,
I am requesting an appeal of my site-ban on July 13, 2023. After reflecting on the discussions and feedback provided, I would like to sincerely apologize for the disruption I have caused. It was never my intention to be a detriment to Wikipedia. I admit that I made mistakes in my approach, such as arguing instead of collaborating, and making overly bold edits without proper discussion. I realize that my actions, while well-intentioned, ended up consuming a disproportionate amount of volunteer time and energy.
I’ve internalized the feedback I’ve received. If given another opportunity, I commit to:
1. Slowing down my editing pace and making smaller, incremental changes
2. Promptly dropping disagreements if consensus is not emerging in my favor
3. Focusing intently on collaboration and discussion on talk pages before making substantive edits (or, preferably, just avoiding making edits that might require this)
4. Contributing to less controversial topics to rebuild trust
5. Familiarizing myself with guidelines more before editing
Wikipedia is an incredible and fun project. I want to be a productive contributor, so I’m asking for a second chance to demonstrate that I can contribute positively. I am ready to abide by any extra conditions necessary to allow a return to editing.
The catalyst to this request, though, isn’t a desire to edit pages as usual, but to clean up and fix existing pages I’ve created or edited in the past. (I don’t want to add content; I want to fix my own old edits–though being allowed to edit more broadly would be welcome of course too.)
Thank you all for considering. I appreciate it, and I will respect the outcome of this appeal.
<span style="color:darkblue;"><b>[[User:Chamaemelum|<span style="color:green;">Chamaemelum</span>]]</b></span> (<span style="color:red;"><i>[[User talk:Chamaemelum|<span style="color:purple;">talk</span>]]</i></span>) 01:17, 27 April 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~))
As you were banned by a community discussion, there must be a community discussion to remove the ban. Is this the statement you would like transferred to a noticeboard for discussion? 331dot (talk) 09:00, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Chamaemelum. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "F102 highway".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:04, 5 May 2024 (UTC)