Please stop converting navboxes back to the dots and away from the list formatting, per WP:HLIST. --IznoRepeat (talk) 17:19, 4 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also, please stop changing the capitalization. That's generally inappropriate for navboxes. --IznoRepeat (talk) 17:01, 10 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Capital letters: "Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization. Most capitalization is for proper names or for acronyms and initialisms. Wikipedia relies on sources to determine what is a proper name". Some of your recent edits to templates and article ledes may have to be reverted.

Note that unjustified removal of citations, links and sidebars (List of political parties in Venezuela, Anarchism, Fascism, List of ongoing military conflicts) could be construed as vandalism. Please explain your edits, either on talk pages or in edit summaries. Also don't remove red links; sometimes, those serve to indicate that an ambiguity is well-known, and a page needs to be written. --Omnipaedista (talk) 03:39, 22 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I noted that you have renamed the template title (here) about the Colombia civil armed confict to 'Civil War'. Your edit has been reverted. Wikipedia relies on sources to determine what is a proper title in such cases. --04:27, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Do not bold-face foreign terms as you did here. Please read Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section#Foreign language: "Do not boldface foreign names not normally used in English, or variations included only to show etymology". --Omnipaedista (talk) 04:27, 22 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You need to state why you believe it should be merged on the talk page of the article you want it merged to.Talk:Before_Watchmen#merge_discussion Dream Focus 22:20, 10 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please stop deleting the hatnote from the top of the article. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:05, 12 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Jim1138 (talk) 04:00, 12 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Liberalism in Russia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Party of Democratic Reform (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 26 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Charles, I reverted your headline changes in the article Namibia. There certainly could be better headline wording, but your choices did in my opinion not improve the article (e.g., prehistory is normally used for the time before human settlement, South African Namibia is an oxymoron because the South Africans were suppressing the name "Namibia", and under German colonialisation the name "Namibia" did not yet exist).

Please discuss such changes on the talk page first, particularly for top-importance Wikipedia articles. Cheers, Pgallert (talk) 03:59, 12 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The state ideology of North Korea is Juche, the ideology of the Workers' Party of Korea is Kimilsungism-Kimjongilism. --TIAYN (talk) 20:43, 17 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

And [1] is about your VERY misguided efforts. --Niemti (talk) 03:04, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Can you please explain why are you performing controversial moves without seeking consensus? A threat at the Administrator's noticeboard about you has been opened. I suggest you to please elaborate about such actions there. Thanks. — ṞṈ 03:05, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please stop moving pages without any sort of prior discussion, or even explanation, as to why. You recently moved 1991 uprisings in Iraq without any sort of discussion, and it appears to be something you've been doing elsewhere. Please stop this. In this case, go to the talk page of the article, and start a discussion, and only move it if you find consensus for the move. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 15:25, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There are two sections on the Militaries by Country list. One is for countries and the other is for territores. So please leave it alone! tom991

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

First Liberian Civil War (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Liberian Civil War

First Sudanese Civil War (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sudanese Civil War

Second Sudanese Civil War (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sudanese Civil War

War in Darfur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sudanese Civil War

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 9 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Charles,

I revert to World Uygur Youth Congress, which is the organization which has been officially designated. We can not presume that World Uygur Congress is designated as well (or find a good reference that both names refer to the same group, not a subgroup). See http://www.china-embassy.org/eng/xw/t56257.htm Nicolas1981 (talk) 04:12, 14 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Charles,

Thanks for your contributions to List of designated terrorist organizations! Unfortunately, two of the references you cited seem to not exist anymore: http://www.cdi.org http://www.guardiacivil.org/terrorismo/grupos/lista.jsp

If you could find where these pages have been moved that would be great! Meanwhile I had to revert.

Keep up the great work! Nicolas1981 (talk) 02:38, 31 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Constant moves of historical and war articles by a single user with no consensus regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

I notice you moved Iraqi insurgency (post-U.S. withdrawal) to a new name without ANY FORM of discussion or consensus on the subject. You should go to the talk page of the article, start a discussion, and only move it if you find consensus for the move. I see from the messages above and your edit history that you are doing this a lot, so as a precaution I am adding your user name to the Administrator's noticeboard pending possible actions against the account. Skycycle (talk) 15:59, 31 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please respond to the above at WP:ANI#Constant moves of historical and war articles by a single user with no consensus. Failure to respond could result in sanctions, including loss of editing privileges. KillerChihuahua 22:56, 31 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for responding. Consider yourself under a self-imposed ban from moving articles. I suggest in the future you be more responsive to other editors' concerns; it should not take an ANI thread and an admin telling you that you risk losing editing privileges for you to respond to others. Try to work more with your fellow editors, respect their concerns, and discuss disagreements with them. KillerChihuahua 00:11, 1 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please justify re-adding Benin to the infobox on the talk page, I justified removing it. --Golbez (talk) 01:33, 7 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Similar issues as with a previous article above:

Please stop deleting the hatnote from the top of the article. Thank you.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks!

--Josh Triplett (talk) 04:34, 17 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Appalling POV merging by Emmette Hernandez Coleman of Flag of WS/Flag of the SADR. Thank you. —Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 07:39, 21 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There's a discussion you might be interested in at Talk:Coat_of_arms_of_the_Sahrawi_Arab_Democratic_Republic#Move?. I'm telling you this because you were involved in Talk:Flag_of_Western_Sahara#Merger proposal and/or Talk:Flag_of_Western_Sahara#UNMERGING_ARTICLES. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 20:57, 13 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	For editing Donghak Peasant Revolution, although not being a bot or AWB. Seonoo of Kim (ANSWER IN MY T.A.L.K. P.A.G.E!!!!!!!!!) 07:39, 27 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Charles, I see you've added a bunch of articles to Category:Political parties in South Africa that are already members of Category:Defunct political parties in South Africa. The thing is, the "defunct" category is a subcategory of the main category, so articles in the "defunct" category shouldn't also be included in the main category. This is explained at Wikipedia:Categorization#Categorizing pages, which says, "In addition, each categorized page should be placed in all of the most specific categories to which it logically belongs. This means that if a page belongs to a subcategory of C (or a subcategory of a subcategory of C, and so on) then it is not normally placed directly into C." Regards - htonl (talk) 17:20, 2 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, same with sub-categories of Category:Political parties in Egypt. Articles that are already members of Category:Coalitions of parties in Egypt, Category:Communist parties in Egypt‎ Category:Defunct political parties in Egypt‎, Category:Islamic parties in Egypt‎, or Category:Liberal parties in Egypt‎ should not additionally be directly included in the main category. Could you please revert your own edits to restore the old order. Thank you. Kind regards --RJFF (talk) 17:29, 2 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Charles,

it has been explained to you more than once: please do not add higher level categories to an article, if the page is already in a sub-category of this category. If it is in the sub-category, it is automatically also in the superordinated category. Thank you. --RJFF (talk) 09:54, 17 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have undone some of your edits, but I do not have the time to undo all of them. Could you please undo yourself? (Tunisian, Bulgarian and Iraqi parties) Thanks. --RJFF (talk) 09:55, 17 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Again! Why are you doing this? Can you please stop? --RJFF (talk) 18:57, 17 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not move hatnotes under maintenance templates. Per WP:Hatnote#Placement:

Hatnotes are placed at the very top of the article, before any other items such as images, navigational templates and maintenance templates (like the "cleanup", "unreferenced", and "POV" templates). Text-only browsers and screen readers present the page sequentially. If a reader has reached the wrong page, they typically want to know that first.

Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:38, 5 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

As the leading editor in terms of edit count of ((The Children of the Corn Series)), I am alerting you to the discussion about the use of derivative works templates in author bio articles at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Novels#Derivative works and cultural references templates. We are discussing whether they should be removed from or collapsed or left alone in the author's articles.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:52, 3 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey Charles Essie

I'm sending you this because you've made quite a few edits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :).

So, as you know (or should know - we sent out a centralnotice and several watchlist notices) we're planning to deploy the VisualEditor on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere.

What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default.

The thing that generates the human-readable names and descriptions is a small JSON data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide here, along with a list of prominent templates, although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the Feedback page.

Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:01, 28 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I see that you added a bunch of items to the category "Category:Massacres in Afghanistan."

Massacres are an intentional or indiscriminate killing of a group of people who should not have been targeted. Accidents and fog-of-war incidents are not massacres. The sinking of the Titanic was not a massacre, no matter how much negligence one might want to attribute to it. Neither was the 2007 Shinwar shooting. These various incidents had all been investigated. Bad things happen in war, which is why legitimate armies wear uniforms, and why legitimate critics were supposed to demand that insurgents distinguish themselves from civilians.

This has been discussed before, and it was eventually decided to create a separate category for these other incidents. That's why we have the cat for "Category:Civilian casualties in the War in Afghanistan (2001–present)."

I realize that some people like to make moral judgments, and call a tragedy a "massacre" because it feels wrong when you don't look at the entire picture. But, if you'll notice, the same people who claim to care about these things had been unwilling to demand insurgents follow the laws of war. Had they cared enough to have done that, many of these very incidents would never have happened.

-- Randy2063 (talk) 23:54, 30 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Background and causes of the Iranian Revolution may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:20, 6 July 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm not sure I entirely understand your grievance, could you please explain it to me. Charles Essie (talk) 17:25, 6 July 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timeline of the Iranian Revolution, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Beheshti and Mehr (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 7 July 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Charles! It would be very helpful if you could drop by Talk:2011_Kurdish_protests_in_Iraq#merge and give your input. Thanks! ~ Zirguezi 19:15, 10 July 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Charles. Just thank you for creating Category:People of the Iranian Revolution. Cheers.Farhikht (talk) 09:01, 19 July 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey Charles, just want to inform you that I've been removing the category "Arab nationalists" from various articles, including that of Gamal Abdel Nasser, because it's redundant. Articles that already have cats such as "Arab nationalist blank" or "blank Arab nationalists" don't require the additional inclusion of the parent category, which is "Arab nationalists." With Nasser, because we already have "Arab nationalist heads of state", "Arab nationalist thinkers" and "Egyptian Arab nationalists," adding the parent cat would just be overkill. --Al Ameer (talk) 00:33, 1 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What is your rationale for putting practically all Lebanese civil war militias into this category? What does it have to do with "rebellion"? Militias are not "rebels" by definition. FunkMonk (talk) 17:08, 24 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

They were rebel groups because they did answer to the government and they fighting for their own vision of what the Lebanese state should be. Charles Essie (talk) 17:32, 24 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

But they did not fight the state (since there practically wasn't one), they fought each other. I have requested a rename, no sources I have ever encountered label these militias as "rebel groups". FunkMonk (talk) 17:36, 24 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You're entitled to remove them from the category, and maybe create a new category for the militias, but I would request keeping a separate rebel group category. Charles Essie (talk) 17:41, 24 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

But that's the point, there's nothing that could be put in that category. Apart from maybe Fatah al-Islam, but they were never labelled a rebel group by anyone, and they were not even Lebanese mostly. FunkMonk (talk) 17:44, 24 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Okay, fine, do whatever you want, I don't care anymore. Charles Essie (talk) 21:13, 24 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What we want or care about is irrelevant, it is all about what's accurate and supported by sources. FunkMonk (talk) 21:24, 24 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! --RJFF (talk) 14:05, 8 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1969 Libyan coup d'état, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Free Officers Movement (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 17 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:Romanian Revolution. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:Romanian Revolution redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). BDD (talk) 23:12, 29 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear Charles Essie

As a Wikipedian interested in African subjects and specifically Uganda, we thought you might be interested in the following opportunity.

WikiAfrica is looking for a Wikipedian in Community from Uganda to play a pivotal role in its Kumusha Takes Wiki project. This might be a position that you would consider. Or it could be the perfect opportunity for someone you know from this country, please spread the word! For more details, please look at this page: http://www.wikiafrica.net/call_for_wir_en/

If you have any questions about the above, please contact isla on isla [at] wikiafrica [dot] net : Isla Haddow (talk)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to United States support of authoritarian regimes may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[[Ferdinand Marcos]] ([[Philippines]]) )1965–86)<ref>http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/nsa/publications/philippines/philippines.html</ref><ref>http://

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:46, 10 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Communism in Vietnam may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Most notable were the organizations led by [[Hoang Co Minh|Hoàng Cơ Minh]] from the US, Võ Đại Tôn] from Australia, and Lê Quốc Túy from France. Hoàng Cơ Minh was killed during an ambush in Laos. Võ

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:09, 19 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Revolutionary terror, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page White Terror (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 13 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That link was already pointed to the disambiguation page, I just changed the spelling a little bit. Charles Essie (talk) 14:41, 13 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Greetings, this notice is to let you know that numerous categories which you created have been nominated for deletion. The discussion is at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2013 December 23#Fooian revolutionaries. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:52, 23 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Charles, I notice you have made maintenance edits on LGBT rights articles, adding categories (which is good) and removing blank lines. I don't really see why you are removing these lines, since it does not make any visual difference, while having such blank lines in the source code increases readability of the code. Now the references, templates and categories right after each other, which is less readable. Regards, SPQRobin (talk) 17:46, 24 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Red Cossacks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ukrainian Republic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 28 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I made no such link, excuse me, but where are getting information? Charles Essie (talk) 16:35, 28 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

i see you edited the Zhi Xian Party, i wonder if the party is banned and if so it must be said in the article, i found this: http://www.forbes.com/sites/hengshao/2013/12/17/bizarre-china-report-the-grand-wedding-power-play-smog-inspired-creativity/ founders of a brand political new party filed a lawsuit against the beijing ministry of civil affairs last week after the ministry suprisingly declared zhixian-or supreme consittution party, violated existing laws by carrying out activities as an ungregistred social organisation........founders of the zhiaxian party were clearly displeased with their party a political enitity being labeled as a mere "social organisation" in a bold power play zhixian party issued a formal announcement rescinding the ministry attemlpt to outlaw the party. chinese constution olny prohibits opposition to the ccp one one the founders said but not the establishment of new political parties which manifestly is a downright diffrent matter......Not hard to guess what the official response would be, but let’s quote the spokesman for the mysterious United Front Work Department of the CCP Central Committee, at a Q&A session in 2011: “The Communist Party of China and eight democratic parties essentially represent all social classes and groups. The multiparty cooperation system has a broad coverage. Therefore there is no need to establish new political parties.” does this mean that the party is banned? and if so it must be said in the article, can you please help me? Ionchari (talk) 08:50, 8 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Greetings, were you proposing to merge the revolution article "into" or "from" the 2 others? Because i checked the tag in all 3 articles and all say "into", which sounds a bit weird. Can you please check back? Thanks. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 22:30, 7 February 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Done Charles Essie (talk) 22:33, 7 February 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 23:30, 7 February 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Egyptian Revolution of 2013 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Egyptian Revolution of 2013 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.GreyShark (dibra) 19:30, 17 February 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2011–13 Russian protests, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Communism in Russia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ukraine without Kuchma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Berkut (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 4 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Beavis and Butt-head may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Head are working the late shift at Burger World) and also having him almost say the forbidden word (such as one time when he sang "Liar, liar, pants on..." and pausing before "fire" (''Liar! Liar!'').

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:18, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Governance of the Gaza Strip may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Minister]].<ref>((cite news| title = Hamas battles for control of Gaza | publisher= [The Guardian]]. 16 June 2007|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2007/jun/16/israel.comment | location=

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:44, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I commented there, also on your question on the Russian revolution. 83.83.1.229 (talk) 22:52, 29 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Eurasian Economic Union may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• The Eurasian Commission can take decisions on not only the customs policy]p of the union but also on the macro-economy, the competition regulations, the energy policy and

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:09, 9 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mansoor Hekmat may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[Category:Iranian communists]]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:46, 11 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Federation of Democrats (South Africa) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * http://www.federationofdemocrats.co.za/ Federation of Democrats Official Site]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:54, 29 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A little imprecise definition. Laws and the state power always work so, in almost all countries. So, <Putinism> is something else than only <for friends - everything, for enemies - the law>. The lema <Putinism>, but also its positive position moments. So, for example, for himself Mr. Pesident Putin, as a real man expects nothing other than described here <Putinism>.Pinochet22 (talk) 09:01, 20 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Wolverine (character), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 03:20, 27 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:The Sarah Connor Chronicles has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. - adamstom97 (talk) 07:43, 27 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! I undid your recent category change to the Pirate Party of Berlin page in which you changed the category from "Political parties in Germany to "Libertarian parties in Germany". The Pirate Party Germany characterizes itself (according to their website) as "social-liberal-progressive". Do you have anything that states explicitly that the party aligns itself with libertarianism (used here, as in the category, in the American sense of the term)? Interestingly, the only other party in the category is the Party of Reason, a small-government/free market party. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ljpernic (talk • contribs) 14:37, 25 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please state your reasons for describing MAK as "Right to Extreme right". Thank you. Cdh1984 (talk) 14:43, 11 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I didn't do that. All I did was remove Category:Left-wing parties in Algeria because I saw the label "Right to Extreme right". Charles Essie (talk) 15:52, 11 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

My apologies. I've looked again and will put the same question to the person who changed it from "Center-left/left-wing". thanks Cdh1984 (talk) 12:50, 13 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

While it is understood that we're all flying from one article to another surrounding current events, edit summaries such as this are not appreciated as they are WP:UNCIVIL. You should have typed in the correct title of the article rather than a red link. Thank you for your time. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 05:13, 10 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm terribly sorry. I didn't intend for that to come off as rude or demeaning. I was just trying to point out that the article 2013–14 Ukrainian Crisis did infact exist. I'll be more careful in the future. Charles Essie (talk) 14:40, 10 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Not to worry. I was reading high on the temper scale when I whined here. Sorry to have been so indignated when I know you to be a good editor. I'll keep a glass of cold water on hand to throw in my own face when I get hot under the collar! --Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:49, 11 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

All right. Charles Essie (talk) 01:29, 11 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Conflict in the Niger Delta , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Catlemur (talk) 20:42, 28 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If 2014 Hungarian Internet tax protests is expanded to justify the move, send me a heads-up and I will change my vote to Support (or if I don't for some reason, as I do have another life which sometimes keeps me away from Wikipedia, feel free to link to this comment and deem my vote to be changed). Andrewa (talk) 20:03, 26 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I noticed the contributions you've made to the American Left article on and off over the past few years. I like that you added a "lead too short" template [2] , and the other small changes you've made just seem like helpful uncontroversial formatting improvements and small additions that indicate goodwill in a bizarre editing environment.

I found a simple verification failure in the leading reference of the American Left article [3]. As a result, the first sentence or two of the lead changed from one side of falsehood through a day or two of an actual correct and well-referenced description of the American Left before passing over to the other side of falsehood which I point out at [4]. I'm writing about it here because I thought you might find it interesting and funny. There isn't much I can do about it, and I'm not recommending that you try to engage with certain other editors there. They seem to be too far gone down a path away from building an encyclopedia in my view. Flying Jazz (talk) 01:10, 28 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Charles. Could you stop removing articles from Category:Political parties in Israel? The sub-categories you are putting them into contain both extant and defunct parties, so the top level category is still required as an indicator of current status.

Also, I saw you added Agudat Yisrael and Degel HaTorah to Category:Far-right political parties in Israel and Category:Religious Zionist political parties in Israel. Neither of these parties fit either category (particularly not the Religious Zionist one!) - could you be a bit more careful? Cheers, Number 57 18:40, 28 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry about that. I'll stop. Charles Essie (talk) 19:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No problem, thanks! Number 57 20:05, 28 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Charles. I noticed that you removed Rally for Democracy and Socialism from Category:Political parties in Burkina Faso, I guess because it is also in Category:Socialist parties in Burkina Faso. Can I make the same request ask above? Socialist parties categories contain both active and defunct parties, so active parties always need to be kept in the top level category. Cheers, Number 57 10:00, 1 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User Ridland changed the title of the article from 2014 to 2013 unilaterally, without discussion and less than 10 days after we agreed with a majority consensus to name it as it was (per WP policy at least a month has to pass since the last consensus). Can you ask an administrator at the noticeboard to review the issue and re-redirect the article back to 2014 if he sees it to be proper? EkoGraf (talk) 20:30, 13 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You see my message? EkoGraf (talk) 05:21, 16 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've never done this before. Can you tell me what to do? Charles Essie (talk) 13:02, 16 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry, didn't see your reply. Seems to be OK now, an admin redirected it back to 2014 on his own. EkoGraf (talk) 17:25, 19 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shu'ubiyya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persians. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 30 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, you reverted my edit in Iraq category. Iraq is not an Arab republic but a Republic. Its official name is Republic of Iraq not Arab Republic of Iraq like Egypt. --Helmoony (talk) 19:06, 8 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Iraq is a member of the Arab League, which makes them an Arab state. They're also a republic, which makes them an Arab republic. Charles Essie (talk) 19:48, 8 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Can you just take one minute and open the article Arab republic. Arab republics are republics based on ethnic origin. A republic member of the Arab league is not necessary an Arab republic. --Helmoony (talk) 03:46, 9 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I guess. Charles Essie (talk) 13:27, 9 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eagle of Saladin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arab Socialist Union. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 16 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cambodian–Vietnamese War

added a link pointing to Third Indochina War

Insurgency in Laos

added a link pointing to Third Indochina War

Sino-Vietnamese War

added a link pointing to Third Indochina War

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please help to edit it. Saifeng3 (talk) 09:11, 11 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Charles. I was rather surprised to see these categories suddenly deleted (I don't watchlist categories I create). The whole purpose of creating them was to separate extant and defunct alliances, so that defunct ones would appear as a sub-category of "Defunct political parties in Fooland". Now there is no way of knowing from their categorisation whether they are extant or not. Half of the comments in the discussion are either unaware of (or simply ignore) the fact that we have the Defunct parties category...

I really would have appreciated you discussing with me why I created them first before you nominated them for deletion, so I could have explained why there is a need for them. Please consider this in future. Thanks, Number 57 12:44, 18 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm sorry. I guess I figured that you would join the conversation. It was wrong of me to make that assumption. Charles Essie (talk) 13:44, 18 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No problem, lesson learnt from my point of view too. I already have nearly 9,500 articles on my watchlist, and had never bothered with categories, so perhaps I will in future. Cheers, Number 57 13:58, 18 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Internal Macedonian Revolutionary Organization – Democratic Party for Macedonian National Unity may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:57, 25 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I reverted for technical reasons. Sometimes, this works, but others it doesn't. --B.Lameira (talk) 00:39, 22 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No problem. Charles Essie (talk) 00:57, 22 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Charles. I'm sure I've asked a couple of times before, but could you please stop removing extant political parties from the main "Political parties in Fooland" categories. The subcategories contain both extant and defunct parties, so the main category is the only place where all the extant parties can be listed (as opposed to the Defunct category). Thanks, Number 57 21:03, 31 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'll try to remember this time. Charles Essie (talk) 21:35, 31 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks! Number 57 21:41, 31 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

• Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Communism in Russia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Red Guards. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 10 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Charles Essie ! Just for the record of my renamed / deleted categories, could you notify me on my talk page ? Stefanomione (talk) 22:53, 23 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry about that, I'll try to remember to do that in the future. Charles Essie (talk) 15:29, 25 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Muammar Gaddafi into Federation of Arab Republics. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted ((copied)) template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 20:55, 22 July 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Does this also apply when creating a draft page that hasn't yet been made into an article? Charles Essie (talk) 17:37, 22 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Russian nationalism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rodina. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 29 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Charles, I'd like to explain to you in good faith why I restored my removal on the Slobodan Milošević article. Essentially, when an editor takes something off, he is left with emptiness in the spot where the statement once stood and as such, there is no place to add sources. You say that the "experts" claimed Milošević was a nationalist. In fact, when you think about it, there is no "expert knowledge" required when labelling a nationalist. Despite its bad coverage, the individual merely adopts the ideology and from here, he projects his own self as a nationalist. There are a lot of nationalists in modern-day Serbian politics, the President Toma Nikolić identifies as one, and famously there is Vojislav Šešelj and a host of high profile figures, none with anything they would even wish to hide: there is a far-left and far-right more or less in every society.

With regards Milošević, it is indeed the case that from early on, his international opponents in western Europe and the United States labelled him a "nationalist", and it is also the case that many mainstream sources (i.e. those the community call "reliable") frequently parroted the label. None of this though explores the concept of Serbian nationalism, and if anything, most have proven that they are not even sure what Serbian nationalism entails in the first place. The most common ideology is one of Greater Serbia, and Milošević's name was linked to this concept right from 1991 until very recent years: although many knew this was never the case, even the modern scholars seem to have conceded this notion now, particularly after the disclosures in the thousands-of-pages judgement on Radovan Karadžić which just about deemed the connection beetween Milošević and Greater Serbia an absurdity (though not in such direct words).

However you look at it, Milošević's detractors needed a "strong case" to oppose him, and to be honest and say that he was simply a hardliner who was not willing to give up Yugoslavia wasn't "corrupt" enough for them, so they created a number of fanciful theories as to how the remaining Pan-Slavic state with Montenegro and the support for Serb breakaway states in Bosnia and Croatia somehow amounted to a "Greater Serbia" on the bottleneck premise of "one man giving the orders across this vast area". In fact, not only did Milošević eventually sign the Dayton Accords (which he did not have to do as he was not a Bosnian Serb), he never interfered with or tried to influence the four failed peace talks prior to Dayton which dated back to 1992. I should add that two of these were agreed by the Serbian representatives and on neither occasion did Milošević's hammer come down. I should note that even regarding the two peace talks that the Serbs rejected, they still attended and considered a proposal which they knew in advance would result in a sovereign Bosnia and Herzegovina, something no right-minded Serbian nationalist would consider (which when you reflect, even raises question marks now just how nationalistic the Bosnian Serb leadership was). Another thing is that it is impossible to equate Serbian nationalism with the continuation of Serbia in a Pan-Slavic union with Montenegro, a region claimed as "Serb" by nationalists and not "independent of it". Other inconsistencies include the peaceful withdrawal from Macedonia (another Serbian heartland to the nationalists), and the creation of FR Yugoslavia in 1992 singularly excluding Serb-held territories in Croatia and Bosnia. It would have been far easier for a nationalist to declare a "Serb state" to include all desires areas, and eradicate a Montenegrin entity. However, it had been Montenegrins representing a Montenegrin interest that kept Montenegro united with Serbia.

That said, this is my own analysis. What you might like to know is that the combintation of Milošević with "nationalism" has been discussed among scholars and publishers, and just as some do call him nationalistic, others - and not necessarily all complimentary ones - state clearly that he was not nationalistic. Here are some:

• Read after the highlighted paragraph
• Article on Warsaw Voice
• Branding by avowed nationalist Šešelj as "worst traitor" in Serbian history
• Opinion on Milošević from Momčilo Đujić
• cannot find link - Warren Zimmermann is on record as confessing Milošević was not a nationalist, though he did call him an "opportunist".

So as you can see, this one really is not as simple as calling "Adolf Hitler" a definite "nazi". I hope you see my point here. --OJ (talk) 11:42, 8 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Charles. I noticed you created this category, but I'm not sure it's necessary. The articles in Category:Opinion polling by country are pretty much exclusively for elections. It might have been better to rename the existing categories (perhaps Category:Electoral opinion polling by country etc) rather than create a duplicate that all articles are in twice. Do you have any objections to me suggesting the new category is deleted? Cheers, Number 57 19:27, 14 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Here's my suggestion. We delete my page but we move Category:Opinion polling by country to my page's title (for consistency with Category:Opinion polling for future elections and move all the subcategories accordingly (example; Category:Opinion polling in Australia to Category:Opinion polling for elections in Australia). Charles Essie (talk) 19:36, 14 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Left you a reply at the article's talk page, but also letting you know here I started in my sandbox [5] a rough skeleton of the central article and if you wish you can also help by editing and expanding it while I will also do the same and we will move it to an official article when we done. EkoGraf (talk) 18:39, 18 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't know where to start. I don't have much experience in creating big articles from scratch. Is there any way we could get more people in on this? Charles Essie (talk) 19:59, 18 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I offered Coltsfan over on the talk page to help out if he wants as well. I got one more editor in mind to ask for help. You can also see if anybody else wants to. EkoGraf (talk) 20:24, 18 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm taking some content from the other articles, moving it into this one, cutting down and summarizing it. I think I finished the prelude and 2003 invasion sections, and have moved some content to the insurgency section, but haven't cut it down yet. You can check and see if you can cut it down yourself, or in fact change the wording both in the first two sections I already finished as well as in the 3rd I'm currently on. EkoGraf (talk) 21:05, 18 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Charles Essie. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Can you please explain to me what is achieved by putting people such as Nicolae Iorga in both the Category:Democratic Nationalist Party (Romania) politicians and the parent Category:Romanian nationalists? Dahn (talk) 08:22, 4 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just FYI, if you create categories like Category:Communists_by_nationality_and_political_party by mistake, the best way to get them deleted is not to blank them but to add the ((db-self)) template, which will put them into the deletion process directly rather than relying on another editor to do it for you... <g> Le Deluge (talk) 16:59, 1 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you. Charles Essie (talk) 17:08, 1 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Charles Essie! I saw you recently edited a page related to the Green party and green politics. There is a new WikiProject that has been formed - WikiProject Green Politics and I thought this might be something you'd be interested in joining! So please head on over to the project page and take a look! Thanks for your time. Me-123567-Me (talk) 18:37, 22 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Charles Essie! I saw you recently edited a page related to the Green party and green politics. There is a new WikiProject that has been formed - WikiProject Green Politics and I thought this might be something you'd be interested in joining! So please head on over to the project page and take a look! Thanks for your time. Me-123567-Me (talk) 18:39, 22 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Charles Essie! I saw you recently edited a page related to the Green party and green politics. There is a new WikiProject that has been formed - WikiProject Green Politics and I thought this might be something you'd be interested in joining! So please head on over to the project page and take a look! Thanks for your time. Me-123567-Me (talk) 18:46, 22 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just in case you might not know, some of your category rename proposals of last week could well have been nominated for speedy renaming at this page. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:42, 28 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

I noticed your recent edit to Template:Green Party of the United States‎ does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Me-123567-Me (talk) 23:13, 5 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Opinion polling for the next United Kingdom general election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Green Parties in the United Kingdom. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:02, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You may be interested in this merge discussion. Regards, Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 15:34, 5 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A very rude editor is constantly changing the start date of the 2014-present Iraqi civil war from January 1st to June 4th at the Template:Iraqi Civil War infobox. Per two previous consensus established, where sources were cited for the January start date, it was established it started in January 2014 (when ISIL took over Fallujah and much of Anbar) and the name should be Iraqi Civil War (2014-present). He is constantly reverting back to June instead of January and he has now also removed (2014-present) from the heading of the infobox (this is required since this is the second civil war, the first one, for which we have a separate article, being from 2006 to 2008). I tried pointing out in the edit summaries when reverting him that a consensus was previously established and that he should start a discussion on the talk page if he wants a new consensus (instead of edit warring), he ignored that and simply made insulting comments. He seems to be a new editor (three months of edits) and possibly isn't aware of how discussions and consensus work. Could you help out? Thanks in advance! EkoGraf (talk) 17:02, 11 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Here are the sources that were cited in previous discussions that clearly state the escalation of the new phase and rise of ISIL started in January 2014 with the capture of Fallujah, not in June 2014. We could use these sources for the January 2014 start date. [6][7][8][9][10] EkoGraf (talk) 17:14, 11 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'll try and revert him again using these sources and open a dialogue at his discussion page. But if he does revert me again please try to help to find a compromise, thanks! Between, I was really busy with real-life events recently and had not the time. But at the moment I do, so if you are able to, I could use some help on developing that umbrella article at my sandbox. :) Any help that you can give (make edits) would be appreciated! EkoGraf (talk) 17:18, 11 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I didn't delete United in Europe, I merged all verifiable content to European Parliament election, 2014 (United Kingdom)#Parties and candidates. I also added a hatnote to that section, which you didn't transfer to the article when you reverted. You also didn't link from that section to the restored article. I'll take this to a merge discussion, this is not a notable political party as they failed to get enough press coverage, didn't stand, and soon folded. Fences&Windows 11:53, 4 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Gorani Citizens' Initiative—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. MiguelMadeira (talk) 15:27, 14 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--MiguelMadeira (talk) 15:27, 14 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi I am Glen am autism asking I edit 2017 Qatar diplomatic crisis on wiki page I wonder I edit do right thing I read news article on Fox News about Qatar says UN should play role I want to know I wrote correct on this page? GAJJR (talk) 03:15, 28 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just wondering about all your C2D category nominations of yesterday, why haven't you listed them at the speedy renaming page? Marcocapelle (talk) 04:46, 2 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I wasn't sure if they qualified for it. Charles Essie (talk) 15:19, 2 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm pretty sure they all qualify as a candidate for speedy rename, per WP:C2D as you noted. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:10, 3 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

My mistake I was viewing on mobile and misread the revision history. Apologies.

No worries, the mobile version can be confusing. Charles Essie (talk) 03:44, 13 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Once again at the talk page I voiced my support for the title to be Iraq War (2014-present) as now you proposed it again (as a compromise). Between, I think the IP editor is actually that Ibrahim guy that changed the title without discussion in the first place, but cann't be sure. EkoGraf (talk) 17:54, 19 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Iñaki LL (talk) 13:38, 12 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 1990'sguy was:

The existing sources seem fine, but only two sources are cited -- this article needs many more in-line citations, and it would be a good idea to also find more reliable sources to cite. Way too much of the article is uncited for it to be acceptable to create.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arab Socialist Union and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

1990'sguy (talk) 12:51, 4 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Charles Essie, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 1990'sguy (talk) 12:51, 4 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United Left (East Germany), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Party of Democratic Socialism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 9 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Organizations of the Egyptian Crisis (2011–present), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Oculi (talk) 13:13, 15 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry for the delayed reply. Like I said, I have been really busy trying to keep up with the two jobs and to be honest this entirely slipped my mind. I just converted it into an article Iraq conflict (2003–present). So it would be nice if you could also expand the article a bit. Thanks for reminding me to do this! Sorry again! EkoGraf (talk) 07:32, 20 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No problem and thank you. Charles Essie (talk) 13:57, 20 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi We have Iraqi Republic (1958–68), so I think we should create that article. What is your opinion ? --Panam2014 (talk) 14:10, 22 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm KAP03. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Socialism and Liberty Party have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 23:51, 30 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Charles Essie. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I noticed you reverted my category change, when I removed Category:Elections in Iraq, with the comment "Why? Iraqi Kurdistan is part of Iraq". I agree with the comment, but the reason why is that I have created a new category, "2018 elections in Iraq", which is already part of the category "elections in Iraq".

On that basis, are you ok for this to be removed again? AndrewRT(Talk) 18:32, 1 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oops. I didn’t catch that. My apologies. Charles Essie (talk) 21:25, 1 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Martyr, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Upper Volta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 6 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just to let you know, you need to use <noinclude> when you add categories to these templates, otherwise they mess up the infoboxes. See e.g. what Lebanese general election, 2005 looks like since you categorised all those ones. Cheers, Number 57 17:40, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

My mistake. I think I've fixed them? Charles Essie (talk) 17:48, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Charles,

I came across some of your edits—for example, here, here, here, here, here, and here—and noticed that you are removing the blank lines that separate template code from category code. While this has no visual impact for readers, it does make editing more difficult by creating a massive block of text wherein templates and categories are not easily distinguishable. Therefore, I kindly request you stop making these changes within articles.

Thank you, -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 01:04, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've noticed you are continuing this practice (e.g. here and here). I ask you again to please desist, and at least to engage in a conversation. -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 19:33, 25 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Socialist Party of Ukraine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Violet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 25 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Charles Essie

My name Admiralnelson I wonder you could add new article on led American invoment fight Isis in Syria I think president Trump want pull troop out or something I want add article page here article here article read here or so. ^[1]

^[2] AdmiralNelson (talk) 22:38, 30 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Borotba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Internationalism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 16 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Arab Socialist Union, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 6 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Charles Essie,

I saw your work on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to watch our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself!

And if you're looking for other juicy places to edit, consider adopting a cleanup category or participating in one of our current formal discussions.

Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 12:45, 13 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. You recently altered dozens of articles from Category:Conservatism in the Republic of Ireland to Category:Conservatism in Ireland. That means we now have parties from the Republic of Ireland (only) sharing a category with parties from Northern Ireland (only), which is less than helpful and is, in fact, a dis-improvement. Can you point to where a discussion on this took place, or was it unilateral? Regards, Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 07:35, 2 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It was unilateral and I apologize for not starting a discussion on this. Where should we go from here? Charles Essie (talk) 14:56, 2 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Having looked over the changes I think all of them are proper to the former category rather than the latter; it'd be best to just revert, I think. Or if you think it needs to be discussed, then probably WP:CFD would be the place to do it, with a notice posted at WT:IE. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 16:08, 2 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

How about a partial revert. There's some some stuff in there that might be better suited to an all-Ireland category. Charles Essie (talk) 16:34, 2 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sure - there may be some pre-1922 or cross-border bodies there, but not many. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 18:00, 2 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Charles Essie. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Arab Socialist Union".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl | talk 10:27, 6 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Do you have sources for the parties you added to that catagory? If so, would you add the source and perhaps a few lines in the article. Darkstar1st (talk) 19:43, 9 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Charles, following the success of your nomination at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2018_June_17#Category:Cantons_of_Rojava, please would you update the text of the category pages where required? – Fayenatic London 23:48, 11 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks! Also, should the pages Afrin Canton and Shahba Canton go down from the Regions category into Category:Afrin Region? – Fayenatic London 09:33, 12 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Charles Essie,

In your recent edit, you made a lot of different changes. I noticed two kinds in particular: you added a lot of piped links (like [[Joe Crowley|Joseph Crowley]]) and you removed a lot of red-links (like Seema Singh Perez). Both of these kinds of edits are explicitly discouraged by editing guidelines. The guideline about redlinks is WP:REDLINK; you can read it in detail, but the key bits are

In general, a red link should be allowed to remain in an article if it links to a title that could plausibly sustain an article, but for which there is no existing article, or article section, under any name. Do not remove red links unless you are certain that Wikipedia should not have an article on the subject .... Good red links help Wikipedia—they encourage new contributors in useful directions, and remind us that Wikipedia is far from finished.

Similarly, the guideline about piped links is WP:NOTBROKEN; the key bit is "It is almost never helpful to replace [[redirect]] with [[target|redirect]]."

I would prefer not to do a single revert to your edit; but I also am not inclined to go through and check each of the many changes you made to see whether they are in accordance with these guidelines. Instead, I request that you make a partial revert of your edit, as appropriate.

Thanks for you attention, JBL (talk) 20:08, 6 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I decided to do a full revert. I have no idea what changes "were" appropriate. Charles Essie (talk) 21:01, 6 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:The Beatles templates, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:28, 27 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thank you for working tirelessly on Wikipedia! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 16:43, 13 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You're welcome. Charles Essie (talk) 16:50, 13 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arab nationalism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Damasus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 2 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Charles Essie. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party – Lebanon Region/meta/shortname has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:45, 28 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In the said article Haile's birth name is given as dwayne "the ras" johnson. while hilarious it is clearly wrong and a play on dwayne "the rock" johnson. I dont know how to edit wikipedia and found your profile on the talk page. please rectify this if you see fit or at least introduce the problem to other caretakers of the page. thank you.

Someone already has. Charles Essie (talk) 15:49, 18 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

They're paramilitary, not military, units. Category:Military wings of political parties is a subcategory of Category:Paramilitary organizations. I was cleaning out unqualified entries in the deleted category, and usually explained why in the edit comments, but I seem to have dropped the ball on this one. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:56, 20 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's socialism articles. Did you know there's a WikiProject for editors interested in writing about socialism? If you would like to join, simply click the Join WikiProject button on the WikiProject Socialism page. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the WikiProject Socialism talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! MarioGom (talk) 20:08, 27 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to There's Something About Paulie, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 16:11, 31 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Elections in Iraqi Kurdistan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:43, 3 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:The Pink Panther characters, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. TTN (talk) 17:44, 9 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1895 establishments in Poland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:41, 22 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Transformers robot characters, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. TTN (talk) 16:57, 24 January 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Why do people sometimes put an "n" in my name? You're the second person to do this on Wikipedia recently... (No offence taken. :) And no answer is needed, I'm sure it was just a typo.) Boud (talk) 00:08, 7 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm sorry about that, it was just a typo. As to why, I think it's because "Bound" is commonly used word at that's kind of what your name looks like at first glance. At least, that's why it happened here. Charles Essie (talk) 00:11, 7 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Structure of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union has been nominated for merging with Category:Organization of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page. Place Clichy (talk) 14:44, 29 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Revolutionary wave, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fascist Italy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:04, 3 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I created the article Kurdish-Turkish peace initiatives 1991-2004. It is still expandable though, but quite informative, learned a lot while writing it.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 11:22, 6 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

He was Austrian, not German. And it doesnt appear that German Nationalism defined his politics. Rathfelder (talk) 08:46, 28 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fair enough. But for the record, there are many Austrians who are German nationalists. Being Austrian has nothing to do with it. Charles Essie (talk) 19:15, 28 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Fictional victims of child abuse has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 03:49, 10 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Latin American Spring has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. CDLCR (talk) 21:35, 23 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Arab anarchists has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. czar 19:06, 31 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Charles Essie,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Joseywales1961, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged Wikipedia categories named after political parties in Hungary for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative. Also, you may want to consider working on future articles in draft space first, where they cannot be deleted for lacking content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Joseywales1961)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961 Talk 08:21, 10 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for deleting it. I created it completely by accident. Charles Essie (talk) 17:13, 10 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Left-wing populist parties has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Soman (talk) 00:30, 7 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:2019 disestablishments in Guatemala requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:28, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:1888 establishments in Austria has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Laurel Lodged (talk) 11:30, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:2001 disestablishments in the Czech Republic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:13, 9 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1888 establishments in Austria requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:49, 16 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I recently made some edits on the Azerbaijan Communist Party (AKP) which you undid assuming that it is about the "UPC–CPSU" affiliated party. Though the logo, the site, the general secretary (leader), the founder of the party and many more are based on the "CPSU (2001)" affiliated one. On the other hand I agree that there are characteristics and information from both parties blended in the article. So that's why I suggest, if you know and are sure about specific information on the AKP (UPC-CPSU), to make the appropriate edits and make the article suit to the right party. At the same time either me or you will have to remove and/or replace the stuff that relates the party  to the CPSU (2001).
Alternatively, the article is about the AKP (CPSU (2001)) and the information about it stays in place, while the information about the AKP (UPC-CPSU) gets removed and another article/draft can be suggested for the latter.

In any case I think that a distinction between those two parties should be pretty obvious. Sfoklus (talk) 17:58, 19 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I see your point. Personally, I find the whole thing very confusing. I don't get why Communist Party of Azerbaijan (1996) and Communist Party of Azerbaijan (2011) were deleted or why information about the latter was merged into Azerbaijan Communist Party (1993). I think we should start a discussion in Talk:Azerbaijan Communist Party (1993) to resolve these issues. Charles Essie (talk) 20:28, 19 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Sfoklus: I invite you to join this discussion because the answer to our issue might be here. Charles Essie (talk) 20:43, 19 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1934 disestablishments in Bulgaria indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:31, 10 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello :) I am writing my MA dissertation on Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict, and I noticed that you have contributed to those pages. I will be looking at the process of collaborative knowledge production on the Israel-Palestine conflict, and the effect it has on bias in the articles. This will involve understanding the profiles and motivations of editors, contention/controversy and dispute resolution in the talk pages, and bias in the final article.

For more information, you can check out my meta-wiki research page, where I will be posting my findings when I am done.

I would greatly appreciate if you could take 5 minutes to fill out this quick survey before 8 AUGUST 2021!

Thanks so much,

Sarabnas (talk) 19:18, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1965 in Angola indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:19, 5 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1967 in Angola indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:19, 5 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1969 in Angola indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:20, 5 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1971 in Angola indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:21, 5 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1972 in Angola indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:22, 5 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Venezuelan protests (2014–present) has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. NoonIcarus (talk) 15:00, 31 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

To make your participation at Talk:Tigray War/Archive 4#Requested move 8 November 2021 clearer, you should best add a bullet point with Support or Oppose in the list, although the replies are useful too. Remember that an uninvolved editor will have to read through a possibly quite long discussion, and although the raw numbers of support/oppose are not meant to override the reasoning based on Wikipedia policy, they are still a strong clue. You can use the ((s)) template to strike out your !vote if you change your mind later. Boud (talk) 00:29, 9 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Charles,

I see you have edited the PKK article several times. Your opinion would be needed in Talk:Kurdistan_Workers'_Party#Neutrality_of_the_article as there's a group of Turkish accounts who keep frequently adding terrorist label to the first phrase of the article for Google Knowledge Engine. SkyEditor85 (talk) 16:39, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Charles Essie. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:New Irish Republican Army, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 19 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please see my proposal to speedily rename subcategories of Category:Enforced disappearances by country e.g. Category:Forced disappearances in Argentina to Category:Enforced disappearances in Argentina to align with the parent category per C2C. Hugo999 (talk) 04:26, 23 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Charles Essie. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vended, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:03, 17 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've proposed moving Homosexuality in Macau to LGBT rights in Macau. Please comment in Talk:Homosexuality in Macau. Naraht (talk) 18:35, 29 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Charles Essie. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vended".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:32, 15 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Ongoing protests has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. QueenofBithynia (talk) 18:23, 1 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:DC Animated Universe templates has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 01:30, 11 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi @Charles Essie: I noticed you took out stalinist category. The Comintern folk were dyed in the wool Stalinsts to a man and women. I don't know if it worth knowing that, or if it helps, but I thought it was a bit odd taking it out, although I don't know much about categories. scope_creep^Talk 08:07, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Subcategories such as this don't need to be featured in every parent category in a tree. See here for details. Charles Essie (talk) 08:17, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy New Year!

Charles Essie,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. See this for background context.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 17:08, 3 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding ((subst:Happy New Year fireworks)) to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 17:08, 3 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Charles Essie! Happy New Year to you! :) Listen, i've got some good news for you! The good news is, that you can create a new Category page! The new Category page's name is: Opposition to Viktor Orbán! :) It is similar to Vladimir Putin, and Fidel Castro. You know, the Anti-Viktor Orbán, Anti-Vladimir Putin, and Anti-Fidel Castro, that meaning! :) The United Hungarian Opposition, which is created by Péter Márky-Zay, and the other left-wing opposition politicans, and the opposition political parties, which is the Jobbik, MSZP, Momentum, DK, LMP, PM, The Everybody's Hungary Movement, and the Hungarian Liberal Party. These politicans are hate Viktor Orbán, and they hates the Fidesz and the KDNP, so, these opposition people are Pro-West, Pro-European, Pro-Liberal Democracy, and Pro-LGBTQ movement followers, that are hates Viktor Orbán, and the Far-Right politicans, and the Far-Right movements. And also hates the MHM (Mi Hazánk Mozgalom) (English: Our Homeland Movement). The Our Homeland Movement is splited from the Jobbik, because the Jobbik is now a Centre-Right Wing, and Pro-European party, and the Jobbik's leader is Márton Gyöngyösi, which is he now loves the European Union, and Gyöngyösi is apologized the Ukranian incident, which is the 2014 Crimean Referendum, which is part now the Russian Country, and this Crimean Country is captured by Vladimir Putin, and the Russian Millitary Troops, which is illegal to the West, and the United States, they are not recognized the Russian Crimean Country. Listen Charles Essie, this new Category page, which you can create it, in the English Wikipedia, it is will be similar to Opposition to Vladimir Putin, and Opposition to Fidel Castro Category page. :) I just saying it, that you can create it, because it is really important to everyone, like me, and the other Wikipedia. That's all, have nice day, and Happy New Year again! TomFZ67 (talk) 15:08, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Here it is. Charles Essie (talk) 17:22, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Charles Essie Excellent! :) Thank you very mutch! :) You deserve some beer Charles Essie. :) You're great. TomFZ67 (talk) 17:16, 11 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Greta Van Fleet has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 02:49, 16 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:A Song of Ice and Fire family trees has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 14:02, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1999 disestablishments in Guatemala indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:35, 27 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Venezuelan protests (2014–present) has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. NoonIcarus (talk) 23:07, 25 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:2023 disestablishments in Ecuador indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:54, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Resistance Committee (Ukraine), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– robertsky (talk) 16:46, 6 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Attempted coups d'état by country has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gjs238 (talk) 14:00, 30 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:International Democrat Union former member parties has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 17:32, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Coalition governments of Germany has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 23:01, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]