Welcome, come in! Have a seat and make yourself at home.

Was there something you wanted to talk about?

13 February 2024   News and notes: Wikimedia Russia director declared "foreign agent" by Russian gov; EU prepares to pile on the papers Disinformation report: How low can the scammers go? Gallery: Before and After: Why you don't need to touch grass to dramatically improve images of flora and fauna In the media: Speaking in tongues, toeing the line, and dressing the part Serendipity: Is this guy the same as the one who was a Nazi? Traffic report: Griselda, Nikki, Carl, Jannik and two types of football Crossword: Our crossword to bear Comix: Strongly Single page Front page About Subscribe Suggestions Archives

Sure, what exactly do you want to know? --Marco Craso (talk) 07:40, 24 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Marco Craso: Thanks.

• Can you explain what you mean by: a diffusion cultural?
• What is: a shelter for cultural exchanges?
• teach the public their technical. What does this mean?

That's everything for now, but more questions might come up while I'm editing. --♫CheChe♫ talk 10:36, 25 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

1. I meant something like cultural center for the "diffusion" of the culture to the public. A bad translate from the spanish wikipedia.

2. I used the translator for this one but you don´t have a term for this in the english wikipedia. In spanish this is an albergue and in french that is a auberge de jeunesse. Something like a cheap hostel for yount people.

3. In spanish is "enseñar su técnica" (english does not have a word for this? That is incredible! :D - That is something like teach his "how". Something like the procces and how the artist makes his work. Thank you very much for the effort! --Marco Craso (talk) 10:58, 25 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Marco Craso: Ok, that makes sense. For number 3, would 'techniques' work? Or is it supposed to mean 'how' as in 'artistic process' (i.e. way of being artistic/creative)? --♫CheChe♫ talk 11:04, 25 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also when you say 'promotes itself', does the center provide these courses? (Or just recommended them?) --♫CheChe♫ talk 11:14, 25 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't really know. Maybe is techniques the word. That is just about his work process (not being artistic or creative). For example if the artist is a painter his "técnica" would be how he paints, for teaching children or another people just for educational workshops for schools or old people. --Marco Craso (talk) 11:22, 25 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ok, I've given it a go. Check to make sure I haven't said anything wrong. --♫CheChe♫ talk 11:47, 25 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, thanks for the conversion. Could you fix the typo, should say "shadowing"? And I wonder if a sans-serif font wouldn't be better - at the thumbnail size used in the article the text comes across as a bit difficult. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:17, 29 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Chiswick Chap: Done, and thanks for the diagrams in the first place! Also, if you don't mind, I'm planning to vectorise several others of your diagrams. Best of luck with the coevolution GA nomination. Thanks again, --♫CheChe♫ talk 13:30, 29 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've just made 6 diagrams of the clap and fling flight of the thrips as discovered by Torkel Weis-Fogh. I have a powerpoint file of all of them – if you'd like it, just ask ... I would like a way to edit .SVG files easily, doing it with Inkscape is possible but absolutely horrible; and I don't see an obvious way to get from .PPT to .SVG, which seems extraordinary for something so simple. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:49, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Chiswick Chap: Unfortunately I'm not sure about automated conversions. I personally do all by SVGs by hand (ensures the best quality and smaller file sizes), but I think it should be simple to convert a PDF to SVG. I'm not sure what I would do with a PowerPoint file (except maybe run it through a PDF converter), is it possible to export a PowerPoint file as PDF from PowerPoint (program)? If so, then sending those would be very helpful. —♫CheChe♫ talk 17:12, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I made 2 images, as before, File:Operation Uranus Deception Actual Soviet Dispositions 18 Nov 1942.png and File:Operation Uranus Deception German View 18 Nov 1942.png, and they're in use now. I tried to make the matching .SVG images via PDF and thought I'd succeeded, but the image components seem to have unglued themselves so the images are unusable. (Glum face). We can get them deleted, or better, you might like to overwrite them. They're File:Operation Uranus Deception Actual Soviet Dispositions 18 Nov 1942.svg and File:Operation Uranus Deception German View 18 Nov 1942.svg. Your not-terribly-graphical correspondent, Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:03, 22 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Chiswick Chap: Haha, no problem. I'm always happy to help. I've gone ahead and redrawn them by hand (I can rarely get automated conversion to work myself!), so let me know if there are any inaccuracies. Happy editing! —♫CheChe♫ talk 17:44, 22 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have renominated the article for GA review. —MartinZ (talk) 23:25, 24 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sailor Moon (character), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DIC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 18 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There were five total typos in File:Wasps are Paraphyletic.svg, one that Chiswick Chap spotted and four that I did, including a glaring one "Jew Wasps" instead of "Jewel Wasps". When vectorizing scientific images, or really any that include potentially unfamiliar terminology, it is important to be careful when transcribing text. We have to rely on editors in good standing doing a lot of checking of their own work because we can't review every change in detail. Please double check these sort of things in the future. Your work in vectorizing images is appreciated but attention to detail is critical. —DIYeditor (talk) 23:06, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Whales are Paraphyletic.svg also had one typo. —DIYeditor (talk) 23:21, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@DIYeditor: Goodness that's humbling, thanks for pointing it out. I usually check for spellings once or twice, but I'm not always the best at that sort of thing. I'll make sure to try harder in the future. – Sincere apologies, ♫CheChe♫ talk 17:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC).Reply[reply]

No problem, mistakes happen. Once the images are in vector format it is easy enough to edit them. Ideally other editors could check the conversions. It's valuable to have diagrams in svg. —DIYeditor (talk) 02:15, 25 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello CheChe :)

I'm trying to implement fairy centaur piece, aka mann + knight compounded.

Maybe you know how to properly convert it with inkscape.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Chess_Cet45.svg

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Centaur_on_white_squares.png

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Centaur_on_dark_squares.png

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Chess_diagram

Sunny3113 (talk) 05:19, 1 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Sunny3113: Hi there, happy to help. I've uploaded a new version of Chess_Cet45.svg (now with a transparent background). Is that what you needed? –♫CheChe♫ talk 15:21, 1 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Much appreciated indeed, that scaling looks much better. Unfortunately i only managed to upload white "Centaur" we need black Centaur as well. Maybe you can transform it to black piece. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/c/cb/KnightKing.png Result will be seen in the article below -> Look for variant named "KnightMate" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_chess_variants

Sunny3113 (talk) 18:28, 1 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Sunny3113: No problem. How's this: ?

Very good. The centaur is missing with correct .svg (white and dark squares) here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Chess_diagram | I tried with .png but .svg is the correct format.

	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h
8									8
7									7
6									6
5									5
4									4
3									3
2									2
1									1
	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h

Knightmate starting position

@Sunny3113: Sorry, I don't know what you're asking here, and I'm not sure how the template works. Now that the diagrams are drawn, it might be best to ask again on the template's talk page. If you need any more images just let me know. –♫CheChe♫ talk 14:27, 2 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello CheChe, thanks for the correction. Still, I think the sentence sounds awkward when starting in singular ("A person") and then going to plural ("they..."). Lehayim (talk) 07:04, 23 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Lehayim: Singular they has been around at least since Shakespeare (and I've been using it my whole life). Still, people do often seem uncomfortable with it for some reason. If it makes you feel better, he or she is also acceptable. (Though going round changing all theys to he or shes is crusading if you don't find consensus first). Anyway, happy editing! —♫CheChe♫ talk 10:09, 23 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No worries at all. Just make sure to double-check whether the edit meets the 'vandalism' definition, or if it's a note meant only for internal editing (as was seen there). Nate • (chatter) 16:52, 1 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi CheChe. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! TonyBallioni (talk) 16:09, 3 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Alex Shih (talk) 17:04, 8 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

How is deleting possible Chinese origins vandalism? when the theory is unsound and contradicted by historical facts and timelines?.27.62.106.50 (talk) 12:18, 10 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Alex Shih:I'm very sorry if I reverted something by mistake. Feel more than welcome to correct the issue. I have just started using Huggle and it's doing things I don't expect. Needless to say I'm not using it at the moment, and I'm trying to go back and clean-up / fix anything as we speak. Again, sorry. ♫CheChe♫ talk 12:21, 10 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That wasn't me commenting. Alex Shih (talk) 16:50, 10 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Alex Shih: Sorry, the other editor seems to have jumbled up their message. ♫CheChe♫ talk 16:56, 10 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. Regarding the anti-vandal work you've been doing: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate. They can also be used to give stronger warnings to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Furthermore, users can be far quickly and easily reported to WP:AIV, and make administrator's work in blocking them much simpler, as they can clearly see disregarded warnings relating to recent edits. Thank you. –72 _(talk) 14:27, 10 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@72: Yes, I am aware. I will make an effort to use them more in the future! ♫CheChe♫ talk 14:32, 10 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

♫CheChe♫ please go through these http://ipindiaservices.gov.in/GirPublic/ViewApplicationDetails.aspx?AppNo=533&index=0&pIndex=0&status=1 https://www.outlookindia.com/website/story/finally-west-bengal-wins-the-fight-with-odisha-over-origin-of-rosogolla-gets-gi-/304322 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ami.bangali 2ed (talk • contribs) 10:53, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi CheChe, I see that you have recently been granted the Pending Changes Reviewer right. Please ensure that you do not accept edits that introduce unsourced material, especially to BLPs, as you did here. It is precisely these type of edits I protected the article to prevent. Thank you,--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:55, 17 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Ponyo: Thank you for reviewing my review. However, the reviewing criteria at Wikipedia:Reviewing_pending_changes do not require the edit to be cited. In fact, this section explicitly states that the edits do not need to comply with verifiability. The protection level is intended to prevent vandalism, not false or unsourced edits. Of course, it is also intended to ensure that the BLP policy is upheld. In regard to this specific edit (and this is presumably where I am ignorant of something), there doesn't seem to be anything libellous / attacking about it. If it is indeed false then it should be corrected in the usual manner (as you already have done). Regardless, thanks again for your vigilance! –♫CheChe♫ talk 19:21, 17 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

CheChe, I am very aware of the requirement for approving or disallowing pending changes. Edits that add unsourced personal information to articles are contrary to BLP (in this specific case, WP:DOB) and should not be accepted; this is the first point of of the General Criteria of the reviewing process ("you should not accept the new revision if in analyzing the diff you find...It conflicts with the biographies of living persons policy"). Content does not need to be libelous to be contested, per policy "We must get the article right. Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources. All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by an inline citation to a reliable, published source. Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion". The reviewing criteria also states "reviewers should take special consideration of the reason given for protection, and attempt to uphold it.". I protected the article to prevent the "Addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content: + persistent addition of unsourced personal info in a BLP", so any edits that introduce such material should not be accepted. When admins set pending changes on BLPs specifically to prevent the addition of unsourced content, it is very important that Reviewers abide by the requirement for reliable sourcing. --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:38, 17 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Ponyo: Thank you very much for the clarification. It has become clear that I need to study some of the finer details of the BLP policy much more carefully (owing to its importance), before reviewing any more pending changes that fall under BLP. –♫CheChe♫ talk 19:47, 17 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you, CheChe. Protecting our BLP subjects is one of the most important "jobs" here. --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:57, 17 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, CheChe. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Island_Graaen_and_Landskrona_Harbour.jpg I remember that you do some svg conversion work. Can this be vectorized? Would it be difficult to do? It really needs to be replaced due to JPG artifacts etc. and I may undertake doing it myself just to get rid of it. Thanks. —DIYeditor (talk) 05:48, 1 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@DIYeditor:: Sure, should be easy to do. How's this: File:Island_Graaen_and_Landskrona_Harbour.svg? I'm not sure what's happened to the letter spacing... but I have some ideas how I might try to fix it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CheChe (talk • contribs) 11:12, 1 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wow that is great! Thanks so much. Big improvement over the JPG. —DIYeditor (talk) 19:35, 1 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi CheChe, would you consider adding your thoughts at a discussion about the inclusion of a phylogenetic tree image at Talk:Earth#Phylogenetic Tree image removed? Cheers, User:HopsonRoad 13:48, 17 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Group testing you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 22:41, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You may have seen my post at WT:WPMATH already, but since I see you're knowledgeable about mathematics, and have done some GA reviewing, would you be interested in reviewing Hidden Markov model? It's languishing almost at the tail of the WP:GAN queue; it was nominated eight months ago. I've looked at it but I think someone with more mathematical background than I have is needed to give the article a fair review. Any interest? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 23:17, 4 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Mike Christie: I'm certainly interested. I'll probably give it a go later in the week. –♫CheChe♫ talk 23:34, 4 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Group testing you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Group testing for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 12:21, 5 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Group testing at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with ((db-g7)), or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 15:41, 14 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 21 May 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Group testing, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that group testing can be used for DNA sequencing, cryptography, machine learning, and data forensics? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Group testing. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:56, 21 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, CheChe. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello

Our team at the Wikimedia Foundation is working on a project to improve the ease-of-use and productivity of wiki talk pages. As a Teahouse host, I can imagine you’ve run into challenges explaining talk pages to first-time participants.

We want all contributors to be able to talk to each other on the wikis – to ask questions, to resolve differences, to organize projects and to make decisions. Communication is essential for the depth and quality of our content, and the health of our communities. We're currently leading a global consultation on how to improve talk pages, and we're looking for people that can report on their experiences using (or helping other people to use) wiki talk pages. We'd like to invite you to participate in the consultation, and invite new users to join too.

We thank you in advance for your participation and your help.

Trizek (WMF), 08:37, 11 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The previous message about the talk pages consultation has a broken link.

The correct link has been misinterpreted by the MassMessage tool. Please use the following link: Wikipedia:Talk pages consultation 2019.

Sorry for the inconvenience, Trizek (WMF), 08:48, 11 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Pell's equation on a "Mathematics" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:30, 20 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Sylvester–Gallai theorem on a "Mathematics" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 27 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FYI, per Template talk:Please see § Fish eye, I made a derivative work of one of your files. I don't do this often, so please check to make sure I credited you appropriately. Best, Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 03:50, 29 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Psiĥedelisto: Hi, thanks for getting in touch. That's no problem at all – those are some good changes! ♫CheChe♫ talk 09:42, 29 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, CheChe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:International Asexuality Day, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:04, 8 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Proxima Centauri b has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:41, 13 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, CheChe. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Proxima Centauri b/1.
Message added 15:50, 2 February 2022 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:50, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi @Jo-Jo Eumerus: sorry about that. It turns out I've been a lot busier than I thought I would be. I will be too busy for this in the next few weeks as well. I would suggest it's best to find a GA reviewer for this article in the normal way – though if it still hasn't been reviewed later on I'll have a crack at it. Best of luck with your nomination –♫CheChe♫ talk 17:25, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]