Hi. When you recently edited Uong Bi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ward (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 21 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article List of Asilidae species has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A list which none of its items are exist and may not be notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ●Mehran ^Debate● 19:35, 18 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Long Tan → Long Tân – The content of this artilce should move and overwite to Long Tân, Ba Ria-Vung Tau. Then, Long Tan should redirect to Long Tân. There are many commune places in Vietnam named Long Tân. Then, Cheers! (talk) 04:48, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi! Actually shouldn't the article be deleted, it seems to be duplicate with Battle of Long Tan? In ictu oculi (talk) 12:30, 23 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It is a place name, if any part is duplicated, please move to correspond article. [Long Tan] should be a redirect page.--Cheers! (talk) 23:50, 23 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Glad to see you got your move. I will add 'support to the other one. By the way, I just noticed you moved page Hòa Hưng to Hòa Hưng, Ba Ria–Vung Tau, yes sensible move, many vietnamese place named Hòa Hưng - but it seems odd to have the village spelled in Vietnamese and the province with Vietnamese removed instead of Hòa Hưng, Bà Rịa–Vũng Tàu. The only 3 RMs on Vietnamese place names which have taken place have all 3 gained User support for use of Vietnamese names, and any removal of Vietnamese was done as undiscussed move, so please feel free when you're doing valuable work correcting the geography stubs to also use Vietnamese spelling. The majority of English-speaking users welcome it. And I believe there are some place names where the Vietnamese distinguishes - but if changed to English they look the same, is this so? In ictu oculi (talk) 15:43, 24 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank for your information, I move the Hòa Hưng to [Hòa Hưng, Ba Ria–Vung Tau] just follow another existed case. It is important that we/you can create the disambig pages so the readers can go to the exact article. Non-Vietnamese users are very difficult to type the Vietnamese names so they just tpye [Hoa Hung] instead of [Hòa Hưng].--Cheers! (talk) 02:11, 25 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, yes that's how it works with French and Czech too, anyone searching will type "Antonin Dvorak" but Google and the en.wp redirect will go to Antonín Dvořák, this is why all Latin alphabet articles (apart from those Vietnamese ones which have been recently "anglicized") are at original spelling, we don't "anglicize" any other nation's Latin alphabet so no particular reason to do it only to Vietnamese.

By the way, I have a question. My Chinese Vietnamese grammar gives the word "lượngtừ" for classifier (linguistics), such as classifer cuốn in "ba cuốn sách", "three-classifier-books," but I have never seen the word "lượngtừ" in a Vietnamese source. It looks to me as if the Chinese editor took the Chinese word 量词 (characters for lượngtừ in Chinese) and translated it back into Vietnamese as ""lượngtừ" My big Vietnamese dictionary is not to hand. Have you ever seen the word "lượngtừ" as a grammatical term for a counter-word or classifier? I suspect there is another Vietnamese term for classifer cuốn in "ba cuốn sách". Any idea? In ictu oculi (talk) 05:25, 28 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I'm still a little unsure of what should be the correct English, "township" or Ngân Sơn (town) In ictu oculi (talk) 13:02, 31 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

many people usualy translate: thị xã --> town; thị trấn--> township, but some cases town stand for thị xã or thị trấn. Actually, thị trấn is the same level of a subdivision of thị xã. District-level town (Vietnam) (thị xã) and Commune-level town (Vietnam) (thị trấn). I usual use township for thị trấn'.--Cheers! (talk) 01:55, 1 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

btw - Did you see the reply on WT:CAPS re "Province/province"? In ictu oculi (talk) 04:11, 2 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email!

1. Go to https://www.questia.com/specialoffer
2. Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code. Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive).
3. Create your account by entering the requested information. (This is private and no one from Wikipedia will see it).
4. You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID. (The account is now active for 1 year).

If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and, second, email QuestiaHelp@cengage.com along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia).

• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Questia/Citations.
• Questia would love to hear feedback at WP:Questia/Experiences
• Show off your Questia access by placing ((User:Ocaasi/Questia_userbox)) on your userpage
• When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot (talk) 05:02, 19 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks, I finished the registration and I can access it.--Cheers! (talk) 05:34, 19 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I was looking at the articles, translated from Korean, on the Binh Tai massacre, Go Dai massacre, Tay Vinh massacre. But xã Bình An is today xã Tây Vinh? Is there some duplication due to misunderstanding of name changes in these 3 articles? In ictu oculi (talk) 11:30, 22 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It is confirmed that Xã Bình An is Xã Tây Vinh today.[1]. Gò Dài is a location in xã Bình An/Tây Vinh where had alot of people died in one day. Binh Tai massacre mentions to location in Sơn Tịnh District, Quang Ngãi province[2][3] not in Phuoc Binh, Song Be.--Cheers! (talk) 11:55, 22 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks, corrected. In ictu oculi (talk) 13:06, 22 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

But then Dien Nien-Phuoc Binh Massacre is a duplicate? In ictu oculi (talk) 13:17, 22 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

according to the sources, there are two massacres in xã Tịnh Sơn, one in thôn Phước Bình (9 Oct.) and another in thôn Diên Niên (13 Oct.). It is sometime called Dien Nien-Phuoc Binh Massacre. I can't find the location named Binh Tai related to this Massacre, except blog sources.--Cheers! (talk) 01:21, 23 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I can't find Binh Tai either. Should it be merged into Dien Nien-Phuoc Binh Massacre? It seems confused by Korean sources. Do you think maybe a Korean editor got confused with vi:Thảm sát Thái Bình, 1966? In ictu oculi (talk) 06:39, 23 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

1) I dont have the source implies that they are the same but it mentions the events in the same day and caused by the same Korean military unit, so we can show this doubt in the article, isn't it?. 2) I dont think the editor make confuse due to the date, Japanese source [Asahi Shimbun] said the massacre is in February, instead of October. Regards,--Tranletuhan (talk) 07:43, 23 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks. Maybe will let Cheers make the edits to correct. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:53, 25 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done. Thanks.--Cheers! (talk) 03:54, 25 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

See Phuoc Long, has 2 links to Phước Long, Bac Lieu 2nd is Phước Long, Hồng Dân, "was a commune-level town in Hong Dan District, Bac Lieu" ... but this has no vi.wp article. Wasn't it a temporary designation and should redirect/merge to the town? In ictu oculi (talk) 02:53, 25 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Previously this township belongs to Hong Dan District, and when Phuoc Long District is established, this township become as a capital of Phuoc Long District. I fixed it and created a commune of Phuoc Long too. But there is another commune of Phuoc Long belonged to Giong Trom District, Ben Tre province. I think we can't use Phước Long (village) for a unit in Phuoc Long District, instead of Phước Long, Phước Long District and Phước Long, Giong Trom District. How is about this recommend? --Cheers! (talk) 03:34, 25 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Okay, so Phước Long, Giồng Trôm is now created linking to vi:Phước Long, Giồng Trôm. Useful for the disambiguation page. But I don't understand the need for Phước Long (village) (even though Phước Long, Phước Long District is clearer), this doesn't have a vi.wp article I think? In ictu oculi (talk) 03:57, 25 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Or we can move to Phước Long, Phước Long ?, and vi is vi:Phước Long (xã thuộc huyện Phước Long).--Cheers! (talk) 04:00, 25 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That's okay. Alternatively, although it's a mouthful Phước Long Village, Phước Long District, Bạc Liêu). Either way is an improvement. As long as it is compatible with vi articles that is fine. In ictu oculi (talk) 04:11, 25 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

done.--Cheers! (talk) 04:16, 25 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That looks like a job well done. In ictu oculi (talk) 04:31, 25 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,

I've added the Vietnamese Wikipedia to WPCleaner list of wikis. You will now have to configure Configuration for the Vietnamese Wikipedia. Tell me if you have any problem. --NicoV (talk) 10:56, 27 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks. Have a nice weekend.--Cheers! (talk) 00:03, 28 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Xin Chao! Nguyen1310 (talk) 02:34, 31 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Gần and gừng are pronounced as the same way ? Fête (talk) 20:59, 6 November 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Its pronunciation is different, you can try it by google voice.--Cheers! (talk) 02:35, 8 November 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Peut-être is pronounced "pơ-tấy" in Quebec French. Listen here . Kỳ quá ? Fête (talk) 17:30, 8 November 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In Southern Vietnamese, tai and tay are pronounced as the same way ? Fête (talk) 17:41, 14 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

if it mentions to "ear" (tai) and "arm" (tay) which are the same.--Cheers! (talk) 05:43, 18 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Diff. "Pho TAI" isn't the same as "TAY Nguyen", fo example... Nguyen1310 (talk) 05:32, 18 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In this case, "Phở Tái" and "Tây Nguyên" are diff.--Cheers! (talk) 05:43, 18 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No worries, do you know anything about Vietnamese mythology? In ictu oculi (talk) 04:41, 18 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I know some stories, just in Vietnamese.--Cheers! (talk) 05:44, 18 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That's fine, just a little proofreading would help. To make sure there is nothing strange. I also started Vietnamese fairytales, but that's just a stub. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:11, 18 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

BIG THANKS = Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Đặng Trần Côn In ictu oculi (talk) 13:38, 18 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey thanks for earlier reply on my Talk page, as discussed have put in a move to restore the article to the original at Talk:Chữ Nho. Have a good day!. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:08, 2 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, is it possible for you to translate this page to Vietnamese? ●Mehran ^Debate● 18:13, 15 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I saw you created a lot of articles in wiki vi like here [4], I'm just wondering if you can give me some data bases excel files or something like that are ready to be used. I want to make the same thing in wiki ar. Thank you a lot. --Helmoony (talk) 15:31, 11 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You are welcome, please send email to me, all data in excel file. All Turkey articles follow the interwiki format "village, district".--Cheers! (talk) 16:31, 11 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I also have alot of excel files of other contries (include Vietnam) and species, if you are interested I can send them to you.--Cheers! (talk) 16:32, 11 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Cheers!. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((You've got mail)) or ((ygm)) template.

--Helmoony (talk) 16:59, 17 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Cheers!. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:AutoWikiBrowser/Bugs.
Message added 11:17, 19 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

-- ^t numbermaniac ^c 11:17, 19 July 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 15:31, 9 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to South China Sea may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:53, 28 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

• Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
• Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
• Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
• Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
• Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
• Research coordinators: run reference services

Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey Cheers, I sent you an email last week about this - can you check whether you received it? Thanks, Nikkimaria (talk) 03:00, 25 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I replied the e-mail, please Nikkimaria.--Cheers! (talk) 06:10, 25 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Tu,

Glad you and your luggage got back fine. Great meeting you over the last week – looking forward to more chats!

If I could bother you a second... I submitted my "Tiny Planet" of the Last Supper sculpture in Esino Lario for Featured Picture on the English Wikipedia. If you think it qualifies, could you please support my nomination?

Thanks in advance,
cmɢʟee⎆τaʟκ 22:42, 28 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Great, how can you do that? Can you fix "Stitching errors" in that image? --Cheers! (talk) 02:54, 7 July 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most geography, wildlife and women articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 55 African countries, so should be enjoyable! Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African wildlife articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance. If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing any article related to a topic you often work on, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Might be a good way to work on fleshing out articles you've long been meaning to target and get rewarded for it! Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 04:54, 13 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Cheers!. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Cheers!! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 06:23, Tuesday, November 22, 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Cheers!. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Cheers!. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]