Hello Michael, thank you for your message. I will be travelling around The Netherlands, Belgium and France for the whole month. Unfortunately, I am not able to take up new projects now.

Good luck with your search and welcome to the community!

Best,

Elisa

Please don't reach me again. I find it badgering users and I don't want to be involved. Callmemirela 🍁 ^talk 18:39, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Callmemirela: Absolutely! I apologize for the inconvenience. I am just learning the navigation of wikipedia.Chefmikesf (talk) 20:36, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm not really sure what you want, please elaborate. You can reply either in English, German or Spanish. Best, Hxx

Sorry, Chefmikesf, to put it mildly, I do not approve of contributions to Wikipedia for money, although, I suppose, it happens a lot. I might be overly idealistic, but in my view, you are compromising the whole idea of Wikipedia. Sundar1 (talk) 08:12, 14 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Chefmikesf, I appreciate you reaching out asking for aid, but unfortunately, as much as I am good with translating articles, the subject of request is beyond my expertise, which means it will double or triple the time to review and edit articles. You can check over Wikipedia:Contributing_to_Wikipedia to see if there are resources out there to help you pair up with those who are better suited for the subject. Thanks, and wish you best. Shuniya (talk) 17:24, 12 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. New attempts are welcome.

Please meet the requirements of copying. It seems to be copying to the sandbox of each country version. However, it does not conform to CC-BY-SA. For example, in the Japanese version, there is concern that it will be deleted if there is no link in the edit summary. In that case, we can not copy from your sandbox. Please read: Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia, especially Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia#Translating from other language Wikimedia projects.

How to write a fixed form in the edit summary: may be (I am not familiar with English practice):

• e.g. : "en:Bottega Veneta (05:15, 13 December 2017, UTC) translation"

--タバコはマーダー (talk) 05:37, 27 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please write into the edit summary. --タバコはマーダー (talk) 07:55, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

talk Do you see the edits made to the links and edit history? we understand the challenges traversing languages and want to help an any way we can. Thank youChefmikesf (talk) 00:12, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I reflected on the article.

I confirmed the link in the article text. Some Japanese are hard-headed. Compliance with the guideline is the most safe. Sorry. --タバコはマーダー (talk) 09:18, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi User:Warren Leywon, I'm working on translating Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from English into Chinese and was wondering if you have time to help me out. I found your username on Wikipedia:Translate_us and saw that you're fluent in both English and Chinese. I have a paid COI regarding Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, but my primary concern here is ensuring that the information available in English is available and up to date in Chinese as well. I have a translated version of the article on SANDBOX. Would you mind reviewing it for accuracy as well as its compliance with Wikipedia guidelines? Thanks!--Chefmikesf (talk) 23:37, 27 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,User:Chefmikesf. I would like to help you translate but currently, the final exams are coming and I am busy with preparing for them,it will last for several weeks until January 13th the next year. So temporary I have no time to help translating,sorry if you are worry about that. And also,Wikipedia has a very complex guidelines and codes,even I could not grasp them all. Anyway, I got a look at the translated article and think that is well done at first glance. But I want to suggest that you should use the word “肿瘤医院” instead of "癌症医院",only when referring to the name of the hospital. You can freely use "癌症" where there is necessary to describe the name of diseases related to cancer. The reason is that in Chinese culture,the word “癌症” has a bad meaning and always indicates something bad will happen,and if chosen for the name of a hospital,it will bring bad luck to it, either. Therefore,most hospitals in China will use the word "肿瘤" when naming their hospitals.Both words are the same,all mean "cancer". But “肿瘤” is relatively neutral over “癌症",since it doesn't indicate something bad. And when comes to the cancer as a disease,you should use "癌症" in order to convey the academical accuracy. It is an intricate linguistic aspect of Chinese. So you should pay attention to it. Warren Leywon (talk) Warren Leywon (talk) 04:19, 28 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy New Year Warren Leywon! I hope you had a successful series of final exams. Thanks for the input regarding the nuances of Chinese Language culture. I understand you have a lot on your plate right now so I will be brief. If we adjust these changes, do you have an estimate of copy edits needed before this sandbox would be ready to publish?Chefmikesf (talk) 23:39, 16 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello,Chefmikesf. Would you mind if I directly make changes to that on your sandbox? There is editing history so that if I do something improperly,you can revert my editing to a previous point.Thanks for your blessing,hope I won't flunk any of them.
Sincerely,Warren Leywon (talk) 12:28, 17 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have edited your sandbox and may it helps you.Because somehow a technical problem,half of my editing is not properly saved,and it means my nearly half-hour work will just become ineffective.I have try to make the changes that I did conform with contemporary mainland simplified Chinese language users' usages,and I know rather less on traditional Chinese grammars or Wenyan's way of expressing. As I know,wikipedia in Chinese has long been blocked out and totally inaccessible.I don't know if '维基大典' is the 'canonical Chinese wikipedia' and is very curious about its idiosyncratic features.Could you tell me more about that?
Sincerely,Warren Leywon (talk) 14:06, 17 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Warren Leywon I’m sure you will ace all your exams! I see the point you have made and appreciate the edits to the sandbox. Feel free to engage in open collaboration with this page. After examining your criticism, I trust in your abilities and believe you have good intentions to bring the current MSK Wikipedia page to the Chinese language Wikipedia. Do you feel comfortable petitioning this article for publishing? Chefmikesf (talk) 21:23, 18 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, thanks for asking, but unfortunately, for one, my Korean is nowhere near fluent, and for another, I've already got a great deal on my Wikipedia plate to deal with, so can't really devote time to a new project I know nothing about. But best of luck with it! 2Q (talk) 03:00, 12 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry for being a little late, but I've checked the Korean Bottega Veneta page. I corrected a couple of things, but now it's completely fine to integrate into the Korean Wikipedia, thanks for having me help you. MasukudoMahn (talk) 01:26, 6 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have a paid COI regarding Bottega Veneta, but my main concern here is ensuring that the information available in English is available and up to date in Korean as well. I am in need of some help navigating the Korean Wikipedia, from a COI ethical point of view as well as a lack of knowledge in the Korean language. If you have the time, could you help integrate this content into the Korean Wikipedia article? Chefmikesf (talk) 22:44, 13 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello,I think it is good enough to be publish. Imfeelyoung (talk) 11:54, 7 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for the quick response Imfeelyoung. I have a paid COI regarding Bottega Veneta, but my main concern here is ensuring that the information available in English is available and up to date in Korean as well. I am in need of some help navigating the Korean Wikipedia, from a COI ethical point of view as well as a lack of knowledge in the Korean language. If you have the time, could you help integrate this content into the Korean Wikipedia article? Chefmikesf (talk) 18:02, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Well, I poked around a bit and smoothed things out. But you still need to incorporate the points here with the Chinese article that's already there.--little Alex (talk) 20:31, 23 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

little Alex Due to my COI, lack of knowledge of the language, and my commitment to follow the Wikipedia guidelines I am not able to move forward. I would be happy to incorporate these points but reached out to ask for your expertise. Would you be interested in continuing this collaboration to bring the English content to the Chinese Wikipedia? Chefmikesf (talk) 22:54, 23 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I guess I can try, though I can't promise how quick I'll be. Where's your text again?--little Alex (talk) 17:14, 12 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I totally understand your time is valuable and appreciate the help very much. Here is the Sandbox Chefmikesf (talk) 21:55, 12 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I incorporated all your stuff onto the page. It's as done as I can get.--little Alex (talk) 13:20, 25 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you!little Alex (talk)Chefmikesf (talk) 17:18, 25 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Chefmikesf: You are invited to vote on Pineapple juice.Catfurball (talk) 19:00, 13 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi! I no longer live in Saratoga either, so I'm backing away from related articles. If you have anything to contribute, have at it. Peter Flass (talk) 22:45, 24 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey I keep meaning to look into this, but I'm pretty busy these days IRL, and haven't found the time yet! -- 06:16, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

@Kendrick7:, Thank you for the response. Much appreciated if you can help with the small factual updates.-Chefmikesf (talk) 18:43, 29 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Other than laying eyes on their thermostats, this topic never crosses my mind. I haven't gotten so far as to take a second look. Remind me which of the facts should excite me? -- 03:55, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

I tried to work in your other changes, but there was some ugly hiccup in the ref templates and I threw in the towel, but I may yet get to them. I guess I thought the lead was too long, with the added hazard (as you pointed out in a way) of having a lot of information that might quickly fall out of date. And once I decided to move stuff out of the lead, I decided it was hard to decide where to put it, so I thought better sectionalization might help someone reading the article find the information they are looking for quickly if they needed to delve any further. -- Kendrick7^talk 00:13, 16 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In September 2020, Honeywell and their predecessor AlliedSignal, celebrated their 100 year anniversary on the NYSE.^[1][2]

Hello! I have reverted the changes you made at Talk:Honeywell because those changes did not follow the guidelines for posting on talk pages found at WP:REDACTED. Those guidelines involve using strikeout font for items being removed and underlined font for added items. As the changes in this particular case involve removing text which was already displayed using strikeout font, the double-use of strikeout font to show that this text is being removed is not possible. Thus the edit request needs to be placed as an entirely new request at the bottom of the talk page. It's best not to use strikeout font in the first place when indicating text that is to be removed from the article. In those cases its always better to place the text to be removed in its own section immediately before the verbatim text which is to replace it. An example for doing this is shown below:

Thank you for your help with this! Regards,  Spintendo  02:45, 12 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Spintendo, I have taken the appropriate steps to fix the request on my sandbox's talk page. Can you take a look here before I add this back to the Honeywell talk page in-case it needs an edit. I apologize for the misunderstanding.--Chefmikesf (talk) 21:55, 12 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just got back from vacation... Count me in. I was rather busy lately, but I expect to have more free time from now on. GregorB (talk) 09:53, 15 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Michel Sadelain sandbox added to my watchlist. Looks good, I'll leave some comments within a couple of days hopefully. GregorB (talk) 22:24, 22 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No problem, I'll focus on the content and references anyway, because minor stuff such as formatting can be addressed by anyone, at any time. GregorB (talk)

Dr. Sadelain's education - do go ahead, should not be controversial because it repeats what is already said in the article body and supported by refs.

Scott W. Lowe is on my watchlist now, I'll take a closer look at #8 and ping you in the talk page if I get stuck. GregorB (talk) 19:17, 28 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Philip Kantoff, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Boghog (talk) 17:42, 13 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, Chefmikesf, I ran Earwig's Copyvio Detector on the J&J article this morning, and there are serious issues with copy from three of the cited articles. None of the copyright vios appear to be in the early history update, which is what I was checking, but there are entire paragraphs in the rest of the article lifted from sources. These need to be either deleted, parphrsed, summarized, or quoted with attribution. Today, if possible! Thanks for your attention to this legal obligation. — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 19:38, 29 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

hello Grand'mere Eugene,

~Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I’ve been working on the article for over a year to improve the content to meet Wikipedia’s guidelines. I noticed there are many section that still need major work. Currently I’m working on the research and rewrite process for the rest of the history so I’m totally open to work on this with you. Just to confirm, the content we worked on is OK—Chefmikesf (talk) 20:17, 29 October 2020 (UTC) ?Reply[reply]

Right, no detected problems with the early history sections. It is also possible that after the article was written, there may have been copying from the WP article into the sources tha now show up as likely copyvio, a process known as Wikipedia:CITOGENESIS, or circular re-pulication. At any rate, the J&J article does need attention to removing/revising likely copyvio. Oh, and I've clipped a few possible source articles from newspapers.com which I'll list on the article's talk page. — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 21:40, 29 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hmm, That's a good theory Grand'mere Eugene. Like I said, I will continue to research and redevelop the rest of the History section to meet Wikipedia's guidelines. Can I contact you when I'm ready to present? Also thank you for providing additional sources from Newspaper.com. I'll read them today!--Chefmikesf (talk) 18:55, 30 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Taken care of and reinforced with an inline ref. GregorB (talk) 19:43, 8 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

GregorB, Thanks! --Chefmikesf (talk) 19:47, 9 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've undone the edit and added the article to my watchlist (for 30 days, FWIW). Some sort of protection might be warranted, but for the time being this is low-level stuff (both frequency and seriousness), so let's see whether it continues or not. GregorB (talk) 21:45, 7 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello!

The applicable piece of guideline here is WP:COIU. Adding an external link actually isn't listed by WP:COIU as a kind of an "unambiguously uncontroversial edit"; repairing an EL is, but these are different things nevertheless. Still, given the straightforward, "formal" nature of the inserted link (an infobox param) and the uncontroversial nature of the actual URL target (personal webpages hosted by an organization), I'm struggling to find anything substantially problematic in your particular case. Since you listed all the URLs beforehand, and I agreed these are uncontroversial, this kinda counts as an independent review, but you still can't really invoke WP:COIU in the edit summary if you do it yourself. To be on the safe side, I'll do it, tomorrow. Will notify you when it's done. GregorB (talk) 21:56, 26 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks GregorB!--Chefmikesf (talk) 22:47, 26 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I did Charles Sawyers like this - provided the title text through the ((URL)) template because these URLs are fairly long. Would this be OK? GregorB (talk) 17:54, 27 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

GregorB This is great, as long as the text matches the link. Nancy Y. Lee and Luis A. Diaz are biography pages, not labs. --Chefmikesf (talk) 18:10, 27 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That's right, I took that title from the actual target page - will try to do the equivalent for the rest. GregorB (talk) 18:35, 27 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done, except:

1. Alexander Rudensky - no infobox, URL already present in the EL section
2. Nancy Y. Lee - same
3. Luis A. Diaz - URL already present both in the infobox (via Wikidata, interesting) and in the EL section

GregorB (talk) 21:11, 27 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Jerry Lohr, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 05:47, 25 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

For Urban Air Mobility, I added the paid contribution disclosure to the talk page that mirrors the one on the draft's talk page. I feel like we have added enough content to the mainspace page by your draft to make it significant Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 15:24, 9 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Actually I noticed the tag there but it should be at the very top of the talk page Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 15:56, 9 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Notable as a CEO of a Fortune 500 company. PRNewswire just aggregates press releases and is not a reliable source. The street is also tagged as not being a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joaquin Duato and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Joaquin Duato, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 02:01, 2 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Chefmikesf! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gusfriend (talk) 02:01, 2 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Gusfriend: I updated the submission by removing the primary sources and removing a sentence that was supported by the primary source. Please let me know if this meets guidelines.--Chefmikesf (talk) 21:08, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The sources look a lot better. You should feel free to resubmit it to see what other approvers think of it.Gusfriend (talk) 22:24, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Joaquin Duato, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:12, 29 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy New Year!

Chefmikesf,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 03:53, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding ((subst:Happy New Year fireworks)) to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 03:53, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Chefmikesf/sandbox/J&JCredo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Seawolf35 (talk) 16:35, 25 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:Chefmikesf/sandbox/J&JCredo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Seawolf35 (talk) 16:37, 25 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.Deb (talk) 17:31, 25 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]