Welcome to my talk page! For newsletters and other things I'm subscribed to, go to my newsletter page.

You did not fix the List of ongoing armed conflicts ,please fix your mistake. User:Garmin21. —Preceding undated comment added 00:38, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I did. If you check the previous edit, you'll see that one of the tables was in the wrong location, and I moved it back to where it was supposed to be. ChekhovsGunman (talk) 14:47, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NVM Wowzers122 fixed it.- User:Garmin21 —Preceding undated comment added 00:44, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pertaining to this edit, please check and cite your sources in the future. (Using an WP:EDITSUMMARY wouldn't hurt either.) It was both unsourced and incorrect, that set had 2049 pieces and there are 5 larger Ideas sets as of March 2021. It may have been the largest when it came out, but so was the rocket that came out three months prior and the Voltron set that came out a year later, so noting "when it came out" would be insignificant and WP:UNDUE. Thank you, Yosemiter (talk) 01:12, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Yosemiter: Yep, I put it in the wrong set. I meant to say that the Tree House was the biggest set, but somehow I messed up and put it in the section about the fishing store. I'll correct that. ChekhovsGunman (talk) 21:02, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ChekhovsGunman I wanted to add something further to your most recent edit to this page. Your claim about the Treehouse being the largest set is not supported by the citation you added (the Lego page doesn't make any mention of this). You need to add a media source that states this specifically, not just cite the product page itself. I hope this make sense. Fieryninja (talk) 21:36, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Fieryninja: That's because it isn't. The since released Grand Piano now is at 3662. But I also don't think it is worth mentioning at all on the page since it can always be surpassed as well. I would also recommend not using Shop links as citations (leans into the realm of WP:PROMO), especially when plenty of independent press releases exist that could cite claims like this. Yosemiter (talk) 22:32, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Yosemiter: Dang it. I hadn't realized the piano had already been released. Sorry. ChekhovsGunman (talk) 11:48, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In terms of large sets, there are articles showing there is a general trend in increasing part counts such as this in 2017 and this in 2019. Part of the reason is a larger amount of small pieces as detailing and not so much in the physical size of the set itself. In other words, being the largest in a specific theme when there are a few truly massive sets in other themes (like the 10,000 piece Coliseum) probably is not really noteworthy. Yosemiter (talk) 13:34, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am a editor who likes American football, and I am bored, can you give me an article that needs help? Sportsfangnome (talk) 20:50, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don't think I know any articles. I'll tell you if I find one. ChekhovsGunman (talk) 23:20, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://www.americaspace.com/2020/07/17/snc-shooting-star-wins-contract-for-unmanned-orbital-outpost/, https://www.sncorp.com/media/2922/snc_shootingstartransportvehicle_brochure_2020.pdf. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Shooting Star (spacecraft) may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 01:02, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense. I think that the previous editor of the draft used copyrighted material, and I likely overlooked that. I'll edit this and resubmit. ChekhovsGunman (talk) 01:52, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ChekhovsGunman! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 01:02, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you're an active editor and member of the Spaceflight Wikiproject. I’m working on a rough draft of a new article here [1] for my satellite communications company E-Space, which I hope to submit to the Articles for Creation queue because as an E-Space employee I have a COI and can’t publish it on Wikipedia myself. But since I can see that the queue is very long and I want to have the best possible chance of approval when it gets submitted there, I was wondering if you might be willing to have a look at the draft and point out anything that needs to be improved first?

Thanks very much for your time! Talex000 (talk) 22:29, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shooting Star (spacecraft) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 13:43, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]