Hello, Claireliontamer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Bhaskar Sunkara. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JesseRafe (talk) 14:30, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael J. Brooks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael J. Brooks until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SmartSE (talk) 22:41, 11 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I removed a considerable number of inappropriate reference on Michael J. Brooks. First, blogs, etc are not reliable sources. Second, linking to his Patron page is wildly inappropriate. Finally, the sources need to be about him not by him. I also removed the listing of regular shows, which I for reasons I explained on the talk page.

I would suggest when writing an article you should first find three independent reliable sources, like articles in major newspapers, widely circulated magazines etc (not blogs, podcasts, YouTube shows) that give significant coverage to the subject. Significant coverage usually means several paragraphs that talk about the subject. These sources must have strong editorial control, have a reputation for fact checking and accuracy and be by third parties who are completely independent of the article's subject ie no press releases or other promotional/advertising material. You should also read this page about writing your first Wikipedia article before you get started.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me on my talk page or ((ping)) me (((ping|Jbhunley))) from any talk page. Jbh ^Talk 21:03, 18 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I've been very busy as well, so I hadn't noticed this Wikipedia drama for two months. I felt that it was unfair this page was deleted, and now it seems the original Michael Brooks page has also been removed. The article on the person has a better case of notability than the podcast, and I'm willing to host the last revision of that article as well. You're certainly invited to make any revisions you want to the podcast article that is currently on my username space. It's been a long time since I was any major sort of editor but I could help. Onetwothreeip (talk) 09:50, 12 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]