An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sherim van Geffen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ruelle.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 28 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article 2021 CS Denis Ten Memorial Challenge has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The upcoming event doesn't meet WP:INDEPENDENT, WP:MULTSOURCES and WP:CORPDEPTH. I

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Asketbouncer (talk) 13:19, 28 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2021 Skate America, you may be blocked from editing. Per WP:LIVESCORE sports results are not included till the end of the competition. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 18:55, 24 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Sportsfan 1234: This is common practice in the figure skating editing community. I don't see how it's your business or right to police my ability to do this. It is not vandalism, and my reporting is accurate. Please stop deleting my edits. Go ahead and report me if you really feel so strongly. I have reviewed the page you're referring to, and there is nothing there prohibiting me from continuing. Clemkr (talk) 18:59, 24 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ignore him. WP:LIVESCORES is not an actual policy outside of the snooker community, and figure skating most assuredly does not fit into that category. 😂😂😂 Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:15, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Marilena Kitromilis, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 18:52, 24 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Marilena Kitromilis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 04:02, 31 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lindsay Thorngren, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hackensack.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry, I shouldn't have reverted multiple times. Nevertheless, MOS:FLAG states plainly that flags aren't necessary at all and in unclear situations should be avoided. I won't continue to argue this point, though. I genuinely appreciate all of your contributions to figure skating articles and I'm sorry if I've upset you. Hergilei (talk) 02:20, 23 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Hergilei: It appears that we aren't going to come together on this. I still disagree that the page you've linked is applicable to this situation as I don't see how "country represented" would be confused with citizenship. There really is no lack of clarity, in my opinion. He represents Poland. He formerly represented Russia. That much is inarguable. That page has been a pet project of mine since it was a draft all the way back in 2017, so I perhaps feel a bit more defensive than I ordinarily would. We can leave it alone. Clemkr (talk) 02:25, 23 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 02:22, 11 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Last year you did the article for 2021 Channel One Trophy. Will you be doing the one for 2022? It seems like Valieva will participate according to this [1]. ErnestKrause (talk) 18:13, 16 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Clemkr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Veronika Zhilina, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:16, 23 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Hektor Giotopoulos Moore has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the ((prod blp/dated)) tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. RoanokeVirginia (talk) 20:11, 17 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You're kind of right, and kind of wrong. And Prax is kind of right, and kind of wrong. ANI is not really fit for purpose, especially in non-black-and-white situations where people are kind of right, and kind of wrong.

If, after the dust settles a little, you'd like some help trying to resolve this outside of the crucible of ANI, let me know. If you're pretty much done with WP, I guess I understand that too. --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:33, 19 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you, I really do appreciate that. Like you said, I feel like things wouldn't have come to this point had they not started out so pointedly. I don't take well to being spoke down to or given unconstructive criticism. I do care about being here, and I do feel genuinely emotional about this situation. Having that called into question by others on ANI hurt. I am still a person, not an emotionless editing bot. I can see Prax's point, but I wish it had been delivered in a way that wasn't so spiteful. Drmies getting involved just felt like unnecessary fuel to the fire. I'm not stupid. I know what needs to be done, but there are certainly instances in this situation where I was in the right in my editing, and I wish that would be acknowledged. Clemkr (talk) 17:44, 19 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Clemkr, I saw this too late to open my big mouth, but Levivich's statement at ANI about the sources you had included suggests you were treated harshly. You say you can see Prax's point; that's both generous and shows you appreciate that we need to be careful with BLPs. I hope you do return; up to you, but that's what I really wanted to say. Yngvadottir (talk) 02:03, 20 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for saying that. I've spent four years on this site trying to contribute in a meaningful way, and resolving the few conflicts that have arisen along the way in a respectful and empathetic manner. I regret that I was not given the opportunity to do that in this situation, and I don't know that I will ever be afforded that from the user in question. It is difficult to want to continue here when I have little faith that the same behavior won't continue. I was not exaggerating when I said that this whole ordeal has impacted me emotionally, and that, coupled with the lack of empathy shown in the ANI is what prompted me to choose retirement. At this point, I do not know if I will return, but I appreciate you, Levivich, and Floquenbeam showing me grace during throughout this troubling situation. Perhaps there are things I could have done differently, but I tried my best, and I never intended to act in a way that would hurt another user or this project. It hurts to be bullied, even when you're a grown up. Clemkr (talk) 02:12, 20 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If you decide to come back I'd like to work with you on some edits or something. I'm sure I can learn a thing or two. I'm sorry for what happened to you and I, like others, think you were so gracious throughout the unfortunate discussion. Empathy is not something that comes natural for a lot of people. I know others see things differently but I believe empathy and understanding is crucial to remaining collaborative and I am so relieved there are others that see it the same way as I. Yes, it involves temperance and possibly a little effort on the part of those involved but the reward is seeing another human being blossom and maybe growing a little ourselves. Is it an expressed policy requirement? lol No, remaining neutral and indifferent in understanding of policy might be doable but the way we communicate those policies with our fellow human beings and the way we administer those policies should never be done with indifference. There is an element of compassion and empathy that should be shared among every editor that truly wants the encyclopedia to become better because that means more effective collaboration. I'm just as guilty as the next. There are times my temperance is worn thin, especially in cases where I feel new editors are being pushed around by experienced editors. That is no excuse for forgetting that those experienced editors are human too and I have to work on how I respond. All that to say this, you are valued as an editor here, just as much as anyone else, and I think that is clearly shown by those that have responded. I certainly do not blame you if you choose to not return but I hope you will give it consideration. --ARoseWolf 15:00, 20 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kimmy Repond, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 19:05, 27 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Clare Seo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 10:51, 27 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Clemkr! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 10:51, 27 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Clemkr. Thank you for creating James Hernandez (figure skater). User:Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article! Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Bruxton)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 21:42, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Andreas Nordebäck has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Junior skater who for now lacks notability. Nothing on Google News, not a lot in general.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 07:21, 12 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Clemkr, the article has been restored after I contested the deletion. With the bronze medal at the 2022 CS Finlandia Trophy the notability should be clear now. By the way: I create articles about figure skaters in de.Wikipedia. I appreciate the articles about figure skaters and competitions you created here in en.Wikipedia. --Kallichore (talk) 00:33, 8 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 CS U.S. International Figure Skating Classic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Short program.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Thanks for creating this draft. The subject doesn't seem to meet the criteria for a figure skater's biography on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(sports)#Figure_skating

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jocelyn Hong and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 11:09, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 CS Warsaw Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maxim Naumov.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 18 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Quaemenelimbus. I noticed that you recently removed content from Anastasia Vaipan-Law without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Quaemenelimbus (🗨 here) ^_^ 18:36, 18 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Sarina Joos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet either WP:NGNG or WP:NSKATE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:03, 26 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi @Clemkr: I reviwed your article as part of the WP:NPP article review process. The article is only referenced to a profile which has been generated from a database. These database generated profiles are no longer sufficient per the recent RFC. The consensus now that these articlse must have genuine secondary showing the person is notable, i.e. not only from a database. It is a WP:BLP after all. All you have is copied the information from the profile and put in a load of content that is not sourced. I'm sending it to draft where you can work on it. Once its done give me a shout and I'll send it back to mainspace. Great article apart from that. Hope that helps. scope_creep^Talk 10:05, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Jean-Hans Fourneaux, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Per the message I left. Database profiles are not longer sufficient for references per the recent RFC. It is a BLP and it needs real secondary sourcing. scope_creep^Talk 10:08, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Daniel Tioumentsev has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet either WP:GNG or WP:NSKATE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:41, 10 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Sophia Baram has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet either WP:GNG or WP:NSKATE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:42, 10 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sophia Baram is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophia Baram until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:33, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Tioumentsev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Tioumentsev until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:34, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, thanks for your work; but please remember we don't normally link the names of well-known countries, or common terms, in the main text. Tony (talk) 23:13, 15 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Andy Deng has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources to show they meet GNG, and they do not meet WP:NSKATE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:57, 29 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Cayla Smith has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources to show they meet GNG, and they do not meet WP:NSKATE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:57, 29 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Nozomu Yoshioka has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources to show they meet GNG, and they do not meet WP:NSKATE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:59, 29 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Clemkr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Valentina Plazas, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Clemkr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jocelyn Hong, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Clemkr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vivien Papp, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:00, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Clemkr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Valentina Plazas".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:38, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Clemkr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jocelyn Hong".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:02, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Clemkr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vivien Papp".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:09, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Clemkr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mariia Nosovitskaya, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 2 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Clemkr. Thank you for your work on Lucas Broussard. User:Star Mississippi, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nicely done to address the issues raised at the AfD. Would still benefit from more in depth sourcing.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Star Mississippi)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Star Mississippi 01:36, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Clemkr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jean-Hans Fourneaux, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Lucas Broussard requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucas Broussard. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:38, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Clemkr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Jean-Hans Fourneaux".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:32, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2023 CS Finlandia Trophy, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:44, 8 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi! You recently added a newly dissolved and a newly formed Russian pair to the current skating season article. I could be wrong, but judging by the source title, you’ve got them backward. You might want to double-check and be sure they’re correct. I don’t want to monkey with the table; those edits are not my strong suit. --Dr.Margi ✉ 17:14, 12 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. I believe I have them correct. Kaganovskaya/Angelopol and Pasechnik/Nekrasov both dissolved. Kaganovskaya/Nekrasov has been formed. Clemkr (talk) 19:57, 12 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You do. I went back and looked again, and it was the mark-up that confused me. Sorry about that! --Dr.Margi ✉ 23:57, 12 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No worries! Clemkr (talk) 01:40, 13 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jean-Hans Fourneaux is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean-Hans Fourneaux until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:21, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]