Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Discussion here. SuperMarioMan 22:12, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
Having read the number of diffs on WP:ANI where you gratuitously attack other editors, it is clear that you are not here to edit collegially and even admit that you don't care if you are banned for it, so I have granted your wish. Black Kite (t) 22:51, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
I'll be back. CodyJoeBibby (talk) 13:56, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
My name is Legion. For we are many. CodyJoeBibby (talk) 15:41, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
CodyJoeBibby (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
My comments were fully justified. CodyJoeBibby (talk) 19:39, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
In that case, your block is fully justified. I stand by it. —DoRD (talk) 19:52, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
CodyJoeBibby (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was not given any reasonable chance to respond on AN/I to explain my case, thus basic principles of justice were breached. CodyJoeBibby (talk) 19:59, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
One of the guiding lights on Wikipedia is our policy of civility. You've demonstrated you are unable to abide by this policy with edits such as this and this and this. --jpgordon::==( o ) 20:36, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
CodyJoeBibby (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
But this doesn't change the fact that an accused person should be allowed to explain their case before being condemned. My actions may have been wrong, but were a response to wrong actions from other editors. CodyJoeBibby (talk) 20:49, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This does not justify your incivility. I'm sure you know the expression two wrongs don't make a right. only (talk) 21:02, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
So the first wrong (committed by the pro-guilt cabal on the MoMK article) goes unpunished, but the second 'wrong' (some robust comments made by me) is very severely punished? Now that's interesting. CodyJoeBibby (talk) 21:14, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
You know SuperMarioMan, I'm not sure I really want any 'helpful' suggestions from you now that you've caused this disaster for me. But thanks anyway. Why you obsessively stalk me to this extent is something of an issue. If it continues, I think I'm going to need to call law enforcement. CodyJoeBibby (talk) 21:19, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
I have revoked talk-page access for this account while blocked, pending the resolution of your above mentioned possible legal action. Additional requests to be unblocked can be made by emailing unblock-en-l@lists.wikimedia.org or by email to the arbitration committee. CIreland (talk) 21:40, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
I agree with LedRush here - that is not a plausible legal threat. I've noticed some overreaction in the wp:nlt area in general on many occasions; perhaps it's just seen as being safer this way. pablo 20:51, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.
In this issue:
--The Olive Branch 18:55, 4 September 2012 (UTC)