Hello, Comfr! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place ((helpme)) on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a ((Talkback)) message on my talk page. @ 20:13, 5 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply] Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arrhenius equation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reciprocal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 1 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You're welcome! — LlywelynII 01:57, 6 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article The 11foot8 Bridge has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable bridge.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 03:51, 8 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The 11foot8 Bridge, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Amtrack and U-tube. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 8 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Great addition to the patent troll article! Very interesting section. Many thanks. Edcolins (talk) 20:02, 3 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Walk of shame page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 27 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carbon monoxide detector, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page OSHA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 11 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Comfr. Thanks for adding the synthesis information to Pethidine. Please have a look at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia - when you do that, it is important to attribute appropriately in an edit note. I took care of that for you, but it is best when the person doing the copying does it. (Translation makes it a derivative work, and you still need to attribute) Thanks! Jytdog (talk) 19:35, 3 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear User:Comfr, congratulations on creating Quoin (printing). I have added a reference to the article for you, as well as an image. I would encourage you to add more information and references to the article. Have a great day! All the best, Anupam^Talk 22:47, 18 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This edit: [1]. I don't understand your point. Which chart is the "chart to the left" that it's left and right correspond to doctor's left and right? As I can see every chart (table) and also the image (image of open mouth, it's visible on the right margin) are positioned the same way and patient's right teeth are located in the left part of table and image, too. Kaligula (talk) 17:42, 10 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for quick reply and quick fix :) In the picture there are no designations (left or right) so the paragraph (IMO) can be somewhat misleading, compared to the description under the image. I prefered the previous state (before your changes), when the paragraph stated only about the charts below (but not the image) and the description under image described only image. But - as you prefer. Kaligula (talk) 21:50, 10 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Maybe The charts below represent "doctor's view", so patient's left teeth are listed on the right side of each chart; and right ones are on the left side.? If you agree feel free to edit the article. Kaligula (talk) 20:47, 17 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Well, I have to admit that this edit is outstanding! :D The only thing I could think of wondering if to have anything against is the title of your section – but eventually I would leave it as is :) Thank you very much for your patience! I wish you luck in future edits :) Bye Kaligula (talk) 22:47, 17 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Dodi 8238. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Moxie Marlinspike, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please see previous discussions at Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard/Archive239#Moxie_Marlinspike and Talk:Moxie_Marlinspike#Additional_Aliases. Thank you. Dodi 8238 (talk) 18:53, 5 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Comfr. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Flixborough disaster. Roxy the dog. bark 19:36, 27 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please read WP:BRD and Wikipedia:Edit warring. Kendall-K1 (talk) 12:36, 19 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vrindavan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Geographic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 9 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sulfuric acid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Convention. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 24 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Comfr. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I recently edited the page for this photo in order to improve and expand the non-free use rationale. In addition, from what I can tell, the photo itself is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0, so I used the ((Photo of art)) license tag to differentiate the licensing of the photo itself versus the licensing of the depicted sculpture. I hope this is correct. --Elegie (talk) 15:33, 8 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Elegie: Thank you. I am quite new to copyrights, and I appreciate all the help I can get.

@Comfr: May I ask the following question: Did you yourself take the photo of the Digital DNA sculpture? --Elegie (talk) 06:55, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Elegie: Yes, my photo. Comfr (talk) 08:37, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Early reports often inaccurate. I.e, the 14-yr-old boy, hit in the thigh, according to witnesses, was surprised he'd been hit. It was like when non gang members a ways back from the scene have been hit by stray fire when gangs do drivebys on each other. How do we know whose bullet hit this 14-y-o the perp's or the officer's?

Quote: "Investigators are still trying to determine which bullets struck which individuals."[2]--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 07:49, 21 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Per WP:TALK, post your message to User talk:Hodgdon's secret garden, not the user page. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:41, 21 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You are invited to join the effort to revitalize and improve the Portal system...

The Portals WikiProject was rebooted on April 17th, and is going strong. Fifty-nine editors have joined so far, with more joining daily.

We're having a blast, and excitement is high...

Our goal is to update, upgrade, and maintain portals.

In addition to working directly on portals, we are developing tools to make portals more dynamic (self-updating), and to make building and maintaining portals easier. We've finished two tools so far, with more to come. They are Template:Transclude lead excerpt and Template:Transclude random excerpt.

Discussions are underway about how to further upgrade portals, and what the portals of the future will be.

There are plenty of tasks (including WikiGnome tasks too).

With more to come.

We may even surprise ourselves and exceed all expectations. Who knows what we will be able to accomplish in what may become the biggest Wikicollaboration in years.

See ya at the WikiProject!

Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   23:59, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

P.S.: Sorry 'bout the newsletter post. I didn't spot your opt-out asterisk right away. I reverted my edit. -TT

Hello, Comfr. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, TheShop.Build, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: ((proposed deletion/dated...))
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Nick Moyes (talk) 06:00, 2 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Comfr. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Comfr. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disambiguation pages are for directing readers to the article they are actually looking for. Every single entry must have a blue link (existing article) that actually mentions what the subject of the disambiguation page is. In this case ICT. If it is a notable subject then write the article about it or include the ICT thing in another applicable article. Do not keep adding it without doing those things. What you are doing is disruptive. ~ GB fan 21:21, 3 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Horse racing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aerobic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:09, 26 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jonelle Matthews is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonelle Matthews until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Comatmebro (talk) 02:31, 27 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Heinz Raether, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 23:25, 28 January 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bridge11foot8.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 10 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bridge11foot8.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text ((Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>)) below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 06:24, 11 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There are some 24 published reviews of Weapons of Math Destruction listed among its references. These are reliable secondary sources about the book's content, while the book itself cannot be a reference for itself. While I think expansion of the article on the book is a good idea, please do so based on what these independent sources say about it, not on your own reading of the book itself. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:15, 19 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Path 27, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barstow.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 11 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. I have reverted your addition of a Failed Verification tag to the Scott Peterson article, because I double-checked the cited San Francisco Chronicle article, and it indeed contains the quote in question. Thank you. Nightscream (talk) 20:05, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please stop removing citations and other material from the Scott Peterson article wihtout a valid reason, as you did with this edit. The reason that Citation #5 in the article (which is of this San Francisco Chronicle article) was placed in the middle of the first sentence of the paragraph that begins Peterson's conviction being upheld by the Supreme Court of CA was placed there because that's the source from which that information came from. By removing it, you created the appearance that the next citation, which is of this East Bay Times article, supports that information, when it makes no mention of that.

Conversely, by placing that Chronicle citation instead at the end of the passage that first mentions the rationale for this (that jurors had been dismissed jurors without beasked if they could put aside their views on the death penalty), you give the passage that that citation is the sole one from which that information is derived, which is not the case, as Citations121 and 122 also support it, which is why all three were properly grouped together at the end of that following passage.

If you had a valid rationale for this, then please mention it in your edit summary. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 01:47, 21 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article WateReuse has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

article does not meet WP:N which is also evidenced by the lack of reliable sources. Only the website of the organisation is used as sources. The deletion was already proposed a while ago but not carried out (one objection on the talk page but not very convincing).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

An article you recently created, Magnetic chicane, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – dudhhr ^talk _contribs (he/they) 19:05, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Metering pump, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dispenser.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 14 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Comfr. Thank you for your work on Cesium telluride. User:Hughesdarren, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

On Chemspider Cs2Te is named Caesium telluridocaesium See:[3]

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Hughesdarren)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 02:29, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Hughesdarren: Thanks for catching the link to a disambiguation page. Even though this is a new page, there are over 40 links to it, all coming from old red links. I made a quick fix, but I will have to study this some more.

Thanks for doing page curation. If it weren't for editors like you, wikipedia would be a mess. Comfr (talk) 03:34, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No worries I would have thought that Cesium Telluride follows the conventional naming of inorganic compounds but Chemspider is a pretty good source, Couldn't find a CAS number though..anyway thanks for your kind words and keep up the good work. Hughesdarren (talk) 04:31, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I added a chembox and a few properties. Please let me know if I have made any other mistakes. Comfr (talk) 06:18, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You may appeal this block by adding the following text on your talk page:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Comfr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 172.56.208.205. Place any further information here. Comfr (talk) 05:10, 3 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Decline reason:

Per below. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:16, 3 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

. Please include the following information:

I made edits earlier today. Comfr (talk) 05:10, 3 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You say my ip is 172.56.208.205, but my router says it is 28.124.253.71. Comfr (talk) 05:13, 3 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The problem has gone away. Sorry to bother you. Comfr (talk) 05:23, 3 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I reverted your edit to Maker Nexus because the subject is not notable. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:57, 22 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi @User:Chris troutman, Thanks for new page patrolling, but I created this article less than 10 minutes ago, and I am continuing to work on the article. I have two more references from local newspapers, which have editorial control. Comfr (talk) 19:02, 22 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ok; I'll wait a couple days. Please label the article ((Under construction)). Chris Troutman (talk) 20:05, 22 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The redirect Officer-involved shooting has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 23 § Officer-involved shooting until a consensus is reached. WhatamIdoing (talk) 02:25, 23 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maker Nexus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maker Nexus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chris Troutman (talk) 21:16, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You asked here

After passing through the convergent "combining cone", the mixed fluid is fully condensed, releasing the latent heat of evaporation of the steam which imparts extra velocity to the water^[how?].

A good question: the answer is that it doesn't. As the steam condenses, its density increases enormously and the velocity of the mixture reduces! This causes an increase in pressure. All this happens upstream of the combining cone. (The latent heat is irrelevant, indeed a nuisance if the feedwater is too warm).

(I'm not sure if Kneass explains the working in this way).

2A00:23C7:D29D:4E01:6406:6A2:55C4:800A (talk) 04:34, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]