talk page
![]() |
Hi Coolidon! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:32, 24 April 2015 (UTC) |
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of TheAmazingAtheist, and it appears to include material copied directly from Rational wiki.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:23, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on TheAmazingAtheist requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dai Pritchard (talk) 16:34, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
You can find the reason why I deleted the article in the deletion log.
I am currently unable to access Rational wiki, so I can't check if the article is under a free license, or if the references check out. But in any case, I believe that the article fails the inclusion guidelines, so I would recommend that you don't re-create it. (The deleted article contained a minor claim of notability that he had called for investigation of couple of people, one whom later took part in a school shooting. As I have said, your article - as far as I can see - didn't contain any, and was a borderline attack page. It is not the purpose of Wikipedia to expose random Internet cranks.) If you disagree with my decision, you can challenge it at deletion review. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 16:51, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi. A friendly notice. You are making edits on many pages without leaving an edit summary. Please leave a summary to let others know what you are doing. Happy editing.DrChrissy (talk) 16:58, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
See here for a guide on edit summaries: Help:Edit summary.--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 18:13, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.DrChrissy (talk) 18:04, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Joseph2302. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 18:51, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:EdJohnston. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:09, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Coolidon, I think you're genuinely trying to help out by filling in fossil record data but several editors are concerned you're not putting in good numbers, and the numbers you're putting in aren't supported by sources. Are you using a reference to get those numbers? What source are you using for them? Zad68
19:11, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. Zad68
19:25, 28 April 2015 (UTC)soo unfair
So that means im forever and ever blocked from wikipedia huh oh well thats disappointing
what should i do? then promise to never edit on wikipedia and i will get unblocked??
Zad68
19:36, 28 April 2015 (UTC)Man ive always like wikipedia i actually edited ever since i was 10. i guess the fossil stuff was maybe guessing but i thought it was close
i never knew that. well lesson learned. i guess.....
Maybe i should just go to Wild Ones Wiki instead......
i know stuff. man i have created a bunch of wikipedia pages. it was me who created some spanish wikipedia pages. and other stuff. i even tried to created a page for TheAmazingAtheist that idiot, and i even created the fila brasilero english page. man i have experience!
yeah yeah i just didnt know about fossils thats all jeez.
so what am i supposed to do???
alright i admit i said the f word to someone i cant remember but alright i admit it.
Coolidon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
i will not vandalize or guess anymore
Decline reason:
Under the circumstances, a Standard Offer approach could be taken in this case. PhilKnight (talk) 20:19, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Coolidon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Alright i will not guess,vandalize, be rude or edit unnessisary or unconfirmed articled ever again.
Decline reason:
Clearly WP:NOTHERE. Continue editing Wikipedia when first appropriate levels of maturity and English have been reached and can be demonstrated. And that will take time. Probably a long time and a year at the very least. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 20:39, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.