Hello Cossde. You have been invited to join WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge, a WikiProject dedicated to improving the Asia-related articles on Wikipedia. You received this invitation due to your interest in, or edits relating to or within the scope of the project. If you would like to join or just help out a bit, please visit the project page, and add your name to the participants. If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by: ((subst:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge Invite (1)|~~~~)) Thanks, Dan arndt (talk) 03:08, 28 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Cyril Dissanayake (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to MVO

Richard Udugama (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Planter

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:40, 29 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sajith Premadasa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page United National Front (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:42, 2 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited C. Nagalingam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page District Judge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:04, 9 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Grassmere, Colombo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sources are just passing mentions, not about the house. Article doesn't make it clear why this is a notable subject, and looking for online sources doesn't help either.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 07:36, 11 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grassmere, Colombo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grassmere, Colombo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 08:44, 11 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Richard Gotabhaya Senanayake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Naranwala (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 16 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Gemunu Kulatunge has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the ((prod blp/dated)) tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Harrias ^talk 08:39, 17 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Y. Balaretnarajah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sri Lankan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:31, 1 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of assassinations of the Second JVP Insurrection (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Matara

Tiran Alles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Democratic National Alliance

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:35, 8 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Gotabaya Rajapaksa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Tamil

Sajith Premadasa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Tamil

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:19, 18 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think the executive presidency order should also be there. Because previously I experienced most of users were distracted by the order shown in Wiki. (Order of presidency and executive presidency) Nimesh Ekanayake 11:41, 18 November 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nimeshkasunekanayaka (talk • contribs)

Hi, Nimeshkasunekanayaka, welcome to Wikipedia. The executive presidency is not a formal position. It only gives the holder of the post of President executive powers. Therefore having two orders makes no sense since its one post, the President of Sri Lanka. Cossde (talk) 06:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sarath Wijesinghe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Planter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:40, 7 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maha Dissava, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colonial (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 4 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roshan Goonetileke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Air University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 25 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gotabaya Rajapaksa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Army Headquarters (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:18, 9 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Crishantha de Silva (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to National Defence University

Felix Dias Bandaranaike (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cabinet

Ministry of Defence (Sri Lanka) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to MP

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:07, 16 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article S. C. Obeysekara Jnr has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ANYBIO, lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 06:05, 21 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm struggling to find any reliable sources (in fact any sources) that provides details about S. C. Obeysekara Jnr. If you know of any, particularly that support the claim he was a member of the Legislative Council of Ceylon then I'd be happy to remove the PROD notice. If I can help in any way let me know. Dan arndt (talk) 07:16, 21 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The only issue is that neither his father or children had the same name, so the question is why is it S. C. Obeysekara Jnr? Dan arndt (talk) 07:32, 21 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The more I look at the letter in "The Nation" the more I have to agree with you that S. C. Obeysekara Jnr is actually Solomon Christoffel Obeyesekere. There is just no contrary evidence that an individual by the name of S. C. Obeysekara Jnr, who was a member of the Legislative Council, ever existed. I’d be happy if you want to go ahead and delete the article.Dan arndt (talk) 11:38, 21 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've put a request for the page to be deleted and beefed up the Solomon Christoffel Obeyesekere article.Dan arndt (talk) 03:26, 22 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, S. C. Obeysekara Jnr. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Solomon Christoffel Obeyesekere. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Solomon Christoffel Obeyesekere. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Dan arndt (talk) 04:13, 23 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Crishantha de Silva (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to National Defence University

Eugene Wilfred Jayewardene (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to District Judge

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 23 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Anura Bandaranaike (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to BA

Sri Lanka Navy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Diving

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:17, 3 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You added a reference to Amerasinghe 1986 in that article, but without a full citation it's impossible to know what the reference is. Could you add it please?

Also if you use User:Svick/HarvErrors.js, you'll be notified of these errors in the future. If you don't know how to install it let me know, I'll walk you through it. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:37, 8 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited R. L. Brohier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Supernumerary (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Judiciary of Sri Lanka. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:05, 11 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there,

I saw you tagged Royal–Sri Palee for speedy deletion as an article with no content. Just want to say that A3 only applies when the article is essentially empty, save for maybe some external links and/or perhaps a rephrasing of the article title. While The Royal–Sri Palee (Battle of Kapukula) [1] is the annual Big Match played between Royal College, Horana and Sri Palee College Horana. is currently brief, this gives the article some content, more than enough to understand what the topic is. As a result, A3 probably does not apply and I declined the tag. I thought of tagging the article under A7 (and I wouldnt have overturned had you tagged it with A7), but I ended up with a PROD tag to appear less bitey. Please let me know if there are any issues. Thanks --Dps04 (talk) 11:50, 14 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Alumni of Queens College, Colombo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:23, 15 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ceylon Defence Force, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:42, 17 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Royal College Colombo alumni, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Public Service Commission (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:31, 28 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tuan Nizam Muthaliff, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Directorate of Military Intelligence (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:37, 4 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Sri Lankan intelligence community requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:37, 4 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jayanath Colombage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dartmouth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Susanthika Jayasinghe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Private (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 18 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Conscription in Sri Lanka has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi2canibe (talk) 16:34, 21 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Justin Kotalawela, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 29 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Ana Seneviratne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Planter

Eugene Wilfred Jayewardene (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Volunteer force

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 6 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

A. F. Wijemanne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Matara

E. J. Cooray (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to BA

Lalitha Rajapakse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to BA

Saliya Upul Aladeniya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Volunteer force

T. F. Jayewardene (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Volunteer force

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 13 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Nishantha Ulugetenne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to MA

Ranasinghe Premadasa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Federal Party

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 20 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Department of Prisons, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Watcher.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:39, 2 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ali Sabry (Sri Lankan politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Civil law.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:02, 17 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charles Henry de Soysa, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hydrophobia and Chevalier.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Mediation Board

added a link pointing to Commission

Tribunals in Sri Lanka

added a link pointing to Mediation Board

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Sri Lanka tribunals requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:37, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Sri Lanka administrative law requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:38, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Faculty of Management and Finance, University of Colombo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:26, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Faculty of Arts, University of Colombo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:27, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Faculty of Graduate Studies, University of Colombo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:28, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Faculty of Law, University of Colombo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:28, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Faculty of Science, University of Colombo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:29, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Kanthiah Vaithianathan

added a link pointing to CCS

Sirisena Cooray

added a link pointing to JVP

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 13 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Kanthiah Vaithianathan

added a link pointing to CCS

Prime Minister's Office (Sri Lanka)

added a link pointing to CMG

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 20 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article National Diploma (Sri Lanka) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, lacking any references or sources since May 2017.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 13:28, 21 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Senerat Gunewardene, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page District Judge.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 27 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sri Lanka Artillery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Volunteer force.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 20 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Bank House, Colombo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBUILDING, just being the official residence of the Governor of the Central Bank does not make the building automatically notable in its own right.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 14:50, 26 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Air House, Colombo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBUILDING, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 08:22, 4 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, Hope you can help with the article on Darren Roos the CEO of IFS AB. Thanks in advance. NaminiGunasena (talk) 08:39, 4 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:University of Colombo logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:58, 24 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:UoC logo small.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:59, 24 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christopher Allan Hector Perera Jayawardena, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Volunteer force.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 15 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on EDEX, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mean as custard (talk) 10:47, 29 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:EDEX Logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 2 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Uniforms of the Sri Lanka Army, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ADC and Scarlet.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 5 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Gunasena de Soyza

added a link pointing to BA

Regimental police

added a link pointing to Cane

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 12 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Lists of Sri Lankan military personnel indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:45, 16 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kandyan Convention, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Uva.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 19 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Commander of the Army (Sri Lanka), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 26 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article L. S. B. Perera has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP: ANYBIO, requires significant coverage (not mentions in passing) in multiple independent reliable secondary sources. Being the High Comissioner to Canada does not make him automatically notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 01:44, 7 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Henry De Mel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chevalier.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:13, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Chathu69. I noticed that you recently removed content from article on Sri Lanka Institute of Information Technology without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.

Dear friend, A wave of vandals is trying to delete Sri Lankan Military related articles. I saw most of the pop-ups of military related articles had changed with bikini woman's image. User:Chathu69 is one of them who try to vandalize. As a notable contributor to Sri Lankan articles, please be gracious enough to help protect Sri Lankan articles from these vandals. Thank you. Have a nice day.
49lk (talk) 09:59, 21 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Agreed. Cossde (talk) 10:04, 21 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks a lot for your immediate response. 49lk (talk) 10:39, 21 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I believe it is better to discuss these issues in the Talk:General Sir John Kotelawala Defence University because we can discuss content the article point by point, which will be beneficial to other editors as well. Chathu69 (talk) 12:16, 21 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert Drayton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CMG.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 31 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited E. A. Nugawela, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defence Medal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 7 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

1915 Sinhalese-Muslim riots

added a link pointing to Pettah

Don Baron Jayatilaka

added a link pointing to Wesley College

Edwin Wijeyeratne

added a link pointing to Civil law

John William Ronald Illangakoon

added a link pointing to District Judge

Mohamed Macan Markar

added a link pointing to Hadji

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 14 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Modera House has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBUILDING - appears to be reliant on a single source.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 03:38, 19 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Cossde,

Thank you for creating Arthur Basnayake.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article needs to cite sources. Clarity is needed when saying Ceylon and Sri Lanka in the same sentence. Kindly do the needful.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Whiteguru)). Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 08:48, 19 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited C. A. Dharmapala, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Volunteer force.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 21 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

General Officer Commanding, Ceylon

added links pointing to CIE, CB, DSO, CMG, KCIE and KBE

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 1 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dayantha Porambe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dayantha Porambe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Obi2canibe (talk) 15:06, 5 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Here are some reliable sources which show that the LTTE used military ranks:

• NBC News
• The Guardian
• National Defense University
• CBC
• Daily Mirror
• The Homeland Security Digital Library
• Centre on Conflict, Development and Peacebuilding

--Obi2canibe (talk) 15:29, 12 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

These doesn't define a Military rank structure, it only refers to the use of brigadier or Lt. Col. as a title. What is the rank hierarchy or which rank Prabhakaran had as head of the LTTE militancy. Cossde (talk) 07:07, 14 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I suggest you read the sources. And also WP:BOLD.--Obi2canibe (talk) 15:47, 19 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I suggest you provide sources that indicate a Military rank structure as that we could add it. Cossde (talk) 18:13, 19 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Read the sources. You're no longer at the prestigious school, you don't need to be spoon fed.--Obi2canibe (talk) 18:32, 19 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It is very disappointing to see that you have fallen to personal attackers against me. This is a clear violation of WP:AVOIDYOU and I kindly request you to desist. On the matter at hand, as I said clearly, please provide the rank structure used by the LTTE so that we can add it to the relevant article and thereafter link these articles of rebels to it for clarity. The basic concept of a Military rank is that it is a hierarchy and ranks only make sense in that structure (i.e. rank 1 is higher than rank 2 ), else its just a part of the name or nom de guerre (i.e. Captain America is the nom de guerre of Steve Rogers). It would be interesting to understand this structure one source you have include above, indicates that the LTTE was a flat structure which is the opposite of Military rank (i.e. abolishing of ranks in the People's Liberation Army Ground Force as a result of the Cultural Revolution and the Albanian People's Army) therefore the sources you yourself have given are contradictory and only indicates that these have been used as a form of their nom de guerre.Cossde (talk) 19:08, 19 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Daily Mirror source for example, gives clear evidence of a military ranking structure, with posthumous promotions being given, raising a cadres rank e.g:

'Arulventhan or Charles held Lt. Col. Rank when killed. He was promoted posthumously as “Colonel.”'Oz346 (talk) 06:34, 21 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Oz346, thanks but that's not helpful at all. It only proves that "Colonel" is superior to "Lt. Col.". We need a good source with the rank structure which places "Colonel", "Lt. Col." and others in it without stepping into WP:OR. Cossde (talk) 06:46, 21 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Can you please show me the Wikipedia policy that says we need a detailed document showing the ranking structure of the LTTE, before we can accept the reliable sources that unequivocally describes those LTTE members as having those ranks?

Secondly Tamilnet has been deemed a reliable source by consensus which involves neutral Wikipedia admins, so your purging of Tamil news sources on the child soldiers page is going against Wikipedia policies:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_64

You cannot make your own rules on a whim, just because you do not like something stated in a reliable source.Oz346 (talk) 13:01, 21 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

First, @Oz346 the whole objective of rank is the rank structure, so that one understand what where the ranks fall in i.e. what is higher what is lessor. Else its meaningless and simply becomes a part a name. As you say if these are ranks used by the LTTE, I am sure you can provide reliable sources indicating the rank structure indicating the hierarchy and the rank insignia. As I said before, we can add it to the LTTE article and link the ranks of these carders to it as it the case with other military ranks, else its just a part of the name or nom de guerre. Cossde (talk) 05:29, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Secondly, the consensus you indicate has identified as a Pro LTTE reliable source and can be used pertaining to the LTTE. Content that was removed was pertaining to the Sri Lankan Army. Cossde (talk) 05:29, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

you are making your own rule up again, there was no restriction given by the admins on what Tamilnet can be used to reference for related to news content on SL civil war (its main area of interest), as long as it's given attribution as 'pro-rebel Tamilnet'. This is what the neutral admins have said, are you going against their recommendations? Oz346 (talk) 07:35, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Oz346, there is no reason for you to get offensive/aggressive here. I only pointed that Wikipedia:WikiProject Sri Lanka Reconciliation/Sources classified Tamilnet as a QS pro-rebel. Which means Qualified sources what tell only tell one side of the story. Hence your use of it conserves WP:NPOV#bias, when used to tell the story from the side of the SLA or the GoSL. Cossde (talk) 07:47, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/172330675

No that is NOT what it means, it does not mean that Tamilnet can not be used to describe things related to SLA. It means that Tamilnet must be explicitly shown to be a source which has bias in the topic, and therefore needs attribution. The 'other side' in this case would be a pro-SLA source which may theoretically offer contrary rules. However, the recommendation did NOT say you can censor Tamilnet from the SLA related topics. Oz346 (talk) 07:54, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

typo. 'Contrary views' I meant Oz346 (talk) 07:55, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Oz346, again there is no reason for you to get offensive/aggressive here. Simply using a one sided source to talk of the other side goes against WP:NPOV. Cossde (talk) 08:01, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is nothing in the NPOV page which justifies you removing the pro-rebel source to describe an event related to the SL army. In fact NPOV clearly supports the inclusion of reliable sources even if they have biases:

"A common argument in a dispute about reliable sources is that one source is biased and so another source should be given preference. Some editors argue that biased sources should not be used because they introduce improper POV to an article. However, biased sources are not inherently disallowed based on bias alone, although other aspects of the source may make it invalid. Neutral point of view should be achieved by balancing the bias in sources based on the weight of the opinion in reliable sources and not by excluding sources that do not conform to the editor's point of view."

please show me the passage in the NPOV article which justifies your claim. Thanks. Oz346 (talk) 08:47, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Oz346, your edits did not present any argument of sorts, you added Tamilnet's claims, without explicit attribution, that SLA was recruiting underage personal where as the local media you referred to categorically denied it. It appeared as editorial bias which is a clear violation of NPOV. This I believe falls under "Avoid stating seriously contested assertions as facts." i.e. Tamilnet claims SLA carrying out school level recruitment and Tamilnet claims found a NIC that states the dead soldier was 17 years old. Your edits were editorial biased, stating seriously contested assertions as facts. Your are welcome. Cossde (talk) 09:33, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That is not a satisfactory reason to completely purge the reliable source and it's passages, attribution could have been added. I reverted your large scale, wholesale, unjustified deleting to the status quo. As consensus on Tamilnet states, it should not be deleted wholesale. If I had originally written those phrases, I would had added attribution. It's not a major problem, you can add the source back now with the attribution, and we can get consensus.Oz346 (talk) 09:45, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am sorry that you don't seem to agree, however as I remember it was your additions to the page that I reverted based on my assumption that your edits were editorial biased and clear NPOV. A sort of a tit for tat edit, which I don't think is justifiable in Wikipedia. You seem to continue the edits propagated by பெரும்பாண்டியன்2 which makes me wonder if you are a scockpuppet. Cossde (talk) 09:54, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

well you are wrong, I did not write any new passages to that article, I merely reverted your wholesale purging of Tamilnet which is contrary to the consensus reached on Wikipedia re: tamilnet use as a reliable source. And as for your baseless accusation of me being a sock puppet for that user. I'm very happy for a sockpuppet investigation to be made comparing that user with me, because we are NOT the same person. You shouldn't revert things on 'assumptions', but on the merits of the sources and Wikipedia policies and consensus decisions. Just repeatedly saying NPOV, NPOV without justifying where exactly in the NPOV policy supports your argument to remove Tamilnet is not enough.Oz346 (talk) 10:50, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You seem keen on propagating பெரும்பாண்டியன்2's edits and my assumptions are based on Wikipedia policies. If you are unhappy with those, you more than welcome to take these to arbitration. Cossde (talk) 10:58, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@SebastianHelm,: could you please look into this, user Cossde has wholesale deleted Tamilnet cited passages, and is refusing to allow it's use, when previous Wikipedia consensus explicitly said that it can be used with attribution. Thank you for your time. Oz346 (talk) 11:22, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Regarding LTTE ranks, there are reliable sources showing that they did use a traditional military ranking system:

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2009/4/28/the-history-of-the-tamil-tigers

"LTTE military ranks and grades are similar to those of the Sri Lankan army. These include two grades of enlisted ranks, non-commissioned officers and commissioned officers.

The units also follow a similar structural pattern with squads as the smallest and the regiment as the largest military unit." Oz346 (talk) 11:47, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks Oz346, but this isn't helpful at all its confusing. It says that the "LTTE military ranks and grades are similar to those of the Sri Lankan army. These include two grades of enlisted ranks, non-commissioned officers and commissioned officers". However the Sri Lanka Army rank structure doesn't have two grades of enlisted ranks, it has seven other ranks which includes warrant officers and NCOs. That is why we need the exact ranks structure to include it in the LTTE article. Cossde (talk) 12:06, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Jumping in here. @Oz346: There is no need to use an unreliable source like TamilNet when the same content already exists with citations to reliable sources. Trying to expand on single unreliable source to create WP:UNDUE weight is not WP:NPOV. Also you have engaged in WP:OR as the source you added clearly states "The newspaper made clear the campaign was directed at school leavers above the age of 18" and "By his letter Lt. General Daluwatte had encouraged these senior officers to visit schools, where they received their primary and secondary education, in a bid to woo the senior students to join the Army once they reach the age of 18." and nowhere child soldiers are even mentioned. Putting a fake source doesn't mean you can make up things not only not present in the source but totally contradict it. -UmdP 16:27, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have not engaged in any OR. Those sources were not originally added by me. I reverted changes that were justified on the spurious basis that Tamilnet is not a reliable source, when neutral admins on wiki have already deemed it as a reliable source that can be used with attribution.Oz346 (talk) 16:47, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You can call Tamilnet unreliable as much as you want, that doesn't change Wikipedia's consensus decision that it's a reliable source. Tamilnet is the only media source which exposed Sri Lankan Army human rights abuses like this to the world in English:

https://www.tamilnet.com/art.html?catid=13&artid=18447

Pictures don't lie, no matter how many times people say 'unreliable'.Oz346 (talk) 17:02, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It is not reliable here, it is explicitly stated to be biased and the information is exclusively from it thus in that article it is unreliable. There are reliable sources for both against the LTTE and the government in that article already and adding information entirely reliant on TamilNet is WP:NPOV and WP:UNDUE. Also as you did re-add the content multiple times so you have taken WP:BURDEN from the user that originally added it and you continue to argue in favour of it. Thank you - UmdP 17:05, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

As you created the article 1953 Coronation Honours (Ceylon), could you please review the article 1953 Coronation Honours (Pakistan) to check whether everything has been put at the right place per the source? Thank you. Peter Ormond 💬 21:05, 14 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Peter, it seems fine. Great work. Cossde (talk) 06:47, 21 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Janakapura, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Classified.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 24 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lohan Ratwatte, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rugby.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 1 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Mandaitivu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Volunteer force.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 8 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sri Lanka Armoured Corps, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages MVO and Criminal Justice Commission.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 25 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Sri Lanka Signals Corp indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:42, 30 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nalin Seneviratne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chatham.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 2 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Sri Lanka Armed Forces".

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

UmdP 07:19, 27 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Titles in the Kingdom of Kandy indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 19:15, 8 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Chris Nonis has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the ((prod blp/dated)) tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Dan arndt (talk) 09:17, 31 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Chris Nonis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://drchrisnonis.com/Dr-Chris-Nonis-Profile.aspx and http://ceylon-ananda.com/nonis-on-thin-ice/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dan arndt (talk) 13:46, 31 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hector Kobbekaduwa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Public Service Commission.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi mate, How are you doing? I see your articles creations appear on User:AlexNewArtBot/SriLankaSearchResult. Nice job. If you could add WikiProject Sri Lanka project banner, it will help to track the articles more easily. Cheers--Chanaka L (talk) 04:33, 19 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for contributing to the article John Hudson (Indian Army officer). However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 10:38, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sri Lanka Navy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Floating dock.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 29 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear Cossade,

Before editing the name of Ehelepola Wijesundara, I suggest you research his name scribed on the 5th casket of Temple of Tooth relic. You can find this on the Dalada Maligawa page.Its safe to assume that Ehelepola Wijesundara knew his name better than you or anyone else.

Furthermore, please refrain from altering the reality of the history of Sri lankan heroes to support the discriminating altered history written by the British. You are in fact shaming your own people by engaging in such discriminating activities.As the old sri lankan saying “don’t spit while looking up”. 219.88.174.245 (talk) 10:39, 31 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't appreciate threats. If you have Reliable source which backup your claims, you are free to change content as per Wikipedia guild lines. Cossde (talk) 11:47, 31 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place ((Ds/aware)) on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Hello. You are not permitted to re-add that poorly-written material back (diff). It is a WP:BLP violation and therefore sanctionable, both under that policy as well as WP:ARBBLP. Thank you. El_C 11:48, 4 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Visit the talk page on Ehelepola Nilame and see what Adakiko is suggesting. That individual is suggesting that the article should be deleted, this is what they want, to completely erase our history. I edited Ehelepola’s name based on what was said on the dalada maligawa page’s post. What I wrote was the correct name but your persistent reverts has allowed these indiviuals to achieve ulterior motives. Maha kalu sinhalaya (talk) 09:38, 19 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

For the benefit of the target of Maha kaly's message, Adakiko simply suggested that if reliable sources can't be found to support the content of the article, then maybe the topic isn't notable, and therefore should be deleted. As a participant in WP:AFD myself, I've seen people suggest that same thing before, and that is what they mean by it. Quite a reasonable suggestion and a policy based one as well, see WP:Notability and WP:Verifiability. Adakiko has not nominated the article for deletion though, and I don't think that they have any intention of doing so. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 23:43, 19 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for contributing to the article William Codrington (Royal Navy officer). However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 08:32, 22 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Westminster House has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No secondary sources, tagged for lack of notability and sources since 2018.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 15:33, 23 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article W. M. P. B. Menikdiwela has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable public servant - fails WP:ANYBIO - references are only mentions in passing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 03:57, 6 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited P. B. Jayasundera, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ali Sabry.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 6 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article S. J. Walpita has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP: ANYBIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 07:06, 7 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sri Lanka Volunteer Naval Force, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages QC and CMG.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 19 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Cossde:, I know that you are Sri Lankan, isn't it a custom that in Sri Lanka Major Generals are called generals and also lieutenant generals are called generals, will you explain it please.

Please, see Category:Pakistani generals and Category:Indian generals, please note that all persons mentioned in these categories are not full generals (four star generals/the rank just above lieutenant general). MN Namiki (talk) 12:55, 17 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@MN Namiki, the categories for each rank was created some time ago to indicate the distribution of biographical articles. As you can see, majority of the general officers, are of Major General rank. Where as in the Indian and Pakistani serving generals fall into all types of ranks. Therefore having a similar common category general officers, doesn't work for Sri Lanka. Furthermore if there is such a common category general officers, should Brigadiers be added to it? They are considered One-star rank. Cossde (talk) 08:12, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Cossde:, See - List of Sri Lankan generals and brigadiers, should it be renamed as 'List of Sri Lankan major generals, lieutenant generals, full generals and brigadiers'? By the way, there is difference between Brigadier and Brigadier General. See - G.D. Bakshi who was a major general and he has been fallen in the category of Category:Indian generals. MN Namiki (talk) 11:50, 24 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article J. R. Weinman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. R. Weinman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Rathfelder (talk) 22:36, 16 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Sri Lankan solicitors indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:19, 17 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National list member of Parliament (Sri Lanka), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ali Sabry.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 29 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Graeme Thomson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Admiralty.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 6 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anuradhapura, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page North Central Province.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 15 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Asoka de Silva.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 6 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article M. R. Latiff has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ANYBIO, lacks significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 10:00, 10 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sri Lanka Army Volunteer Force, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Volunteer force.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Mullaitivu (1997), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black Tiger.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just noting that you should look out for some edits in Civil War pages because we had a similar issue in the past. -UtoD 06:00, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wasantha Karannagoda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sri Lankan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:37, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

1958 anti-Tamil pogrom

added a link pointing to Hatton

Sri Lanka Armed Forces

added a link pointing to Anton

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Oz346 (talk) 14:10, 30 May 2023 (UTC)"Reply[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sri Lanka Armed Forces. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. You are removing sourced, valid content and edit warring. You need to stop. Oz346 (talk) 13:53, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Oz346 (talk) 13:57, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring, as you did at Sri Lanka Armed Forces. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  Bbb23 (talk) 15:03, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I have reverted your edit as the case request was malformed, as you will see if you look at the page in history. You had given an entire paragraph as the case request title, which broke the page's formatting. Also, much of the text was in large and/or bold formatting - this is not necessary. Please re-submit when you have fixed these problems. Thanks, Black Kite (talk) 13:03, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Noted. Done. Cossde (talk) 13:06, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In response to your request for arbitration, the Arbitration Committee has agreed that arbitration is not required at this stage. Arbitration on Wikipedia is a lengthy, complicated process that involves the unilateral adjudication of a dispute by an elected committee. Although the Committee's decisions can be useful to certain disputes, in many cases the actual process of arbitration is unenjoyable and time-consuming. Moreover, for most disputes the community maintains an effective set of mechanisms for reaching a compromise or resolving a grievance.

Disputes among editors regarding the content of an article should use structured discussion on the talk page between the disputing editors. However, requests for comment, third opinions and other venues are available if discussion alone does not yield a consensus. The dispute resolution noticeboard also exists as a method of resolving content disputes that aren't easily resolved with talk page discussion.

In all cases, you should review Wikipedia:Dispute resolution to learn more about resolving disputes on Wikipedia. The English Wikipedia community has many venues for resolving disputes and grievances, and it is important to explore them instead of requesting arbitration in the first instance. For more information on the process of arbitration, please see the Arbitration Policy and the Guide to Arbitration. I hope this advice is useful, and please do not hesitate to contact me or a member of the community if you have more questions. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 13:40, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Noted, Thanks. 13:49, 5 June 2023 (UTC) Cossde (talk) 13:49, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sri Lankan Ambassador to Japan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Japana.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 6 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! In response to your request for arbitration, the Arbitration Committee has agreed that arbitration is not required at this stage. Arbitration on Wikipedia is a lengthy, complicated process that involves the unilateral adjudication of a dispute by an elected committee. Although the Committee's decisions can be useful to certain disputes, in many cases the actual process of arbitration is unenjoyable and time-consuming. Moreover, for most disputes the community maintains an effective set of mechanisms for reaching a compromise or resolving a grievance.

For grievances about the conduct of a Wikipedia editor, you should approach the user (in a civil, professional way) on their user talk page. However, other mechanisms for resolving a dispute also exist, such as raising the issue at the administrators' noticeboard for incidents.

In all cases, you should review Wikipedia:Dispute resolution to learn more about resolving disputes on Wikipedia. The English Wikipedia community has many venues for resolving disputes and grievances, and it is important to explore them instead of requesting arbitration in the first instance. For more information on the process of arbitration, please see the Arbitration Policy and the Guide to Arbitration. I hope this advice is useful, and please do not hesitate to contact me or a member of the community if you have more questions. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 17:03, 10 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@MJL: Isn't this a repeat of what Dreamy Jazz did a little higher up?--Bbb23 (talk) 17:55, 10 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Bbb23 Cossde filed two requests at ARC this week, both of which were removed as premature. So "yes, it's a repeat message, but for a different instance" is the answer to your question I suppose. :) Perhaps Cossde will take heed of the content this time... firefly ( t · c ) 18:40, 10 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for the explanation, firefly.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:10, 10 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I find the note on armed forces unnecessary and the current war crimes para needs to be condensed and considering the notes were added on your agreement can you give your view in the talk page? -UtoD 14:29, 15 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at List of attacks on civilians attributed to Sri Lankan government forces. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  Bbb23 (talk) 21:27, 22 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cossde (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I don't contest the block. However the block should be extended to User:Petextrodon who had also taken part in the edit war in the same page. Also in the mean time is there any way I could comment on Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Liberation_Tigers_of_Tamil_Eelam. Cossde (talk) 01:37, 23 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Decline reason:

If you're not contesting the block, there is no reason to use the unblock request template. And in the department of "no reason", requesting that we also block someone else is especially not a reason. Daniel Case (talk) 06:39, 23 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Clancy Fernando, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Special Boat Squadron.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 20 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Darren Roos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darren Roos (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 14:35, 26 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lalith Jayasinghe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clasp.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 28 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paul Pieris, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages BA and LLM.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 5 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Chithambaranathan Mahendran has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Ambassadors are not automatically notable - lacks any other indications of notability (see WP:ANYBIO).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 04:34, 16 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It is only now that i noticed your respectful note from July at WT:SLR/Sources#Tamil Times. I'm sorry that you disagreed with my decision, the more so as in the latest discussion, the arguments brought forward there again seem to be more convincing from the other participants. Since SLR is not as busy as in its heyday, you currently seem to be the only Sinhalese in these discussions, and a lot depends on you. So, in accordance with the old principles of SLR, i want you to be able to better make your case. Would you like us to discuss such things here? ◅ Sebastian 19:55, 12 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@SebastianHelm, yes please. How do you think that can be done? Cossde (talk) 01:47, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your reply. Sorry that I made you wait for 18 hours; I'm not as busy on Wikipedia anymore, and there are additional problems this week that I have to attend to. But I should be able to make time tomorrow between 8 and 13h UTC. Either I will just write things here, or, if you could set aside some time for this, we could talk here or chat via another channel around then, which would make things easier. But please don't expect it to be „done“, in the sense of baking a cake. Rather in the sense of learning a language. Lahiru k, one of the founding members of SLR, could tell you all about it. Sadly, he, like many others of my old SLR friends, isn't around at WP anymore. We can give it a try, though, since I'm encouraged by what I've seen from you so far. ◅ Sebastian 20:39, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I sent you mail. ◅ Sebastian 12:47, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for reaching out. I am sorry, I couldn't respond earlier. I had trouble accessing email. Mind if you could resend the mail please. Cossde (talk) 14:33, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done. If you again didn't receive it, can you please e-mail me so I can reply to you? ◅ Sebastian 02:09, 15 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lionel Balagalle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page JVP.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Check if you have anything to add here - UtoD 20:56, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gal Bangalawa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gal Bangalawa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt (talk) 11:09, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Cossde. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nedeesha Ramanayake, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:04, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charles Wijewardhana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Wijewardhana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Obi2canibe (talk) 13:01, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deshabandu Tennakoon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Police Commission.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Air Ceylon Avro 748 4R-ACJ bombing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air Ceylon Avro 748 4R-ACJ bombing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GalacticOrbits (talk) 17:43, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]