Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]
Hello! Coulomb1,
you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! LizRead!Talk! 22:35, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello, Coulomb1,
If you have questions about something so specific and well-defined as article assessment for WikiProjects, it's better to bring it to the Teahouse than post a question on a Talk page that few people might ever come across. There are amost always some editors who are hanging out at the Teahouse and you are likely to get your answer faster there.
Also, please be careful with page moves and don't just move them because you think a different page title is better. There are guidelines about proper page titles and, for example, the category titles for article assessment are kept consistent over thousands of categories so inventing something new is not likely to be lasting. Thank you. LizRead!Talk! 22:39, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Sorry if my move was wrong. I saw that the title was uncapitalized so I thought it was a move not needing much discussion. Coulomb1 (talk) 23:52, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello, I'm Vanderwaalforces. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to ISBN have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. PS: The outcome of this your edit might be very much unintended, just letting you know.Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:14, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi @Vanderwaalforces. I don't see exactly what the edit does wrong; could you please explain further? Coulomb1 (talk) 19:30, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yep I still don't know what exactly I did wrong. I changed 'will' to 'much,' which I believe is better wording, and changed the source a bit.
I need a specific explanation of what I did wrong because I really have no idea lol. Coulomb1 (talk) 20:48, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You removed the short description template and added ((cite book |url=https://www.kb.se/download/18.71dda82e160c04f1cc412bc/1531827912246/ISBN%20International%20Users%20Manual%20-%207th%20edition.pdf |title=ISBN Users' Manual, International Edition |date=2017 |publisher=International ISBN Agency |year=2017 |isbn=978-92-95055-12-4 |edition=7th |location=London |language=en-us |access-date=28 January 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191211194637/https://www.kb.se/download/18.71dda82e160c04f1cc412bc/1531827912246/ISBN%20International%20Users%20Manual%20-%207th%20edition.pdf |archive-date=11 December 2019 |url-status=live))Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:50, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The short template removal was accidental but the rest was on purpose. Is there anything wrong with what I did besides the short description template? Coulomb1 (talk) 21:19, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Encoded was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Compute pipeline and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hi @Encoded. I added some more in-depth citations and resubmitted. Now the article has sources from Microsoft's documentation and certain in-depth sources from NVIDIA and AMD employees. Coulomb1 (talk) 13:06, 15 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CoconutOctopus was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Compute pipeline and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.