WOT[edit]

Thanks for your note. The brand-new account was kind of a red flag, although the IP that posted that lengthy editorial also only had one entry. It's not properly worded for an encyclopedia article, and it appears to be driven by anger against the service, but that doesn't mean there isn't something to it. Since you've been good enough to come and talk to me about it, what I'll do is restore your reversion, and move the re-deleted stuff to the talk page, where we should soon find out whether anyone else actually cares about the article. :) ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 20:47, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

International Academy of Science[edit]

I had two problems with you submitting this for deletion. First, you did not follow the procedure properly. I had to sort out what you had missed and add it. It was also not listed properly on the AfD page. I did that. Second, you gave no reason for deletion except that we should follow the German wikipedia. No, we make up our own mind, after being given some good reasons for deletion. You have now done that, so we can now have a proper debate. --Bduke (Discussion) 02:21, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your answer. Sorry, didn't know proper protocol.