Wow. Thank you for noticing and improving that! CAVincent (talk) 06:10, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bonnie483(talk) 04:50, 07 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	Pickle Prize
	For having a cool name. 🥒🥒🥒 Sahaib (talk) 21:09, 6 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you!! <3 Crunchydillpickle (talk) 12:54, 13 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Doing Things Media, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— The Most Comfortable Chair 10:48, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Love you long time <3 Hajinishere (talk) 20:41, 31 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Crunchydillpickle,

Please start using Twinkle to tag pages for deletion, including CSD, PRODs, and pages for AFD/RFD/CFD/etc. Once you set up your Twinkle Preferences to "Notify page creator", Twinkle will not only include an appropriate edit summary that states what you are doing but also will post a notification on the talk page of the page creator. Twinkle also has a lot of other cool features and will maintain deletion logs for you. I highly recommend it.

If you have questions about deletion tagging or editor notifications, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:02, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Crunchydillpickle! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 17:29, 11 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey! Thank you so much for the note. Yikes, I really should know better and this is a good reminder to be more careful! I'll be paying much more attention to my "minor edit" markings. Thanks for all you do and happy editing :) Crunchydillpickle (talk) 23:14, 11 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, Crunchydillpickle. When you have a chance, if you could weigh in at Talk:Anxiolytic#Merging_from_Anti-anxiety_medication, I would appreciate it. Thanks! Doctormatt (talk) 19:20, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

oops, late here, but support the merger. glad you went ahead and did it! :) Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 14:52, 21 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Crunchydillpickle/sandbox/Darrel the Barrel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 16:49, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey Padgriffin! I am so sorry for the error — that was so careless! I meant to put the short article draft in my sandbox but I neglected the crucial "User:" in the title. My apologies for putting my messy, incomplete word salad into article space!! Thank you so much for catching this. Once again, I apologize for the mistake. Maybe someday I'll stop making so many dumb mistakes, ugh! Crunchydillpickle (talk) 17:30, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 28 April 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Emily Meggett, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 02:37, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

thanks! Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 02:38, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, i made some edits on your Persistence hunting and id like to know what you think CarrionQueer (talk) 12:05, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey, sorry this response is a little late. I skimmed your changes and they look like great improvements. I see that other editors are working on the article as well. Thanks for your considerable work and I hope you keep editing Wikipedia! It's a great place to be :-) Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 05:36, 13 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 11 June 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Penelope (platypus), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1953, zookeepers accused Penelope the platypus at the Bronx Zoo of "posing as an expectant mother just to lead a life of luxury on double rations"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Penelope (platypus). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Penelope (platypus)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 11 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 15,572 views (648.9 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of June 2023 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 12 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

yay, thanks!! :) Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 00:36, 11 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'd be happy to answer some questions, but unfortunately, I'm not able to to email since it's not connected to my Wikipedia account. LittleT889 (talk) 01:02, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey! Thanks for replying. If you'd like to keep it onwiki, here are some questions. If you'd rather not do this here, you can email me with a throwaway email perhaps? My email is crunchydillpickle9 at gmail

1. Wikimedia Commons (and Flickr, and public domain sources, etc) have some subjects that are well-covered (like some trains and tourist destinations) but also some surprising gaps! Do you think it's generally hard to find photos/gifs/videos of gestures and dances?
2. How much do you share your Wikipedia edits with people in your life? Have you ever shared with friends that you were once the photo of the thirst trap article? Have you ever shared your various dances like the Nae Nae?
3. You edit a lot of different topics (many of which are fascinating!). This may be hard to answer, but if you can think of a reason, what motivates you to keep writing and maintaining articles?
4. If you're okay sharing (and I understand if not), what are your typical days like? Describe your job/industry, hobbies, family, etc.

Thanks and let me know! Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 02:02, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello there! Here are the answer to your questions:

1. Yes, absolutely. Especially ones that are recent. Which is why I’ve contributed a few things myself.

2. I very rarely share my Wikipedia edits with people in my life. Only a handful of times have I shared it with very close friends or family when it was relevant or if I needed their help. For instance, a good friend filmed me doing the Naruto run and flossing. A few people know about the dances. No one knows about the thirst trap article though. In general, I try to stay anonymous.

3. I feel like I am making a (very) small contribution to humanity when I edit Wikipedia. In this short life, at least this will be a part of my legacy. Long after I’m gone, I might still be dancing the nae nae in that gif.

4. Currently, I work part-time as a physician. For many years, I was in school or training, but for the past several years, I have often been traveling.

If you have any further questions or need clarification, please let me know. Thanks! LittleT889 (talk) 00:22, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Crunchydillpickle,

Thank you for creating Wisconsin Butter Fire.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please find other articles where this article can be linked. It is an orphan right now.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Lightburst)). Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Lightburst (talk) 03:35, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Lightburst! Thanks for taking the time to check it over! I don't believe it's true orphan since it's on the List of non-water floods (though on the list of non-water floods, I used an alternate name "Wisconsin butter flood" there, which redirects to Wisconsin Butter Fire. I figured it was better since it makes clear that the event was not just a fire but also a flood. Let me know if I should still keep un-orphaning and I can get busy :) Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 03:58, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for the message. I did remove the template. Thanks for the article! Lightburst (talk) 04:00, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I was wondering how long it would take for someone to make this page after Annie mentioned it. Great article! EponineBunnyKickQueen (talk) 06:01, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey thanks! I hadn't written an article about a performance venue before so it was a fun challenge :) I welcome all your improvements and suggestions! Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 06:07, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 17 October 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Wisconsin Butter Fire, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Wisconsin Butter Fire created a river of melted butter in Madison? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wisconsin Butter Fire. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Wisconsin Butter Fire), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 17 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 17,752 views (739.6 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of October 2023 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Very evocative writing, well done! Keep up the good work. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 15:50, 17 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks! Wish I could give you a purple koolickle! Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 15:57, 17 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Could you add in an Editor section to the recess therapy wiki page? The editing being attributed to "Will Halbert"

reference https://winners.webbyawards.com/2023/video/performance-craft/best-web-personalityhost/244438/julian-shapirobarnum--recess-therapy (bottom of page in credits section) 2603:8080:2500:90B:31F9:1D6B:3098:6E43 (talk) 17:37, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Will do! Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 17:26, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

i don't know that i've ever come across your userpage before, but i made the same joke on my own userpage and my bot's userpage. Funny that, thanks for the laugh today! that's me at the red carpet, by the way :P

theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 23:07, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I love all my fellow fruit and vegetable editors!! By the way, thanks for all you do at DYK! :-) Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 23:10, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi @Crunchydillpickle. I came here through Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nitish_Rajput. I noticed the Wikipedia user infobox on your user page and decided to copy "the code" into mine. I wanted to inform you of my intention. Hope to see you around. Charlie (talk) 15:24, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Go for it! Pretty sure I copied it from someone else's userpage a few years ago. Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 17:39, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

First of all, thank you for the UAA report! To make it easier for you next time, a couple pointers. First, for a username that flagrant it's not necessary to warn the user, just report it. Second, Twinkle has a function to generate a UAA report; if you haven't enabled Twinkle I strongly encourage you to, it makes so many things much easier (I got my start manually patrolling NPP for months, when the interface for doing so was far less intuitive, Twinkle dramatically increased my productivity). And if you do manually report a user, since every once in a while Twinkle randomly barfs, use the template ((user-uaa|1=''Example username'')) (it's in the UAA editnotice) and that'll simplify the process for you. Thanks again! The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 22:45, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you so much for these tips! Will do :-) Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 22:50, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Really liked your work for Slate. But remember that as much as it seems I'm the only one who always appears on the Top 25 more people are writing - as much as I mentioned complete lack of interest in Fast & Furious and the Jeffrey Dahmer show , I wasn't the one saying I wouldn't watch Inventing Anna. igordebraga ≠ 16:43, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Crunchydillpickle!

I think that I (re)submitted a draft in the incorrect order - used 'publish' instead of 'resubmit' Is that why you updated the "under review" status?

I see this in the history (below) - what steps should I have followed? Thank you:

curprev 22:30, 5 December 2023‎ Crunchydillpickle talk contribs‎ 13,809 bytes −52‎ Unmarking submission as under review (AFCH 0.9.1) undothank Tag: Manual revert curprev 22:27, 5 December 2023‎ Crunchydillpickle talk contribs‎ 13,861 bytes +52‎ Marking submission as under review (AFCH 0.9.1) undothank Tag: Reverted Science and such (talk) 13:54, 6 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey @Science and such! Thanks for reaching out. I don't think you did anything wrong. I started reviewing the article and then I realized I wasn't quite confident in my interpretation of the notability standards for books vs. authors. I decided to leave and let a more experienced reviewer take it! Best of luck, Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 16:02, 6 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've not communicated via a talk page before, and for that I preemptively apologize if I'm not utilizing according to norms.

I appreciate your feedback about the page we have been working on on the Journalist Paul G. Hayes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Paul_G._Hayes.

Since receiving your comments, we have gone back to the archives to edit and augment significantly with dedicated commentary by Sig Gissler (Editor, Professor), James A Clum PhD (UW), John Eifler (Architect), Robert Wells (Journalist), Robert Rosenblatt (LA Times), U.S. Senators William Proxmire and Gaylord Nelson and others. And we have removed "passing mentions".

Importantly, we have added narrative and proper references to Hayes' work on nuclear energy investigation, energy policy, and Wisconsin's heritage.

Our main challenge in sufficiently characterizing his large body of work has been the timing of Hayes' retirement from Journalism (1995), which happened just as digital was coming on... and by the inaccessibility of Milwaukee Journal archives (which were removed from the Google News archive a few years ago.) We have added significantly to citations using infoweb.newsbank in a format that I hope is wiki friendly.

So my question: are we getting closer? What suggestions for improvement might you make?

@Ndhayes1 Ndhayes1 (talk) 04:26, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey, I took a look at your edits. This is very thorough and clearly made with a lot of care. I'm still not seeing convincing evidence that it meets Wikipedia's notability standards (WP:JOURNALIST), and I still think that it would have a better home on a personal website or blog. Note that many of the journalists with Wikipedia articles, such as fellow Wisconsinite Margo Huston, have dedicated profiles that other journalists have written about their work or career. I do not see any such sources about Paul G. Hayes.

One main issue is that the in-line citations aren't great. Many statements are not sourced. Many statements have citations that do not contain the relevant info. For example: "Hayes contributed research and the essay 'A Tale of Five Rivers' to the series 'Pollution, the Spreading Menace' for which the Journal won a Pulitzer Prize in 1967 in the Public Service category" has a citation, but it goes to a Pulitzer website page which does not mention Paul G. Hayes nor state that he contributed research to the prizewinning work. I am not confident that this article will make it to Wikipedia, but if it does, you'll need to remove the unsourced statements. Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 18:58, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks again for your feedback and for looking at it again.

I've taken steps to improve citation relevancy and remove unsourced statements in today's draft. Not looking for another review, but wonder if you might comment on the example Pulitzer paragraph and let me know if I'm headed in the right direction. There I've added context and other new sources who name Hayes and his contribution.

Appreciate a quick eye on it. Ndhayes1 (talk) 19:48, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Anti-organized crime institutions in Russia

added a link pointing to Ithaca

Cornell Fine Arts Library

added a link pointing to Ithaca

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have renamed the article to Draft:The case of Ong Mingwee to to highlight the fact that the case is significant, rather than the person involved in it, also adding more sources to highlight its significance. The case is also cited often in local online forums , but are not suited to be cited as sources on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sgassumeinnocent (talk • contribs) 06:41, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Looks like we both reviewed at the same time... haha. I'll restore my comment. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 01:21, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Agh, sorry about that! Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 01:23, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I was curious what issue you had that considered the amount of media coverage for this poet to be insufficient. When doing a search, there is an ample amount of media coverage within the poetry community. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. RIpoRI (talk) 19:50, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Draft:Sanzhi language Read the latest edit summary 90.241.160.140 (talk) 16:12, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Whatever it doesn’t matter anymore. 90.241.160.140 (talk) 11:53, 24 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Crunchydillpickle: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, —Ganesha811 (talk) 07:01, 24 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I have added two sources to the draft I created Draft:Mustapha Aarab Can you take another look? Trabeltomed (talk) 19:26, 24 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article cites no sources. Why did you accept it? Mach61 (talk) 23:08, 28 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey Mach61, yikes, thanks for catching my error. When I first saw that draft, I made a mental note to myself to add sources myself (since I was curious about the topic and the draft was otherwise decent). Then I... forgot to do that. Very sorry. Won't happen again. I flogging myself with a wet trout at this very moment (metaphorically). Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 03:55, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article's been tidied up, so I suppose all's well ends well. Cheers, Mach61 (talk) 01:57, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks again for your careful eye! Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 01:03, 5 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

For lile Daskid Galaxypas (talk) 01:01, 5 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I don't know what this means! Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 01:02, 5 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Help me do my bio on Wikipedia Galaxypas (talk) 01:41, 5 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, we added additional secondary sources to the page and included additional resources as well. Our submission was declined again for the second time due to the same issue which we did resolve.

We are just wanting to understand what we need to do in order to get our page up and running.

We originally planned to edit our American Payroll Association page since we rebranded to PayrollOrg in May, but were unable to change the name which is the reason for the new page being created.

Any insight you can provide would be appreciated,

PayrollOrg CMG95 (talk) 16:10, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	One of the grestest pages possibly ever created SamDavies47 (talk) 17:23, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Aw, thank you! Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 20:37, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jon Agee, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:47, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Crunchydillpickle. Thank you for your work on Praxis (proposed city). North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|North8000)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:46, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Pickersgill-Cunliffe review four books