Hi Curlymanjaro! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Johannes de Cuba, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:53, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Curlymanjaro! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 14:14, Thursday, April 16, 2015 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Stephen Need, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Curlymanjaro. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Stephen Need".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)) or ((db-g13)) code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: ((subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Stephen Need)), paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. -- numbermaniac (talk) 06:06, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:LycianTombPhellus.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text ((di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>)) below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 01:15, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carlton le Willows Academy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages AS-level and BTEC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Joseph Terry at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with ((db-g7)), or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 23:15, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Curlymanjaro,

I noticed you're active in British related topics. Can you help me out here? I would like to know the names of three gentlemen who are found in a picture in this link: [1]. The picture is the one with the caption: "Opening of the Governing Council meeting Isola di San Lazzaro degli Armeni..." Now I believe one of them is Prince Charles Philippe, Duke of Anjou, the other is, as I assume, Charles Falconer, Baron Falconer of Thoroton, but the other one I don't know. Who and what is a "the Grand Master"? I'd really appreciate your help if possible. Thanks. P.S. Please ping me. Étienne Dolet (talk) 20:43, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Stephen Need, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Curlymanjaro. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Stephen Need".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)) or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 19:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Joseph Terry you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mackensen -- Mackensen (talk) 01:01, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Joseph Terry you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Joseph Terry for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mackensen -- Mackensen (talk) 01:41, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Joseph Terry you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Joseph Terry for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mackensen -- Mackensen (talk) 02:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Sir Joseph Terry at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 00:01, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 18 February 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Joseph Terry, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1898 Sir Joseph Terry died of heart failure due to over-exertion while attempting to win a by-election in York? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Joseph Terry. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Wilfrid Eggleston you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 00:01, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Wilfrid Eggleston you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Wilfrid Eggleston for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 19:20, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Wilfrid Eggleston you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Wilfrid Eggleston for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 02:01, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 29 March 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Wilfrid Eggleston, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Canadian civil servant Wilfrid Eggleston rejected Prime Minister Mackenzie King's request to censor the Conscription Crisis of 1944? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wilfrid Eggleston. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:43, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 29 March 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Wilfrid Eggleston, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Canadian civil servant Wilfrid Eggleston rejected Prime Minister Mackenzie King's request to censor the Conscription Crisis of 1944? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wilfrid Eggleston. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:43, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fred Pepper you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 22:41, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Fred Pepper you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fred Pepper for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 14:41, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:UniversityofAberdeenLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:15, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sir James Mor Macdonald, 2nd Baronet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parliamentarians. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alan Oakley (designer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fuzes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gabriel Pleydell you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Midnightblueowl -- Midnightblueowl (talk) 17:21, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Gabriel Pleydell you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Gabriel Pleydell for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Midnightblueowl -- Midnightblueowl (talk) 14:01, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 18 August 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gabriel Pleydell, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1555 Gabriel Pleydell was found guilty of ring-leading a plot to exile Mary I of England? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gabriel Pleydell. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:01, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Curlymanjaro. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, On behalf of WP:WPSCH, I would like very much to suggest you consider getting this article through a GAC. You've already promoted several articles to GA, and this one looks as if it's ready. If you want to do this, as a courtesy, you may wish to touch base with Bleaney who created the original stub. I'd be happy to give the article a a final 'once over' peer review if you want to go ahead. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:16, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sad to say, the project through the Wikipedia Library has been discontinued. See Wikipedia Talk:BNA#Discontinued. Tony Holkham (Talk) 19:30, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That is a shame. Thanks for the ping though! Curlymanjaro (talk) 19:34, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Curlymanjaro. Please check your email; you've got mail! The subject is The Wikipedia Library - OUP.
Message added 07:37, 4 February 2017 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((You've got mail)) or ((ygm)) template.

--Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 07:37, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Are you still interested in access to this database, I still have no response to the email I sent you. For now I've marked your request as  On hold--Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 02:12, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the Gabriel Pleydell article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 7 April 2017. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/April 7, 2017. Thanks! Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 18:56, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Carlton le Willows Academy

Thank you for quality articles on personalities such as Gabriel Pleydell, Wilfrid Eggleston, Fred Pepper and Joseph Terry, for the template and improvement of Carlton le Willows Academy, for work on consistency, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:28, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Three years ago, you were recipient no. 1628 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:19, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Labour Party of Scotland you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Midnightblueowl -- Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:01, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Independence from Europe you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Midnightblueowl -- Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:01, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Independence from Europe you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Independence from Europe for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Midnightblueowl -- Midnightblueowl (talk) 22:02, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Labour Party of Scotland you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Labour Party of Scotland for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Midnightblueowl -- Midnightblueowl (talk) 11:02, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Independence from Europe at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with ((db-g7)), or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 02:23, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for contributing to DYK. Please be aware that page creators/nominators are not allowed to review their own hooks, nor are they allowed to promote their own hook to prep. I have returned your hook to the noms area so another editor can promote it. Please be patient. Yoninah (talk) 12:27, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your other nomination that you promoted, Independence from Europe, has also been returned from prep. As Yoninah said, please be patient—these nominations will eventually be moved to prep by an editor who frequents DYK. It could take a couple of weeks; we currently have a backlog of 138 approved nominations, and are promoting 56 per week. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:55, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On 9 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Labour Party of Scotland, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after its dissolution in 1973, some members of the Labour Party of Scotland left to work for a pirate radio station? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Labour Party of Scotland. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:03, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On 19 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Independence from Europe, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that if elected to government, Independence from Europe would build a large condominium in London to house British Members of Parliament? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Independence from Europe. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih^Talk 12:02, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Thomas Richard Morris at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Elisa.rolle (talk) 02:46, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 16:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 23:12, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Thomas Richard Morris at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with ((db-g7)), or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 10:39, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is back. I think his mayoralty would be enough. There is not a word about his death, no obituary, and very little about his election. If you have access to relevant newspapers it might help. FWIW, I think his mayoralty of a comnunity of this size is notable but its not up to me. One could also quibble over the decision to pull this from the DYK queue given that you had fulfilled the DYK requirements. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 10:55, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

One way or another, Curlymanjaro, we need to hear from you on the nominations page. Please post there soon if you wish to continue pursuing this nomination. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:28, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I've been super busy with school and I feel that I've already set out my argument for the page's notability. As for the DYK nomination itself, I'm not in a position to carry on arguing about the finer details, I just thought it would be a neat thing to do in a short space of time. In other words, I don't mind. Curlymanjaro (talk) 01:55, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place ((subst:Dobos Torte)) on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 11:38, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wahey! Thanks a lot; nice to know that someone is in my corner. Curlymanjaro (talk) 22:41, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas Richard Morris is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Richard Morris until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 05:38, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Curlymanjaro. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 581 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 18:02, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 581 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 581 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 20:21, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Highlands and Islands Alliance you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 17:21, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Highlands and Islands Alliance you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Highlands and Islands Alliance for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 14:21, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - If a valid sub-category is in place, then the parent category shouldn’t be added. For example if “South Carolina Gamecocks football players” is present, then “University of South Carolina alumni” isn’t needed. All U of South Carolina football players are alums of the school. See WP:SUBCAT. Thanks. Rikster2 (talk) 21:18, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Curlymanjaro. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Curlymanjaro. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Friends of the British Overseas Territories has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is self promotion of a non-notable charitable trust with citations that reference nothing of note. I recall a similar article was created and deleted a while ago, but it seems to have re-appeared.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 22:13, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bill Bowman (Scottish politician) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 11:21, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bill Bowman (Scottish politician) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bill Bowman (Scottish politician) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 14:02, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Carlton le Willows Academy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Fingrmouse -- Fingrmouse (talk) 15:41, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Carlton le Willows Academy you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Carlton le Willows Academy for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Fingrmouse -- Fingrmouse (talk) 16:41, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Bill Bowman (Scottish politician) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! RRD (talk) 03:35, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Carlton le Willows Academy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Carlton le Willows Academy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Fingrmouse -- Fingrmouse (talk) 12:02, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On 1 July 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bill Bowman (Scottish politician), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that before his accession to the Scottish Parliament in 2016, Bill Bowman lived and worked for more than a decade in Bucharest? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bill Bowman (Scottish politician). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Carlton le Willows Academy at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Kenirwin/(talk) 15:33, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On 19 September 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Carlton le Willows Academy, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Carlton le Willows Academy alumni include cricketer Mark Footitt, Air Supply singer/guitarist Graham Russell, and balloonist Janet Folkes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Carlton le Willows Academy. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

valereee (talk) 00:01, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Sovereign Military Order of Malta–European Union relations at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with ((db-g7)), or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 07:17, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Curlymanjaro, it has been two and a half weeks, and the nomination has still not been transcluded. Further, it is not long enough to qualify as a DYK: the absolutely minimum is 1500 prose characters, and this is only 1266 prose characters. If you wish to pursue this nomination, you'll need to transclude it (or request help for doing so), and also do more work on the article to get it up above minimum length. I hope you do both of these soon, but if not, the nomination could be removed or closed. Thank you for your attention. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:00, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Golden Link you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 19:01, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Golden Link you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:The Golden Link for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 16:41, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Sovereign Military Order of Malta–European Union relations at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 14:06, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Professor Popper's Problem you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:21, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Professor Popper's Problem you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Professor Popper's Problem for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:02, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if you are active on Wikipedia and are still interested in helping out with urgent tasks on our large Schools Project, please let us know here. We look forward to hearing from you.

Sent to project members 13:58, 29 August 2021 (UTC). You can opt of messages here.

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Carlton Town F.C. you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 15:00, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Carlton Town F.C. you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Carlton Town F.C. for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 05:41, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Five years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:56, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you today for Carlton Town F.C., "about Carlton Town Football Club, a small Nottinghamshire team competing at the eighth tier of the English football pyramid"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:49, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm awaiting a QPQ for the DYK nomination of Carlton Town F.C. It can't pass without one. Please supply one soon and ping me when you do. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:48, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 23 April 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Carlton Town F.C., which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Carlton Town F.C., now competing at the eighth tier of the English football pyramid, was once denied promotion by a hat-trick scored by future England international Jamie Vardy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Carlton Town F.C.. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Carlton Town F.C.), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		The Featured Article Medal
		By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this special, very exclusive award created just for we few, we happy few, this band of brothers, who have shed sweat, tears and probably blood, in order to be able to proudly claim "I too have taken an article to Featured status". Gog the Mild (talk) 19:44, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Curlymanjaro! The article you nominated, Carlton Town F.C., has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:06, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 31 August 2022. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 30, 2022, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/August 2022. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 11:43, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:10, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]