Greetings everyone, feel free to voice your opinions and suggestions

Archives

/Archive 1 /Archive 2

Cyril, Happy to help tidy things up! Happy trails! Schmiteye 02:44, 28 March 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear Cyrillic,

Thank you for applying for NPWatcher! You've been approved to use it. Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if there is a newer release (or just add the main page (here) to your watchlist). Report any bugs or feature suggestion here. If you need help, feel free to contact me or join NPWatcher.

Snowolf ^(talk) _CON ^COI - 23:21, 31 March 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for the Barnstar!!!! FireSpike 23:41, 1 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You are welcome, and you deserve it.--Cyril Thomas 23:45, 1 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi - I see you have recently created a new stub type. As it states at Wikipedia:Stub, at the top of most stub categories, and in many other places on Wikipedia, it is recommended that new stub types are proposed prior to creation at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, in order to check whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, and whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies. Your new stub type is currently listed at WP:WSS/D - please feel free to make any comments there as to any rationale for this stub type. And please, in future, consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha? 01:49, 4 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reply

Dear Grutness, thank you so much, I have posted a reply in your user page. --Cyril Thomas 12:36, 4 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Cyril - you wrote:Thanks for the criminology-stub comments. I think the parent category should stay as it is, criminology is definitely fit to an umbrella term for many categories, still, it's better to seperate forensic science and medicine from the criminology category.

Certainly it should stay in some of the parent categories it has, but one or two of them seem a little odd - I'm not sure why it should have been in a biography stub category, for instance 9the other way round may have made more sense). On the whole, though, it looks like the stub is acceptable and, if anything, it may be the earlier forensics stub category that needs to be looked at, since it hasn't really grown to the size where it would be very useful for editors. BTW, thanks for accepting my comments about the stub type so well - a lot of editors grumble very loudly when stub types they've created are questioned! Grutness...wha? 23:42, 8 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have denied the usurpation as the matter has not been discussed by the community. There are many issues that need to be discussed such as legal and technical. Other issues include a maximum number of edits, the time duration, and the legal impact of the forced attribution change. =Nichalp «Talk»= 16:43, 6 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This needs to be put up on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy), with a CC link on WP:BN and the talk page of WP:CHU/U. Since the topic is going to be contentious, it would be advisable to create a new page/subpage somewhere. Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 04:53, 7 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

PS What happened to Marayur for FA? =Nichalp «Talk»= 04:53, 7 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for the barnstar! Mikieminnow 22:37, 9 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Cyril,

Thanks for your note. I'm afraid that I'm not seeing the same problems that you are on Breaking Benjamin. After my unprotection, there have been only three edits; of those three, two were part of an edit and subsequent self-revert. Perhaps you were thinking of a different, but related, page? — TKD::Talk 02:50, 12 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reply

Posted a reply on your userpage. Thanks.--Cyril Thomas 16:53, 12 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Usually, when an anonymous user makes an edit and quickly reverts himself/herself, I don't make a big deal out of it unless it's accompanied by other troublesome edits; the user was probably experimenting. I don't know why you would have gotten any errors when editing; perhaps there was a database hiccup or the server was busy at that moment. — TKD::Talk 06:38, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear Cyril,

I have checked my contributions and I can't find any mention of the revert. Are you sure it was me? I did warn the creator, but not on that page.

CarrotMan 17:22, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reply

Posted a reply on your user page.--Cyril Thomas 17:29, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear Cyril,

Ah, I get it now! I did know that the vandal was also the creator, but I had trouble finding the right template. Thank you for your kind comments, nice to meet you too.

CarrotMan 17:36, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! I have a request for translation entry help on Wiktionary. Could you add the Malayalam translations for the following pages?

• parrot
• listen
• Appendix:Units of time

Please note that both "parrot" and "listen" have multiple definitions and multiple translations sections. Thanks for any help you can provide! --EncycloPetey 00:08, 14 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have the same problem when I want to add words in Ancient Greek. The best option I have found is to copy and paste each letter from a page that lists them. For Malayalam, there is a Wikipedia article on Malayalam script, though I don't know whether it contains all the charatcers or not. My own browser isn't even set up to display Malayalam. --EncycloPetey 23:40, 14 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

LOL, glad to know I'm not the only one who keeps forgetting the preview button! I'll get rid of the tag ;-) --Speed Air Man 10:38, 16 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reply

Thank you :) --Cyril Thomas 10:38, 16 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hmm well it has been attracting a lot of vandals, you're right.. they've all been blocked but I dare say they'll be back with new accounts. I have to leave Wikipedia for a while now, but keep your eye on the article and if any more vandalism appears then yeah it might be an idea. LibLord 16:22, 16 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes I was aware of that haha! LibLord 19:38, 17 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just out of curiosity how does one become an admin and are there other positions of responsibility on wikipedia that come before administrator? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by HolyChristianWarrior (talk • contribs) 19:32, 2 May 2007 (UTC).Ya I know I was accused of vandalising the Corcoran page (which i was not),but I wasn't I was contributing to the article and the other editor started an edit war, and also he pasted a vandal warning on to mytalk page.Odran Corcoran 16:00, 4 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reply

Dear HolyChristianWarrior, You can start reading this section Becoming an administrator, a clean record of constructive contributions and vandalism-free record is also essential. Thanks for the post. (See the reply in your talk page too...) --Cyril Thomas 00:58, 4 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You list the image as GFDL-self, but it appears to be the same image as used on his official profile, so it seems to be a work of a staffer. Care to clarify? Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 05:32, 11 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reply

Dear Night Gyr, I am a student at the University of Dundee and Paul Wilkinson is the Professor at St. Andrews, the parental University. Paul Wilkinson is also occasionally presents lectures at our University, and I have full rights to the picture and Paul Wilkinson himself grant me permission to use the photo as suitable. Thanks, --Cyril Thomas 03:22, 12 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to ((inactive)) and/or ((historical)) status. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F. Thank you. Delivered on behalf of user:xaosflux 01:25, 10 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've nominated this template for deletion at WP:SFD. Cheers. --MZMcBride 16:55, 10 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reply

I have posted a reply on your userpage. Thank you.--Cyril Thomas 23:21, 10 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Paul Wilkinson.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. cholmes75 ^{(chit chat)} 18:13, 29 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reply

I got the picture from Paul Wilkinson himself, he sent it through his secretary Gillian, if you personally email me, I will give you Paul Wilkinson's telephone number at St. Andrews, Center for the Study of Terrorism and Political Violence, you can contact him or his secretary directly to inquire about the image given to Cyril Thomas to upload in Wikipedia. --Cyril Thomas 12:34, 4 September 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for clarifying. I reverted and warned to be safe, but I looked later at the IP's contributions and thought that it might have been legitimate. — TKD::Talk 13:25, 11 September 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reply

No problem at all, in fact I am grateful for your edit, as it will make me remember to log in next time and I feel more protected LOL. Thanks TKD... --Cyril Thomas 13:47, 11 September 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you very much for the barnstar. I blush :) Keep up your good work, too! Stephenb (Talk) 12:22, 20 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What a Glock is that?--Sanandros (talk) 15:00, 13 April 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reply

It's Glock 17. Thanks for the question. --Cyril Thomas (talk) 00:56, 28 April 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:AGI gld logo no backgd.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Reply

Rationale Added, thanks. --Cyril Thomas (talk) 00:56, 28 April 2008 (UTC) ===Reply[reply]

Hi Cyril, I'm currently working pretty heavily on the biographical page for L. Patrick Gray, Hoover's ill-timed successor. Anyway, I thought about adding a FBI project tag onto his talk page, but it seems that project is pretty dead these days. Do you know what's going on with it? Are people still active in it at all? Thanks (Morethan3words (talk) 06:45, 24 July 2008 (UTC))Reply[reply]

Reply

Dear Gary, Thanks for the message, I don't think FBI project page is active now, primarily because Shane is no longer an active Wikipedia user now, still we can contribute to the project. Adding project tag is a good thing, whenever I create a project related to FBI I add the tag because it will guide others to do the same and the project will be alive. Cheers, Cyril

Thanks for uploading File:Skokie dvd wiki.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 28 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Cyrillic. You might be interested in this AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young Jin Moon. Redddogg (talk) 17:28, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Another article you contributed to. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hak Ja Han Redddogg (talk) 17:23, 22 March 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dashiell Hammett.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:25, 22 March 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 20:25, 22 March 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Academy Group, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Tagged for months with notability concerns, still lacks reliable 3rd party references

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((dated prod)) notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. RadioFan (talk) 12:09, 1 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have nominated Academy Group, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Academy Group. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ukexpat (talk) 14:26, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Academy Group requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding ((hangon)) to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Many otters • One hammer • HELP)} 14:51, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, this file was uploaded by you and is now used in the german Wikipedia.

I have the question if it is a "real" weapon, because it is marked 0-1-A and the charging handle is on the right side. Also there is no ejection port to see.

--Wiki-Chris (talk) 21:47, 3 December 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, it's a real submachine gun, the image is flipped for the ease of usage. Ejection port is on the other side, in other words, it is a mirror image. Thanks for the question --Cyril Thomas 23:03, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

The article Thomas Pala has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to meet WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((dated prod)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((dated prod)) will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 18:17, 4 December 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Cyrillic! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 9 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 1,824 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the ((unreferencedBLP)) tag. Here is the list:

1. Gregg McCrary - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Patrick Mullany - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Howard Teten - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Bruce Alexander - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Russell D. Howard - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Michael R. Napier - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
7. John G. Raucci - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
8. Frances Grey (actress) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
9. Raymond E. Foster - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:25, 9 January 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello - You, or someone with your username, has voted in Global Sysops Vote but you don't have a Unified Login (SUL account). Please could you:

• merge your accounts
• or add a link from your Meta user page to your local user page.

This is necessary to confirm your identity or your vote may not be counted. Thank you --(RT) (talk) 11:28, 9 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Jon Katzenbach requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding ((hangon)) to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 19:02, 14 April 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:John mills observatory.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:40, 6 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:40, 6 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above noted image or media file appears to have conflicted licensing. As an image cannot be both 'free' and 'unfree', a check of the exact status of this media/image concerned is advised.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:14, 4 June 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for uploading this media, It would be appreciated if you could add :

• 1-2 paragraphs explaining what is shown in the image.
• A location marker/geocode for the location shown.
• An explanation of how this is your own work.
• An explanation of why this image or its subject is notable.

As well as helping those categorising the image, it will help place the image in context and allow other users of the image (including academics) to make better use of the image :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:04, 22 July 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for uploading this media, It would be appreciated if you could add :

• 1-2 paragraphs explaining what is shown in the image.
• A location marker/geocode for the location shown.
• An explanation of how this is your own work.
• An explanation of why this image or its subject is notable.

As well as helping those categorising the image, it will help place the image in context and allow other users of the image (including academics) to make better use of the image :)

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:09, 22 July 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for uploading this media, It would be appreciated if you could add :

• 1-2 paragraphs explaining what is shown in the image.
• An indication of where the image was taken
• An explanation of how this is your own work.
• An explanation of why this image or its subject is notable.
• A scientifc/taxnomic classifcation for the organism/plant shown.

As well as helping those categorising the image, it will help place the image in context and allow other users of the image (including academics) to make better use of the image :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:34, 22 July 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for uploading this media, It would be appreciated if you could add :

• 1-2 paragraphs explaining what is shown in the image.
• An indication of where the image was taken
• A location marker/geocode for the location shown.
• An explanation of how this is your own work.
• An explanation of why this image or its subject is notable.

As well as helping those categorising the image, it will help place the image in context and allow other users of the image (including academics) to make better use of the image :)

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:04, 22 July 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for uploading this media, It would be appreciated if you could add :

• 1-2 paragraphs explaining what is shown in the image.
• An indication of where the image was taken
• An explanation of how this is your own work.
• An explanation of why this image or its subject is notable.

As well as helping those categorising the image, it will help place the image in context and allow other users of the image (including academics) to make better use of the image :)

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:19, 22 July 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for uploading this media, It would be appreciated if you could add :

• 1-2 paragraphs explaining what is shown in the image.
• An indication of where the image was taken
• A location marker/geocode for the location shown.
• An explanation of how this is your own work.

As well as helping those categorising the image, it will help place the image in context and allow other users of the image (including academics) to make better use of the image :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:34, 22 July 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Cyrillic, I've just come across this article, which you created years ago. It still needs references, but I know nothing about him, can you help? Thanks, Markiewp (talk) 19:53, 18 August 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tomfloodmillsobservatory.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:45, 16 September 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Academy Group, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://wikibin.org/articles/academy-group.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:56, 28 September 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Academy Group requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding ((hangon)) to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a ((Talkback)) message on my talk page. 18:57, 28 September 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Cyrillic. You have new messages at Talk:Academy Group.
Message added 19:17, 28 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

A tag has been placed on Academy Group requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template ((hangon)) underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 12:30, 29 September 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Cyrillic. You have new messages at Ks0stm's talk page.
Message added 17:16, 3 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.Reply[reply]

Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a ((Talkback)) message on my talk page. 17:16, 3 October 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:40, 15 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tribals.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:42, 27 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cyrilradcliffe.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:48, 27 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Open Day at the Mills Observatory.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:52, 27 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Cyrillic, The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011. You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form. But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach. As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions. We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

The article Carl Pusser has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crash Underride 04:53, 26 August 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The September 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 14:05, 5 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Greenfarm.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:08, 8 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Green Farm

Corrected tags and licencing info. Thanks --Cyril Thomas (talk) 16:06, 21 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Finlay Freudlichmillsobser.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:15, 21 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Finlay

The image was very old paper cutting, which I have uploaded from India, I am afraid I couldn't locate back the paper cutting again, however, since it's more than 40 years old paper cutting, there won't be any copyright violations or issues. Thanks --Cyril Thomas (talk) 16:05, 21 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That's not how copyright works. In fact, in the UK copyright subsists for 70 years after the death of the author. Magog the Ogre (talk) 17:15, 21 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 04:43, 12 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 18:53, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey once u uploaded a SWAT pic to the WP but right now we have some copyright questions to you and would like that you can answer us these questions here — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanandros (talk • contribs) 17:00, 16 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Yojimbo (movie poster).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 23:29, 12 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited

Date Saturday, December 8, 2012 Time 10 a.m. – 3 p.m. Location Seattle Public Library Meeting Room 1 on Level 4, Central Library, 1000 4th Avenue, Seattle WA, 98104 Event An editathon on Seattle-related Wikipedia articles with Wikipedia tutorials and Librarian assistance on hand. Hashtag #wikiloveslib or #glamwiki. Registration http://wll-seattle.eventbrite.com or use on-wiki regsistration. Yours, Maximilianklein (talk) 03:05, 1 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Leaforstubimage.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 05:33, 3 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm just dropping you a quick note about a new Wikipedian in Residence job that's opened up at the National Library of Scotland. There're more details at the WP Scotland noticeboard. Richard Symonds (WMUK) (talk) 15:53, 22 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Serialmurder.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 00:25, 25 November 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your upload of File:Abies koreana leaves.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:19, 7 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Abies koreana wiki 3.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:23, 7 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Abies koreana wiki 2.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:23, 8 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Billlsamson.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:26, 6 February 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reply

Checked the files again, thanks for adding the data and helping - moving the files to Wiki-commons. Best wishes --Cyril Thomas (talk) 05:52, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Cyrillic. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Martha Crenshaw, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Martha Crenshaw to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, ubiquity (talk) 19:39, 22 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reply

The article was still in progress, I have added the references. Thank you.--Cyril Thomas 20:13, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Martha Crenshaw, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mapping. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 23 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

(Copy of the message posted in your talk page)Thank you for your message in my userpage talk section. The mapping disambiguation page is technically correct as terrorism mapping justifies the first part of the section of the page. As you can see, the "mapping" page is semi-disambiguation as it explain mapping relations with various disciplines in detail. When someone moving from Martha Crenshaw page by clicking the mapping link it will give the person an idea of the term mapping. Since specific research mapping article is unavailable it was the only choice I had.Thanks again for your message. Best wishes,--Cyril Thomas 17:12, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please see if you can provide the source of the image (if you still remember it), otherwise it will get deleted. Thanks! --Moonian (talk) 09:12, 15 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, at Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge we're striving to bring about 10,000 article improvements and creations for the UK and Ireland and inspire others to create more content. In order to achieve this we need diversity of content, in all parts of the UK and Ireland on all topics. Eventually a regional contest will be held for all parts of the British Isles, like they were for Wales and the Wedt Country. We currently have just over 1900 articles and need contributors! If you think you'd be interested in collaborating on this and helping reach the target quicker, please sign up and begin listing your entries there as soon as possible! Thanks.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 28 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:59, 6 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. This month The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There is over £3000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. Wikimedia UK is putting up £250 specifically for editors who produce the most quality new women bios for British women, with special consideration given to missing notable biographies from the Oxford Dictionary of Biography and Welsh Dictionary of Biography. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate independently this is also fine, but please add any articles created to the bottom of the main contest page even if not competing. Your participation in the contest and contributing articles on British women from your area or wherever would we much appreciated. Thanks.

The file File:Idukkimapwiki.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:58, 25 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The file File:Mapkerala.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:58, 25 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sherlockholmeshatforcriminologystubs.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:13, 19 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, This image was seemingly uploaded prior to current image polices, Thank you.

However, as part of ongoing efforts to ensure all media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed it would be appreciated if you were able to confirm, that it was your own work, by marking it as ((own)), amending the ((information)) added by a third party, and adding |claimed=yes to the ((Media by uploader)) or ((Presumed self)) tag(s) if present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the ((information)) where appropriate).

IF you have other uploads, please consider "claiming" them in a similar manner, You can find a list of files you have created here.

This will assist those reviewing the many many "free" images on commons that have not yet been transferred to Commons. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:41, 22 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Greenfarm.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 25 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raymond E. Foster is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond E. Foster until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mccapra (talk) 05:29, 12 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article John G. Raucci has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable BLP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 13:28, 23 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Samspsonralphallen.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 15:38, 1 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Jgrantbrucemillsobservatory.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 15:51, 1 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Goddardcomparison-wiki.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 15:53, 1 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Comparisonmicroscopewiki.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 2 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The file File:Woodenheartcover.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Replaced by file:Muß i denn muß i denn Wooden Heart by Elvis Presley German single.png...

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 16 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Woodenheartcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:07, 16 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Frost at Christmas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced article no proof of meeting WP:NBOOK

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 00:53, 11 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article A Touch of Frost (novel) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced article no proof of meeting WP:NBOOK

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 00:53, 11 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Serial crime has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced for 15 years now. Could be a redirect to a better referenced article on crime?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:22, 6 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Yojimbo (movie poster).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 12 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bruce Alexander (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Alexander (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 09:31, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bloodredriversbook.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 30 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Frostatchristmas.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 7 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]