Welcome to my talk page. Please adhere to the talk page guidelines and particularly the following: Please post your new topic at the bottom of this page. Please sign and date your entry by inserting "~~~~" at the end. Please specify a descriptive "Subject/headline" for a new topic and separate subtopics by ===heading=== lines, if needed. Please indent your posts with one more ":" than what you are replying to, i.e. begin with ":" if replying to an existing topic and "::" if replying to a reply. I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your Talk page (or the article Talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply. ⇒ Start a new Talk topic.

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Welcome.

Hello, DPdH, and welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful in developing your contributions:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian. Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions or place ((helpme)) on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Adrian M. H. 13:50, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Nahuel Tank.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:07, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Image-Nahuel Tank.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:06, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing your first article. Please ensure that you expand and wikify the article promptly to avoid the possibility of it being nominated for a deletion review. You will also need to cite all statements. If you need further advice or assistance, please contact either me or a user with specialist knowledge in this subject via our talk pages, or ask at the Help Desk. Regards, Adrian M. H. 13:50, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:IAe30.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:09, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:IAeDl22.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:47, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:IAe27-3v.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:29, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good job! --Jor70 14:12, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:MS-760.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:33, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• −≥≤≤≤≤≤≤≤≤≤≤≤–°task box]] is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including ((WPMILHIST Announcements)) there.
• Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
• The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, article improvement contests, and other tasks.
• We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
• We've developed a style guide that covers article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
• The project has a stress hotline available for your use.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Kirill 23:08, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter Issue XXII (December 2007)
Project news The Intelligence task force has been created. The contest department has completed its ninth month of competition. The top scorer this month is Blnguyen, with 22 points, followed by Dreamafter, with 8 points, and Redmarkviolinist, with 6 points. Blnguyen also remains the overall leader, with 162 points in total. All project members are encouraged to submit the articles they're working on as entries. Help with converting deprecated infoboxes is needed; any assistance is welcome! ((WPMILHIST)) now supports an explicit tag (class=DAB) for marking disambiguation pages.	Articles of note New featured articles: Battle of Albuera Battle of Dyrrhachium (1081) Battle of the Gebora Constantine II of Scotland Francis Harvey Vasa (ship) Wulfhere of Mercia New A-Class articles: 1962 South Vietnamese Presidential Palace bombing Evacuation of East Prussia
Current proposals and discussions A discussion about minimizing terminological ambiguity has begun.
Awards and honors Blnguyen has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his efforts in improving the quality of articles related to Vietnamese military history, including the creation of numerous A-Class articles. Woodym555 has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his outstanding work on topics related to the Victoria Cross, notably including the creation of featured articles, featured lists, and a featured topic. For their outstanding efforts as part of Tag & Assess 2007, Bedford, TomStar81, and Parsival74 have been awarded the gold, silver, and bronze Wikis, respectively.
Tag & Assess 2007 Tag & Assess 2007 is now officially over, with slightly under 68,000 articles processed. The top twenty scores are as follows: 1. Bedford — 7,600 2. TomStar81 — 5,500 3. Parsival74 — 5,200 4. FayssalF — 3,500 5. Roger Davies — 3,000 6. Ouro — 2600 7. Kateshortforbob — 2250 8. Cromdog — 2,200 9. BrokenSphere — 2000 9. Jacksinterweb — 2,000 9. Maralia — 2,000 12. MBK004 — 1,340 13. JKBrooks85 — 1,250 14. Sniperz11 — 1100 15. Burzmali — 1000 15. Cplakidas — 1000 15. Gimme danger — 1000 15. Raoulduke471000 15. TicketMan — 1000 15. Welsh — 1000 15. Blnguyen — 1000 Although the drive is officially closed, existing participants can continue tagging until January 31 if they wish, with the extra tags counting towards their tally for barnstar purposes. We'd like to see what lessons can be learned from this drive, so we've set up a feedback workshop. Comments and feedback from participants and non-participants alike are very welcome and appreciated.
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

Note: This newsletter was automatically delivered. Regards from the automated, Anibot (talk) 23:13, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 14! TomStar81 (Talk) 02:50, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The January 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:34, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just to be sure... you are aware that that section of the talk page has been inactive since July of 2007, and the merge long ago was closed as a no merge, right? If not, please check the timestamps on comments before responding. if a section's been dead for months on end, and the merge tag template is no longer on the article, odds are, it's over. ThuranX (talk) 05:29, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The February 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fifteen candidates. Please vote here by February 28! --Eurocopter tigre (talk) 12:18, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just for your information - You recently changed the aircraft-project to no in Talk:DINFIA IA 35, with the explanation that it was a production aircraft not a project. I have reverted your change as the tag means it is a wikipedia aircraft project nothing to do with the status of the aircraft. MilborneOne (talk) 12:55, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The February 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:24, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The March 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:03, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The April 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:38, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The May 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:26, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The June 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:27, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The July 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:02, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey,

I'm currently working on the TAM (tank) article, with the ultimate goal of taking it through featured article candidacy (as I do with all of my tank-related articles), but unfortunately the only really good source I own is Javier de Mazarrasa's La Familia Acorazada TAM, which is from Spain. Although another three books are used as sources where they can be used, the majority of the information provided is from the stated book. I was wondering if you knew of any other book published in Argentina which covered the TAM in detail, and where I can buy it. Although I believe that this article will pass the A-class review, I don't know if it will make it through the FAC with only one major source. I plan to masquerade this by adding a new section when I pick up one of my books from my cousin's car's trunk (de Mazarrasa's book Carro de Combate AMX-30E - also has details on Venezuela's AMX-30s) covering how the TAM compares to other tanks in service on the continent (mainly, Venezuela's AMX-30s, Brazil's Leopard 1A1s (I'm not sure when Brazil is supposed to get the "new" 1A5s) and Chile's recently acquired Leopard 2A4s). That way there will be an entire section with sources other than those already used, and it will look as if the article is far more versatile in regards to references. However, I'd still like to know if there are other good and detailed sourced on the TAM which I could buy. I'm avoiding websites because two of the ones I have visited (globalsecurity and FAS) are not reliable (some of their information is incorrect, at that) and any other websites are really not verifiable or reliable. In the article Nahuel (tank), of which you've written most of what is currently there, I see the book Blindados Argentinos, de Uruguay y Paraguay, Ayer y Hoy - does that contain any information on the TAM? If it does, I'd like to look for it and see if I could buy it on the internet.

In any case, thank you for your time. JonCatalán (talk) 04:51, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply! I bought my copy of Mazarrasa's book while I was living in Spain, but you can probably find it on the internet (he is one of the most sold authors on this type of topic from Spain). In regards to how the TAM compares to other tanks, I would agree that when comparing armor and firepower the TAM is not in the same league as the Leopard 2, but I doubt the Leopard 2 would have the degree of mobility that the TAM has in the Pampas, or even in the Amazon jungle (referring more to Brazil - I would bet money that this is one of the reasons why they still hesitate about replacing their Leopard 1s with Leopard 2s). I mean, even Chile's Leopard 2s are deployed along the Peruvian border, as I doubt they would be as effective as the TAM in the mountains. I agree that the TAM could probably be upgraded, but I don't think the lack of money should define its role, which was my main argument - its role in the Argentine Army, in my opinion, remains the same as any other main battle tank. Although, I do consider the TAM a superior tank to the AMX-30 and Leopard 1 (it actually has greater armor protection!). And, I will continue looking for Fogliani's book. Thanks, again! JonCatalán (talk) 05:19, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I left some comments on the TAM page. JonCatalán (talk) 23:45, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, you can purchase de Mazarrasa's book here. Also, here. Do you have the names to those magazines? Perhaps I could find them by emailing the editors? Thanks! JonCatalán (talk) 03:34, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We're treating it like vandalism. One of his accounts has been blocked, and once I can get a hold of an admin on IRC I will get his IP blocked, as well. JonCatalán (talk) 21:29, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:58, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message. The external link looks, at least for my ignorant eye on the subject, pretty good. But then again, I don't have a clue on the subject. Good wiking, Mariano(t/c) 07:22, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The August 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:54, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The September 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fourteen candidates. Please vote here by September 30!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:47, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The September 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:22, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, would greatly appreciate if anyone can give me advice on how do I "bookmark" an article that I'd like to read later (as is usually done in "paper" books, including encyclopedias).
I've already placed a question in the Help Desk, maybe it's better to answer there.
Thanks & regards, DPdH (talk) 07:46, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I don't know about "bookmarking", but you may click on the "watch" tab and it will place the article on your watchlist. When you're ready to view the list of articles of your interest, simply click on the "my watchlist" tab, and the articles you "watch" will be sorted by the latest timestamp in which the article was last edited. I hope that answers your question. Have a great day. - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs} 07:48, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the fast response. I ommitted here (but did mention in the Help Desk) to say that I'm already doing so, but there are heaps of articles that I'm not interested in tracking changes; but just mark them for later reference. Have a g'day too! DPdH (talk) 07:53, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

((helpme))

Your best bet is to create a subpage (say, User:DPdH/Bookmarks) and just populate it with a list of the articles you want to keep an eye on. Also, for future reference, please place the ((helpme)) tag with your question--makes it a bit easier for us! :) [roux » x] 08:07, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, good workaround, thanks. It'd be very nice if bookmark were a functionality already included in "Wikipedia". Maybe for a future release? Regards, DPdH (talk) 08:20, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, in that case, why not bookmark it with your browser instead? Depending on the browser you are using, bookmarking or marking a page in your favorites is relatively easy. - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs} 08:10, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The October 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:46, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to drop you a note to express my appreciation for your efforts to contributing to improving the Fighter aircraft article and its offshoots. Please see my response to your question there and explained where we are in a long-term attempt to improve this set of articles. If you're interested in the subject, we can certainly use a few more hands! Cheers, Askari Mark (Talk) 03:40, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Right now, the main focus is the Fighter aircraft article, which is considered a “core article” for Wikipedia (one of those that any decent encyclopedia should have). Once we get that fixed up, we can export the improvements to the “1st Gen” and “4th Gen” articles. The main thing we need right now is to add sources for much of the extant text. Since so little has been cited yet and much of the material is pretty basic, there’s a lot of “low-hanging fruit” out there (from both online and print sources). If you haven’t worked that side of Wikipedia, it’ll be a good learning experience – not just about sourcing, but you may also find material worth adding. The article currently reflects the personal historical and technical knowledge of a handful of us that needs to be retroactively sourced; this approach has been driven by the short timeline given to clean up the article for WP 0.7. (I was actually working on overhauling the F-16 Fighting Falcon article, which I am still not finished with.) If we had held to finding sources as we went, there’s no way we could have shaped it up in time. What exists is pretty much a “go” for WP 0.7. Now, it’s more a matter of going back and doing it right with sourcing. That will help advance the article to where it can make GA or even FA class and thus qualify for WP 1.0. Does this sound like something up your alley? Best regards, Askari Mark (Talk) 04:44, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, most of my library is packed up and in storage, too. Something about having a family means having them expand to fill all space available – and only your space is negotiable! ;-) Askari Mark (Talk) 16:03, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The November 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 16:17, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:42, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:38, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the WikiProject Firearms. I hope you enjoy being a member.--LWF (talk) 03:05, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:03, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:39, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your edit to the disambiguation page James Craig.

Per WP:MOSDAB, disambiguation pages should include only one navigable link per line. When you edit a disambiguation page, this guidance is also prominently displayed in a box at the to of the edit page. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 04:48, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:41, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:24, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I removed the empty sections was because (to me) it looked messy, and I prefer not adding section headings until I have a line or two of content. That said, if you re-added the sections, I would have no objections, -- saberwyn 22:29, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you know of first hand accounts of the reason the ARA Guerrico exposed herself I would be most interested to read them. Contrary to what you may infer from the spats I've had with Jor70 I am interested in telling both sides of the story and I have worked jointly with Darius on a number of Falklands articles that do tell both sides of the story. Regards, Justin talk 10:45, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The April 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:54, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply from BillCJ, related to my inquiry about "Users" in aircraft infobox. DPdH (talk) 08:00, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On May 13, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article ARA Rivadavia, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Orlady (talk) 08:38, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DPdH, I could use some assistance on the Helibras article. (I know Spanish and Portuguese are related, and somewhat mutually intelligiable, so you might do better looking at this than I would, whterh or not you know Portuguese.) The current "products" list in our article makes it appear that Helibras manufactures 19 different types of helicopters, while the company's wabsite lists 11 models. What I'm unclear about is the extent in which Helibras actually contributes to these models in production. I believe Helibras assembles some Eurocopter modesl, and may be a subcontractor on others, but I am unable to distinguish between the two without a greater understanding of the language. Thanks for whatever you can do. - BillCJ (talk) 20:46, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:36, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:57, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:22, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. - Trevor MacInnis ^contribs 00:12, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September!
Many thanks,  Roger Davies ^talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:39, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[1] there from all time, including 1982s, perhaps we can use some. --Jor70 (talk) 20:05, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September!
For the coordinators,  Roger Davies ^talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I have one question on the dust storm in Australia: How bad have it hit Melbourne?--Gilisa (talk) 20:59, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:40, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The criteria used for topic, class and importance can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Argentina/Assessment. Thanks for the offer of help, but if you don't mind I would like to empty Category:Unassessed Argentine articles and Category:Unknown-importance Argentine articles all by myself. I have moved to this project recently and my idea is to fill my watchlist with argentine articles, to be able to track changes and revert vandalism on the periods I'm not editing. I know I can do that more easily by other means, like copying and pasting categories contents in it, but I thought it would be better to add them in a manner that helps along the way with maintenance. MBelgrano (talk) 14:40, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:37, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:37, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 08:47, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:02, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Que tal che!, feliz año !. FYI I stubbed ELMA article. --Jor70 (talk) 16:34, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Another member and I worked and worked to try and find a suitable photo. Thanks for the help. It makes the article look a lot, lot better.--Jackehammond (talk) 05:34, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:24, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I created the Argentine Naval Aviation article and now I really need your help to fill the List of Argentine Naval Aviation aircraft --Jor70 (talk) 11:33, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:22, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:16, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:42, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:38, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:17, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, I rewrote ARA Moreno, but I've now noticed that you were rewriting it in 2009. Would parts of your work bolster the article / cover something I may have missed? —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 17:57, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick poke to make sure you have seen this. —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 08:46, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to add a specific question in case you're around ... in this edit to ARA La Argentina, you mentioned the book Acorazados y Cruceros De La Armada Argentina ... do you have the book or know where I might buy it? It's currently out of stock at Amazon. - Dank (push to talk) 13:53, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Another quick poke, I saw that you edited on the 8th but I think you missed this with the Milhist newsletter below :) —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 03:33, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DPdH. You have new messages at Dank's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

- Dank (push to talk) 13:49, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. :-) If you have time, please feel free to add whatever you think the article needs; I'd appreciate it. —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 02:34, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:02, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LII (June 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:56, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of BAP 100, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.janes.com/articles/Janes-Air-Launched-Weapons/BAP-100-Airfield-Attack-Bomb-France.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:50, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIII (July 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:21, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIV (August 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,  Roger Davies ^talk 21:33, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LV (September 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

Your Military history Newsletter Project News: Editors for the newsletter, GAN backlog reduction drive Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: EyeSerene sums up our "Five years of military history"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:26, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, friend. Do you like how these articles are looking? Am I missing anything off the top of your head? Rivadavia class battleship, ARA Rivadavia, ARA Moreno. Many thanks for your help, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 09:49, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to make a featured topic out of them, see User:The ed17/Next#South American battleship progress :-) I would definitely welcome free images of either ship! Perhaps you would have access to a free image of Chilean battleship Almirante Latorre as well? Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 06:19, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, it was a sudden whim. I think Argentinian copyright laws require 25 years since publishing. Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 06:30, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors, "Military Historian of the Year", New Incubator, Black Project Report Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: bahamut guides us through "Nominating military biographies for deletion"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:17, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your military history newsletter – Volume LVIII, December 2010 From the editors • "Military Historian of the Year" • Discussions • The month's new featured and A-class content • Review awards Contest results • A-class medal recipients • bahamut teaches us proper usage of "Jargon and acronyms" To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here. BrownBot (talk) 20:38, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military history Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: EyeSerene discusses "Writing neutrally for Wikipedia"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 15:34, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiving this message because you are currently listed as being a member of WikiProject Rocketry. In order to establish how many members are still actively editing within the project, if you still consider yourself to be an active member of WikiProject rocketry, please go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Rocketry/Members and move your name from the list of inactive members at the bottom of the page to the list of active members at the top of the page.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Rocketry at 19:07, 12 March 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Ed talks about real-world collaborations and how you can help

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 21:35, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Dank helps you see what article writers want from reviewers

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 01:37, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Buggie111 discusses neutral point of view

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:16, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors – Contest results, A-class medal recipients Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Editorial: Hawkeye's thoughts on the article writing process

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:25, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Certified in Risk and Information Systems Control, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion (((db-...))) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 16:19, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Certified in Risk and Information Systems Control is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Certified in Risk and Information Systems Control (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 21:50, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there I can see you're confused as to how article should be if it's in mainspace, The article as it stands and the certification as it stands lack ntbility. You use the CISA article as a reason it should be kept but look at that article compared to yours. WP:GNG requires that the product be covered by third party sources which help validate if it's a notable product or ust something being sold. As is it appears right now that it's a non notable product that's being peddled on Wikipedia. If you think you need to beef it up consider making a subuserpage like User talk:DPdH/Certified in Risk and Information Systems Control once it meets the notability guidelines then move it to mainspace. Something I've learned in the 70 or so articles I've made if the notability is in question before you publish make sure you have at least three 3rd party sources when you publish and it may help avoid csd and deletions. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 17:29, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Spindle (computer) , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. § Music Sorter § (talk) 05:44, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Finland and Spitfires Op-ed: Fifelfoo and hunting for plagiarism

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 22:49, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Zeebrugee and Afghanistan Op-ed: WereSpielChequers examines RfA

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 21:53, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DPdH. You have new messages at talk:List of battleships of Russia and the Soviet Union.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Buggie111 (talk) 16:13, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Carthage and Australia in Palestine Op-ed: Remembering 9/11

Hello, DPdH. I see that you are a member of WP:OMT. I am reminding you that there is a discussion [here] about whther or not to award Bahamut0013, a member of OMt who passsed awsay a short while ago, the Titan's Cross in silver. your opinion will be welcome. Thanks, Buggie111 (talk) 14:03, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D and Ian Rose look at Australian air power Op-ed: Buggie111 ruminates about WikiLife and WikiDeath

Hi DPdH! As your MILHIST Military Avation Task Force coordinator, I'd like to conduct a short questionaire to give me an idea of what you would the task force to achieve and the capabilities of yours that might contribute positively to the task force. The four questions of this questionaire are:

1. What are your strengths on Wikipedia?
2. Which four military aviation articles would you like to see be promoted to at least GA?
3. What detailed resources (books, journals, etc) about military aviation do you have access to? Please provide the publications' authors, titles and ISSNs/ISBNs.
4. Which three military aviation articles are you wiling to provide assistance? This can be expansion, copyediting, reference formatting, etc.

Please reply by copying and pasting the following at User talk:Sp33dyphil#MILHIST Military Aviation questionnaire and filling it out.

; ~~~
#My strengths
#Articles I'd like to see the task force improve
#:
#:
#:
#:
#Sources which I have
#:
#:
#Articles I'm willing to provide assistance
#:

Thank you for your assistance. Regards --Sp33dyphil © • © 09:22, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply. It would be preferable if the results all come in by January, so I can organise some sort of a collaboration. Some of the people to which I have sent the message have not responded yet, so it may take a while. BTW, please be specific with your answers. Cheers --Sp33dyphil © • © 06:15, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D analyzes three books from Osprey Publishing Review essay: Nick-D reviews the new Bundeswehr Military History Museum

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors – MHotY coming; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the Congolese Wars Review essay: Ian Rose goes to El Alamein Op-ed: DCI's call to revitalize WikiProject History

Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:54, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Review essay: Kirill Lokshin, the first coordinator Op-ed: Hchc's English Castles

Thank you for uploading File:Vickers Modelo Argentino 1938 - 9 July 1938 Parade.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Cambalachero (talk) 02:17, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Op-ed: Ian Rose discusses article assessments

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Op-ed: Hawkeye on Wikipedia collaborating with the AWM

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Bomzibar on Subhas Chandra Bose; Hawkeye on corps commanders; Nick-D on American special forces Op-ed: The Land on commemorating World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Bomzibar on Chiang Kai-shek; Nick-D on the Falklands War Interview: Article writers discuss biographies Op-ed: Nick-D examines using news articles as sources

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D on the Chaco War and the Bougainville Campaign Op-ed: Remembering conflict

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors: Wikimania 2012; special projects note Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D on the Australian 25th Battalion Interview: Article writers discuss buildings and fortifications Op-ed: Hawkeye7 reports on a weekend workshop

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D on the legacy of World War II Op-ed: Bomzibar on German military history

The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 08:52, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: AustralianRupert on artillery in South Australia, and Nick-D on Venice's empire Op-ed: Nick-D on the "Kokoda: Beyond the Legend" conference

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; milestone for the Fortifications task force; contest results Articles: The month's new Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/News/October 2012/Hawkeye7 on mission command Op-ed: The ed17 on how The Bugle could be improved

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: The month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Sturmvogel_66, AustralianRupert, and Nick-D look at ships, soldiers, and railways Op-ed: Nick-D on navigating the FA and A-Class review processes

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: The month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Simon Harley on British battleships and Nick-D on the French Resistance Interview: Five editors discuss some less-represented areas of military history Op-ed: Ian Rose looks back on 2012

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: The month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Mongol naval power Op-ed: Crisco 1492 on war films

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at US Army leadership since World War II

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at refugees during the Battle of France Interview: Editors discuss writing articles about the former Yugoslavia Op-ed: Prioryman on German V-weapon sites and the historian's responsibility

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Sturmvogel 66 and Hawkeye7 look at aspects of the Pacific War Op-ed: ErrantX considers the rabbit hole of research

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Dumelow on the French Foreign Legion and Nick-D on New Zealand military history Op-ed: Nick-D on military history tourism

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!

Hi DPdH! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch (talk) 20:00, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Works on the RNZAF, World War I in the Baltic, and British battleship construction Op-ed: Anchors Aweigh for the Majestic Titans

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Australia's frontier wars Interview: What Wikimedia chapters can offer military history editors

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page B-1 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 22:49, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the death of Osama bin Laden Op-ed: Sturmvogel_66 presents his secrets of prolific contribution

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Sarandí, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Siege of Montevideo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DPdH! I'm so happy to see you signed up to join the project - welcome. You can dive into our to-do lists here. Be sure to watchlist your favorite to-do lists, as they will continue to grow as new content gets added to the WDL website. Also, you can always search the WDL website for something that you're interested in. And be sure to share your outcomes here. If I can help with anything just ask and welcome aboard! SarahStierch (talk) 04:18, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Sarandí, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Battle of Sarandí may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• the [[Siege of Montevideo(1825)|siege of Montevideo]] (May 8, 1825), led by [[Manuel Oribe]]) and that of [[Colonia del Sacramento]] (August 18, 1825).

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:08, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill ^[talk] 16:07, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the American Civil War

Hi -- I notice that you have added a notification to the Sunda Strait Bridge page asking for more references. I have collected most of the material so I'd like to respond. The basic problem is that although this project is potentially an extremely important project for Indonesia, detailed information is very thin on the ground. I speak Indonesian fluently, and I have searched hard in Indonesian-language sources. The fact is that there just isn't much around. And that, indeed, is one of the main reasons that I looked for as much reliable information as I can find to post on Wikipedia. This page provides far more information about the proposed bridge that I think that one can find anywhere else. To be honest, I would have thought that most of the piece is fairly well documented, no? Apparently you do not agree. I guess, perhaps, that you would like to see more references to the sorts of items covered in (for example) the "Technical aspects" section? It is indeed possible to dig out some more reference on these issues but my own feeling is that it is, surely, not necessary to reference all sentences? Having said this, I note that somebody (I assume an Indonesian Wikipedian) has inserted the second sentence to the piece with a reference to one Professor Sedyatmo from Bandung. This piece of information is new to me and I don't know if there is a source for it. It may or may not be true. But it is harmless, I suppose. A bit irrelevant, really. Pmccawley (talk) 11:22, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I propose you link to the main page of the RAN International Fleet Review on the ship's pages that were involved, instead of linking to List of ships present at International Fleet Review 2013. I also advise you to fix the new content from "In October 2013 [blank] participated" to "In October 2013 [ship name in italics] participated". Acalycine^talk 05:37, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the suggestion, I already thought that but changed idea as the reference to the ships is in the list rather than in the IFR main article. As I'm doing the change manually (don't know how to use scripts or bots) it'll take me some time to implement your suggestion. Kind regards, DPdH (talk) 05:24, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

One last suggestion: I suggest you implement an archiving process on your talk page. WP:ARCHIVE Acalycine^talk 05:37, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again, I know that I need to do that but didn't know how to do it. 8) Regards, DPdH (talk) 06:54, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Still haven't implemented archiving, too busy, 8( DPdH (talk) 23:59, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DPdH. You have new messages at Hpeterswald's talk page.
Message added 07:19, 6 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.[reply]

HMAS_Leeuwin_(A_245) was my error :(

Keep up the good work Hpeterswald (talk) 07:19, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

: No worries! You're doing a good job too. DPdH (talk) 07:40, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you are planning to start the article Steyr 1500A in the next few days? Periglio (talk) 14:27, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Correct assumption, I'm already working on it. Regards, DPdH (talk) 13:45, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just checking :) It just seemed an obscure redlink to create but I can see that you are the right person for the job. Keep up the good work. Periglio (talk) 18:16, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bento Manuel Ribeiro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Captain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks Austro-Hungarian battleships of World War I Op-ed: Advice on reviewing Featured and A-Class articles

As you are listed as a member of Operation Majestic Titan, you are receiving this message to notify you that a new Titan's Cross nomination has been opened. You are therefore cordially invited to iVote or offer your opinion on the nomination. Sincerely, TomStar81 (Talk) 05:39, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 looks at US industry in World War II Op-ed: AustralianRupert offers a soldier's perspective on editing Wikipedia

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 44M Tas Rohamloveg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magyar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Carcharoth and Hawkeye7 look at World War I cemeteries and the British Army in World War II Interview: Less-represented areas of military history – part 2 Op-ed: TomStar81 and Nick-D look back on 2013 and ahead to 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Argentine Army may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• of Patricians|Infantry Regiment "Patricios"]], which to this date is still an active Army unit). These units had previously fought the [[British invasions of the Río de la Plata]] in 1806 and

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:00, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cazadores de Monte (Argentine Army), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tartagal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of de Havilland Canada DHC-6 Twin Otter operators (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Transair

Nathan Bedford Forrest (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mobile warfare

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Conquest of the Planet of the Apes may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ' Blu-Ray</ref> In addition, TV producer [[Irwin Allen]] contributed [Theatrical property|props]] and clothes to the film: he let the makers of 'Conquest' borrow his [[USOS Seaview|Seaview]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:32, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of de Havilland Canada DHC-6 Twin Otter operators, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BFD (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia supports parenthetical referencing and it is not confusing. You find the first word in the citation in parentheses and then find it in the references below. The general feeling in Wikipedia is that the established referencing style should not be changed. I often add to and edit the diecast and modelling articles and find the in-line citations harder to construct. I request that you do not change the citation system (and Wikipedia supports parenthetical referencing). Thank you for your contributions--Cstevencampbell (talk) 15:11, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback, I've provided a response in your Talk Page. Regards, DPdH (talk) 23:06, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've reviewed the citation style guidelines, and actually they discourage switching between "major styles" unless there is consensus that the change will be appropriate for the needs of the article. They also recommend that an edit notice is placed in each article using this style. I'll follow these recommendations. Regards, DPdH (talk) 07:04, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the coffee. I needed the break ! I agree that in-line citations sometimes work better for the reader in longer articles only because you can roll over them and see the citation. Otherwise I think they are more confusing than parenthetical referencing. With parenthetical referencing you simply look up the cited first word and date in the references in alphabetical order. Works first time every time. In-line citations are confusing when you have multiple citations to one author as you are forced into the op cit garbage. And again, people have told me how easy in-line citations are to set up, but I still don't see it - they are a bunch of gobbledygook to arrange and with parenthetical references you just write them in and you are immediately finished. Anyway thanks for your help.--Cstevencampbell (talk) 17:07, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and first off, thanks for adding the table to the article. I'd ask that in the future, though, that you make sure that the references are consistent with what's already in the article, since it creates needless work to standardize later. Thanks. Parsecboy (talk) 15:14, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D, Zawed and Hawkeye7 look at recent releases

Hi Following your successful creation of the page International Fleet Review 2013 I created the Centenary of Military Aviation 2014 Air Show but seem to have met with resistance. If you could review and add your valuable advice here it would be appreciatedHpeterswald (talk) 21:04, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Centenary_of_Military_Aviation_2014_Air_Show

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Rabaul in World War II and Australia in World War I

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mack NO (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Transmission, Crane, Displacement and Tyre

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited M6 Tractor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prime movers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was hoping to get your advice on the RAAF Museum page where I had added some photographs of the replica Bristol Boxkite.

File:Bristol Boxkite Centenary Flight at Centenary of Military Aviation 2014 (1).jpg 
File:Bristol Boxkite Centenary Flight at Centenary of Military Aviation 2014 (2).jpg 

and started a talk page to get a consensus following the removal by one editor

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:RAAF_Museum

Your advce would be appreciated

Hpeterswald (talk) 10:56, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

just put my comment. Regards, DPdH (talk) 13:17, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 on military command and Nick-D on F-111s in combat

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Universal Carrier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nationalist China (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 looks at Britain's War Machine Interview: Article writers discuss German military history

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sperrbrecher may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• navy.de/kriegsmarine/ships/minehunter/sperrbrecher/index.html Sperrbrecher, at German Navy website]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:42, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Skippers Aviation may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• unknown object and De Havilland DHC-8, VH-XFX, Perth Airport, Western Australia on 19 March 2014'']] (retrieved 2014-05-30)</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:48, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of aircraft of the Argentine Air Force may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * [[Voisin V|Voisin 5 LA]]<ref>[((cite web |url=http://www.gacetaeronautica.com/gaceta/wp-101/?p=5991 |title=Catálogo Ilustrado de

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:10, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Voisin V may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[[Argentine Air Force]] - one aircraft <ref>[((cite web |url=http://www.gacetaeronautica.com/gaceta/wp-101/?p=5991 |title=Catálogo Ilustrado de

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:13, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at The Lost Boys of Anzac Op-ed: Peacemaker67 on Featured Articles involving Yugoslavia in World War II

I would suggest you might want to read the relevant pages - the Argentine Air Force did not exist prior to 1945 - the Avro 504 was long gone by then, and it was operated by the Argentine Army Aviation.NiD.29 (talk) 06:47, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As said, please check your sources. In the "Argentine Army Aviation" as such did not exist prior to 1954 (as stated in that wikiarticle), and the statement in the Argentine Air Force wikiarticle is not correct; the Air force predecessor is the Army Aviation Service which so far does not have an article on its own. Plus the Avro 504 is listed in verifiable sources as having been used by the Argentine Air Force. Please check sources and don't revert my edit. Thanks , DPdH (talk) 06:56, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have "Servicio Aeronautico del Ejercito" (Army Aeronautical Service) or "Servicio de Aviacion Militar" (Military Aviation Service) formed in 1912... Army Aviation IS much closer than Air Force. Perhaps a redirect to the Air Force page with the correct title would be the best option until the historical page is written. I was merely trying to stop you from changing all the operators to an entity that didn't exist, rather than changing them all to the historically correct name(s), so no need for further undos.

I find that hard to believe when the last one is listed in my references as out of service in 1938. Perhaps you are be referring to museum aircraft kept nominally on strength? Not really the same as actually being operated by the Argentine Air Force.NiD.29 (talk) 07:44, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If that was your intention (I've assumed your changes were in "good faith"), I agree so have redirected under the historical name as suggested. Can you please share your sources where those names are mentioned? I'm mostly using online ones (other than Wikipedia) and would like to double-check before starting amending other similar cases I've already found. Thanks & regards, DPdH (talk) 10:43, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at life aboard a US aircraft carrier and Hawkeye7 considers the role of food in World War II

Most of my English-language sources use La Plata, but I did find one that says that the ship was indeed named after the river and uses El. It would have been helpful if you'd provided a link to your source as almost any source at all on these ships would expand the small amount of coverage available on them. Which is one reason why they're still stubs.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:01, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"El" is correct not only semantically but historically. Yesterday I didn't have time to add links to both articles, and I'm providing a link today (sadly the source is in Spanish). I've been thinking on creating wikiarticles for these ships for a long time, and now that you've kicked-off with a "stub" I'm happy to contribute expanding them. Regards, DPdH (talk) 14:02, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Their technical specifications are pretty well covered in English, but there's very little available on their careers so your Spanish-language sources should prove to be very useful.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:19, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Both articles cover in depth the ships' careers, and I'm happy to translate and summarize those to expand the articles. Regards, DPdH (talk) 14:25, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of aircraft of the Argentine Air Force may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[File:IAeDl22.jpg|thumb|right|I.Ae. 22 DL)]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:59, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Jonas Vinther and Nick-D look at examples of electronic media Op-ed: TomStar81 on the shot heard around the world

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Wrap-up of some recent external reviews Interview: World War I editors Op-ed: TomStar81 on the outbreak of World War I

Greetings DPdH! About a year ago, you suggested on the A-4 Skyhawk talk page that the "Aircraft on display" section should be split into its own article. I believe this is still a needed improvement to the overall article, and no one else seems to be chiming in on the talk page....are you still willing to create that article? Cheers! Skyraider1 (talk) 14:55, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for reminding me. If there is consensus that it can be considered an improvement to the article, I'm ok to do that split. Regards, DPdH (talk) 15:24, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Regards, DPdH (talk) 08:47, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Noticed you took an interest and I've added a cite as requested. I am aware from a number of websites that Argentina was seeking to use the F-86 in a ground attack role but I am struggling to find a reliable cite for it. I'm also struggling for reliable cites for the torpedo equipped Pucara trials the FAA conducted. If you have an interest would be grateful for anything you turn up. Regards, WCM_email 20:29, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note; will check that citation later, as AFAIK F-86s were not put in service again (but I don't have a verifiable source for this either!). As for the torpedo trials with the Pucara, I do have a verifiable source, and will add citation later today. Regards, DPdH (talk) 00:57, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't find where in this article the torpedo trials with Pucaras are mentioned? Anyway can provide at least 1 verifiable source. Regards, DPdH (talk) 07:46, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ah sorry, should have explained. I knew it happened but it was removed from the article previously due to a lack of inline citation. Regards, WCM_email 21:18, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Any clue where that sentence or paragraph was located, or when was it deleted? Just went thru the last 3 months of "article history" and couldn't find it... Thanks! DPdH (talk) 09:34, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No sorry, it is likely a lot older than that. I saw it removed but was topic banned at the time and couldn't comment. WCM_email 12:22, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of auxiliary and merchant cruisers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anchor Line. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 looks at the military history of Austria-Hungary Timeleine: This month in World War I

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of preserved Douglas A-4 Skyhawks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BRAC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. DPdH (talk) 07:22, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Operation Frankton may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• shipping on the western side of the dock, placed eight limpet mines on four vessels including a ''[[Sperrbrecher]'' patrol boat. A sentry on the deck of the ''Sperrbrecher'', apparently spotting

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:13, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D on Britain in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Nazi Germany's Eastern Front allies Op-ed: TomStar81 on the origins and legacy of trench warfare Timeline: This month in World War I

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 on armoured reconnaissance and German scientists, Nick-D on time travelling historians Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the World War I Christmas truce Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Jonas Vinther on Hitler and Cliftonian on the Rhodesia Regiment Interview: 2014 Military History Newcomer Award nominees Review essay: Nick-D on the Australian War Memorial Op-ed: TomStar81 on the birth of strategic bombing Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Nick-D on the British Pacific Fleet Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the advent of chemical warfare Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Recent external reviews Review essay: Nick-D on the Australian Fleet Air Arm Museum Op-ed: TomStar81 on submarine warfare in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Hi, would you still be interested in working on operation Operation Typhoon? Christwelfwww (talk) 17:29, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What's exactly the idea? DPdH (talk) 00:04, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've rfecently created an article about the Battle of Rzhev in the summer of 1942 Battle of Rzhev, Summer 1942 I must admit it took a long time working on it. I see the battle of Moscow page is not right, there should be numerous sub articles becuase its a massive topic. I then saw your comments which I 100% agreed with, but to create a article about Typhoon is a bit daunting, so I was interested to see if there was any interest elsewhere for colaberation. I also have a family, a job other commitments that only allow me to work intermittently. My idea would be to split into subtopics. Please let me know if you are interested, maybe others might also help Christwelfwww (talk) 11:39, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]