Thanks for creating Piano Concerto (Poulenc), Damibaru!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Always had a soft spot for this work so was great to see this pop up on the new pages feed! I've added some categories.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Women in Music
	10 to 31 January 2016 Please join us in the worldwide virtual edit-a-thon hosted by Women in Red.

--Ipigott (talk) 11:22, 6 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Symphony No. 2 (Khachaturian)

added a link pointing to State Symphony Orchestra of the USSR

To a Wild Rose (MacDowell)

added a link pointing to American

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 7 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for creating Viola da Gamba Sonatas (Bach), Damibaru!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Looks great! Have added a navbox and linked this article on the list of Bach compositions so it's discoverable.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Violin Sonata in G minor (Tartini), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.thefullwiki.org/Devil%27s_Trill_Sonata.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:30, 21 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Symphony No. 1 (Gottschalk) at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with ((db-g7)), or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 01:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/1994 Peshawar school bus hijack in Pakistan at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with ((db-g7)), or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 01:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

1994 Peshawar school bus hijacking

added a link pointing to North-West Frontier Province

Three Romances for Violin and Piano

added a link pointing to Op

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:08, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for listing Erie, Alabama as a stub. This page should be added onto more in the future by anyone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cassini127 (talk • contribs) 01:26, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your comments. No, there isn't much information on these third world airports, and a lot of what exists is inaccurate. No one has ever weeded out the many airport lists because there was no way to do it. Now we have satellite photos, so I'm tidying up.Cptmrmcmillan (talk) 14:33, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Cptmrmcmillan: What you are doing is indeed appreciated! When I go through the New Pages Feed, there are certain users who become known for one thing or another, and when I see something they do, it always makes me a little bit happier. The airports stubs that you've created are one of those. Thank you! Damibaru (talk) 18:44, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for reviewing Dineo Seshee Bopape. I just picked her randomly off the work list at the Art + Feminism editathon today - she is cool! Art is definitely thriving, or at least it is at the A+F editathons...we killed it today! Thanks again. JSFarman (talk) 02:14, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@JSFarman:I hope the A+F editathon was fun. I totally missed it. No matter where banners and messages are posted, most of us less awake people just somehow always manage to miss things. At least we have the month of March to somehow make up for things. As for whether art is thriving, I am not 100% sure. Classical music, which, for me, is very much art, and its concerts are attended more than anything else by old people and music students, and by the time that I could imagine myself being a professional musician, concert goers would be all music students and dead people. So I guess it depends where you look... Cheers! Damibaru (talk) 02:37, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks, Damibaru! I plan to keep adding citations, but am glad to have my first article approved! Szuszkia (talk) 08:02, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Gee I barely remember the first article I created, @Szuszkia. I remember it wasn't very notable or well referenced, though. Just remember that on Wikipedia, anybody can edit something, and pages don't belong to one person (besides user pages and user talk pages, and even then). Cheers! Damibaru (talk) 23:32, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Aha, pardon me! I should have said that I am glad that my first contribution has been approved (for now), @Damibaru. I sure hope that others will contribute to the article - that's the best part! Thanks again!Szuszkia (talk) 03:15, 9 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks, for reviewing Baruth bei Bautzen. You asked if there are any references. I put an external reference when I created the page. I can find more if you think the page requires it. Vcczar (talk) 05:29, 8 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Vcczar: I don't think it is the most urgent thing, but I might add a ref for the population. That is not common knowledge, and very exact (as opposed to 400 residents, or even 410), so it would be best if it was cited. Happy Women's Day! Thank you, Damibaru (talk) 23:30, 8 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eight Short Preludes and Fugues, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prelude. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 9 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 13 March 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Symphony No. 1 (Gottschalk), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the second movement of Louis Moreau Gottschalk's first Symphony is probably the first orchestral setting of a samba? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Symphony No. 1 (Gottschalk). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:02, 13 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Your submission of 1994 Peshawar school bus hijack in Pakistan at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 12:19, 14 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

music and chamber musicians

Thank you for quality articles such as Gottschalk's First Symphony, Poulenc's Piano Concerto and Musica Alta Ripa, for details about performing, for templates such as the complete Bach, - "avid lover of people, travel, food, music, art, and literature", you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:13, 14 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you very much, Gerda Arendt. It was in part due to you too, since there have been more than once that things that you have edited also inspired me to edit. Cheers! Damibaru (talk) 13:58, 14 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you, made my day! You can do me a favour and add infoboxes to your other articles, we have ((infobox Bach composition)), for the viol sonatas, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:10, 14 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Yes, I added infoboxes to some articles. How would I do it for a page about a collection of pieces, as with the BWV's 1027, 1028, and 1029? Thank you, and my apologies for taking so long in replying! Damibaru (talk) 22:12, 19 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

See Cello suites, - for the BWV numbers you can use ((hlist)): BWV = ((hlist| 1027 | 1028 | 1029 )). There was another one, Missa (Bach), but that's history. You can still copy, if you like. See also Chorale cantata (Bach), for a group of pieces. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:50, 19 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A year ago, you were recipient no. 1347 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:38, 14 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ps: We hae now many more works by Poulenc, - could you take a look at this translation, please? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:41, 14 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for Mechthild Bach! Can you add a bit of music? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:49, 7 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, @Gerda Arendt:, I hope you are doing well! Do you mean to say that some of Bach's discography should be added? Thanks, Damibaru (talk) 23:59, 8 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Well, yes, on vacation, thank you for asking. - No, I mean, add a bit of what she sang. She was on my to-do-list, thank you for taking her off ;) - Seriously, with a bit more content, she could become DYK, so better known. Look! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:09, 9 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Two years precious now ;) - and a soprano pictured on the Main page, DYK? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:41, 14 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

four years now ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:56, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'd like to invite you to join our WikiWednesday event tonight, located by Union Square: WP:Meetup/NYC.--Pharos (talk) 14:44, 16 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Devil's Trill Sonata a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Violin Sonata in G minor (Tartini). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. BethNaught (talk) 22:21, 17 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as 1994 Peshawar school bus hijacking, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://tribune.com.pk/story/1049740/on-this-day-in-1994-when-afghan-gunmen-held-over-70-students-hostage-in-pakistan/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:1994 Peshawar school bus hijacking and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, 1994 Peshawar school bus hijacking, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:1994 Peshawar school bus hijacking. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:1994 Peshawar school bus hijacking with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:1994 Peshawar school bus hijacking saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! BlueMoonset (talk) 16:15, 26 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@BlueMoonset: Thank you. I was notified on the DYK nomination page, and I tried to work on the problem, but obviously, it was not sufficient. If you look at the history of 1994 Peshawar school bus hijacking, you will notice that user Abc-wtf-def began the article, with text that CorenSearchBot tagged as being a copyvio from http://www.read-latest-news.com/news-on-this-day-in-1994-when-afghan-gunmen-held-over-70-students-hostage-in-pakistan/. That text is also identical to the text of the link you added above, which in turn has many surprising similarities to the N.Y. Times, A.P., and L.A. Times refs. Let me know what you think I can do. If the page is deleted altogether, it is an easy solution.

As for the DYK, I added a DYK nomination for one article, and I meant the DYK nom for the article in hand as a QPQ nom. Apparently I am not sure how to do QPQ noms, but I guess it was not necessary, since I did not have five DYK credits mandating QPQ noms. Cheers! Damibaru (talk) 22:30, 27 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Damibaru, I had mistakenly thought you were the creator of the article, since that's what it said on its DYK nomination page, which is why I posted the above message on this page. I should have checked further, to see that it was Abc-wtf-def. I'm sorry if I confused things here. At any rate, the DYK nomination has been closed, so everything has been taken care of on that front. As for QPQs, since it's nominations that count, you now have two noms. QPQ means quid pro quo review—that is, you have to do a review of another nomination—but as you note, that only kicks in after your fifth nomination. So you have time yet. One of the parts of a review is to check for copyvio and close paraphrasing, so you might want to check that before the next time you want to nominate someone else's article: there's not much point in nominating an article that has major issues like that, or is too short, or something along those lines. Best of luck going forward. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:42, 28 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Violin Sonata in G minor (Tartini) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ricardiana -- Ricardiana (talk) 23:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, the real Ricardiana here. I've finished my review -- please let me know if you have any questions. Ricardiana (talk) 04:19, 24 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Violin Sonata in G minor (Tartini) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Violin Sonata in G minor (Tartini) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ricardiana -- Ricardiana (talk) 04:21, 24 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi @Damibaru: Thanks for the tinkle. The "18F" is OK either way. Chemists / physicists prefer one notation and other people usually prefer the other. So I just followed whatever the source said that applied to the given text. I suppose I could have made it uniform style but once the infobox people come by they will undoubdedly "resolve the issue back and forth". (You said you didn't understand a word of the article. I see you might be a musician. I wasn't bright enough or motivated enough to keep playing in the city orchestra. After I lost enough musical brain cells to be almost normal I could still appreciate Mahler Messiaen and MacCunn's ska punk but I could no longer tap into how it channeled all the answers to all the questions before and after the flood. I respect musicians very much, so we are even, unless you're ahead, which seems likely. FeatherPluma (talk) 01:05, 1 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@FeatherPluma: Sorry that it took me so long to reply! To tell you the truth, chemistry and music take up two very different parts of the brain. It is well known that Einstein loved to play his violin Lina, and that Borodin was a renowned chemist, noted for many things, including having discovered the Aldol reaction. Ok, maybe the last one is not well known, but the point is that you can be both, or neither. I tried chemistry once, because it has so much order and regularity, or it seemed at force, but I never got past molecular make-ups and the like. And then phones were made and bought and now I can't even understand how even basic things work. I think it might have something to do with age, too. Anyways, I am rambling without a point when I have better things to do. Enjoy your week! Damibaru (talk) 17:43, 6 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you Damibaru for your kind words. You made a very good point about linking the ancient city with the present one. I'll make it as soon as I have some time. Thanks again. Cheers! Greenhamster

Hello, Damibaru. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hello, Damibaru. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past few weeks. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota. You might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. If you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.25% of English Wikipedia's biographies). Our priorities for December: Seasonal celebrations First ladies Go local #1day1woman Global Initiative
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 12:19, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Damibaru. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Damibaru. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Orchestral works by Bernstein requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>((substituted))</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:23, 2 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Precious

Five years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:03, 14 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Gerda Arendt:, five years was forever ago! Thank you so much for the trip down memory lane!! Damibaru (talk) 07:07, 16 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, recently i've started a draft of the ensemble (Rastrelli Cello Quartet) - would you please review it? I will add some more information later.

User:Dall'Abaco/sandbox

Thank you! Dall'Abaco (talk) 12:42, 30 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]