Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Danielg532! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Abishe (talk) 13:28, 14 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Danielg532

Thank you for creating Luhansk People's Republic–Russia relations.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:16, 9 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Oskil (village), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:19, 24 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Kleuske. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Donetsk People's Republic, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kleuske (talk) 21:10, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Tsentralne Mykolaiv Oblast, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:34, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tsentralne Mykolaiv Oblast. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:36, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Oleksandrivka, Bashtanka Raion, Mykolaiv Oblast, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 03:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Are you planning to create these articles? It's just that they are there for other oblasts, but not for these last two, which were occupied. I would be very grateful. Uliana245 (talk) 15:37, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. I wasn't planning making occupation pages for Kyiv and Chernigiv Oblasts, since i'm new to writing articles on Wikipedia, but i could start them and as more people can add more information. Danielg532 (talk) 20:26, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Even though you're now, you did a good job. Congratulations. Super Ψ Dro 21:07, 13 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you so much! I tried my best to include important events. I hope other people add more information because it's looking pretty bare. But thanks! Danielg532 (talk) 21:44, 13 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, Danielg532, I've been looking thru https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_of_cities_during_the_Russo-Ukrainian_War and I can't help noticing that your dates are inconsistent. Specifically:

• The "As Of" column. If you make an edit saying that a town was taken by X on 2022/03/04 then you need to set the "as of" column to 2022/03/04 (in words). If you then later make an edit saying that town X was then retaken by Y on 2022/08/01, then you need to set the "as of" column to 2022/08/01 in words.
• The "retrieved on" parameter. The ref will often have a "retrieved on" parameter. If you use a ref as a source then you must make sure that the "retrieved on" param use that day's date. Don't reuse an existing ref if it's got an existing "retrieved on" param, instead create a new ref to the same source but with the "retrieved on" parameter set to the correct date.
• Dated sources. You're linking to ISW's dynamic map here and liveuamap's dynamic map here. those maps are updated every day which makes it impossible to check your dates. May I ask you to please use datestamped versions, eg https://liveuamap.com/en/time/01.08.2022 or https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-august-1 instead?

Otherwise you end up with entries like this one for Novomykolaivka currently reads "Novomykolaivka as of 9 July 2022 Captured by Russia 4 July 2022 Recaptured by Ukraine 16 August 2022[164]", where "[164]" is dated "retrieved 5 August". Which requires time travel to make sense.

So can I please ask you to go back thru your edits and try to make them coherent? I know I'm a pain but it really does help. Sorry to bother you, regards, Anameofmyveryown (talk) 21:43, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Since the page Control of cities during the Russo-Ukrainian War is vulnerable to the fog of war, as well as to bias from both sides of the conflict, it is particularly important that we strictly follow Wikipedia's rules regarding WP:verifiability. The edit you made regarding Lyman cited a self-published source, which is incompatible with these rules; therefore, I have reverted it.

As for your edits regarding Kupiansk and Izium, I changed the source cited to The Daily Telegraph, which is listed at WP:RSP as reliable. If you find a reliable, neutral source stating that Lyman is under Ukrainian control (not simply quoting the Ukrainian government, but making the statement themselves), then please do update the settlement's control. —AlphaMikeOmega (talk) 21:05, 10 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Danielg532! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Control of cities during the Russo-Ukrainian War that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 19:24, 11 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Here Panam2014 (talk) 18:19, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CodeLyoko was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oleksandrivka, Bashtanka Raion, Mykolaiv Oblast and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CodeLyoko^talk 04:32, 11 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Danielg532! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CodeLyokotalk 04:32, 11 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Johnny Au. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of shopping malls in Toronto‎, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 16:29, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in List of shopping malls in Toronto‎, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. We don't use embedded links. Instead, we use <ref> tags. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 03:56, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Danielg532. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tsentralne Mykolaiv Oblast, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 6 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Line 6 Finch West, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 01:08, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi... I see you have started creating articles for stops on Line 6 Finch West (e.g. Jane and Finch stop).

Please don't... plain LRT surface stops are not notable in and of themselves and don't warrant their own articles. Yes, I'm aware Line 5 Eglinton has articles for its street-level stops... but it shouldn't. —Joeyconnick (talk) 19:51, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Okay, I understand, but since this will be integrated into the Toronto Subway I think it is important to feauture every station, unlike for example streetcar or bus stops. Even if they are notable or not there are plenty of pages that aren't "notable" so what is the problem with this? Why would 2 stations have their own page? Danielg532 (talk) 00:47, 13 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It is best to discuss before creating articles for individual stops on Line 6. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 17:14, 13 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The stations are all featured in the main article and you seem to have found nothing to say about any of them apart from the fact that they have platforms. What a surprise!. Have a look at wp:otherstuff btw; argueing that other, simmilar' articles exist does not work. It is simply an invitation to AfD whatever lumps of trivia have been cited as examples.TheLongTone (talk) 14:57, 24 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Driftwood stop is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Driftwood stop until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TheLongTone (talk) 14:49, 24 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Jane and Finch stop, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:03, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Tobermory stop, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:04, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Sentinel stop, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:04, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Danielg532. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tsentralne Mykolaiv Oblast".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:11, 6 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Draft:Dnipropetrovsk and Poltava Oblast Skirmishes, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:10, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Territorial control during the Russo-Ukrainian War. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:52, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Topoli, Kupiansk Raion, Kharkiv Oblast is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 03:09, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Danielg532. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Oleksandrivka, Bashtanka Raion, Mykolaiv Oblast, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Daniel i'm writing this to you about your more newer and recent articles (such as : Staseva, Zhytomyr Oblast, Kocheriv, Zhytomyr Oblast and many more) before making articles about villages in Ukraine please first read WP:Notability and see if the village is known enough for it to actually have a proper article inside Wikipedia. In wikipedia articles on topics which are barely notable usually get deleted. Gurther (talk) 20:44, 9 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Danielg532. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Oleksandrivka".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:33, 11 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you. I apologize for not deleting it sooner :) Danielg532 (talk) 15:09, 11 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Dibrova, Sievierodonetsk Raion, Luhansk Oblast, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, or a link to an official government source showing it is a legally recognized populated place. This article has zero. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:13, 15 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Matiashi, Poltava Oblast, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, or a link to an official government source showing it is a legally recognized populated place. This article has zero. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:13, 15 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Zaporizke, Velykomykhailivka rural hromada, Synelnykove Raion, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, or a link to an official government source showing it is a legally recognized populated place. This article has zero. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:21, 15 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Kalynivske, Velykomykhailivka rural hromada, Synelnykove Raion, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, or a link to an official government source showing it is a legally recognized populated place. This article has zero. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:22, 15 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Since this was moved from article to draft status for lack of evidence for notability, no evidence for notability has been added. Incidentally, is it a "townlet" or village -- and if the former, what does the word mean? "Liberated" from whose point of view? When was or is "currently"?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dibrova, Sievierodonetsk Raion, Luhansk Oblast and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 08:49, 16 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dibrova, Sievierodonetsk Raion, Luhansk Oblast, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hoary (talk) 10:10, 16 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zaporizke, Velykomykhailivka rural hromada, Synelnykove Raion, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zaporizke, Velykomykhailivka rural hromada, Synelnykove Raion, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

NP83 (talk) 19:02, 17 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Matiashi, Poltava Oblast. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:33, 18 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Not obviously notable. Needs more and better sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Matiashi, Poltava Oblast and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:34, 18 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Berezove, Synelnykove Raion, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, or a link to an official government source showing it is a legally recognized populated place. Two of the current sources do not even mention this locale. This article has zero. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:51, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Stepove, Synelnykove Raion, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, or a link to an official government source showing it is a legally recognized populated place. This article has zero. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:52, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Novomykolaivka, Synelnykove Raion, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, or a link to an official government source showing it is a legally recognized populated place. This article has zero. One of the refs is a dead link, one does not mention the location. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:54, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Kalynivske, Velykomykhailivka rural hromada, Synelnykove Raion, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, or a link to an official government source showing it is a legally recognized populated place. This article has zero. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:59, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Novoheorhiivka, Synelnykove Raion, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, or a link to an official government source showing it is a legally recognized populated place. This article has zero. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:02, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Solomyr, Varash Raion, Rivne Oblast, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:39, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Syrnystia, Korosten Raion, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:40, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Radcha, Korosten Raion, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:41, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Maksymivka, Mykolaiv Raion, Mykolaiv Oblast, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:44, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Kvitneve, Zhytomyr Oblast, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:44, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Kocheriv, Zhytomyr Oblast, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:44, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Onel5969: please note that these draftifications have all been contested with no improvements Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:46, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stepove, Synelnykove Raion, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stepove, Synelnykove Raion, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:52, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Marianske, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:04, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Stepove, Synelnykove Raion, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:50, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article West Topoli, Kupiansk Raion, Kharkiv Oblast is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West Topoli, Kupiansk Raion, Kharkiv Oblast until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:18, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with West Topoli, Kupiansk Raion, Kharkiv Oblast. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 08:18, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Novoheorhiivka, Synelnykove Raion, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication this is a legally recognized place, fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:16, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Kalynivske, Velykomykhailivka rural hromada, Synelnykove Raion, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication this is a legally recognized place, fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:16, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Novomykolaivka, Synelnykove Raion, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication this is a legally recognized place, fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:17, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Berezove, Synelnykove Raion, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication this is a legally recognized place, fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:17, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Dibrova, Sievierodonetsk Raion, Luhansk Oblast has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication this is a legally recognized place, fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:17, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dibrova, Sievierodonetsk Raion, Luhansk Oblast is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dibrova, Sievierodonetsk Raion, Luhansk Oblast until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:53, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kvitneve, Zhytomyr Oblast is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kvitneve, Zhytomyr Oblast until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:37, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kocheriv, Zhytomyr Oblast is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kocheriv, Zhytomyr Oblast until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:39, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Berezove, Synelnykove Raion, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Berezove, Synelnykove Raion, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:55, 13 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Novomykolaivka, Synelnykove Raion, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Novomykolaivka, Synelnykove Raion, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:56, 13 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kalynivske, Velykomykhailivka rural hromada, Synelnykove Raion, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kalynivske, Velykomykhailivka rural hromada, Synelnykove Raion, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:56, 13 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your edit to Eglinton East LRT has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information.

The map in question is actually from Steve Munro's website: https://stevemunro.ca/2020/12/11/eglinton-east-waterfront-lrt-updates/ itself taken from the official report.

Please discuss here in this link.

Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 16:07, 28 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please don't remove these templates until the discussions have closed, as you have now done twice at the Battle of Paraskoviivka article and done previously at Zaporizke, Velykomykhailivka rural hromada, Synelnykove Raion, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast. If you wish to express your objection to the deletions, leave a comment in the deletion discussion instead. Physeters^✉ 02:58, 15 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Danielg532. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jane and Finch stop, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Danielg532. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tobermory stop, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Danielg532. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sentinel stop, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ontario Science Centre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBC. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 6 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Battle of Orikhiv, you may be blocked from editing. HappyWith (talk) 03:19, 25 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The redirect Petrushene, Mykolaiv Raion has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 15 § Petrushene, Mykolaiv Raion until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 06:55, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Verkhnia Rudnia, Korosten Raion, Zhytomyr Oblast. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources, it is a poor translation and This part “ In 1906 it was a village in Pokalivska volost, “ doesn’t much sense too. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. FuzzyMagma (talk) 13:26, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Johnny Au. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Line 6 Finch West‎, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Your edit requires a new reliable source to back it up. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 00:53, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I already provided pictures of all the canopies if you want to drive there yourself and look Danielg532 (talk) 01:01, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Danielg532. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Matiashi, Poltava Oblast, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Verkhnia Rudnia, Korosten Raion, Zhytomyr Oblast, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 09:11, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Danielg532. Thank you for your work on Cymbulia sibogae. User:Hughesdarren, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi There, Nice Work! I fixed up the speciesbox and added some categories. I'm not an expert so could you please check my work. Speciesboxes can be hard to work with and sometimes need a template created, if you ever need a hand with this type of thing let me know and I should be able to muddle my way through. Cheers and well done!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Hughesdarren)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 01:26, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey! Thanks for the compliment! Thank you too for helping out. If I am honest I am no expert either. I'm sure what you wrote was great though Danielg532 (talk) 02:06, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Cuvierina atlantica, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:02, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

tbh i didnt notice anything but ty ig Danielg532 (talk) 04:18, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Significa liberdade was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

At present, this article doesn't include any references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Verkhnia Rudnia, Korosten Raion, Zhytomyr Oblast and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 04:22, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent addition of an image to Diacavolinia longirostris has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:COPYOTHERS for more information. Loopy30 (talk) 16:51, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

kys Danielg532 (talk) 17:14, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Caledon East, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:04, 3 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Danielg532. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dnipropetrovsk and Poltava Oblast Skirmishes, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:05, 23 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Mayfield West, Canada, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Mayfield West, Canada, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mayfield West, Ontario is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mayfield West, Ontario until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bearcat (talk) 22:59, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The thread is Disruptive editing patterns by Danielg532. SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 16:41, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of communities in Caledon, Ontario, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:31, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Terra Cotta, Ontario is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terra Cotta, Ontario until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bearcat (talk) 18:25, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Stfu Danielg532 (talk) 15:15, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please note:

1. Articles about communities in Ontario go at "Place, Ontario", and may absolutely never be titled "Place, Canada" or "Place, Ontario, Canada". Your options here are "either use 'Place, Ontario' or don't create the article at all", not "you can pick any variant title of your own personal choosing".
2. They go only in the most specific appropriate category: a neighbourhood in Caledon only goes in Category:Neighbourhoods in Caledon, Ontario, and does not also go in Category:Caledon, Ontario, Category:Ontario or Category:Canada alongside that.
3. Category:Villages in Ontario is only for the type of village that is a standalone municipality with the status of village under Ontario law. It is not for "villages" that are really just neighbourhoods within larger municipalities — if it's in Caledon, then by definition it is not a village, because it is in Caledon and not an independent municipality in its own right.
4. Under WP:GEOLAND, communities within incorporated municipalities are not automatically entitled to have their own separate articles just because they exist. They may have their own separate articles if they can be shown to have sufficient reliable source coverage in real media and/or books to pass WP:GNG — if that can't be established, then the community only gets redirected to Caledon, and does not get to have its own separate article. You cannot rely on primary sources, like government reports or maps or content self-published by Caledon's own municipal council, to establish the notability of a community — you must use reliable sources, such as newspaper articles and books, and the place does not get to have its own separate article at all if you can't.

I trust that I've made myself clear, because if I find any more articles about neighbourhoods in Caledon that you created at "Place, Canada" instead of "Place, Ontario", I'm going to have to escalate the consequences. Bearcat (talk) 21:38, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kill yourself Danielg532 (talk) 15:15, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the following articles to which you have significantly contributed, are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted:

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alloa, Ontario until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Daniel. I think it's great you've been adding pages for old and notable villages in the Caledon area. I don't know why one or two editors are giving you so much grief over this, and using the deletion process which is not the right approach for improving and fixing articles. Please keep up the good work - and please don't reply to comments the way you have been - the articles will all be kept after debate - but someone will likely try to get you banned if you keep saying things like that. Nfitz (talk) 06:29, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]