what you mean I have to talk?
Hello there Danja, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you ever need editing help visit Wikipedia:How does one edit a page and experiment at Wikipedia:Sandbox. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149
Thanks for uploading File:Carolinelp.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 18:08, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Named-graphs-1.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:09, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Named-graphs-2.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:10, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
The media file you uploaded as File:Named-graphs-1.svg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.
It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.
Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).
((subst:usernameexpand|Danja))
will produce an appropriate expansion,Hello, I found your user page while doing some wikiarchaeology. . I have restored all of its earliest surviving revisions from old copies of the Wikipedia database, so they are available to everyone now. Hope you don't mind. Graham87 09:41, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Resource Description Framework, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RDF (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
You've added an example of embedded content to the Atom example.
I'd disagree to some extent that this is "probably the most important part of an entry" because Atom (and for a long time, RSS as there was little else it could do) manages to shift basic titles and summaries around without needing to embed content like this. It's certainly "very important" but nor is it "essential" (it works without) and we can agree to differ over "most important".
Accordingly, would it be better if this added example used an XHTML namespace with a prefix? That would be (IMHO) clearer to readers of what is still probably their first Atom example as it makes it very clear what is XHTML and what is Atom. As an example of likely practice, it's also (again IMHO) a more common way of doing things. Certainly I've never generated Atom feeds with embedded content without putting an explicit prefix onto there.
RSS was awkward (and a mess to be honest) because it was neither XML nor even SGML and there was a lot of nasty custom parsing going on to embed HTML, especially anywhere near Userland. For Atom though, it has always (IMHO) at least been XML-clean and so prefixed namespacing was the simplest and easiest route. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:19, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Please delete the impression of the English royals, is totally irrelevent.
And please someone get some decent natural history material.