Hi, Dante26, Welcome to Wikipedia!

haz (user talk) 20:42, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi do you have a source for his birth name being Martino Christofaro Scorseseressa? Thanks Arniep 01:56, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please cite some sources for this article, or else it will be deleted as a hoax. Thank you. Ashibaka tock 20:19, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages as it is considered vandalism. You may comment at the respective page if you oppose an article's deletion. Thanks. --Adam ^(talk) 21:05, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages as it is considered vandalism. No Guru 22:26, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices and comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages. If you continue to remove them, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. No Guru 22:38, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This your last warning. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices, you will be blocked from wikipedia.--Adam ^(talk) 22:40, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 3 hours. To contest this block, add the text ((unblock)) on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so is also considered vandalism.

KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 23:01, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices and comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages. If you continue to remove them, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --pgk^(talk) 18:38, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text, deliberate misinformation, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you believe you have been blocked unfairly, please add the text ((unblock)) to this page, along with an explanation of why you believe you were unfairly blocked. An administrator will review your case. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. --pgk^(talk) 19:00, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dante, just letting you know that I've nominated your article Mariana hill for deletion as a blatant copyvio because it appears you have copy and pasted the biography and trivia straight from IMDb. I also have concerns about a lot of your other articles and edits, which frankly, appear to be hoaxes or at best, unverifiable. Please try to cite references in your articles. Sarah Ewart 13:57, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As above, I have also nominated your article Rudy Bond for deletion as a blatant copyvio because you appear to have copy and pasted it from IMDb. Please cease posting content you have lifted from other websites. This is illegal and against Wikipedia policy. Sarah Ewart 22:24, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto your article on Gianni Russo appears to be a blatant copyvio copy and pasted from IMDb. Please do not post content lifted from other sources. Sarah Ewart 22:35, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto your article on Morgana King. Sarah Ewart 22:43, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The text you added to Joe Spinell was lifted from IMDb and has been removed. Sarah Ewart 00:24, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And Pasquale Cagiano, another copyvio. If there are other copyvios you remember posting, it would be nice if you would remove them yourself. Sarah Ewart 21:31, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a week for persistent vandalism, hoaxes, and copyright violations. You may respond to the block on this Talk page. Ashibaka tock 01:45, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Collateral damage to AOL users--205.188.117.8 14:24, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• No seriously, this user seems to be pulling a denial of service type thing, a half dozen AOL IPs seem to be blocked--205.188.117.8 14:28, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've already unblocked him, but it looks like the autoban has already done its damage. Ashibaka tock 17:15, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Seems to have also caught a few 64.x.x.x's--64.12.116.66 18:06, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Because of the asinine way the autoblock works, I don't know the exact IPs I've autoblocked until someone tells me them. So, "64.xxxxxxx" isn't helpful :( Ashibaka tock 18:14, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know much about the "fulco scorvella" issue. My problem with you is your persistent insertion of copyright material you lifted from other websites. You persisted in doing this even after you were repeatedly told what you were doing was illegal and against Wikipedia policy. You also persisted in inserting phoney "Italianised" names into random articles and ignored all requests for you to provide sources. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 04:42, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[[Category:Requests for unblock|((PAGENAME))]] GOD DAMN IT! it's doing it again, this account clearly exists for no reason other than causing AOL autoblocks, this account is a DENIAL OF SERVICE attack, and should be blocked indefintily, or better, deleted--205.188.117.8 16:06, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm not requesting that the name be unblocked, I suggesting that somebody clean up the AOL IP ranges that his little Denial Of Service Attack has gotton autoblocked, nameley most of the 205.x.x.x range, and most of the 64.x.x.x range--205.188.117.8 16:41, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• It's doing it again, this is one of the most persistant denial of service vandals I've ever seen, it's weeks later, and it's still getting entire AOL ranges autoblocked, this can't be accidental, please cleanup the wave of AOL ip autoblocks caused by this account, and please warn off the anon ip that keeps blanking this message--152.163.100.134 01:10, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

only dante26 can request an unblock with the ((unblock)) template. 151.203.10.94

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Catherine Scorsese is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catherine Scorsese until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JDDJS (talk) 01:02, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael P. Moran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael P. Moran until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rusf10 (talk) 23:19, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]