Hi Dave,

Sorry for long absence. I have been aware of your message just few days ago. Actually it was long time I was not making any more contribution to wikipedia. I will mail you soon. Best regards, User:Farid2053

On 8 October, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sarikoli language, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Someone dropped this on my talk page. I think it belongs to you. =) cab 17:13, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the talk page about the discussion of a possible merge with Tajik people. I realise that you are probably more knowledgeable than myself on the matter and would appreciate your input. :) - Francis Tyers · 00:08, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On 2 December, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Baymirza Hayit, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 17:17, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On 3 December, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gang Bing, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 14:39, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 December, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article British Overseas Airways Corporation Flight 777, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 22:28, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On 12 December, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Rafetus swinhoei, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 18:55, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi David, thanks for letting me know about the deletion. I've added more information to the article and one reference. See what you think. Do we have a chance now? -Intheshadows 11:13, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again David. The work you did regarding the tags and codes is just great. The article looks wonderful. I still don't know how to do all that technical stuff, as of yet. I've added more information but will have to work on collecting more references tomorrow. Some information came from the Austin Chronicle article, which I've added to the "External links" section. I've also left messages on a few talk pages. As well, I took a look at the "Guidelines for Notability" and, as you will notice when you look at the article, it seems evident that Sarah falls well within these guidelines. Its so ridiculous to delete this article, since it will just have to be rewritten in the future as esteem for Sarah Jacobson continues to grow.-Intheshadows 11:31, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi David - How about that? The article is being kept. I think congratulations are in order! -Intheshadows 09:58, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On December 21, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Spenser Somers Foundation, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Thanks for your contributions! ++Lar: t/c 15:15, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi David I see you are an editor interested in Central Asia. Could you take some time to look at Terrorism in Kazakhstan and offer your comment.There is a revert war going on there because one user tries to push his POV on the subject. Thankscs 18:09, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see that you're knowledgeable about Vietnam-related subjects, so I'd like to let you know about the new Wikipedia:WikiProject Vietnam. If you'd like to join, please add your name under "Participants." Badagnani 05:15, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On 15 August, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article S.J. Warmington, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Allen3 ^talk 12:36, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was just wondering, do you know why the Central Asia Monitor went out of circulation? Otebig (talk) 10:58, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 20 March, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article List of journalists killed in Tajikistan, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Congratulations! --Espresso Addict (talk) 16:30, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work on this one, I have added it to Portal:Journalism. Cirt (talk) 23:20, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks everyone David Straub (talk) 22:57, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Could you please provide a citation for the fact that he is deceased? Per Wikipedia's policies on biographies of living people, uncited material on the pages of living (or possibly living) people must be removed so, without it, I cannot allow notice of his death to remain on the page. Cheers, CP 21:08, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On June 2, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Henri Pinault, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 02:21, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On June 18, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mary Lawson (actress), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wizardman 08:35, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I saw from here that it's been five years since you joined the project. Happy WikiBirthday! Keep up the good work, rʨanaɢ (talk) 02:08, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome! Whereabouts in China are you? I finally got to visit Xinjiang this summer, albeit only for a few days, and only Urumchi...I'm hoping to go back next summer for longer. rʨanaɢ (talk) 13:15, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that sounds awesome! There is little I wouldn't do right now for some good qorum... rʨanaɢ (talk) 00:29, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message, if you look at the talk page Talk:Saddle you will see that I am having a little problem with an editor who resents me trespassing on HIS article. He has had the article blocked because I dared to link the term "kura" to the kura (Japanese saddle) image gallery on Wikipedia commons as there is currently no wikipedia article to link to, this is something I have done on numerous articles with absolutely no complaints. I am gathering information and images to eventually write a good article but in the mean time I wanted to add some good referenced information the the existing article. If have an interest in the subject and you feel like getting involved you can take a look at the talk page and give your opinion on my solution to the current problem. Samuraiantiqueworld (talk) 08:22, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like this guy is back again. Hopefully he gets bored before I go to bed, but if not a short block might be in order... rʨanaɢ (talk) 02:44, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded it from a flickr photo. the photo at flickr claims to be released under the license which I provided at wikipedia when I uploaded it. If the original flickr user lied about the license, (I am not the owner of the flickr account), then I did not intentionally upload a copyrighted file.DÜNGÁNÈ (talk) 00:25, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the photo which was previously on the article before I replaced it was fraduently released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License., when the original flickr photo showed no such permission, on the contrary, on the right side under "license", it says : " All Rights Reserved".

Due to the copyrighted status of the original photo, I searched on flickr for a photo and found it over here, on the right side, under "License", it provided a link to the "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License", which allows for the photo to be used. If it is a scan of a movie poster, then its the original flickr user which posted fake information about the copyright.

And I have no particular interest in the photo, as I said, I was looking for a replacement of the original photo which was also copyrighted, you guys should delete both files. Thank you for being vigilant.DÜNGÁNÈ (talk) 00:34, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello David Straub! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hansaddle.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:34, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your contribs to the Ney Elias article. I have created next to no articles on Wikipedia and this is the only one I felt good about. I was very excited to stumble upon this very worthy explorer that somehow had no article. I was really hoping some editors with more knowledge in this area would chime in and it's rewarding to see someone finally did. Thanks! Beach drifter (talk) 05:25, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You undid my addition mentioning Gingrich's reference to Leonard Wood as 'irrelevant.' If you will look at the page view statistics you will see that there was a very dramatic spike in page viewing after Gingrich's reference. This is an empirical indication of the relevance to Gingrich doing so. Clearly, persons became interested in viewing the article as a result of Gingrich mentioning him. This is in no way a subjective analysis on my part. Dwight Burdette (talk) 02:23, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is the response I posted to your comment on my talk page:

I am an Army combat veteran and knew about Fort Leonard Wood because, among other things, my older brother was also an Army combat veteran and did his basic training there. I never knew for whom the Fort was named, but because of of Newt Gingrich's comment, I took the trouble to look it up, like many others. The comment has obviously had a significant impact on Leonard Wood's legacy. Whatever the merit of the comment, it had the effect of evoking the memory of Leonard Wood, and adding to his legacy. That is the point of mentioning it. Normally, I wouldn't bother to pursue this, because having a single edit undone is not that big of a deal, but I'm going to make an exception in this case, because I've been insulted by the insinuation that my addition to the article had a political motivation. I'm flabbergasted by the insinuation. To what end was my contribution serving a political purpose? I'm going to undo the deletion and you are the one who can take this to admin if you want.Dwight Burdette (talk) 00:02, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:800px-Cuc.Phuong.Primate.Rehab.center.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Morning Sunshine (talk) 02:33, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, David Straub. You have new messages at Morning Sunshine's talk page.
Message added 16:34, 16 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.[reply]

Morning Sunshine (talk) 16:34, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:800px-Cuc.Phuong.National.Park.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add ((OTRS pending)) to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as ((non-free fair use in|article name)) or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 00:17, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Roger Lloyd Kennion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:47, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Chuck Jaskwhich (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Track

List of governors of Badakhshan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to National Geographic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 03:42, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of journalists killed in the United States is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of journalists killed in the United States until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

I've noticed your work on journalists in Tajikistan and thought you might be interested in this discussion about an article deletion of a similar list. Crtew (talk) 19:41, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your use of the diamond to represent fictional or composite characters. The concern I have is that we don't have any citations to reliable sources that say these characters are fictional. We have a source saying, for example, that Walter Goggins plays Wells A. Hutchins, a real Congressman of the era. Maybe Spielberg and Kushner changed to a composite character. Where is the reliable source that says so? Otherwise, it looks like original research. Your thoughts? Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 05:25, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your inquiry. Before we use the term "original research", let's come to a common understanding. I think after more than a decade of editing, it is safe to assume that every single member of congress who has ever served in the house of representatives now has an article on wikipedia. One resource that could be used to verify membership in the 38th congress (1863-65) would be to look up the name on the wiki page for the 38th congress:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/38th_United_States_Congress

If that is not satisfactory, then the US House of Representatives runs its own historical website (http://history.housegov/). Individual members can be looked up, but so far I haven't found a page that groups members according to congress, so it does take a few clicks to verify the name.

As for the Wells A. Hutchins stuff you mentioned above, I didn't write or edit that. If you want, delete it. I added the diamond, but like I mentioned in the comment of my edit, anyone can feel free to change it. I just think that there does need to be some mention some where that some members are based upon historical figures and some are fictional, at least in name.

Have a good day. David Straub (talk)

You may very well be correct, but in order to say in the article that these characters are fictional, we need to provide a reference to a reliable source that says they are fictional. Can you suggest a source about the film that says that? Otherwise, how do you know it and how can a reader such as me verify it? I also hope that you have a good day. It is sunny and spring like here in Northern California. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 16:41, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think I have given enough academic justification for calling these characters fictional. Moreover, it's simple logic to say that if the characters were not members of congress, then the characters were not historical congressional figures. You do not need a source that says "This figure was created for this film" and such a source may very well not exist. That would be no more necessary than finding a source that says "Darth Vader is not a historical figure and was created for the purpose of the Star Wars films." It is unlikely that such a source exists because who would find it necessary to write that? You are also misusing the term original research, which is a dangerous accusation to throw around in wikiland. Original research would be if I was challenging a common held assumption with a new hypothesis. I don't think anyone with knowledge of congressional history would think these figures are real, so no original research here. If you want to go further with this, start a debate on the Lincoln film page calling this original research and we can let the wikipedia editors have vote. Please be kind enough to let me know when and if you do this. Good day.David Straub (talk)

Hello, David Straub. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage#Users.
Message added 06:18, 7 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

regarding Mr. Straub and AWB Valley2city^‽ 06:18, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yangtze giant softshell turtle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Geographic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Murder of Brian Glick, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ramsey County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On 26 October 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Roscoe Cook, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in 1959 sprinter Roscoe Cook of the University of Oregon beat Olympic gold medalist Bobby Morrow and world record holder Ray Norton in the 100 metres and tied the world record? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Roscoe Cook. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:04, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kenneth Stonehouse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Halifax (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, place a new ((help me)) request on this page followed by your questions, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I am a bit confused about this new wikidata code attached to articles and its causing an error to come up when I try to make an inter-wikilink.

I want to create an interwiki link from this article, Ole_Olufsen, to it's Danish equivalent, [1]. When I try to do that I get directed to this page, [2], and I get the error below:

"Site link Ole Olufsen is already used by item Q12330127. Perhaps the items should be merged and one of them deleted? Request deletion of one of the items at Wikidata:Requests for deletion, or ask at Wikidata:Interwiki conflicts if you believe that they should not be merged."

It looks like Q12330127 is a wikicommons page about Ole Olfusen. So what am I doing wrong?

Thanks in advance.

David Straub (talk) 07:16, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It looks as though Q12330127 is a duplicate. I have placed a deletion request for it. Once it has gone, it should be possible to link both the Danish and Commons entries to Q3350261. My deletion request was immediately archived by a bot, which seems odd but may be normal procedure: if it has not been actioned soon, I will agitate. JohnCD (talk) 09:29, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Fixed. It turns out that the thing to do is delete the items from the duplicate entry, then they can be added to the main one and the duplicate deleted - see https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Help:Merge. JohnCD (talk) 10:02, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I appreciate the help. David Straub (talk) 06:44, 20 November 2013 (UTC

		Holiday Cheer
		Victuallers talkback is wishing David Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone with whom you had disagreements in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. - Vic/Roger

A tag has been placed on Le Tricolore de Montréal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fenix down (talk) 11:44, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, David Straub. Please check your email; you've got mail! The subject is Adam Matthew account signup.
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((You've got mail)) or ((ygm)) template.

HazelAB (talk) 12:57, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the speedy reply. I sent in the application. David Straub (talk)

Hi David! I found this edit so I decided to investigate...

The article currently says: "it is the first and the only international high school providing an American high school curriculum in Jiangsu Province." However I took an archive of it, and in the archive it says: "it is the first and the only international high school issuing American high school diplomas in Jiangsu Province." - They must have changed the text WhisperToMe (talk) 11:55, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I looked into that claim at the time as well and I couldn't find anything. Thanks for checking into it. David Straub (talk) 06:28, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Yisaddle.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Deadstar (talk) 14:21, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's my photo that I took with my camera, so there should be no problem. I'll find a way to fix it.~~

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joe Roche, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stars and Stripes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, David Straub. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chyrnobyl. Since you had some involvement with the Chyrnobyl redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 18:12, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, David Straub. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I noticed your interest in portals. Here is what has been going on behind-the-scenes with them...

Currently, there are about 1500 portals, comprised of 150,000 pages in portal space, the rest beyond the 1500 being subpages. Most of those subpages contain an excerpt, copied and pasted from some article. Such excerpts never change, and they go stale over time (no longer matching the original source material).

The Portal WikiProject was rebooted on April 17th, and has grown to 68 members. We've been busy redesigning the portal model so that portals will not need all those subpages.

The design concept called "selective transclusion", which is used for migrating excerpts (moving them to the base page), does so by displaying part of an article the same as a template. An added benefit of this is that it also keeps them fresh, by always showing the current version of the content that is transcluded.

We are also working on ways to make excerpted content, and listed entries, dynamic, so that the material or links shown automatically change over time without the intervention of an editor. Selected articles, could be set up to change daily, for example, to present a different article each day. This can even be made to show a different article every time a user visits the page. Currently, we can do this from a set list. We're trying to make it so that the list is updated automatically from an external source that is regularly maintained.

Other automated solutions are being sought or developed for each section type of portals. To automatically update and archive news, did you know entries, and so on.

Once we get a fully automated design worked out, it will be applied to all the portals that do not have dedicated maintainers. This will reduce the amount of maintenance they need. A single editor will then be able to watch over far more portals than before, ideally, with each portal taking up only a single page in portal space.

The Portal WikiProject is dedicated to updating, upgrading, and maintaining the entire portal system and every portal in it.

Come check us out, and if you like what you see, feel free to join.    — The Transhumanist   05:34, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The RfC discussion to eliminate portals was closed May 12, with the statement "There exists a strong consensus against deleting or even deprecating portals at this time." This was made possible because you and others came to the rescue. Thank you for speaking up.

By the way, the current issue of the Signpost features an article with interviews about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

I'd also like to let you know that the Portals WikiProject is working hard to make sure your support of portals was not in vain. Toward that end, we have been working diligently to innovate portals, while building, updating, upgrading, and maintaining them. The project has grown to 80 members so far, and has become a beehive of activity.

Our two main goals at this time are to automate portals (in terms of refreshing, rotating, and selecting content), and to develop a one-page model in order to make obsolete and eliminate most of the 150,000 subpages from the portal namespace by migrating their functions to the portal base pages, using technologies such as selective transclusion. Please feel free to join in on any of the many threads of development at the WikiProject's talk page, or just stop by to see how we are doing. If you have any questions about portals or portal development, that is the best place to ask them.

If you would like to keep abreast of developments on portals, keep in mind that the project's members receive updates on their talk pages. The updates are also posted here, for your convenience.

Again, we can't thank you enough for your support of portals, and we hope to make you proud of your decision. Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   00:09, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: if you reply to this message, please ((ping)) me. Thank you. -TT

Hello, David Straub. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, David Straub. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Native langauge. Since you had some involvement with the Native langauge redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:10, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Avghanistaun. Since you had some involvement with the Avghanistaun redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:13, 30 March 2020 (UTC) ((subst:proposed deletion notify|1=Reeb (beer)|concern=The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing [[Wikipedia:General notability guideline]. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant English-language coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you. )) _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:10, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Antoine Craan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlameRuiner (talk) 11:31, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Georgia School Ningbo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ziad Rashad (talk) 06:07, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Central Asian Review has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 08:07, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Central Asian Review is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Central Asian Review until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Randykitty (talk) 11:22, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Georgia School Ningbo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable school lacking significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 33ABGirl (talk) 12:41, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have disambiguated a lot of the languages on Baidu Fanyi but there were some I was not sure about. I have tagged them - could you take a look?— Rod ^talk 10:38, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't even think about adding the language to the link. I'll take a look. Thanks for doing that. David Straub (talk) 10:41, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]