Hello Davidkinnen, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style
• Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
• If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! -Poli (talk • contribs) 14:22, 2005 July 25 (UTC)

I was wondering why you changed the alterations made on the 1/5/2006? They were accurate. As an employee of President Kennedy school and Community College I am slightly baffled to wy you reverted the text. If you could explain this underneath i would be much greatful. Thankyou.

Such a comment that was reverted was not appropriate for the type of article that was posted, this is an encyclopedia and as such each article has a specific focus and should be clearly referenced. I created the article and wish it to be factual accurate, as far as I aware that line was not factual accurate. Davidkinnen 19:18, 2 May 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Perhaps you should go and ask the person in question, I think you will find he would agree with the statement, and find it humourous also.

I have made some format change to your entry on WP:RM. Please read the guidelines on WP:RM

• What to do on the talk page
• What to do on this Requested moves page

to make sure that all the steps needed for a requested move have been completed. --Philip Baird Shearer 17:52, 27 July 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Why did you put Dark Jedi up for cleanup? Please reply on its Talk: page. --Maru 21:31, 16 August 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for minor cleanup on CSYS; I see that you pointed directly to the relevant Higher page instead of 'Higher Grade' which then redirected itself; I can see the reason for this, as it's probably less error-prone and more logical (or is it...?!)

Wasn't sure about that "secondary educational" vs. "secondary education" when I wrote it. Although I went for the former, on reflection I think your version is better (it's hard to decide when you've spent a while writing something; sometimes it becomes clearer when you take a step back). --Fourohfour 13:33, 23 August 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey, David. I'd have responded earlier, but I couldn't figure out how to find your User-talk.

Cheers for the hello. I am a qualified RE teacher myself, but the classroom just didn't suit me and I quit with stress. Freelancing as a writer now, and might go into a local primary school in the Fall to do workshops on either RE or film.

Good job on the RE article. --Dave Rattigan

Just a short note to thank you for your message and to compliment you on the reformed Faculty of Advocates page and the amended Advocate page. You are correct to remove the merge request. --Lucifer(sc) 15:09, 26 August 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reverted your changes to this article. My understanding is that the term defender is used also in civil cases in Scotland and is in fact less common with criminal cases (where "accused" is typical). When there is an appeal, a petition or an application then the person opposing it is a "respondent". This is true of criminal cases. The terms for someone seeking an appeal vary, but include "appellant", "suspender", "noter", "advocater" and "reclaimer" depending on the specific procedure. Note that someone can be both an appellant and pursuer, or indeed respondent and pursuer, depending on how the previous stages of the case have played out.

Hope this helps.

Lucifer(sc) 16:16, 27 September 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Further to the above and your comment to me I agree with what you say, but my perception of how your changes read to the old Palitiff article was that it appered to imply that the term defender was not used in civil contexts.

Lucifer(sc) 15:33, 28 September 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

David, I'm afraid I've had to revert your change to the Order of Precedence for Scotland, in which you had replaced reference to the Lord Justice General with one to the Lord President. We had discussion earlier in the year as to whether LP or LJG should be the main title, but when it comes to precedence it is his role as Lord Justice General that gives him his place in the pecking order, even if in modern times the role of Lord President is more important. If you check any reference giving the Order of Precedence, you will find that the LJG rather than the LP is listed.--George Burgess 08:15, 10 September 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• A month ago you kindly inserted an image of the trial judges on the Pan Am Flight 103 bombing trial page. Could you manage to do the same for the five appeal court Judges, headed by Lord Cullen, Lord Justice General to accompany the new appeal section?Phase1 15:57, 24 September 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You've created a link to the Procurator Fiscal on the Crown Office page. At the moment this leads straight back to the same page. Are you intending to separate out the PF material again? There's now sufficient material to justify that.

Created Procurator Fiscal article Davidkinnen 20:26, 24 September 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		An Award
		Am most pleased to award this Barnstar recognizing your excellent work reorganizing the geographically-biased, and too-lengthy, main Bankruptcy article

Flawiki 11:58, 24 September 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for your message David- You're right that I neglected education in Scotland in the new article I wrote. In my defence, I mainly did so because Scotland has had a sensible, uncomplicated policy of having all comprehensive schools. Also, I didn't think there were many operational differences between comps north and south of the border. My experience of Scottish Education stopped when I was nine, so perhaps I shouldn't have extrapolated so much (particularly in the wake of devolution).

I did put in something about schooling in NI, although I did so at the bottom of the article on the Tripartite System, which now you mention it may not be the best place for it. The main article on education in NI has a good coverage of the basic points, and the only major thing left out seems to be the exams.

In any case, it's very good of you to put in information from the regions- that was one thing I found very hard to find in the course of my research. Thanks for offering to sort it out. --Evil Capitalist 14:31, 2 October 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Whilst I appreciate - and welcome - the additional detail I am not happy about the tone and approach of recent edits. References in favour of comprehensive education have been removed and replaced with dubious party political references. For example you have deleted the reference to the fact (please note - fact) that Margaret Thatcher during her time as education secretary continued the policy of the previous Labour government on comprehensive schools. In fact most of the changeover from the tripartite system to the comprehensive system happened in the period 1968-75, mostly under a Conservative administration.

The material on the merits of the system is now biased because you have deleted the main arguments in favour which were:

"Supporters of the comprehensive system argue that it is unacceptable on both moral and practical grounds to select children on the basis of their ability. They also argue that comprehensive schools in the UK have allowed millions of children to gain access to further and higher education, and that the previous selective system relegated children who failed the eleven plus examination to a second class and inferior education."

Additionally the current article makes a whole series of evidence free value judgements about comprehensive education – such as:

“There is a widespread perception, shared by many of the system's advocates, that the comprehensive system has not been the success hoped for.”

“Academic performance is usually well below selective schools. This is unsurprising, since selective schools will have a natural advantage over comprehensives. However, it can be argued that the difference cannot be explained by differences in students alone.”

Who argues this? Where is the evidence for this assertion?

“In spite of the intentions of a ‘grammar school education for all’, many comprehensive schools lack resources and good teachers.”

Whose intention was it to provide a 'grammar school for all'? What evidence exists that the lack of resources and teachers is worse in comprehensives schools? Supporters would argue that teaching in a grammar school is easier than teaching in a comprehensive and that grammar school teachers would not be able to cope in the comprehensive environment.

These are not isolated examples and I am considering a wholesale rewrite of both these pages. But I feel I ought to seek comment from the authors – a courtesy not extended to me as the original author – before I do so.

Shropshire Lad

I've now looked at some of the other contributions made by Evil Capitalist. I'm inclined to modify my condemnation because this is someone who has clearly put a lot of research into the contributions. But the entire tone reeks of political bias. Some mention of party politics is inevitable in this debate, but the entries paint a polarised picture that is at odds with the facts. One of the main reasons for the demise of the tripartite system was its unpopularity with middle class parents, who did not relish the prospect of their child going to secondary modern school. Authorities, such as Solihull, which have tried to ressurect the eleven plus have discovered this, and failed as a result. I've revised the Comprehensive school and Comprehensive System pages, and if I have time will systematically work my way through the others. But I resent having to do this. All Evil capitalist has to do is stick to factual reporting and the entries would be fine.

Shropshire Lad 08:11, 7 October 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Since joining Wikipedia I have learnt an awful lot, and one of those things is the value of teamwork. It has become increasingly apparent to me that there are absolutely tons of people out there devoted to editing the Scottish articles, but we communicate only haphazardly. To begin to attempt to remedy this, I have initiated a notice board for all Scoto-fans!

You can find it using this shortcut: WP:SCOWNB (yes, I know that it ain't very "short", but our nordic neighbours had first call on WP:SWNB).

Please sign up and post notices, or at least Watch the page.--Mais oui! 15:14, 22 October 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If you're going to make large-scale changes to an article (especially removing a whole section) you should explain yourself. I have no idea why you made the changes that you did to Divinity, and think that you were wrong (especially your removal of the section explaining the academic discipline), so have reverted them. If you think that your edits were justified, could you say why at Talk:Divinity? --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 09:19, 4 November 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I notice that you never changed the Template:Infobox Ancient Scottish University and just want to point out that I don't mind that in any way. I suppose you could add the principal, while keeping the offices there now, but I leave that to you and the other Scots to discuss. Uppland 09:45, 22 November 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Is the concept of "quorum" really so different in other parts of the world? Could you give me and other editors a clue on its talk page about what to look up to find out about quorum from a global perspective? rspeer 16:35, 23 November 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't know if there are a written guideline about where to put interwiki-links, but I've always found it quite obvious that they should be put in the "external links"-section, as they are external links. And also, there seem to be a consensus about it thought I've never seen interwiki-links anywhere else than in the "external links"-section.- David Björklund (talk) 22:38, 27 November 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've found a guideline in the matter, Wikipedia:Sister projects where they deal with the matter and there it says: "Link to sister projects should be placed under the See also or External links sections of the article.".- David Björklund (talk) 23:00, 27 November 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

To avoid flip-flopping between 'degree Fahrenheit' and 'Fahrenheit' or 'degree Celsius' and 'Celsius', I propose that we have a discussion on which we want. I see you have contributed on units of measurement, please express your opinion at Talk:Units of measurement. Thanks. bobblewik 22:58, 12 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Davidkinnen. I noticed you added an entry to Vandalism in Progress. That page is only for very specific cases, as described by the page's guidelines. Your alert would be better placed on Administrator intervention against vandalism (WP:AIV), where it will usually be processed within minutes. Many alerts that are incorrectly placed on Vandalism in Progress are never dealt with, simply because they become old before an administrator gets to them. Thanks for your efforts. :) --lightdarkness ^(talk) 06:08, 26 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, thanks for your comment about this article. The reason for why I changed it to the new infobox is simply because I was following in the instructions on this project: Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/Colleges and Universities, which I guess is trying to promote a standard university infobox. There is a principal label in that infobox, and I changed the vice-chancellor label to that on this particular page, so that there's now a link right in the label directly to the principal article. Did you have any other Scotland-specific issues with the infobox or does that change work for you? Cpastern 10:38, 6 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Were in the WP:MOS does it recommend page names from (UK) to (United Kingdom)? I thought these things were covered by WP:NC. When a page name has been agreed upon with WP:RM is is customary to discuss further moves on the talk page before doing it! --Philip Baird Shearer 13:54, 19 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

See WP:NC#Prefer spelled-out phrases to acronyms, the specific guideline: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (acronyms) which says "Acronyms as disambiguators: As disambiguators, well-known acronyms such as "US" or "UK" are encouraged, to minimize typing. So, the preferred usage is Great Northern Railway (US)". So please consider reversing you change--Philip Baird Shearer 20:17, 19 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I was wondering if that page itself should be the dab. From what it looks like the other two meanings are very specific and not nearly as widely used as the first. Therefore shouldn't the graduate degree be on the main article with the other two being linked from Master of Arts (disambiguation)? gren グレン 04:59, 5 April 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Davidkinnen. If you want to change a cleanup tag to a wikify tag or vice versa, please replace the whole tag rather than modifying it. For example, on performance audit, you changed ((cleanup-date|November 2005)) to ((wikify-date|November 2005)). The problem is that there is no category for articles marked for wikification in November 2005 because they were all completed and the category was deleted. You can just replace the whole tag with ((wikify)) and a robot will put it in the appropriate month. Thanks, Kjkolb 09:23, 11 May 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! I noticed that you have been a contributor to articles on Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. You may be interested in checking out a new WikiProject - WikiProject Anglicanism. Please consider signing up and participating in this collaborative effort to improve and expand Anglican-related articles! Cheers! Fishhead64 22:54, 11 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kent-Meridian High School, I just thought you'd like to know that the consensus for deleting High School articles now appears to be swinging back in favor of deletion. So this may indicate the beginning of another campaign to remove most High School articles. Your opinion on the AfD article would be appreciated. It might be helpful if a notability standard for High Schools could be agreed upon. Thank you. — RJH (talk) 16:39, 12 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You've amended the article on the Lord President by altering "he" to "they", in an attempt to make the article gender neutral. I have always understood "they", used in this way, to be grammatically incorrect - a plural form where a singular is required. There is only ever one at a time (although some might say that in recent weeks we've almost had two!). While I am skeptical about the value of gender neutrality in relation to an office that has only ever been filled by males, if it is thought necessary then my preference would be to use "he or she" or repeat the reference to the Lord President - that is the approach used in drafting Acts of the Scottish Parliament--George Burgess 14:24, 16 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

David, please see new proposal at:

• Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals/2006/July#.7B.7BScotland-law-stub.7D.7D.2FCat:Scots_law_stubs

Thanks. --Mais oui! 08:54, 22 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If it's not too strange to ask a fellow Wikipedian, can I ask what St Andrews Uni is like? I'm an A2 student, perhaps thinking of going there. I notice from your user page that you once studied there. I don't know how long ago that was, but I'm assuming that as a teacher you're pretty well qualified to talk about the quality of teaching there etc.

How good would you say is the teaching there? How exactly is education organised? How good is the Sciences department there (I'm planning on studying Computer Science)? What sort of culture is it there, from some pictures I've seen it looks quite traditional, but as its Scotland I'm assuming it's a bit less uppity than Oxbridge? What's the town like? What's the countryside like? (I'm into hiking/hillwalking.)

If you can find the time to answer, thanks.--Uberisaac 18:04, 24 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ta for the advice. --Uberisaac 21:02, 24 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please see my comment on reorganization of the "Welcoming Congregation" topic (replying there). Thanks! --Haruo 07:02, 16 October 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have added a ((prod)) template to the article Newly-Qualified Teacher, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. This is because I mistakenly created the page Newly Qualified Teacher, and now believe that it has better content, and is at a more appropriate namespace. Please do feel free to comment, or to make changes as you see appropriate. Tafkam 00:56, 22 January 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:HM Court Service.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 06:17, 3 February 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Davidkinnen, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:UFMCC Small Logo.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Davidkinnen/MCC Sandbox. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 05:21, 19 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Lyon Court People.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:41, 27 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Lyon Grant of Arms.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:41, 27 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Alison_Elliot_standing.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 12:57, 9 July 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:SEC_College_of_Bishops.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add ((di-replaceable fair use disputed)), without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 04:05, 14 July 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:General_assembly_kik_alison_elliot.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add ((di-replaceable fair use disputed)), without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 17:49, 20 July 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just a reminder that when ever you upload a non-free image, it must have both a License and a fair use statement. Without both, the image will eventually be deleted. I went ahead and created a fair use statement for Image:Specialist Schools and Academies Trust.gif as you did provide enough information to make it possible to do. Dbiel ^(Talk) 01:30, 31 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Scottish Government logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:17, 9 September 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Bute Coat of Arms.png. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the ((GFDL-self)) tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as ((non-free fair use in|article name)) or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:18, 15 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 20:18, 15 September 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Scottish Qualifications Authority Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:16, 25 October 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:MCC Toronto Logo.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. PxMa 16:43, 27 October 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your help with this article. Bearian (talk) 19:57, 26 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Can you clean up Feu? Bearian (talk) 20:04, 26 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Can you create a stub for Tailzie (from Scots law)? Bearian (talk) 21:53, 27 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Great job! I made two changes, removing one clause and adding a see also. Bearian (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:President Kennedy School Coventry Logo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Zedla 00:45, 4 December 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have tagged Image:UFMCC_Small_Logo.jpg as ((no rationale)), because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using ((non-free fair use in|article name)) or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 13:56, 19 April 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have tagged Image:Bute_Coat_of_Arms.png as ((no rationale)), because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using ((non-free fair use in|article name)) or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 13:57, 19 April 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:St Marys College Coat of Arms.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? J Milburn (talk) 18:58, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Association of Teachers Lecturers.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:11, 21 May 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:HM Inspectorate of Education in Scotland logo.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 11:39, 14 September 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ofsted Logo.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 10:09, 23 September 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Scottish Credit and Qualifcations Framework Logo.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 05:43, 4 October 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Court of Session Seal.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 04:42, 3 March 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is a notice that I have failed your Good Article Nomination, because I believe that it has flaws so large that they cannot be fixed in a reasonable period of time. Based on the Good article criteria

1. 1(a) - the prose is largely confusing
2. 3(a) - it misses out large chunks of information. What is the history of the Acts of Sederunt? Exactly what are these powers and "further powers" now available in an Act of Sederunt? Can we have a listing of Acts? and so on. The paucity of sources used shows that you've really not given a broad and relatively detailed coverage of this topic - I found eight journal articles on the matter, none of which have been listed (although in fairness you may not have access to them).

• Thanks, Ironholds (talk) 17:06, 18 August 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:High Court of Justiciary Seal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:33, 7 December 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Davidkinnen! An article you have been concerned with needs improving. If you can help with these issues please see Talk:Independent Schools Inspectorate, address the different points if you can, and leave any comments there. Thanks.--Kudpung (talk) 04:47, 7 January 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Davidkinnen! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 1,707 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the ((unreferencedBLP)) tag. Here is the article:

1. Ranald Sutherland, Lord Sutherland - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:43, 18 August 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm just dropping you a quick note about a new Wikipedian in Residence job that's opened up at the National Library of Scotland. There're more details at the WP Scotland noticeboard. Richard Symonds (WMUK) (talk) 15:52, 22 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, at Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge we're striving to bring about 10,000 article improvements and creations for the UK and Ireland and inspire others to create more content. In order to achieve this we need diversity of content, in all parts of the UK and Ireland on all topics. Eventually a regional contest will be held for all parts of the British Isles, like they were for Wales and the Wedt Country. We currently have just over 1900 articles and need contributors! If you think you'd be interested in collaborating on this and helping reach the target quicker, please sign up and begin listing your entries there as soon as possible! Thanks.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 28 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:40, 6 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi! I'm a researcher from the University of Minnesota conducting a study on LGBT user contributions to Wikipedia. Would you be willing to answer a short five minute survey? If so, I would appreciate if you could drop me an email at leung085@umn.edu Weiwensg (talk) 09:25, 18 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Davidkinnen. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've replied to all your questions and issues to date on the D'Arcy Thompson GAN page. It's always hard to know how much detail to give in a Legacy section, as there's a danger of wandering off the subject, in this case D'Arcy himself. I've added a bit of detail on how exactly the famous followers were inspired. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:59, 16 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

When you're next about, I think we're almost done, we just need to close out the GAN. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:44, 18 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Forth Bridge you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:40, 2 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I hope you had a good break over Easter. Could you let me know if you intend to take this GAN forward soon? All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:54, 18 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Judiciary of Scotland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fine. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 4 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I'm TonyBallioni. Davidkinnen, thanks for creating Sheriff Appeal Court!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Adding in line citations to reliable secondary sources could help improve the article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

TonyBallioni (talk) 01:37, 7 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. I see in a recent addition to Sheriff Appeal Court you included material from a webpage that is available under a Open Government Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this legal requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:28, 7 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

High Court of Justiciary

added links pointing to Livingston and Paisley

Scottish Police Federation

added a link pointing to Police Federation

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 11 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Scottish Sentencing Council, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 03:48, 15 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sheriff Personal Injury Court, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 18:54, 15 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Risk Management Authority (Scotland), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paisley. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 18 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Forth Bridge you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Forth Bridge for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:22, 1 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lord Advocate's Reference, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Accused. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 2 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Governance of the University of St Andrews, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Governing body. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Scottish Land Commission, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:59, 24 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. This month The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There is over £3000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. Wikimedia UK is putting up £250 specifically for editors who produce the most quality new women bios for British women, with special consideration given to missing notable biographies from the Oxford Dictionary of Biography and Welsh Dictionary of Biography. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate independently this is also fine, but please add any articles created to the bottom of the main contest page even if not competing. Your participation in the contest and contributing articles on British women from your area or wherever would we much appreciated. Thanks.

Hello, Davidkinnen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Scottish Land Commission".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 15:24, 12 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Davidkinnen. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Judiciary and Courts (Scotland) Act 2008. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 19:19, 17 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I'm Insertcleverphrasehere. Davidkinnen, thanks for creating Judiciary and Courts (Scotland) Act 2008!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please progress an article more than this as a draft before submitting it. This kind of empty article isn't much use at all. Either flesh it out a bit as a stub, or leave it as part of a list. We don't need loads of articles with empty sections.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

— Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 08:55, 20 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Criminal Justice Act 1991, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kenneth Baker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 11 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:HM Inspectorate of Constabulary for Scotland logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 5 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Factor (Scotland) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Factor (Scotland) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Toddst1 (talk) 19:07, 31 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Church Commissioners, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Brown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 22 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Davidkinnen. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Davidkinnen. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article General Register Office (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/General Register Office (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 02:37, 22 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Davidkinnen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Agricultural Land Tribunal for Wales".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:45, 27 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, if you are active on Wikipedia and are still interested in helping out with urgent tasks on our large Schools Project, please let us know here. We look forward to hearing from you.

Sent to project members 13:58, 29 August 2021 (UTC). You can opt of messages here.

A number of articles have been reassessed as per your request at WikiProject Scotland/Assessment (although it took a few years!). I also want to add well done and thank you too for the contributions you have made on legal topics in past years Coldupnorth (talk) 22:57, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		For your contributions on articles relating to the Scottish Legal System Coldupnorth (talk) 22:57, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:SSI has been listed at templates for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Q28 (talk) 03:37, 24 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:HM Inspectorate of Prisons for Scotland logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Scottish Prison Service logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 30 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Accountant in Bankruptcy logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Parole Board for Scotland logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of the Office for Students.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 13 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:National Governance Association logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 20 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Judicial Appointments Board Scotland logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]