The article Declan Frith has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Player does not meet the Wikipedia notability requirements

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

The article Rafael Sotomayor Morales has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 13:26, 13 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@GiantSnowman: Hi, I think the guidelines for WP:NFOOTBALL are slightly too vague. My reason for saying this is that FIFA does clearly state that the fixtures need to be authorised by itself, but WP:NFOOTBALL also states that the teams do NOT need to be members of FIFA. Do FIFA athorise games in which at least one team is not a FIFA member?

On a similar note, NFT keeps records of non-FIFA games, and for nations such as Tuvalu (a non-FIFA country according to NFT), most of their games would presumably be non-FIFA games. One example of a player, who was actually nominated for deletion (with an ultimate decision to keep), is Vaisua Liva. Liva has played 5 non-FIFA games for Tuvalu (as of NFT), yet he has only played in non-FIFA games, for a non-FIFA recognised country. Having looked at the deletion log, you actually voted to keep this article, so I would just like to know what the difference is between Liva, Sotomayor and Chipunza? Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 13:54, 13 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have just looked through the deletion article again, and seen that the Pacific Games are part of qualification for the FIFA World Cup, so I presume these games would therefore be FIFA authorised, and NFT has actually made a mistake by saying these were non-FIFA games? Therefore, would players from the Federated States of Micronesia national under-23 football team be eligible for articles as they have represented their country at FIFA authorised games by competing at the 2015 Pacific Games? Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 13:59, 13 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

As for the Falkland Islands, a Tier 1 game is, per the FIFA Regulations, between "members" (clause 7(1))- The Falkland Islands is not a member and therefore cannot by definition play in a Tier 1 match.

As for NFT, it's not 100% accurate tbh, although it's a decent source nonetheless. GiantSnowman 14:06, 13 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

As for Liva, he played at a competition which featured at least one Tier 1 game, and was therefore considered a Tier 1 competiton (see the Regulations, clause 7(3)). That's why he was kept, but in any event WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. GiantSnowman 14:06, 13 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@GiantSnowman: Ah but Tuvalu aren't a member of FIFA either, and I have had a look and found that FIFA actually said that the Pacific Games would NOT be part of any qualification for the World Cup! (source here at the Wayback Machine (archived 1 July 2016)). So NFT were right to say they were non-FIFA games, and I presume that puts players from Tuvalu and the Falklands on the same level when it comes to international appearances with regards to notability? Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 14:10, 13 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If that's the case then yes - and Liva should be re-nominated and deleted as non-notable per NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 14:12, 13 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Okay, glad that cleared things up then. That would make all Tuvalu players non-notable then I presume? Unless they were playing in a fully professional league of course. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 14:14, 13 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Probably worth making the point that GS seems to have forgotten the recent change to NFOOTY, namely that players who have played for national teams in competitions organised by or sanctioned by continental confederations are now considered notable. This is to level the playing field for sovereign nations that are not members of Fifa. As such, Tuvaluan players who have played in the Pacific games meet NFOOTY, as it is an OFC competition. On the other hand the Falkland islands are neither a nation nor have competed in a competition organised or sanctioned by UEFA so players would not be notable per NFOOTY. Though they could still pass GNG with enough coverage in Falkland islands media. Fenix down (talk) 16:32, 13 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Got it, thank you both for clearing this up! Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 16:34, 13 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Any reason why you have removed references and categories and messed ups the infobox? Your editing is becoming increasingly concerning... GiantSnowman 11:58, 8 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@GiantSnowman: Not sure what you're getting at here. I didn't add the Italian link saying he had moved to Carpi because it's an amateur source. One look at the website referenced will show you the shoddy quality. Is this really a reliable source? Also confused as to why you constantly remove career statistics, when pages such as Lionel Messi and Cristiano Ronaldo both have them. The ones I add are always sourced with Soccerway, ZeroZero or an external statistics page such as the USL or PDL portals.

Your comment on me removing categories is absolutely ridiculous. My page creations often have 'Club career' as opposed to 'Career'. Big whoop. Huge difference there. And 'messing up the infobox' is simply an untrue statement. The differences between our two infobox edits are minuscule. The only major changes I can see are the removal of blank international stats (fair enough), slight formatting differences (my version is cleaner) and your claim that this player is a forward. Please provide a source stating he is a forward. Soccerway has him listed as a midfielder, as does the crappy Italian source you had on there. Is this not vandalism?

On a side note, might be worth noting that as a non-admin, I have limited views of page history and administration. For example, Daniel Iversen is listed to have been created by yourself on 26 July 2018, yet when I went to create the page, there was nothing to indicate that this was the case. As with Reece James. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 12:14, 8 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've added back the career stats table (properly formatted and referenced); the infobox was not formatted in-line with ((Infobox football biography)); you removed the a number of valid categories (A.S.D. Jolly Montemurlo players; French expatriates in Italy; Expatriate footballers in Italy; Category:French expatriates in England; Category:Expatriate footballers in England); you removed the valid stub tag. GiantSnowman 12:30, 8 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@GiantSnowman: Properly formatted and referenced? Sorry but there is nearly NO difference between the two. You're being incredibly anal here. I think Serie D - E makes more sense than just Serie D, too. It's the same thing as the National League having a 'North' and 'South' section, as the 'E' makes it clear that he competed in the Serie D group E. You replaced my <ref group="lower-alpha"> with an efn link, when they do the exact same thing. Apologies about the categories, but as I stated above: when I created the page, it was a blank template. I didn't remove anything, I just created my own version of the page that was minimally different from your own.

The comment about the infobox not being formatted correctly is utter rubbish too. So what if I put the 'years1', 'clubs1', 'caps1' and 'goals1' on the same line? This is the case with most football articles on Wikipedia. Again using Lionel Messi as an example. I don't see you jumping in to "correct" that page. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 12:42, 8 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

'Serie D - E' is ambiguous, hence why it was removed. Feel free to put 'Serie D Group E' or something if you want, but I've never seen that before. Regarding the infobox WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, as you should be well aware. GiantSnowman 12:47, 8 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@GiantSnowman: Please clarify what I am missing with regards to WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 12:51, 8 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just because other articles do certain (incorrect) things does not mean that you can do the same on this one. GiantSnowman 12:57, 8 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@GiantSnowman: If we're going to be this anal about these things, then shouldn't all football player articles have every single line from ((Infobox football biography))? Including things such as embed, image_size, alt and all of the college lines, even if they're blank? In the case of Kalala, you left in the image, image_size, caption, etc lines, even though they are blank. What makes these more important than other things that you have removed? Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 13:12, 8 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sigh...because we want an image on every article; we do not need college parameters for players who did not play college. GiantSnowman 13:23, 8 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@GiantSnowman: Well I think we want players to represent their countries at international level and win the leagues/tournaments they are involved in, but you always remove the national statistics and 'medaltemplates' lines because they have not yet played at international level or won anything. Surely the international stuff should only be removed when a player retires as there is always a chance that they will be called up? It sounds to me like your own editing style. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 13:28, 8 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You're being ridiculous now - ask at WT:FOOTY if you don't believe me. It's standard to only put in college/national parameters if/when they actually play - but we always keep in empty image parameters. GiantSnowman 13:31, 8 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Davidlofgren1996. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Davidlofgren1996. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Ismael Dunga, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 16:08, 8 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please cite Oricon and other charts to establish music notability as a solo singer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yumi Yano and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yumi Yano, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((db-self))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:21, 8 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Davidlofgren1996! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:21, 8 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello there, I noticed that you moved this article back to mainspace. But you left an edit summary that "Soccerway" is a reliable source. However, over the years at various discussions at WP:Football and WP:RS, Soccerway has been deemed unreliable. Since, you added one more source to the article so I am not going to contest your move but I would like you to inform that only sourcing through Soccerway is not going to make the article suitable for mainspace. Regards. Hitro talk 15:29, 9 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. I came across your creation Gary Marshall (footballer) and noticed that you'd misinterpreted the way the Hugman's Footballers site sets out the player's stats (which is a bit misleading). The figures headed Apps are actually starting appearances, so you need to add "Apps" and Subs together to get total appearances. So looking at Mr Marshall's stats, he should have 159+38 league appearances in all, not 159. I've fixed the figures on Gary Marshall (footballer), but if you've used the site to source other pages, you may want to go back and check them. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 22:59, 30 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Contradictory information here regarding current club - please can you review and rectify? GiantSnowman 14:30, 2 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@GiantSnowman: Sorry, went into the article thinking he played for Richmond but found while editing that he had moved to Kingston City. Have rectified, hope this is okay? Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 14:33, 2 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Cheers, thanks! GiantSnowman 14:39, 2 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You're really doing great by creating numerous of new articles and i wanted to thankyou for your contribution to wikipedia but i think it's ok while writing title name Lucas Silva (footballer) instead of adding birthdate in title. AD ^Talk 19:50, 9 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Azkord: Hi, the only reason I did so was to distinguish from Lucas Silva (footballer, born 1993), as he could also be listed as Lucas Silva (footballer). Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 19:55, 9 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just on my view lol ;). Regards, AD ^Talk 19:57, 9 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

anyway i got you, thanks for clearing out ! Cheers !! AD ^Talk 20:00, 9 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You shouldn't try and 'overwrite' or replace existing articles - I have merged the two versions. GiantSnowman 15:38, 10 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@GiantSnowman: My bad, didn't see that another page already existed. Will be more wary in future. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 15:39, 10 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No worries - if you get confused just ask. GiantSnowman 15:43, 10 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@GiantSnowman: Do I even have the rights to merge as a non-administrator? Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 15:45, 10 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No, because it involves a (temporary) deletion of one of the pages, which only admins can do. GiantSnowman 16:51, 10 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Davidlofgren1996,

Thanks for creating Micah Cooks! I edit here too, under the username Britishfinance and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Given is it a BLP, would need more than one source (even if a stub). Well done.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Britishfinance)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Britishfinance (talk) 21:12, 12 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for creating Gift Links.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Good stub!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Britishfinance)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Britishfinance (talk) 21:15, 12 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for creating Chris Brunt (soccer).

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Good stub!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Britishfinance)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Britishfinance (talk) 21:29, 12 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for creating Antonio Otero.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Good stub

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Britishfinance)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Britishfinance (talk) 22:23, 12 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An awdul lot of unsourced information in this article - where have you got the NI int'l stats from? What about Ridgeway Rovers? GiantSnowman 16:31, 13 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@GiantSnowman: Added sources. Please do not add ugly references to pages. Just putting ref-link-ref is sloppy and ugly. You of all people should be doing better. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 17:28, 13 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There's nothing wrong with adding bare URLs, thopugh it's not ideal. I was in a rush trying to clean up that mess of an article. Don't try and lecture me, given all your issues here. GiantSnowman 17:34, 13 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@GiantSnowman: Thank you for helping to clean up my disgusting mess of an article. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 17:35, 13 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No need to be sarky, I'm trying to help you. GiantSnowman 17:37, 13 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@GiantSnowman: Regarding dates, Robinson signed for Oldham in 2017 (ambiguous because in the article it says something about him joining next season, article written in April so probably 2017). He was still most likely playing youth football for Glenavon and was surely playing youth football for Oldham, which is why I added both into the ‘youthyears’ section. Any reason why they should be omitted from this? He was still playing youth football even after playing senior football. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 18:45, 13 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Because it gets far too complex. The infobox is a brief summary of a career. GiantSnowman 09:06, 14 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@GiantSnowman: Rubbish, why bother having the youthyears thing there then? If, for example, Robinson joined Oldham in 2017, but only played youth games from 2017 until 2019, he has represented Oldham at youth level and therefore this information should be reflected under youthyears. His professional, senior career with Oldham should start in 2019. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 21:15, 14 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What about John Smith, a backup goalkeeper for a club. He has never played a first team game but is always on the bench. Is he 'senior' or 'youth'? GiantSnowman 08:35, 15 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@GiantSnowman: By WP:FOOTY, he wouldn’t be eligible for a page ;) but I see your point. I think it’s difficult, because say a player signs for a premier league club at 16 in 2013 and has one appearance on the bench the next day, but then spends the next 5 years playing youth football, would you say his senior career spans 2013-2018? Or would you say that was his youth career?

I think a good compromise is to add it into both, because it covers both bases. Say John Smith signs in 2013, plays youth football until 2014 and makes his senior debut in 2015, you couldn’t just leave a gap from 2014-2015. So you could put in the youth category that he played from 2013-2014 and the senior category 2013-2015. I think it is all very age-dependant though. (Both examples assume that the player leaves immediately after making their first appearance, otherwise, of course, it would be 2013- on both). Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 09:29, 15 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Why have you created one as the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC? GiantSnowman 16:34, 13 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@GiantSnowman: Presumed that's how things were done, created the page for Fabio Zúñiga, then realised there was another Fabio Zúñiga who had also played professionally, so created a new page with Fabio Zúñiga (footballer, born 1979) because you told me not to merge (i.e. create a disambiguation page at Fabio Zúñiga) and I do not have the administration rights to do much on here. Would you oh so kindly create a disambiguation page at Fabio Zúñiga and have a new page, Fabio Zúñiga (footballer, born 1981) created, please? Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 17:28, 13 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Done GiantSnowman 17:33, 13 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please, can you create pages for all soccer players of 2018–19 Superleague Greece? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8F1:1403:F00:4802:4C6B:FAD7:88FE (talk) 08:57, 14 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not describe minor players as "professional" when they are clearly not. If it applies, please use 'international' if you want to demonstrate notability in the lede. GiantSnowman 20:24, 21 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@GiantSnowman: I thought being international made them professional. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 20:25, 21 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No, not at all I'm afraid. GiantSnowman 20:26, 21 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@GiantSnowman: Fair enough, I'll keep that in mind. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 20:27, 21 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Davidlofgren1996, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing!  ~~Swarm~~  {talk}  04:34, 26 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Vicente Fernández (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Content fork for Vicente Fernández Godoy, see WP:CONTENTFORK

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Xaiver0510 (talk) 02:30, 15 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Xaiver0510: The Soccerway link, as well as others, did state this player was born in 2004. However this has now been rectified(?) on Soccerway. Unsure how this came about but looking at Vicente Fernández Godoy, it seems someone at Soccerway made an error. I will not be disputing any deletion, but I would suggest using Vicente Fernández (footballer) as a redirect page to Vicente Fernández Godoy. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 11:21, 15 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Davidlofgren1996: I was using soccerway as the main source for that 2 articles. I am also very unsure whether should it be deleted. Since you feel redirection will be a better choice, I will redirect the article instead to preserve history. Thanks! --Xaiver0510 (talk) 01:49, 18 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alessio Picciarelli is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alessio Picciarelli until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 14:12, 21 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, ((Efn)) does allow you to 'name' the tag so you can use it on multiple entries - but on Fiacre Kelleher the competitions have all been different... GiantSnowman 08:46, 25 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@GiantSnowman: my bad, not sure what was going through my head there. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 09:50, 25 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Not to worry - happens to the best of us! GiantSnowman 11:33, 25 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I imagine this edit is probably correct, but do you have a better source than ZeroZero? The site is not considered a reliable source (one of the many discussions is at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 February 13#Template:TheFinalBall). Thanks, Nzd (talk) 03:06, 31 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Nzd: I know it’s not the most reliable source, but it’s the easiest way to see the lower divisions of Brazilian state league football. There is probably a source out there that has the statistics for the Campeonato Paranaense A3, but it would take forever to find. Also, ZeroZero tends to be as reliable a source as Soccerway in my experience, especially for Brazilian football. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 08:32, 31 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Ryo Nakamura (footballer, born 1990) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fail WP:NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hhkohh (talk) 12:00, 16 April 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Ryo Nakamura (footballer, born 1996) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fail WP:NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hhkohh (talk) 12:00, 16 April 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The page has been semi-protected for three months. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:59, 18 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Abdullah Qazi, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 21:31, 26 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thegooduser was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

please use secondary independent sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abdullah Qazi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Abdullah Qazi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((db-self))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 23:09, 30 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to women's football/soccer articles. I thought I'd let you know about the Women's Football/Soccer Task Force (WP:WOSO), a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women's football/soccer. If you would like to participate, join by visiting the Members page. Thanks!

Hmlarson (talk) 17:42, 9 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Davidlofgren1996. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yumi Yano".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:37, 11 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I didn't delete the article and I won't restore it given it was deleted at AFD (you can use WP:DR if you want to try and overturn it), but the archived link is here. GiantSnowman 20:26, 13 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited FC Tokyo U-23, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daiki Niwa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:24, 14 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: July 2019

Opening ceremony of the 2019 FIFA Women's World Cup, Parc de Princes, Paris, June 7, 2019 Hello WOSO editors! What a 2019 FIFA Women's World Cup in France! There has been a lot of activity on tournament- and player-related Wikipedia articles with all of the worldwide coverage of the tournament and its players. Let's keep the momentum going. WOMEN IN SPORTS EDIT-A-THON FOR JULY + AUGUST! WikiProject Women in Red is focusing on Women in Sports during their edit-a-thon for July & August 2019. Get all the info here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/126 Sign up and help fill in the gaps within various articles related to women's football / soccer - whether they be players, teams, leagues, historical, administrators, referees, etc. Every little bit helps. Be sure to tag your article talk pages with ((WIR-126)). These edit-a-thons are a great way to work with others to help bridge the gender gaps on Wikipedia. Thanks for your contributions! Did you know... WP:GNG takes precedence over WP:NFOOTY (which only includes the players in two currently active women's leagues)? Often times there is enough media coverage that meets WP:GNG or other notability guidelines. For more information, see WP:WOSO#Notability and be sure to tag the new article talk page with: ((WP Women's sport|footy=yes)) Current and upcoming seasons for top-division leagues Australia: 2019–20 W-League Belgium: 2018–19 Super League Vrouwenvoetbal China PR: 2019 Chinese Women's Super League Colombia: 2019 Colombian Women's Football League Croatia: 2019–20 Croatian Women's First Football League Czech Republic: 2019–20 Czech First Division (women) England: 2019–20 FA WSL Faroe Islands: 2019 1. deild kvinnur France: 2019–20 Division 1 Féminine Germany: 2019–20 Frauen-Bundesliga Iceland: 2019 Úrvalsdeild kvenna (football) Republic of Ireland: 2019 Women's National League Israel: 2019–20 Ligat Nashim Italy: 2019–20 Serie A (women) Korea Republic: 2019 WK League Japan: 2019 Nadeshiko Mexico: 2019-20 Liga MX Femenil Moldova: 2019–20 Moldovan Women Top League Netherlands: 2019–20 Eredivisie (women) New Zealand: 2019 National Women's League Nigeria: 2019 Nigeria Women Premier League Scotland: 2019 Scottish Women's Premier League Spain: 2019-20 First Division (women) Sweden: 2019 Damallsvenskan United States: 2019 National Women's Soccer League season Have some new articles in mind or see some that need improvement? Add them to the Open Tasks. Was an article you worked on nominated for deletion? See: Primer for AfD, AfC and PROD Contributing to Articles for Deletion (AfD) discussions Request a copy of a deleted article Want some tips, assistance, or resources from other WOSO editors? Leave a message on the task force talk page.

Thank you for your continued contributions to articles related to women's football / soccer (WOSO)!

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force #wikiwomeninred

Subscribe or Unsubscribe here. Sent by: Hmlarson (talk) 03:15, 17 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 03:40, 17 July 2019 (UTC) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk)Reply[reply]

Can you please make wikipedia pages for all those players of Super League Greece that they didn't have any wikipedia page yet? — Preceding unsigned comment added by GRanemos1 (talk • contribs) 11:50, 28 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Atantaake Tooma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atantaake Tooma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HawkAussie (talk) 23:38, 30 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Not sure what you're talking about? GiantSnowman 08:40, 5 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oh, I've seen - moved back to draft. GiantSnowman 08:41, 5 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not re-create deleted pages - let me know and we'll restore the history. GiantSnowman 11:44, 5 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Abdullah Qazi instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abdullah Qazi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Abdullah Qazi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((db-self))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 19:13, 10 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matthew Urwin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Urwin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CurtNeiMeng (talk) 17:42, 13 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tong Le is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tong Le until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HawkAussie (talk) 13:06, 12 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Felipe Nogueira is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Felipe Nogueira until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Levivich 19:59, 22 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, the name is Giannis Fakkis, not Giannis Fakis. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.54.16.37 (talk) 15:56, 24 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Done GiantSnowman 14:14, 3 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Zain Issaka has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

He did not play senior national team and fully-professional leagues. It does not meet Wikipedia:Notability (sports)#Association football.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 忍者小僧 (talk) 11:02, 7 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article David Kugumgag has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY. Micronesia is not a member or FIFA or even OFC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlameRuiner (talk) 19:05, 29 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I don't want to flood your page with 16 PROD notifications, but I nominated all Micronesian players as they are not notable. Micronesia is not even an associated member OFC, like Kiribati or some other nations. --BlameRuiner (talk) 19:07, 29 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello @BlameRuiner:, please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atantaake Tooma, where it was established that the 2003 South Pacific Games was an OFC organised tournament (source). I will be removing all of the deletion nominations, but if you want to take this further, feel free to nominate each page individually. Thanks. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 19:37, 29 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Abdullah Qazi, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 11 January 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Heads up that I've moved Diguinho (footballer, born 2001) to Draft:Diguinho (footballer, born 2001) since he doesn't have any appearances in a fully professional league yet. So far his only appearance is a Copa do Nordeste game, which doesn't qualify. Feel free to move it back when he appears in an FPL game. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 15:18, 13 January 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article George Lucas (footballer, born 1997) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY has not played in a fully professional league per WP:FPL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eagleash (talk) 13:42, 22 January 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Eagleash: - It does strike me as strange that the Second Professional Football League is not listed as a professional league. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 13:45, 22 January 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yep it's just the name: apparently doesn't mean what it says, like all those firms that put 'reliable' in their name and turn out to be cowboys. :P Eagleash (talk) 13:50, 22 January 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Davidlofgren1996. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Abdullah Qazi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:16, 10 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

忍者小僧 has been blocked as a sockpuppet of Japan Football, so I'm gonna need you to maintain all the Japanese footballers and Wikipedia:WikiProject Japan/Sport task force. I'll also let @BlameRuiner, Fenix down, GiantSnowman, Jogurney, Nfitz, Sir Sputnik, and SportingFlyer: know about this. ミラP 04:00, 17 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Davidlofgren1996,

Can you please create a page for those Greek football players? They are all perfect. Panagiotis Katsikas, Angelos Tsingaras, Konstantinos Balogiannis, Antonis Gaitanidis, Georgios Daviotis, Antonis Trimmatis, Antonis Dentakis, Vasilis Mantzis, Tasos Karagiozis, Apostolos Diamantis, Marios Tsaousis, Panagiotis Ginis, Apostolos Tsilingiris, Petros Bakoutsis, Zisis Chatzistravos, Kostas Bouloulis, Anestis Vlachomitros, Alexandros Anagnostopoulos, Giannis Varkas, Christos Rovas, Michalis Bousis, Christos Eleftheriadis and Panagiotis Moraitis.

Thank you very much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by GRanemos1 (talk • contribs) 17:24, 18 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

"Your" version as you state it (WP:OWN much?) has more sources but the infobox is awful. The youth career cannot extend beyond the senior career, and it does not comply with standard formatting. GiantSnowman 14:45, 1 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@GiantSnowman: "My" infobox was more detailed. Wang joined Jumilla in 2016, and was loaned to Murcia FROM Jumilla (as sourced). His loan to Josep María Gené was also a youth loan (also sourced), and he was then loaned to Estudiantes (as of Soccerway). Yes, he did join Wolves in 2019, having already spent time in senior football, but his loan to Sporting was to their B team at least. Also, he joined Wolves Jan 1, meaning he was from Jumilla from 2016 until 2018. I have amended the infobox accordingly. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 14:54, 1 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also, his name is quite literally Wang Jiahao. This is noted in most of the sources and to expunge it from the page is silly in my opinion. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 14:56, 1 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Include it as his Chinese name, not his main name. This is the English language Wikipedia, and in Englsh language sources he is known as David Wang, and described as Spanish. The latter does not change until he represents China. GiantSnowman 14:59, 1 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@GiantSnowman: Not trying to push it, but I didn't like this source that you included either. It states that he made 24 appearances, scoring 3 goals for Jumilla B, even though numerous sources state these as his stats at Josep María Gené. Even BBC say that he only made 16 appearances for Jumilla B. The source even seems quite subjective, rather slating Wang and agent Jorge Mendes, rather than giving objective facts. Please check your sources. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 15:05, 1 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Yang Chenyu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The player fails WP:GNG and possibly WP:NFOOTY as his only appearance was a sub in Serbian 2nd Division.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HawkAussie (talk) 11:53, 2 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Serbian First League (2nd division) is professional, as of Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues. As it was only one sub appearance, the nomination is fair. However, the player is only 20, so perhaps we should wait until the end of the 2020 China Super League to see if he makes another professional appearance. If not, feel free to nominate. Or nominate now and take it to a debate. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 11:59, 2 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@HawkAussie: I’m editing on mobile, thought the reply would be automatically included. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 12:00, 2 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Davidlofgren1996: The main reason why I put that up is the fact that he isn't in the Hebei China Fortune F.C. squad for the 2020 season (if it even happens) and like you said, he only made the single appearance so the nominaton was fair. HawkAussie (talk) 23:34, 2 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please can you confirm how this player is notable? I've had a draft in my user space since July 2019 waiting for him to make his professional/international debut... GiantSnowman 18:05, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@GiantSnowman: As of Soccerway, Zola has played in the CAF Champions League and CAF Super Cup. These, especially the Super Cup, are composed of the best clubs in Africa, so I would argue that anyone who appears in either would be noteworthy in their own country. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 18:34, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If you are trying WP:NFOOTBALL, has he played in a competitive match between two teams from leagues listed at WP:FPL? GiantSnowman 18:45, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@GiantSnowman: Actually, the source claiming that football in the DR Congo is not professional, clearly states "Le "triste état" du football professionnel en République démocratique du Congo". So, from this, the DR Congo has a level of professional football, which is presumably the Linafoot. And even if not all of these teams in this league are professional, I think it's safe to assume that TP Mazembe, who have one the competition ten out of the last fourteen times, would definitely be a professional team. If you could provide a source that contradicts the one I have provided, and states that the Linafoot is not a professional league, please go ahead. Otherwise, I think a proposed deletion would be most logical, if you are prepared for that hassle. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 19:08, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No, the WP:BURDEN is n you to prove notability. Is the Linafoot listed at WP:FPL? Has he played for any other team from a league listed at WP:FPL? GiantSnowman 19:11, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@GiantSnowman: I have provided a source that offers clarification on the Linafoot. I have suggested it at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues and we will wait on the result. I have checked through the archive of the talk page and there are no mentions of the DR Congo, so this issue has obviously not been brought up before. But as far as I'm concerned, that source proves that the Linafoot is professional, and it is actually a more recent source than most of the ones provided for other leagues, most of which are archived.Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 19:58, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arsène Zola is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arsène Zola until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GiantSnowman 20:02, 30 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Xavi Simons, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
• It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at articles for deletion. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Praxidicae (talk) 18:30, 6 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Xavi Simons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xavi Simons (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 12:14, 7 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Per BRD I have revered your changes - I suggest you discuss each element on the article talk page to gain consensus. Some of your changes are questionable, and sources are at times contradictory/confusing. We need to set out a proper chronology and whether he was at trial/signed for clubs... GiantSnowman 09:57, 15 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@GiantSnowman: I don't even know why I bother any more. You've got contradictory sources on this article and this Guardian source gives numerous false statements. He's not confirmed to be the nephew of Mark Falco, he didn't study psychology at Dundee University, he wasn't in Ajax's academy in 2000 and there's no evidence linking him to Ajax besides the two-week trial he had in 1995. Where is the proof that he was invited to join Ajax at the age of 7?

The WSC article you posted had been archived, which no one had bothered to fix. Here is a link to the archived article. This is not particularly a reliable source anyway, especially with more recent sources (Goal, second Guardian source). It also mentioned him playing for London Colney, which was never added to the infobox, if it's even true! The Guardian interview suggests that "He had supposedly been spotted under assumed identities at a number of non-league clubs". Is this sentence referring specifically to this article? His supposed spells with Barnet, Enfield (as a senior), Waltham Forest and Dryburgh Saints are unsourced.

I am not going to leave a question on the talk page, as this is an absolutely pointless thing to do. As we can see, there is already a post there from 2007, which has yet to have any responses. I have been editing on Wikipedia long enough to be able to edit articles, and my changes to the article should be respected as they were sourced. I did the research to find which clubs he was trialing at and which he signed for, and while it's not 100% accurate, it's a lot better than the mess that it currently is. He was NEVER signed by Ajax. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 10:16, 15 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wow, guess you missed me saying "sources are at times contradictory/confusing. We need to set out a proper chronology and whether he was at trial/signed for clubs" huh? GiantSnowman 10:19, 15 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Seeing as you added that part afterwards, yes, yes I did. Of courses sources can be contradictory, but I'd take actual interviews with Pike himself (Goal, Guardian) over articles in a "football magazine". I have set out a proper chronology as accurate as I could from the sources provided, as well as which clubs he was trialing at and which he signed for. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 10:21, 15 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The first Guardian piece you criticised is also an interview... GiantSnowman 10:23, 15 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Are you seriously using THIS as a reputable source??? Because that's where the Guardian got their source from. Anyway, it's quoting him, not an interview at all! Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 10:26, 15 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Look, I do not doubt that there are issues. That is why I have tagged the article as disputed. We do that then discuss on the article talk page. Please stop edit warring. I will also seek input from WP:FOOTBALL. This needs more eyes. GiantSnowman 10:39, 15 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't know if you have a problem specifically with me, or just an ego issue. My edits to the page were all constructive, and I even took the time to add your slight alterations to the page each time I reverted your, frankly harmful, edits. I'm very confused as to why you won't accept my edits as beneficial, especially when they are sourced, yet you allowed someone to add all the incorrect information to the article, unchallenged. It always seems to be one rule for some, one rule for others with you.

I don't see the issue with my edits. I have read WP:BRD and from what I've gathered, it is a guideline for reaching consensus. My edits were beneficial, so there was absolutely no need to revert them. WP:BRD states "Consider reverting only when necessary." and "When reverting, be specific about your reasons in the edit summary and use links if needed." You cannot just say "Read WP:BRD" as your reason. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 10:51, 15 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please see the article talk page. GiantSnowman 10:58, 15 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tao Hongliang is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tao Hongliang (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HawkAussie (talk) 01:09, 24 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yassine Tekfaoui is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yassine Tekfaoui until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HawkAussie (talk) 05:23, 2 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Denso Kasius is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denso Kasius until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HawkAussie (talk) 01:20, 3 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Bayli Spencer-Adams has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. OLLSZCZ (talk)

The article Morgan Rogers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. OLLSZCZ (talk)

The article Henry Wise (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. OLLSZCZ (talk) 14:36, 13 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Jayden Bennetts has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. OLLSZCZ (talk) 14:38, 13 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Martell Taylor-Crossdale has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. OLLSZCZ (talk) 14:39, 13 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Sunjoon Tenorio has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 13:33, 18 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Sportsfan 1234: You can take it to AfD, but it will no doubt be a no consensus. WP:FOOTY is split on cases like this (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atantaake Tooma), and in the opinion of myself and others, this article passes WP:NFOOTY. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 15:20, 18 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Luis Vega (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The player fails WP:NFOOTY as the Honduras is not a professional league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HawkAussie (talk) 06:15, 26 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@HawkAussie: Feel free to take it to AfD, but there is pretty definitive proof that the Honduran league is fully professional. 1, 2, 3. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 10:48, 26 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Natan (footballer, born 1991) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natan (footballer, born 1991) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mvqr (talk) 13:07, 14 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Davidlofgren1996. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Diguinho".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:03, 15 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

He's Not on Wikipedia But Leicester's Luke Thomas Could Be a Ready Made Ben Chilwell Replacement Him and Donna Strickland, I suppose. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 15:57, 17 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Gråbergs Gråa Sång: Ha. I guess that, as of 17:00 on the 16th July, they were correct - he didn't yet have a Wikipedia page. But they describe how well he played during the article, so surely it would've only taken a few clicks after the game (or even after his assist) to find his page! Shoddy journalism. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 14:58, 21 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Sociedade Esportiva Decisão Futebol Clube players requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:44, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, Davidlofgren1996. Mun Kyeong-geon is Mun Kyung-gun. What should we do? Sawol (talk) 23:44, 10 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Sawol: I didn’t even realise there was a page already. I’ve redirected Mun Kyeong-geon to Mun Kyung-gun, thanks for letting me know. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 06:43, 11 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey, the footballer Igor Thiago Nascimento Rodrigues is known as Thiago, not Igor. You should probably move the page to Thiago (footballer, born 2001).--Ortizesp (talk) 04:33, 14 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Ortizesp: Hey, thanks for that, I saw it in the article and I'm not sure why I put Igor instead of Thiago. If a footballer named Igor born in 2001 becomes notable, we can replace the redirect page with this. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 10:22, 14 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Santiago Agudelo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appearance for the FC Dallas Reserves was part of the MLS Reserve League, and not enough to meet WP:NFOOTY. Also fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Keskkonnakaitse (talk) 16:15, 21 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hannibal Mejbri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hannibal Mejbri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – PeeJay 14:04, 26 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Tariq Uwakwe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 18:01, 8 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Shane Duffy, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:39, 13 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Mattythewhite: Wow I obviously can't read; I didn't notice he had represented Northern Ireland and ROI, my bad. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 17:43, 13 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Why did you move User:Davidlofgren1996/Jon Russell to User:Jon Russell (footballer) and then tag it for WP:G13? Did you mean to move it to mainspace? If so, why the CSD tag? Jackmcbarn (talk) 17:06, 3 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Jackmcbarn: Hi, yes, sorry. I was trying to move it to mainspace, as I've seen other users do, as I thought it would then delete the user page I had created. This did not work, and when I realised my mistake, I figured there was no point in keeping User:Jon Russell (footballer) up as a page, so I requested speedy deletion as I don't know how to delete any other way. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 17:54, 3 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Okay, try the move again then. This time, make sure you change "User" to "(Article)", and it should end up in the right place. Jackmcbarn (talk) 18:02, 3 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

WP:WOSO News: October 2020

Chelsea striker Bethany England scoring the winning goal in the team's 2-1 win against Arsenal at the 2019–20 FA Women's League Cup, February 29, 2020. Hello WOSO editors! What a year to be alive. As usual (but perhaps even moreso since there have been unexpected quarantines), there has been a lot of activity on player, team, league and tournament-related Wikipedia articles with all of the worldwide coverage of women's football / soccer. Great work! Fall Focus: FA WSL articles You may have noticed lots of great things going on for the top English league this year: the FA WSL. More (international!) broadcasts, top international player signings, improved media coverage, and increased viewership. Let's keep the momentum brewing, shall we? Here's a sampling of articles that could use creation, expansion or updating. What will you commit to working on? Historical Topics 1921 FA Ban on Women's Football Gender pay gap in sports update Managers Gemma Davies Kelly Chambers (football manager) Emma Hayes update Juan Amoros (football manager) Teams Brighton & Hove Albion W.F.C. roster update, add stadium, broadcasting sections Everton F.C. (women) roster update, add broadcasting section, former manager articles Players Caroline Siems de (Aston Villa) Ramona Petzelberger de (Aston Villa) Asmita Ale (Aston Villa) Ella Franklin-Fraiture (Aston Villa) Elisha N'Dow (Aston Villa) Jodie Hutton (Aston Villa) Hannah Blundell (Chelsea) update Danielle Turner (Everton captain) update Nor Mustafa (West Ham) Natasha Harding (Reading captain) update Jane Ross (Manchester United) expand Kirsty Hanson (Manchester United) expand Chloe Peplow (Tottenham) expand Hannah Godfrey (Tottenham) expand Other England women's national under-15 football team (see under-16 men's for inspiration) See also Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Women's football task force/Initiatives/FA WSL to collaborate and organize with other editors. Every little bit helps! Thanks for your contributions! Did you know... WP:GNG takes precedence over WP:NFOOTY (which only includes the players in two currently active women's leagues)? Often times there is enough media coverage that meets WP:GNG or other notability guidelines. For more information, see WP:WOSO#Notability and be sure to tag the new article talk page with: ((WP Women's sport|footy=yes)) Current and upcoming seasons for top-division leagues Australia: 2020–21 W-League Belgium: 2019–20 Super League Vrouwenvoetbal China PR: 2020 Chinese Women's Super League Colombia: 2020 Colombian Women's Football League Croatia: 2020–21 Croatian Women's First Football League Czech Republic: 2020–21 Czech First Division (women) England: 2020–21 FA WSL Faroe Islands: 2020 1. deild kvinnur France: 2020–21 Division 1 Féminine Germany: 2020–21 Frauen-Bundesliga Iceland: 2020 Úrvalsdeild kvenna (football) Republic of Ireland: 2020 Women's National League Israel: 2020–21 Ligat Nashim Italy: 2020–21 Serie A (women) Korea Republic: 2020 WK League Japan: 2020 Nadeshiko League Mexico: 2020–21 Liga MX Femenil Moldova: 2020–21 Moldovan Women Top League Netherlands: 2020–21 Eredivisie (women) New Zealand: 2019 National Women's League Nigeria: 2020 Nigeria Women Premier League Scotland: 2020 Scottish Women's Premier League Spain: 2020-21 First Division (women) Sweden: 2020 Damallsvenskan United States: 2020 National Women's Soccer League season Have some new articles in mind or see some that need improvement? Add them to the Open Tasks. Was an article you worked on nominated for deletion? See: Primer for AfD, AfC and PROD Contributing to Articles for Deletion (AfD) discussions Request a copy of a deleted article Want some tips, assistance, or resources from other WOSO editors? Leave a message on the task force talk page.

Thank you for your continued contributions to articles related to women's football / soccer (WOSO)!

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force #wikiwomeninred

Subscribe or Unsubscribe here. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:28, 12 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shun Sato (footballer, born 1990), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shun Sato (footballer, born 1990) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:05, 20 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tomohiro Hirakawa, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomohiro Hirakawa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:05, 20 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hiroto Ichikawa, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hiroto Ichikawa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:05, 20 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Hikaru Yanagawa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Despite passing WP:NFOOTY (only scraping through), it would be a struggle to find resources for this player. Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HawkAussie (talk) 22:47, 17 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@HawkAussie: Hi, it's a fair enough nomination, the player does most likely fail GNG. Though he has made five professional appearances, so I've raised the question at WP:FOOTY here. Getting consensus on these kinds of players will be helpful. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 10:41, 18 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the following articles to which you have significantly contributed, are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted:

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masaya Sato (footballer, born 1989) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 26 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the following articles to which you have significantly contributed, are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted:

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Junichi Watanabe (footballer, born 1988) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 26 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Gaoussou Sow has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlameRuiner (talk) 09:34, 2 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daisuke Uchijima, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daisuke Uchijima until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 12 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shinya Yamagishi, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shinya Yamagishi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 12 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Park Myung-eun, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Park Myung-eun until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 12 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hiroto Takahashi, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hiroto Takahashi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 12 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ryuki Matsuya, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryuki Matsuya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 16 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Junichi Watanabe (footballer, born 1988), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Junichi Watanabe (footballer, born 1988) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 23 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Masaya Sato (footballer, born 1989), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masaya Sato (footballer, born 1989) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 23 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Niyah Joseph is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niyah Joseph until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone 12:46, 2 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Davidlofgren1996 Thanks for the rules on the notability and under Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. Sure would work to improve the article if that isnt completed by 12 January as the date indicated hopefully the page would be moved into a draft page then worked on effectively and submitted thanks. Cheers! ----------Ampimd (talk)12:53, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Ampimd: I think the page is fine, and can't really be improved, it's just that the player has yet to make his professional debut yet, and does not meet notability guidelines. Give it a year or so and he probably will - just not yet. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 12:57, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Davidlofgren1996 Ohk that makes sense, So I believe the page could be moved into a draft page rather or what are your suggestions delete it and rather recreate a new one when he makes his professional debut? I would want to go with the draft till then any suggestions? ----------Ampimd (talk)1:12, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

@Ampimd: I think you could create a page at Draft:Eric Ayiah, and then just monitor the page until either he makes his debut or has numerous independent articles written about him - most likely the former. I would check with an admin first though, as I'm not too knowledgeable in terms of processes, etc. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 13:18, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I have made a mistake by creating Ákos Ónodi without seeing that you have already created Ákos Onódi. I am still not sure about the spelling cuz it is different in several sources. Can you just merge them or something? Thanks! Kokoeist (talk) 19:54, 8 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Kokoeist: No worries, I just went with what was on Soccerway as I find that to be the most reliable source. Annoyingly, Villa have his official name as Akos Onodi, but his Twitter is in line with Soccerway, so that's why I went with that. I've redirected the page now. Thanks! Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 20:06, 8 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You appear to have added unsourced material to articles such as Lamare Bogarde and Sil Swinkels when you created the articles. I have looked for sources but have removed material where I can't find a source (transfermarkt doesn't count). If you can find a RS to back up these statements, please add them back in. Many thanks, Microwave Anarchist (talk) 22:00, 8 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kei Uchiyama is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kei Uchiyama until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Cupper52 (talk) 14:24, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Davidlofgren, first of all I want to congratulate you for your great contributions in wikipedia, I noticed that you are very active in articles related to women in soccer, so I would ask your help in creating the articles of the Mexican coaches that I consider deserve an article, these coaches are former soccer players and now have positions as coaches in Liga MX Femenil and the national team: Ana Cristina González, Ana Laura Galindo and Scarlett Anaya. I leave it at your consideration, I would really appreciate your help. Thank you and greetings! 189.139.58.202 (talk) 22:30, 19 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Marcus Molinari has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The subject is not notable and does not satisfy any criteria at WP:NFOOTBALL. He has never played in a fully-professional league, defined for Brazil at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues#Men's leagues.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WWGB (talk) 23:34, 25 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Ranule has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The subject is not notable and does not satisfy any criteria at WP:NFOOTBALL. He has never played in a fully-professional league, defined for Brazil at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues#Men's leagues.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WWGB (talk) 23:37, 25 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yan Hai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yan Hai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

– robertsky (talk) 04:47, 11 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Wang Dongqing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not pass WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – robertsky (talk) 05:55, 14 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lars Herlofsen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lars Herlofsen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 23:32, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Wei Changsheng has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Passes WP:NFOOTY just as it fails WP:GNG hard.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HawkAussie (talk) 06:35, 26 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wei Changsheng is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wei Changsheng until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

HawkAussie (talk) 23:47, 26 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. With the articles you have created, there are some issues which I would like to bring to your attention:

• Career statistics table format - Taking Shun Hirayama as an example, the table does not need a 'Club' subheading as he has not played international football, and it should contain 'Appearances and goals by club, season and competition' as a table caption.
• Unsourced info - I've warned you about this before but I will stress this again. Per WP:V, all material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists and captions, must be verifiable. This is not the case with Tarik (footballer, born 2002), where Soccerway does not give a date of birth or height, or Ilija Babić where Soccerway fails to give a height or place of birth and does not reference the youth career. This conduct disturbs me, and I will seek further action if you continue to create articles that lack sources to verify the information.

Many thanks, Microwave Anarchist (talk) 11:47, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Microwave Anarchist: Hi. I understand your view on the first point you made, but to me, it's just a way of keeping all of the articles I create in-line and uniform. I know that Hirayama has not played international football, but I personally feel it just looks nicer to have that little subheading. If this is not in-line with WP:FOOTY, then sure, I'll stop doing it.

With the second point, a lot of the information is simply sourced from Google. If you type his full name (Tarik Lucas Oliveira Novais), Google has that little box on the right hand corner that even includes his height (as well as date of birth). I presume they have sourced this from the UAE Pro League site, which also gives this information here. In future, I'll try to include as many sources with, but for trivial things such as height and DOB - when the information is so readily and easily available - I thought it wouldn't matter as much.

Cheers, Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 11:55, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Davidlofgren1996: - Yes, if you can add a source for that information, that would be great. I never know where the information in the little box comes from, but I often suspect it is Transfermarkt, which is obviously not a reliable source. The career stats thing is slightly trivial, and if you prefer the subheading that doesn't bother me too much. The table caption is a minor thing also, but is required by MOS:TABLECAPTION as it is an accessibility issue. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 12:15, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Davidlofgren1996, I noticed that you are an active contributor of football articles, therefore may I ask your help in order to create the articles of the coaches/managers of the Liga MX Femenil and the Serie A de México, I consider the creation of these pages very relevant, taking in consideration that most of them are former footballers.

Such as Rigoberto Esparza, Jorge Campos Valadéz, Leonardo Álvarez, Miguel Ángel Casanova, Daniel Moguel Hernández and Juan Manuel Rivera

It would be awesome if you can create them. My best regards. 189.139.82.101 (talk) 02:42, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Igesumai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Igesumai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 10:35, 21 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Bruno Gonçalves has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NFOOTY or WP:GNG, only played for Red Bull Brasil in the Campeonato Paulista Série A2, which is not a WP:FPL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BRDude⁷⁰ (talk) 17:08, 27 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

For your comments at the ANI thread - they were very much appreciated. Take care. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 20:31, 27 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Lugnuts: No worries! It's nice to see someone who shares similar views regarding stub articles for sportspeople. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 21:09, 27 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for creating many Japanese footballers. Currently, these footballers are missing in enwiki.

• Aoto Osako (d:Q73849888) (Aoto Osako at Soccerway)
• Sho Morita (d:Q77816387) (Sho Morita at Soccerway)
• Reon Nozawa (d:Q73851417) (Reon Nozawa at Soccerway)
• Kojiro Yasuda (d:Q73852176) (Kojiro Yasuda at Soccerway)
• Lee Rae-jun (d:Q55733160) (Lee Rae-jun at Soccerway)
• Keita Ishido (d:Q30933227) (Keita Ishido at Soccerway)
• Kio Yamada (d:Q67498357) (Kio Yamada at Soccerway)
• Vinicius Goncalves Matheu (d:Q69051553) (Vinicius Goncalves Matheu at Soccerway)
• Takuma Nakajima (d:Q53764784) (Takuma Nakajima at Soccerway)
• Shoma Ishigami (d:Q64783893) (Shoma Ishigami at Soccerway)

If you can create these articles, please do it. Cheers, --Wikky21 (talk) 16:23, 30 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Wikky21: Wow thanks for pointing this out, I will create these articles now. Cheers. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 17:50, 30 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The page was 'blocked' by way of a blacklist - meaning I couldn't simply lift whatever was preventing you starting the article. However, I have put together a brief stub as a way around it. GiantSnowman 20:43, 11 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks! Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 21:20, 11 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brad Swancott, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brad Swancott until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 12 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alan (footballer, born 1999) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan (footballer, born 1999) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BRDude⁷⁰ (talk) 18:25, 15 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christiano (footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christiano (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BRDude⁷⁰ (talk) 01:13, 18 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marcelo Lima is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcelo Lima until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BRDude⁷⁰ (talk) 01:35, 18 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there. I've noticed that you do a lot of Brazilian players, and that's great since that's the area I edit the most. I would, however, recommend you to stop creating players who aren't generally notable through WP:GNG. I've seen a lot of these types at User:Davidlofgren1996/Brazilian players, and although I can see that you don't do pages with much info (pretty much a copy-paste from Soccerway), I would recommend you to gather some coverage on those "shady" Brazilian guys.

Cheers, BRDude⁷⁰ (talk) 01:38, 18 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matheus Santos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matheus Santos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BRDude⁷⁰ (talk) 01:43, 18 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pedro Vitor (footballer, born 1998) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedro Vitor (footballer, born 1998) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BRDude⁷⁰ (talk) 01:48, 18 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rodrigo (footballer, born 1999) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodrigo (footballer, born 1999) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BRDude⁷⁰ (talk) 01:51, 18 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@BrazilianDude70: Hi, I usually create articles for players who have just debuted in fully professional leagues - with the hope that they will go on to make many more appearances. In these cases, unfortunately, they have not. I’ve been more mindful of it lately, and I’m trying to pick players in leagues where, even if they drop down a level or two, they’ll continue to be playing in fully pro leagues. Thanks! Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 08:02, 18 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No problem! If you need any help with some Brazilian players, feel free to ask. Cheers, BRDude⁷⁰ (talk) 22:15, 18 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rodrigo (footballer, born 1999), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodrigo (footballer, born 1999) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 19 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pedro Vitor (footballer, born 1998), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedro Vitor (footballer, born 1998) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 19 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matheus Santos, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matheus Santos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 19 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marcelo Lima, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcelo Lima until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 19 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christiano (footballer), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christiano (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 19 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Asuka Nose, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asuka Nose until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 20 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pipi (footballer), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pipi (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 30 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Davidlofgren, I'm creating articles of former Mexican footballers who are now coaches and I wanted to ask you if you could help me in creating some of them, these are the following: Juan Manuel Rivera, Octavio Becerril, Luis Fernando Soto, Esteve Padilla, Luis Manuel Díaz, Martín Pérez Padrón, Félix Martínez Mendoza and Filadelfo Rangel.

It would be great and I would appreciate if you could help me in creating some of them.

SputnikXX (talk) 16:27, 8 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@SputnikXX: I’ll definitely look into it when I get the chance! Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 19:39, 8 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Davidlofgren1996: Thank you very much! I would also add Carlos Cariño to the list. SputnikXX (talk) 02:10, 14 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marcello Rosati is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcello Rosati until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 09:45, 3 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 Emperor's Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Koki Ogawa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 10 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amir Angwe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amir Angwe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

4meter4 (talk) 13:43, 16 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If you keep up with your personal attacks like this I'll ask that you are blocked, OK? GiantSnowman 15:46, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. It appears your talk page is becoming quite lengthy and is in need of archiving. According to Wikipedia's user talk page guidelines: "Large talk pages are difficult to read and load slowly over slow connections. As a rule of thumb, archive closed discussions when a talk page exceeds 75 KB or has multiple resolved or stale discussions." – this talk page is 193.7 KB. See Help:Archiving a talk page for instructions on how to manually archive your talk page, or to arrange for automatic archiving using a bot. If you have any questions, place a ((help me)) notice on your talk page, or go to the help desk. Thank you. --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:44, 17 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That's two articles you've recently created that I already had long-established drafts for. In the future it would be prudent to search in both user and draft space before creating any articles. GiantSnowman 16:20, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@GiantSnowman: come on, you can’t expect me to check every single user in the community’s user spaces just to find drafts. You can see on my profile that I’ve been watching any player included in the Guardian’s Next Gen series, and Robertson and Morrison are both on the 2020 list. I can’t create my own drafts as you do, as I don’t have admin rights. I didn’t get any message pop up for either saying “a draft for this page exists at ____”. I feel this message is a little unfair. Also, what do you want me to do if I do find articles I wish to create in your draft space? Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 16:36, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You can create drafts, you don't need admin rights to that! And you don't need to search individual users, you can search in the whole of draft/user space very easily. GiantSnowman 05:31, 23 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Same with Levi Colwill btw... GiantSnowman 16:00, 1 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Benjamin Atiabou has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY, Austrian second league isn't sufficient to clear even that low hurdle.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 14:22, 2 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Fram: Austrian Second Division is fully pro - Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 14:26, 2 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

My mistake, I looked at Australia instead of Austria. Feel free (if you haven't already) to remove my ProD as a mistake. Fram (talk) 14:39, 2 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Moulaye N'Diaye has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:FPL as the Proximus League wasn't a FPL league until 2016-17.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HawkAussie (talk) 01:23, 28 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Ubon Obot has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The topic isn’t notable and there is only one source for this article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CycoMa (talk) 15:17, 1 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]