Welcome![edit]

Hi Ddjjo! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Missvain (talk) 19:25, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ddjjo, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Ddjjo! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GoingBatty (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrea Ferran[edit]

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TeatroEnEspana (talk) 13:29, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022[edit]

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Pridemanty may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Your behaviour in this edit is not acceptable. Personal attacks against other editors are not tolerated. You are required to be civil and assume good faith with fellow editors, not lash out in anger when someone says or does something that you do not like. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:18, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mind you removing messages that are left here for you (like this one), because it's recognition that you have read it. But I do mind you deleting questions you have asked and others have taken the time and trouble to answer at the Teahouse. Please do not do that again. Nick Moyes (talk) 19:48, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ddjjo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Ddjjo (talk) 14:55, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

One unblock open at a time, please. – Daniel Case (talk) 06:58, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have been accused of a lot of things in the last 24 hours and they are all untrue. I wrote an article about an artist I was interested in last year and then I rewrote it this week listening to the feedback I had received on the Wikipedia chat. Despite several editors checking it and telling me I had done a good job of the article, it was removed a day later by a user called Pridemanty. Since I did not know how to contact that user about why he removed the article without discussing it, I tried to contact him on the two pages on his account. At no point was I trying to vandalise his wall, I was just trying to contact him to understand what was going on. I was also told that the tearoom was a place to ask for help, so I did ask for help on there. Both of these requests for help resulted in a lot of people getting angry with me for as a new user not knowing what was going on. I think I received about 12 really mean emails yesterday when I was trying to work out how to use the website. Then a bunch of warnings were posted on my user page. I tried to delete the content that had got everyone upset and then I received another warning for deleting things. Then another person accused me of having two accounts which I do not have and something called sock puppetry. I haven't done any of these things. I'm going to ask that if you respond to this you can do so in a friendly way because this has all been quite upsetting and a bit much. Also it says this "Finally, the IP filed a malicious WP:ANI report against Pridemanty [3], which I believe to be Ddjjo again in spiteful retaliation for their article being draftified." I don't even know what that means or how to do it.

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ddjjo. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)). -- RoySmith (talk) 14:38, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ddjjo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Decline reason:

This account and TeatroEnEspana were editing from the same IP address, so it would appear that you were using two accounts. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 07:47, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ddjjo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was in coding club in the library. I don't have two accounts and I don't know who TeatroEnEspana is.

Decline reason:

That does not explain why TeatroEnEspana was editing from the same IP address. PhilKnight (talk) 10:01, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Andrea Ferran[edit]

Hello, Ddjjo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Andrea Ferran, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:04, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]