Hello, December200,

If you find an article that has been vandalized, rather than tagging the page as an attack page for deletion, try to correct the vandalism first.

It is very unusual for an account that is 6 hours old to know about tagging articles for speedy deletion. Do you have other accounts on Wikipedia that you have used? Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:24, 17 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

           ThanksUser:Liz for your concern, I am actually new to          Wikipedia though I have read almost every article on the help page hence I have gained mass knowledge by reading those articles. I have understood your concern and thanks for clearing the vandalism in Kipchumba Murkomen. Thanks December200 (talk) 18:42, 17 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Casey Simpson. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:10, 20 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please don't welcome editors who have yet to make any edits. There are a number of reasons why this is not desireable and it is specifically mentioned not to do so at Wikipedia:Welcoming committee. Thank you, -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:21, 22 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Got it User talk:Ponyo. Thanks December200 (talk) 21:29, 22 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:30, 22 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

:User:Ponyo Please state my other account. Provide me with evidence for my block please. I don’t understand why you have to block me without evidence.Why do I get blocked for sock puppetry. Last time my IP was blocked. Now I get blocked because of connection with someone I dont know. Where is the integrity of Wikipedia.Please delete even my account I can’t take this anymore...  December200 (talk) 21:33, 22 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You can log back in to you Edgaragayi account and make an appeal there.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:42, 22 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@User:Ponyo How many times do I have to say I don’t know that guy. I just wanted to keep a clean record here at Wikipedia but you just ruined it and ruined my dreams of a writer. I DONT KNOW THAT USER IN ANYWAY PLEASE LEAVE ME OUT OF THIS.December200 (talk) 21:48, 22 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@User:Ponyo No offense, but do you have even a small bit of Knowledge in IP and Proxy. If you did you will realize we are not the sam person December200 (talk) 21:48, 22 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Interesting. Would you like to explain it to me based on your knowledge of IP and proxy?-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:52, 22 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@User:Ponyo Do you know what, block me and everything. One day when I have the resources I will never forget this, I am just a teenage editor who hasn’t finished high school but was trying to make a future in editing. I don’t even have my own computer or Phone since in our country is hard to access one until you visit a cyber cafe which I am doing now. I know you do this work for Wikipedia, and Wikipedia has just crushed my dream. I will never forget this and I’ll never forget or forgive or forget the whole of Wikipedia organization. I know am nothing now but soon I’ll be something. Thank you for this and Bye. God bless you @User:Ponyo. December200 (talk) 22:00, 22 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Accounts cannnot be deleted. You can, however, blank this page. Continued socking will only lead to additional blocks, so you would be better served pursuing the standard offer with your master account.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:35, 22 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@User:Ponyo Then ban me please, cause I am ashamed of being part of Wikipedia for the unfairness. Polite thanks or do you have somewhere I can report your action December200 (talk) 22:45, 22 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It depends what action you mean to report. If you would like your block to be reviewed, you can post an unblock request, but it would need to be done from your main account. If you believe there has been an actual abuse of adminstrative tools you can email the Arbitration Committee, but be aware that they can see the same technical data as I can and will review it when investigating your complaint. -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:06, 22 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• As you continue to evade your block I have revoked talk page access. You can appeal the block via your master account.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:12, 22 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I checked a sample of the references. Maybe I was unlucky, but each was a passing mention. I checked sufficient to push it back to you for more though. This is especially important because the article has been deleted though a deletion discussion, thus we have to be particularly rigorous when re-creating it. I would hate it to be deleted out of hand.

For a living person we have a high standard of referencing. Every substantive fact you assert, especially one that is susceptible to potential challenge, requires a citation with a reference that is about them, and is independent of them, and is in WP:RS, and is significant coverage. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact cited, that meet these tough criteria is likely to make this draft a clear acceptance (0.9 probability). Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the person is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today.

Please double check your referencing. Where it is a passing mention onky then it adds no value. Where the subject is not mentioned at all please remove it. With referencing more is not better. We need high quality references

Our role as reviewers is to seek to ensure that an article will not immediately be subject to one of our deletion processes when it is accepted. That is why we push it back to the author. We want to accept articles.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Casey Simpson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Casey Simpson, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 08:58, 29 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, December200! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle Faddle 08:58, 29 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, December200. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Casey Simpson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 05:30, 13 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, December200. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Casey Simpson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:03, 1 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]