Write down anything that requires messages related or required my knowledge.

Hi DeltaSquad833! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Masumrezarock100 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:13, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, DeltaSquad833! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 02:47, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SS De Klerk, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Fiddle Faddle 11:23, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I’m a new page reviewer and after seeing your work on new pages I’d like to suggest that you apply for autopatrolled rights. At the moment when you create a new article it goes into a queue to wait for review. If you’re autopatrolled there’s no review and your new article is picked up for search engine indexing right away. If editors are consistently producing good quality articles there’s no need for them to be patrolled. All the best. Mccapra (talk) 07:15, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you I will DeltaSquad833 (talk) 08:21, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DeltaSquad833, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – Joe (talk) 08:56, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Well done Yasser Youssef (talk) 00:25, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DeltaSquad. I just wanted to stop by and let you know that I cleaned up and slightly expanded your draft article of Scarra. I also went ahead and published it into mainspace. Troutfarm27 ^(Talk) 20:56, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for the update and I really appreciate the help! DeltaSquad833 (talk, 9:52, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

I have started a discussion about the article for HMS Crane which you created, concerning whether it too closely paraphrases its source. Your opinions are welcome.Nigel Ish (talk) 12:52, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DeltaSquad833. I have done some copyright cleanup of the article. — Diannaa (talk) 22:49, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for sorting the copyright out and I really appreciate it! DeltaSquad833 (talk, 13:31, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear DeltaSquad833, I think there may also be an issue with the history of the page on the icebreaker Sōya (PL107) that should be addressed. Best wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 09:31, 5 June 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Dear DeltaSquad833, I think - but am not sure it suggests putting this here:

 Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Sōya (PL107 a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Sōya (PL107). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution.  Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Msrasnw (talk) 14:21, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Dear DeltaSquad833, I hope all is well. Thanks to the kind work of @Anthony Appleyard:, who I think I thanked - but might not have, all seems OK now with the history of the Sōya (Icebreaker) - Sōya (PL107). Best wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 13:53, 7 June 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Thank you for the update! DeltaSquad833 (talk) 11:11, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of SS Ben H. Miller for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SS Ben H. Miller is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SS Ben H. Miller until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DGG ( talk ) 09:52, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There's a cracking DYK available if you want to try. Marucla was the only Cuba-bound merchant ship intercepted by the Americans during the Cuban Missile Crisis. Don't worry about the AfD nomination, it'll be an easy keep. Thank for creating the article. Mjroots (talk) 05:39, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for the information and help. I really appreciate it! DeltaSquad833, 16:20, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Cheonji-class fast combat support ship into ROKS Daecheong (AOE-58). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted ((copied)) template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 12:14, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note that this is the 4th request on your talk page to provide proper attribution for your new articles: previously here, here, and here. This is not an optional step — if you copy text from another article, please provide attribution in the edit summary to comply with Wikipedia's licensing requirements. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 12:14, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from KRI Sultan Thaha Syaifuddin (376) into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted ((copied)) template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. You have been warned numerous times for this. As DanCherek, Diannaa, and Msrasnw have previously stated, you must attribute these moves. It is not optional. Sennecaster (What now?) 16:02, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Correction: you moved text into KRI Sultan Thaha Syaifuddin (376) from Parchim-class corvette. Sennecaster (What now?) 16:08, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I wanted to ask why you changed all the infobox images of Nimitz-class carriers to head-on views of the bow? (for every ship) They all look the same and show very little of the actual ship. (I had it on my to-do list to change them all back, but another editor beat me to it.) Anyway, just curious... - wolf 13:44, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I planned to change few other infobox images of many other ships as it may not look as good compared the others available in Wikicommons. Yes the pictures may not give a fulll view of the ship but it gives the article a nicer look to it. This is my opinion anyway, we can talk more about it if you want to. DeltaSquad833, 13:50, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No doubt the picture of a US supercarrier at steam, viewed from the hull as if she were bearing down on you, is a powerful image, but for the purposes of an encyclopaedia, it gives the reader very little information about the ship visually. And to use the same type of image for every ship article in the class is not only limited, but redundant, and so I'm not surprised the changes were all reverted. I'm sure you mean well and your intent is to improve the project, but on well-established articles, I would suggest perhaps posting suggested changes on the talk page first, to gain some feedback, you may find the responses instructive. And if you're planning to make wholesale changes to entire categories of ship articles, then perhaps start a discussion first at WT:SHIPS, to solicit feedback on your ideas. - wolf 14:45, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information and help. DeltaSquad833, 06:50, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Original Barnstar

Hey DeltaSquard833, I note that you had created many pages of the ships of the Republic of Singapore Navy. I would like to thank your hard work and effort put into the endeavour. Here's a barnstar for your efforts! I have recently created a new template Template:Republic of Singapore Navy ships, with the redlinks for missing ships if you ever wish to create the pages in future. I hope this will help you. For ships with names taken from their predecessors, I have labelled them accordingly with their pennant number, with exception of the Sentinel-class as I am still not sure what ships from the Fearless class they succeeded. Seloloving (talk) 11:14, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for the barnstar and the template! I may need it in the future once I return back to Singaporean Navy ships. DeltaSquad833 11:30, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to USS LST-283 has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 12:32, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks!  — sbb (talk) 17:53, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Noted, thank you! DeltaSquad833 04:40, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please provide edit summaries. You are making a high number of edits to articles, many of which were erroneous (such as when you changed "Hull number" to "Pennant number" on many US ships. I see you've reverted those changes, but seeing the high rate of errors or questionable changes you've made, it's impossible to tell which of your edits I can safely ignore, and which need to be reviewed. Thank you.  — sbb (talk) 07:35, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I kept forgetting to put edit summary everytime I published. I’ll try to remember it… DeltaSquad833 12:18, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your recent edits to USN ship articles, USN ships do not use pennant numbers, but Hull numbers, specifically Hull classification symbols. Please correct your errors by replacing "Pennant number" with "Hull number". Thanks. BilCat (talk) 20:04, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Noted, I'll change it asap. Thanks. DeltaSquad833 11:24, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw that you uploaded many U.S. Navy destroyer insignias. I am very happy that you used the png format! (unlike many others...) However, I would like to make some suggestions. For files from the Naval History aand Heritage Command, a special template was created (for example File:USS Cassin Young (DD-793) Insignia.png). You might want to use that. As with the files from Navsource.org or other, it is common to give the direct link to the file and to the page where it is from, see File:USS Goldsborough (DDG-20) insignia, in 1987.png. Concerning the naming, it became common to include a year or decade, as the insignias sometimes changed, like File:USS Goldsborough (DDG-20) insignia, in 1969 (NH 67968-KN).png and to include the file number, at least if the file is from an official institution, just for easier identification. Although, some just load up U.S. Navy photo 80-G-12345 which then lacks any description. Cheers Cobatfor (talk) 06:40, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Noted, I’ll try to make them easier to identify. Thanks! DeltaSquad833, 06:50, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for contact info for admiral eiichi funada. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:581:C000:8A00:CCDD:2939:DB01:96AE (talk) 01:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Mogami-class frigate into JS Mikuma. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted ((copied)) template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 15:19, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. You must be 18 years of age or older, reside in the United States to participate in this study. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 15:49, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of USS APL-42 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article USS APL-42 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/USS APL-42 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fram (talk) 08:50, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of USS APL-32

The article USS APL-32 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 08:57, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of USS APL-31

The article USS APL-31 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability for this ship.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 08:58, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of USS APL-29

The article USS APL-29 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability for this one.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 09:27, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of USS APL-32 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article USS APL-32 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/USS APL-32 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fram (talk) 09:39, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of USS APL-29 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article USS APL-29 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/USS APL-29 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fram (talk) 09:42, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of USS APL-3

The article USS APL-3 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 09:51, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

There is an existing article about Barracks ships. Perhaps consider adding a "list of barracks craft by country" to that article. You can start with the US and add all these APL-classes & craft that are having their individual pages deleted, along with any others (still need sourcing, but this might give you more time and leeway). And, of course, if you can add classes from other countries, that would be good also. (jmho) - wolf 06:16, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On all the Arleigh Burke-class Flight III destroyer articles, it appears you changed the length from 510 ft (160 m) to 513 ft (156 m) using the same source, but I don't see where that is stated in the source. Of course, I might be missing it, so if you could provide a quote for the ref, that would be appreciated. Thanks - wolf 15:04, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, I see you have resumed editing since I posted this question, so... can I expect a response soon? Otherwise your edits may need to be reverted. - wolf 14:24, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I must’ve forgotten to put a reply… I think it should be a typo that I made while editing. Feel free to revert it, my apologies. Delta (talk) 14:34, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thanks for the reply. Just to confirm, you don't have a source that states the Flt IIIs are longer than the rest of the class and your changes were an error? If that's the case, then please correct those changes. Thanks - wolf 17:11, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted all Flight III's length to 510 ft Delta (talk) 06:28, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah good, I'm glad that's now done. I believe that an IP user has made the same changes to length where it's noted in some other articles, but I will try and track them down and fix them. Now I can use the parent article update as support. Thanks - wolf 08:25, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiEagle

The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter

Volume I — Issue 1
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
Announcements After over a decade of silence, the WikiProject Aviation newsletter is making a comeback under the name The WikiEagle. This first issue was sent to all active members of the project and its sub-projects. If you wish to continue receiving The WikiEagle, you can add your username to the mailing list. For now the newsletter only covers general project news and is run by only one editor. If you wish to help or to become a columnist, please let us know. If you have an idea which you believe would improve the newsletter, please share it; suggestions are welcome and encouraged. On 16 December, an RfC was closed which determined theaerodrome.com to be an unreliable source. The website, which is cited over 1,500 articles, mainly on WWI aviation, as of the publishing of this issue. Luft46.com has been added to the list of problematic sources after this discussion. The Jim Lovell article was promoted to Featured Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Hawkeye7. The Raymond Hesselyn article was promoted to Good Article status on 4 December after being nominated by Zawed. The Supermarine Sea King article was promoted to Good Article status on 22 December after being nominated by Amitchell125. The William Hodgson (RAF officer) article was promoted to Good Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Zawed.
Members New Members KingAviationKid (Joined on 17 December) PatrickChiao (Joined on 22 December) Wp9097 (Joined on 16 December) Number of active members: 386. Total number of members: 921. Closed Discussions Featured Article assessment Jim Lovell (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 26 December 2021 Good Article assessment HAL Tejas (discussion) – Closed as not promoted on 30 December 2021 William Hodgson (RAF officer) (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 26 December 2021 Supermarine Sea King (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 22 December 2021 Raymond Hesselyn (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 4 December 2021 Deletion Timeline of Berlin Brandenburg Airport's construction (discussion) – Closed as delete and redirect on 30 December 2021 Evergreen International Airlines Flight 17 (discussion) – Closed as keep on 25 December 2021 Requested moves Akbarpur (Ambedkar Nagar) Airstrip → Akbarpur Airstrip (discussion) – Closed as moved on 30 December 2021 1983 Avensa Douglas DC-9 crash → Avensa Flight 007 (discussion) – Closed as moved on 30 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 035 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 035 (discussion) – Withdrawn on 28 December 2021	Article Statistics This data reflects values from DMY. Aviation pages by quality Quality Total FA 142 FL 15 A 56 GA 505 B 4,573 C 11,878 Start 15,082 Stub 18,754 List 2,539 Category 11,638 Disambig 653 File 2,713 Portal 629 Project 89 Redirect 1,518 Template 2,489 NA 66 Assessed 73,339 Unassessed 1 Total 73,340 WikiWork factors (?) ω = 250,566 Ω = 4.93
New/Ongoing Discussions Featured Article review D. B. Cooper (discussion) – Since 14 December 2021 A-class Article assessment Granville Gee Bee Model A (discussion) – Since 21 April 2020 List of aviation shootdowns and accidents during the Iraq War (discussion) – Since 22 February 2010 Good Article assessment Romanian Air Corps (discussion) – Since 25 December 2021 Jean Batten (discussion) – Since 2 October 2021 Merger proposals List of astronauts by name → List of astronauts by year of selection (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 List of cosmonauts → List of space travelers by nationality (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 List of space travelers by name → List of space travelers by nationality (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 Holidays Czech Airlines → Czech Airlines (discussion) – Since 23 June 2021 Bendix Aviation → Bendix Corporation (discussion) – Since 30 May 2021 Airport Movement Area Safety System → Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (discussion) – Since 29 May 2021 ASDE-X → Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (discussion) – Since 28 May 2021 Splitting proposals Family Airlines (discussion) – Since 23 November 2021 2021 Kabul airport attack (discussion) – Since 24 September 2021 List of military aircraft of the United States (discussion) – Since 16 August 2021 Braniff International Airways (discussion) – Since 8 September 2019 Deletion List of maiden voyages (discussion) – Since 29 December 2021 Requested moves Hot-air balloon → Hot air balloon (discussion) – Since 30 December 2021 Aeropostal Alas de Venezuela Flight 108 → Aeropostal Alas de Venezuela Flight 109 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 150 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 150 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 206 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 206 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 708 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 708 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 892 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 892 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 TWA Flight 800 → TWA Flight 800 (1996) (discussion) – Since 27 December 2021 Dynamic Airways Flight 405 → Dynamic International Airways Flight 405 (discussion) – Since 26 December 2021 CommutAir Flight 4281 → CommutAir Flight 4821 (discussion) – Since 25 December 2021 Thai Airways → Thai Airways International (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 Thai Airways fleet → Thai Airways International fleet (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 List of Thai Airways destinations → List of Thai Airways International destinations (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 Did you know Ravish Malhotra (discussion) – Since 30 December 2021 Alexander Tahy (discussion) – Since 26 December 2021 Veronica Volkersz (discussion) – Since 6 December 2021 Rudolf Szepessy-Sokoll (discussion) – Since 3 December 2021 On The Main Page Did you know... ... that the aerobatic demonstration aircraft used by SoloTürk is also used in military operations of the Turkish Air Force? (24 December)
Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list. Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of USS LSM-479

The article USS LSM-479 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of any notability for this ship (and many other similar ones). The awards are generic ones, nothing remarkable or special about this one.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 17:13, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of USS LSM-478

The article USS LSM-478 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of any notability, awards are generic ones.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 17:20, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of USS LSM-422

The article USS LSM-422 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 17:22, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of USS LSM-422 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article USS LSM-422 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/USS LSM-422 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fram (talk) 08:25, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of USS LSM-316

The article USS LSM-316 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 08:48, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of USS LSM-110

The article USS LSM-110 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 08:49, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of USS LSM-355

The article USS LSM-355 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 08:52, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of USS LSM-479 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article USS LSM-479 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/USS LSM-479 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fram (talk) 14:29, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

DeltaSquad833, perhaps going forward, at least for the next short while, you should consider submitting new articles to WP:AFC first, if only to spare you this mass-deletion response. (jmho) - wolf 15:22, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will take note of that. Thank you! Delta (talk) 09:17, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of USS LSM-316 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article USS LSM-316 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/USS LSM-316 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fram (talk) 15:26, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of USS LSM-110 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article USS LSM-110 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/USS LSM-110 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fram (talk) 15:32, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of USS LSM-355 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article USS LSM-355 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/USS LSM-355 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fram (talk) 15:33, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeltaSquad833, between the barracks ships and the landing ships, so far 18 ship articles, all created by you, have been nominated for deletion. Some have been deleted, some have been saved, most are still in active discussion as I write this. It appears that you haven't taken part in any of those deletion discussions, or even added a single !vote to try and save any of your articles. Why is that?

Also, do you plan on taking part in any of the still-active discussions, or perhaps appealing any of the deletions, or at least asking an admin to allow you to copy the deleted content to one your user pages? If you look, you will see some articles were deleted by only a single !vote, while in some of the others, there are multiple editors making an effort to try and 'keep' these articles. Are you going to join in at all and try to help keep any of these pages? (Just curious) - wolf 06:03, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand where this question comes about. Well I have only been an editor for a year, I prefer people with more experience discuss about the situation. I will speak up if I felt that I can provide solid evidence to why I want the articles to stay. Delta (talk) 07:24, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. I understand that a sense of inexperience can lead to hesitation to chime in on these discussions, but if you can create the page, you can speak up for it. Besides, contributing to these discussions is a good way to gain experience. Even if it's just a simple; "Keep- DeltaSquad833 (date)"... it may not get very much weight, but any !vote is better than no !vote in this situation. On another note, not showing up to defend your own articles, especially in the face of this sudden mass-deletion nomination spree, is not really good form. Anyway, give it some thought, it's up to you. - wolf 07:49, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will try my best to speak up. Thanks Delta (talk) 07:52, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SS Samara, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

RPSkokie (talk) 17:05, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, in the article Marcílio Dias-class destroyer (1973) the references "Gardiner, Chumbley & Budzbon 1995" and "DANFS" haven't been defined. This means that nobody can see what the references actually are, and adds the article to Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors. If you could fix these that would be great. DuncanHill (talk) 13:19, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Yes I’ll get it sorted out once I'm free. Delta (talk) 07:29, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed the cite problems - however note that Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships, which you appeared to be citing DID NOT include the information you were citing to it, while naval-encyclopedia.com is not a reliable source. In addition, much of the little you did add to the article is wrong - for example there were two Gearings transferred, not seven, and neither ship was mothballed post World War Two, which you should have been able to see if you had looked at the articles for the ships' US Navy careers or the DANFS pages. This isn't good enough, and as the article was created after the mass deletions/redirects of your barrack ship and LSM articles, as seen above on this page, indicates that you need to take much more care when creating articles.Nigel Ish (talk) 11:42, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You added a couple of short citations to that article, but didn't provide the full citations. Could you add them please?

PS, you can also install User:Svick/HarvErrors.js as explained here to be made aware of these issues in the future. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 02:17, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I will get it done once I'm free. Delta (talk) 07:41, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DeltaSquad833. In the future, please add attribution when copying from public domain sources: simply add the template ((PD-notice)) after your citation. I have done so for the above article. Please do this in the future so that our readers will be aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself, and that it's okay to copy verbatim. Thanks, — Diannaa (talk) 13:13, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will take note of that, thank you. Delta (talk) 13:16, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SS Charles F. Amidon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 23:48, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on USS Littlehales (AGSC-15) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.hazegray.org/danfs/yard/yf854.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 09:34, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

• AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
• The template ((db-afc-move)) has been created - this template is similar to ((db-move)) when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:59, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as SC radar. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:20, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Thanks for reviewing the article :) Delta (talk) 07:33, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Simon Peter Hughes. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, HMS Petunia (K79), and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Simon Peter Hughes (talk) 07:16, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on USS PCE-882 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://blog.naver.com/dsi90/220902015755. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 14:00, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on USS PCE-867 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://homepage.ntu.edu.tw/~yingshao/pce41yungtai.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 14:05, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have in the past been warned again and again about different copyright issues: unattributed copying within Wikipedia (multiple times), unatteibuted copying from public domain sources, "real" copyright violations (taking text from copyrighted sources), and now it turns out that you are adding poor machine translations of copyrighted texts to articles, making up the bulk of the article (e.g. at USS PCE-867, where we end up with gems like "[...]the rest of the enemy ships escaped, the battle report was fork.".

Adding further copyright violations to Wikipedia may well lead to a block of your account. Fram (talk) 14:09, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do not add translations from languages you have no familiarity with. Not just "the battle report was fork", but you also copied Google's error of translating "year 54 in the Minguo calendar" as 1954 instead of 1965. —Kusma (talk) 20:06, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on HMS Petunia (K79) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www-shtong-gov-cn.translate.goog/dfz_web/DFZ/Info?idnode=67473&tableName=userobject1a&id=64382&_x_tr_sch=http&_x_tr_sl=de&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 14:22, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As a result of concerns regarding copyright violations in your edits, I have opened Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/DeltaSquad833, which has been filled out with your edits in order to review them for copyright issues. Contributor copyright investigations can stay open for long periods of time due to a large current backlog and low number of volunteers. Participation in the investigation, such as providing guidance for which edits you copied from your sources, can help expedite the process. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk🌵CCI guide} 18:44, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion about your continuing copyright problems, with a suggestion to block you, has been started at WP:ANI#DeltaSquad833 and copyright issues. You are welcome to comment there. Fram (talk) 09:22, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent WP:COPYVIO. To see this block lifted, you'll need to convince the reviewing admin that you understand the problem and that you will take steps to prevent it from reoccurring. Thanks and good luck.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).

El_C 10:56, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DeltaSquad833 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hey, I wanted to apologies for the multiple copyright breaches alongside machine translated texts that I've used on multiple articles and probably due to the fact I don't communicate much might have resulted in my block too. I have read the Wikipedia rules on Copyright violations, with taking multiple days of break to think back of my actions. I totally held accountable for my actions and would greatly apologized for any inconvenience I've caused. I hoped that the block on me can be lifted and I promised that I would take good care of my edits and contributions in the future. It is still my intention to bring assistance to the Wikipedia team and website.

Decline reason:

In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. To allow the reviewing administrator to assess your understanding, please respond to the following questions in your next unblock appeal, explaining in your own words:

• What is copyright?
• How is Wikipedia licenced?
• Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
• Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
• How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?

Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. Yamla (talk) 11:08, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DeltaSquad833. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  ~TNT (talk • she/her) 02:59, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, damn... Delta, this is a crappy turn of events. Even though you had several issues that needed to be sorted out, learned, promised-to-never-be-repeated-again'd, etc., etc., it seem like you wanted to create articles for navy ships that needed them. I thought maybe if you spent some time on sister ptojects, like Simple WP, Commons, etc, then came back in 6 months, via standard offer, and agreed to mentorship, you could help the project out. I dunno... maybe you still can, but it seems like you have a lot to answer for and a lot to make up for. I'm not sure if you plan to try and make a comeback (it's possible, others in your shoes have done it) or if you plan on just walking away and finding a new hobby, but, whatever you do, good luck to you either way. - wolf 04:06, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to let you and the people that supported me down. I would say that I can guarantee myself that I deserved this punishment/block for the things I've done. it's hard to take in but I've reached further expectations than I initially had coming here, but It's still my intention as a maritime historian to help the community out. It had been a fun and long learning experience, which I've put many hours into. I can say I'm satisfied with the amount of contributions made and would like to thank you especially for it. Might not be the outcome both of us were expecting but it is what it is and I must be held responsible and accountable for my actions. Once again thank you. Delta (talk) 05:07, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I understand that you have been recently blocked for copyright violations and then for sockpuppetry. I read your unblock appeal and it seems like you have understand the issue and is willing to deal with it. The decline response is like an interview to ensure you really understand and read through it. Do appeal again with your answers if you wish to be unblocked.

For the sockepuppet block, I can only imagine that you do not understand the above and decided to start all over again. This is considered WP:BLOCKEVASION and regardless IP editing or via a new account, it would be considered as sockpuppetry. You can appeal against this also if you understand what went wrong.

Do take some time to read and understand this and if you wish to appeal against the block, I would suggest you to appeal for both incidents together as both are related and appealing for either one individually would likely to be denied due to the other one. --Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 03:38, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply and suggestion, it has come to my attention that I might've unfortunately done more harm than good on this website but I think it's the right thing to leave it as it is. Thanks. Delta (talk) 05:09, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:51, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:41, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Anthony Abell College.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you have created a large number of ship pages, including many on the Algerine-class minesweepers of the Royal Navy, which appear to comprise text copied and pasted from elsewhere. These ships were built with different power plants, ie. with either Turbine or VTE (reciprocating) engines, which You seem aware of this, but have copied information from the VTE ships into articles on turbine-powered ships regardless. I’ve just fixed your article on HMS Brave, but there are at least a dozen others. I would suggest you review the pages you have created for similar mistakes, and rectify them; If you aim for quantity, then quality will suffer, and it is not up to other people to clear up after you. Regards, Xyl 54 (talk) 23:47, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, this has obviously fallen on deaf ears...Xyl 54 (talk) 17:37, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]