On 22 February 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Geology of Uruguay, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that there was intense volcanic activity in Uruguay during the Cretaceous period about 130 million years ago? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 06:04, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Dentren. I see your point here. I agree it may be better to have this information in one article and not distributed to anything tangentially related. The thing is, I've recently added the intendant to many, many other communes' articles because so many of them were stubs they could have used some additions. What do you think? - Ruodyssey (talk) 12:31, 26 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

We can remove the unnesesary information article bty article (the 350 communes?) and replace it with information on the composition of the minicipal councils and on how many times the alcalde have been reelected, to ensure the sections have a considerable lenght, if that worries you. Dentren | ^Talk 18:01, 26 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I can remove them with AWB, not a big deal. All communes have been de-stubbed recently, so the blurb about the intendants won't be missed. But I think more about the cities' histories and different geology would be more interesting than politics for my tastes. - Ruodyssey (talk) 08:22, 27 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Lovely and interesting article. :-) Keep up the good work! --Ohconfucius ^¡digame! 04:06, 9 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey Dentren, Yerba is a Spanish name and not an English name. Fao (United Nations) use the name "Mate" and not "Yerba Mate". Brazil is the biggest world producer and consumer of Mate in the world, if the point is world use, so we should change to "Erva Mate". In the Spanish Wikipedia you should use the term you want, but in English we need to keep it impartial, and undo to "Mate". Cheers! http://faostat.fao.org/site/339/default.aspx User talk:DRLammel 08:00, 18 July 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 17 March 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article History of yerba mate, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that there were attempts to ban yerba mate in early 17th-century South America? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 16:05, 17 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chilean people. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive; until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chilean people. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive; until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.186.105.255.47 (talk) 18:20, 30 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dentren, please feel free to change the lead, I'm now thinking it wasn't much of a great improvement after all. Likeminas (talk) 00:41, 22 April 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If you mean that my recent editions werent much of an improvement you may be rigth. The lead should present the key events and aspects of the regime. I think the way this topic is dealt with in the spanish wiki is good and we should copy what is good there. As in the Spanish wiki I think the article should deal witgh a whole epoch, not just some fighures in governments and isolated events. Dentren | ^Talk 11:30, 22 April 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No, I meant my last revisions might not be a great improvement. I think you've done a good job, that's why I wanted to get your opinion on what you think of it now.

In any case, I agree with you. The Spanish version summarizes well the entire article. I'll try to improve it in the near future.

Likeminas (talk) 13:40, 22 April 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Azul azul has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A7-notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 20:41, 17 May 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Can you quote the source stating that the Peruvian congress "unilaterally" declared Peruvian, Chilean maritime boundaries?

I can be wrong. I am not reverting your changes... though.

--Giraldezjota (talk) 08:28, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of New Chilean Cumbia, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.woodstock.com/cumbia-concerts.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:04, 10 June 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ChoshuencoEliasSalazar.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add ((OTRS pending)) to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as ((non-free fair use in|article name)) or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 23:13, 2 July 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just an FYI: When you started the merge proposal for North Rennell Island, you typoed the link on to the talk page and pointed to Talk:North Rennel Island (missing an "L"). That got picked up in the orphan talk report. I copied your merge proposal from the typoed talk page into Talk:North Rennell Island and fixed the Merge proposal template on the article. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:36, 15 July 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you. Dentren | ^Talk 08:27, 15 July 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:MochoconoEliasSalazar.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add ((OTRS pending)) to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as ((non-free fair use in|article name)) or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 00:18, 22 July 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi!

Thanks for the

message left by your User:Helpful Pixie Bot. The bot writes of 'first world'. This is a concept I am unfamiliar with, except as in nations like first world is industrialized nations, etc. Is the bot referring to fairly recent time near the present geologically, a United States point of reference, or something else. The List of tephra layers is a relatively recent article creation that I will be expanding to go further into the past where there are radioactivity dates available and more around the world for extensive coverage, also where radioactivity dates exist. Is this what the bot is asking for, or is there something else?

I clicked on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias link, but did not find it helpful. A first impression is that the worldwide view being asked for is arealistic or unrealistic, but I may not be understanding. Marshallsumter (talk) 02:16, 27 July 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think its impossible to have one article covering all tephra layers. Instead I would suggest to have one covering the realy (realy) important ones like the settlement layer of Iceland and so on. That would make it easy to keep the article balanced and give an unfamiliar user a good overview. If you wish to have to add primarily information dealing with St. Helens or the US the right thing is to create a separate article. Dentren | ^Talk 09:23, 27 July 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Check the discussion of this article! Thanks 3BRBS (talk) 15:00, 13 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Dentren. Are you User:Dentren on Commons? If so, I have a question regarding an image you uploaded. Please let me know. Cheers, Waldir ^talk 16:16, 30 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Dentren/Archive 5! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Re: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Clay_minerals Why did you include ilmenite (FeTiO3) in your template for clay minerals? It's anhydrous. Bz60zd (talk) 10:38, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Rio Guanaco has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This seems to be an error. I cannot find this hamlet in Geonames or in any map or guidebook, or in the 2002 census which is the only source

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.--Mhockey (talk) 17:16, 14 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Dentren, I would appreciate your opinion in the case southermost. --Best regards, Keysanger (what?) 12:48, 6 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

hello dentren, im new to wikipedia so i don't know all the protocols, however I feel compelled to talk to you about the current and heated discussion that's relating to the 'war of the pacific' article (maybe this is not the first time). The issue involves the Repaso claim. According to the talk pages there's some users who are casting doubt on the repaso claims with legitimate arguments concerning the NPOV. One user has already gotten banned for trying to change the section on the article concerning the repaso. My concern is that the process of consensus is non-existent, the heated arguments about the repaso is created because the two users who claim to be part of the consensus process are refusing to acknowledge the NPOV issue with the repaso. If you have time I would like to know your POV especially on the Repaso issue, according to Marshal and Ian you are also part of the consensus process on the article. Once again I'm compelled to talk to you because the other two people seem to be on an ego trip determined not to acknowledge concerning issues.--202.138.9.251 (talk) 10:04, 8 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Dentren. Sorry for apparently getting you involved on the subject of the War of the Pacific. I barely mentioned you once, commenting that you originally removed the tags on the article (I don't remember mentioning you again). You're welcome to comment on the topic at hand. The IP that comments above this message is the user which got banned, so I warn you to be careful with how you deal with him/her (he has created a series of other puppet accounts as well). Best regards.--MarshalN20 | ^Talk 02:16, 9 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Southernmost European settlement of the world has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. No sources offered in 5 years since it was created.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jojalozzo 19:08, 29 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Logo austral.jpg, which you've sourced to www.uach.cl. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add ((OTRS pending)) to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as ((non-free fair use in|article name)) or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 17:49, 5 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Caullehotspring.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jespinos (talk) 01:10, 10 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Maltusadomocho2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jespinos (talk) 16:56, 10 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Argentina and Chile Highlighted with Zoom.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:57, 22 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I am a photo researcher working on a college textbook. My author would like to use your photo" Permafrost peatbog border. Storflaket, Abisko, Sweden." I would like to send you a letter of permission for the use of your image. We prefer to have written permission. Please contact me regarding permission. My email is louannkwilson@yahoo.com Thank you, LouAnn — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lawmaw (talk • contribs) 15:15, 2 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your request have been answered in an mail that beggins with.. Hello LouAnn, Feel free to use the "Permafrost peatbog border. Storflaket, Abisko, Sweden." (filename "Storflaket.JPG") image from Abisko, Dentren | ^Talk 01:15, 15 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tierra del Fuego, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mount Darwin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:12, 22 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Javiera Márquez requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Patchy1 11:06, 26 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Dentren. You have new messages at JohnCD's talk page.
Message added 22:37, 26 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Political positions of Sebastián Piñera, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Renovación Nacional (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 29 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on CODEFF requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Cindy(talk to me) 01:35, 18 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Dentren. You are invited to join WikiProject Brands, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of brands and brand-related topics. To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000(talk) 17:11, 21 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Hello Dentren: Thanks for joining the new project! Northamerica1000^(talk) 04:27, 22 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]