A tag has been placed on Coming From Insanity requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.thatnollywoodblog.com/most-anticipated-nigerian-movies-2019/?share=skype. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick(Talk) 22:50, 5 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Greetings Dfertileplain

Kindly list all other articles you created in line with the contest under the Article achievements section, remember to follow the instructions there. This is to enable the Jury to consider all the articles you created during the 2020 Afrocine Nigeria Contest.

Please do well to reply the post and tag me using ((U|Haylad)) if you have any questions.Haylad (talk) 13:42, 27 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Greetings!

Thank you very much for participating in The 2020 Months of African Cinema Global Contest which was concluded on 30 November 2020. The contest was able exceed all expectations, with the creation of over 3,200 articles written in 19 languages. This places the contest firmly as one of the most successful article writing contest on Wikipedia.

A big thank you to you and every single person who created articles during the period of the contest for making this happen!

Please note that we have now concluded the review of all submitted articles, and winners have now been listed on the relevant page. We'd still be contacting everyone who has won something separately to send over their prizes. Thank you very much once again! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:45, 03 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Amber Rasberry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to pass WP:GNG. Source 1 sounds based off a press release so not independent, source 2/3/4 are WP:SELFPUBLISH so aren't reliable. WP:BEFORE turned up this, but it also sounds press release based so not independent. Only passing mentions in books.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –Novem Linguae (talk) 09:13, 21 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Love is Yellow (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, nothing in a WP:BEFORE except film database sites, videos, and sites saying the film is coming, or was recently released. No reviews found. Fails WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 17:54, 24 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deleted warning. --Serols (talk) 15:56, 10 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Serols, you reverted wrongly. you could have checked before reverting rather than being overzealous as i was only trying to fixed the page and my contributions was constructive and apt. Dfertileplain (talk) 15:48, 10 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I just see that you have not finished with your edits. I deleted the warning. --Serols (talk) 15:56, 10 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019 Nigerian Senate elections in Jigawa State, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mohammed Sabo. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 13 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oluremi Akintola-Samuel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oluremi Akintola-Samuel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mccapra (talk) 21:08, 14 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, i've noticed you've added to a lot of Senate pages and I wanted to ask if you could finish your pages (add in correct vote totals, candidates, etc) and if you can make sure the 2015 pages have the APC in the party bars. The APC had been created at that point so all the bars with AC, ANPP, and CPC are inaccurate. If you need help with percentages and parties for 2019, most of them are on User:Watercheetah99/2019 Nigerian Senate election. Thanks, Watercheetah99 (talk) 02:00, 23 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Rianna Jade Parker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TheChronium 08:26, 27 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I don't see a case for WP:NMUSICIAN. WP:GNG is also not reached.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bukola Sawyerr Izeogu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bukola Sawyerr Izeogu, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 01:55, 31 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Dfertileplain! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 01:55, 31 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Oluseye, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 00:41, 1 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

For clarification I have draftified your article because of two reasons, the first and most imperative is the potential COI existence and the second being the only reason he qualified per a subsection of WP:creative is substantiated by “BellaNaija” a very unreliable source that has no reputation for fact checking, no editorial oversight, To sum it up it is a blog. So I have given you both reasons. Please kindly pass it through AFC. If you have further questions my talk page is there or you could reply here. Celestina007 (talk) 00:51, 1 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Celestina007, thanks for the review. First I don't have any COI with the subject as I only created the article due to the Black Lunch Table/August2021-BLT Contest as it was listed as suggested article and secondly I will take out the "BellaNaija" and add more accurate sources. Thanks Dfertileplain (talk) 06:51, 4 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Oluseye, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 04:47, 8 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Oluseye. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 04:50, 8 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Dfertileplain, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as FKABUDU (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Celestina007 (talk) 12:56, 11 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks I have seen this response above but after cross referencing I’m seeing too many worrisome edits made by this account thus i have gone ahead and left you this agf-sock warning. Celestina007 (talk) 13:07, 11 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I really don't understand this and its really worrisome. I don't know whatever editing patterns you see but they are all incorrect and misleading; there are random million of things to contribute to on Wikipedia and hence editing similar article with another user doesn't mean I am their sock. Regards. Dfertileplain (talk) 14:01, 11 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Allow me explain, without spilling much beans, your edit pattern & topic choice areas are too similar to someone else's here hence the warning. If you aren’t engaging in sock puppetry then please you shouldn’t worry. Its only proper i leave the warning because I assume you are doing so in good faith. In-fact, people tend to mistakenly engage in sock puppetry, for example, coordinating with friends off wiki to create promotional non notable articles is a form of socking but here we refer to it as “meat puppetry”. I’m sorry if this has caused you stress. My tp is always available if you need have further questions. I’m assuming good faith here if I wasn’t i would have created an SPI with diffs of very concerning overlaps. Celestina007 (talk) 18:18, 11 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2023 Bayelsa State gubernatorial election is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 Bayelsa State gubernatorial election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Whiteguru (talk) 21:04, 12 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Omeyoma Eshemitan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omeyoma Eshemitan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Aloolkaparatha (talk) 14:21, 30 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project core team is happy to inform you that the Months of African Cinema Contest is happening again this year in October and November. We invite Wikipedians all over the world to join in improving content related to African cinema on Wikipedia!

Please list your username under the participants’ section of the contest page to indicate your interest in participating in this contest. The term "African" in the context of this contest, includes people of African descent from all over the world, which includes the diaspora and the Caribbean.

The following prizes would be recognized at the end of the contest:

• Overall winner
  • 1st - $500
  • 2nd - $200
  • 3rd - $100
• Diversity winner - $100
• Gender-gap fillers - $100
• Language Winners - up to $100*

Also look out for local prizes from affiliates in your countries or communities! For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. We look forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:20, 30th September 2021 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

You're specially invited to join the House of Representatives Elections in Nigeria Contest from 1 October 2021 to 31 October 2021.

The contest will encourage and motivate experienced and new Wikipedia editors to create articles on house of representatives elections in all the 36 states of Nigeria. Nigeria has conducted house of representatives elections in 1979, 1983, 1992, 1999, 2003, 2007, 2011, 2015 and 2019. But articles about these elections are missing on Wikipedia and this contest will seek to specifically solve this problem.

Sign up for this contest by listing your username under the participants section.

The following prizes will be awarded at the end of the contest.

• Overall winner - Infinix Note 10
• Runner-up - Tecno Spark 7P
• Second runner-up - MOVFA Super Power Bank

For more information concerning the contest and how to fully participate, visit the contest page by clicking here.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:51, 1 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Celestina007 (talk) 22:17, 15 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bukola Sawyerr Izeogu. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:26, 18 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Greetings,

It is already past the middle of the contest and we are really excited about the Months of African Contest 2021 achievements so far! We want to extend our sincere gratitude for the time and energy you have invested. If you have not yet participated in the contest, it is not too late to do it. Please list your username as a participant on the contest’s main page.

Please remember to list the articles you have improved or created on the article achievements' section of the contest page so they can be tracked. In order to win prizes, be sure to also list your article in the users by articles. Please note that your articles must be present in both the article achievement section on the main contest page, as well as on the Users By Articles page for you to qualify for a prize.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

• Overall winner
  • 1st - $500
  • 2nd - $200
  • 3rd - $100
• Diversity winner - $100
• Gender-gap filler - $100
• Language Winners - up to $100*

Thank you once again for your valued participation! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You're specially invited to join the State House of Assembly Elections in Nigeria Contest from 6 December 2021 to 6 January 2022.

This new project will be created to explicitly reassure and inspire experienced and new wikipedia editors to create articles on state house of assembly elections in all the 36 states of Nigeria. Starting from 1979, 1983, 1992, 1999, 2003, 2007, 2011, 2015 and 2019, Nigeria has conducted state house of assembly elections. But, none of these articles exist on Wikipedia and this new project will seek to categorically solve this problem once and for all.

Sign up for this contest by listing your username under the participants section.

The following prizes will be awarded at the end of the contest.

• Overall winner - Tecno Spark 8
• Runner-up - Tecno POP 5
• Second runner-up - Oraimo 27,000mAh Power Bank

For more information concerning the contest and how to fully participate, visit the contest page by clicking here.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:29, 8 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Federal College of Education, Yola, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:17, 17 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Oyinkansola Jinadu, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 22:00, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, can you be so kind as to explain the relationship between yourself and the subject of your article (Draft:Oyinkansola Jinadu) which apparently is a “serial entrepreneur”, furthermore I note you use promotional wording in the article and also try to advertise their services, can you please walk me through your thinking? I left a COI tag on the article pending our discussion. So please can you be so generous as to enlighten me ? When responding could you be so kind as to use the ping function? Thank you. Celestina007 (talk) 22:07, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi @Celestina007:, thank you for the question. I have no relationship whatsoever with the subject. I was watching my TV and saw her interviews on Silverbird TV on how she enhance beauty so I decided to google about her and then write a Wikipedia article for her since she doesn't have one and has sources online. Don't know if it's wrong to write about "serial entrepreneurs" but in all honesty I have no relationships whatsoever with her; for the promotional tones you mention, they were not intentional atall pls help remove them or rephrase where necessary. This is just me writing about inspiring women like I have always done; thank you once again for your tireless works. Regards. Dfertileplain (talk) 10:51, 28 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Per your denial to any existing COI I have removed the COI tag I placed on the article. You still need to remove some of the puffery in the draft article. Celestina007 (talk) 21:40, 28 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just like User:Celestina007, I sometimes have wondered what a "serial entrepreneur" is, and have concluded that it is someone who has more than once tried to go into business. I have concluded that it sounds like marketing buzzspeak that means that the person has tried and failed to succeed a few times. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:23, 14 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Noting that I have incubated once again and would strongly advise creating editor to use the AFC method. An WP:APPARENTCOI is present here. Celestina007 (talk) 15:48, 14 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Dfertileplain. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bukola Sawyerr Izeogu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:07, 24 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Greetings!

After successfully completing the 2021 Months of African Cinema Global Contest on 30 November 2021, we are happy to announce the winners in the contest!

Over 4,000 articles were created across 17 language Wikipedias, surpassing all expectations and placing the contest firmly as one of the most successful article-writing contests on Wikipedia. A big thank you to you and every single person who created articles during the period of the contest for making this happen!

All our winners have now been announced and you can check the complete list here. We'd still be contacting everyone who has won something separately to send over their prizes. Thank you so much for being part of this global event! –Jamie Tubers (talk) 21:31, 24 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Dfertileplain. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Federal College of Education, Yola, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 19 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You're specially invited to join the Federal Medical Centres, University Teaching Hospitals and Federal Specialty Hospitals in Nigeria Contest from 25 May 2022 to 25 June 2022.

Federal Medical Centres, University Teaching Hospitals and Federal Specialty Hospitals are Federal government of Nigeria owned hospitals controlled by the Federal Ministry of Health. There are a total of 22 Federal Medical Centres, 20 University Teaching Hospitals and 13 Federal Specialty Hospitals in Nigeria, but articles about these hospitals are missing on Wikipedia and this project will seek to create these articles on the English Wikipedia.

Sign up for this contest by listing your username under the participants section.

Souvenirs will be awarded to participants at the end of the contest

For more information concerning the contest and how to fully participate, visit the contest page by clicking here.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:25, 25 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Dfertileplain. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Federal College of Education".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:17, 17 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Dfertileplain, I wanted to give you a heads-up about the website liquisearch.com, which you used as a source in this edit to Richard Eromoigbe. Liquisearch is a Wikipedia mirror, taking its content from wikipedia.org, and so it can't be used as a source in Wikipedia (it becomes a circular reference). It's not always easy to spot Wikipedia mirrors, and Liquisearch doesn't have a clear attribution, but when you find a website that contains the exact same text as a Wikipedia article, that's a sign that it is almost certainly a mirror (unless the Wikipedia article is a copyright violation of the other website! That's not the case with Liquisearch, though.)

Just wanted to make you aware of this. Happy editing! --bonadea contributions talk 10:06, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you very much for this. This is well noted. Dfertileplain (talk) 19:08, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Dfertileplain, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Hughesdarren, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Tunde Apalowo, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tunde Apalowo.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Hughesdarren)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 08:34, 21 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tunde Apalowo, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tunde Apalowo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:05, 22 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Nissi Ogulu, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. A loose necktie (talk) 14:18, 27 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Olajide Tope is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olajide Tope until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Reading Beans (talk) 10:40, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Olajide Kindness is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olajide Kindness until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—Nnadigoodluck███ 01:05, 20 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Droughts in Nigeria indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:16, 28 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Omeife is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omeife until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FightBrightTigh (talk) 17:29, 20 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Tope Dare. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 12:24, 27 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

see WP:SOLUTIONS

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tope Dare and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:43, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Obafemi Awolowo University. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 17:14, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Officer Woos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Officer Woos (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Seawolf35 (talk) 17:37, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Dfertileplain. Thank you for your work on Ademola Are. User:Lightburst, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Lightburst)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Lightburst (talk) 03:51, 15 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tope Dare is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tope Dare until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Reading Beans (talk) 06:54, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]