| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 |
 |
|
Philippine–American War[edit]
I see that this edit of mine made some unintended changes, possibly because of an edit conflict which I failed to recognize. I was only intending to make the changes impacting (Deady 2005). I also see that you have made some subsequent edits. I don't want to bump heads with you in your ongoing edits of that article, so I'll just alert you to a possible problem by this talk page message.
Somewhat related -- you might take a look at Template talk:Sfn#Enhancement request: new paramer: name.
Cheers, Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:13, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the message, kaibigan!
- With respect to Template talk:Sfn#Enhancement request: new paramer: name: I am still just a newbie here at Wikipedia, and this is well beyond the scope of my current understanding of wiki markup. Therefore, I do not have enough information to either support or oppose your proposal at this time.
- With respect to the Philippine–American War article: edit conflicts are inevitable when several people are simultaneously working in earnest on the same article. I will try to turn my attention to other articles if I see that you are editing this one. I would however like to ask your opinion about the following issues:
1. There are quite a few unreliable sources used as citations in this article. For example, these self-published sources:
- Brunberg, Jon (2013). "Philippine insurrection". The Polynational War Memorial. (self-published).
- Dumindin, Arnaldo (2006). "Philippine–American War, 1899–1902". filipinoamericanwar.com (self-published).
- Constantino, Renato (1975). The Philippines, a past revisited (PDF). Socialist Stories (self-published). ISBN 971-8958-00-2.
2. Too many sources, most of which are used only once or twice. I think we should try to identify which sources are of the highest quality and keep those, while discarding those that are of lower quality. The sources which are high quality but redundant, could relegated to the ==Further reading== section, in case they might be needed for later. ns.
1. I'm not very knowledgeable on reliability of individual sources. As ought to be clear from my user page, I'm not an academic.
- Philippine insurrection should be expunged; internally, it says: "Source: Wikipedia".
- I don't know anystthing about Arnaldo Dumindin. His stuff does seem to be selfpub. I don't recall ever seeing anything in his cited articles which contradicted what I think is mainstream history.
- Renato Constantino is an academic and a popularly published historian whose views as seen in his witinngs are (from memory) sometimes controversial and sometimes even at odds with other well regarded giatorians.
2. Agree. As articles develop, editors will add bits and supporting cites from what is handy to hand for them, though the bits added might also be supported by other sources cited elsewhere in the article. Cheers, Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 12:41, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
this: " the condition had not yet been described or given the name "PTSD", but it existed nevertheless" is pretty much the definition of OR when dealing with a primary source. It is your interepretation that what is described there, is PTSD. You need a secondary source that says that the 1899 article is discussing PTSD. Please don't add, and especially please don't try to edit war, original research into WP. Jytdog (talk) 22:33, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- I understand and agree with your point, but please try to keep Assume good faith policies in mind. DiverDave (talk) 15:46, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, DiverDave. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Would like your input in a discussion[edit]
Hi,
I would appreciate it if you could give your input regarding https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_naval_ship_classes_in_service#Split_this_article_into_multiple_articles Thanks in advance Dragnadh (talk) 14:53, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
WikiProject Anatomy newsletter (#6)[edit]
Released January 2018 · Previous newsletter · Next
Hello WikiProject Anatomy participant! This is our sixth newsletter, documenting what's going on in WikiProject Anatomy, news, current projects and other items of interest.
I value feedback, and if you think I've missed something, or don't wish to receive this again, please leave a note on my talk page, or remove your name from the mailing list.
Yours truly, --Tom (LT) (talk) 10:48, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
What's new
 |
new good articles since last newsletter include Thyroid, Hypoglossal nerve, Axillary arch, Human brain, Cerebrospinal fluid, Accessory nerve, Gallbladder, and Interventricular foramina (neuroanatomy) |
 |
I write an Introduction to Anatomy on Wikipedia in the Journal of Anatomy [1] |
 |
Vagina receives a lot of attention on its way to good article status. |
 |
We reach two projects goals of 20 good articles, and less than half of our articles as stubs, in July 2017. [2] |
 |
A discussion about two preferred section titles takes place here. |
Introduction to WikiProject Anatomy and Anatomy on Wikipedia
Seeing as we have so many new members, and a constant stream of new editors to our articles, I would like to write in this issue about how our project and articles are arranged.
The main page for WikiProject Anatomy is here. We are a WikiProject, which is a group of editors interested in editing and maintaining anatomy articles. Our editors come from all sorts of disciplines, from academically trained anatomists, students, and lay readers, to experienced Wikipedia editors. Based on previous discussions, members of our project have chosen to focus mainly on human anatomy ([3]), with a separate project for animal anatomy (WP:ANAN). A WikiProject has no specific rights or abilities on Wikipedia, however it does allow a central venue for discussion on different issues where interested editors can be asked to contribute, collaborate, and perhaps reach a consensus.
- Project and article structure
Wikipedia has about 5,500,000 articles. Of these, about 20,000 fall under our project, about 5,000 of which are text-containing articles. Articles are manually assigned by editors as relating to our project (many using the rater tool). As well as articles, other Wikipedia pages in our project include, lists, disambiguation pages, and redirects. Our articles are improving over time, and you can have a look at our goals and progress, or last newsletter, to get a better idea about this.
Our articles are structured according to the manual of style, specifically here. The manual of style is a guideline, which "is a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow, though it is best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply", and prescribes the layout of anatomy articles, most of which follow it.
Our articles are organised in a particular way. Most articles have a infobox in its lead, describing key characteristics about the article. Because we have so many articles, articles are often linked together in different ways. An article tends to focus on the primary topic it is written about. Further information can be linked like this, or piped (like this). We use navboxes, which are the boxes at the bottom of articles providing links to similar topics, as well as hatnotes. Typical hatnotes in articles include ((main)), ((see also)) and ((further)). This lets us link to relevant and related articles. The bottom of articles also shows categories, which store groups of related articles.
- Tools
For interested editors, our project offers a number of additional tools to help edit our articles. On our main page appears a log of the most edited recent articles. An automatic list of recent changes to all our articles is here. We have a list of the most popular pages (WP:ANAT500). To keep abreast of news and discussions, it is best to monitor our talk page, newsletters, and our article alerts, which automatically lists deletion, good article, featured article, and move proposals. We also have a open tasks page for editors to create lists of tasks that other editors can collaborate with. Articles are also manually assigned to a "discipline", so interested editors in for example, gross anatomy, histology, or embryology can easily locate articles via here.
Our project has all sorts of smaller items that editors may or may not know about, including a barnstar, user box (((User WPAnatomy))), welcoming template (((WPANATOMY welcome))) and fairly comprehensive listing of templates (here).
- Invitation
We are always happy to help out, and I invite new editors, or for those with any questions relating to how to get around the confusing environment that is Wikipedia, to post on our talk page or, for a kind introduction to questions, at the WP:TEAHOUSE.
How can I contribute?
- Ask questions! Talk with other editors, collaborate - and if you need help, ask!
- Continue to add content (and citations) to our articles
- Collaborate and discuss with other editors - many hands make light work!
- Find a space, task or type of article that you enjoy editing - there are lots of untended niches out there
This has been transcluded to the talk pages of all active WikiProject Anatomy users. To opt-out, leave a message on the talkpage of Tom (LT) or remove your name from the mailing list
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, DiverDave. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, DiverDave. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Happy Earth day![edit]
Hello! Wishing you a Happy Earth day on the behalf of WikiProject Environment and WikiProject Ecology.
|
What is this?
What you can do!!
Newly nominated content
Similar events
|
  
|
| |||
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:51, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Wikiproject Anatomy newsletter #7[edit]
Released September 2020 · Previous newsletter
Hello WikiProject Anatomy participant! This is our seventh newsletter, documenting what's going on in WikiProject Anatomy, news, current projects and other items of interest.
I value feedback, and if you think I've missed something, or don't wish to receive this again, please leave a note on my talk page, or remove your name from the mailing list.
Yours truly, --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:24, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
What's new
|
new good articles since last newsletter include Epiglottis, Human nose, Pancreas, Prostate, Thymus, Trachea, T tubule, Ureter and Vagina, with Anatomical terms of location also awaiting review |
|
A made-up eponymous term is used in our article that eventually makes it in to university anatomy teaching slides and a journal article |
|
We reach a project goal of 150 B-class articles in July 2020, increasing by about 50% over five years, and are one good article away from our goal of 40 GAs, doubling over the last five years |
|
In the real world, Terminologia Anatomica 2 and Terminologia Embryologica 2 are released ([4], [5]). Terminologia Anatomica 2 is now included in anatomy article infoboxes, and there is ongoing discussion about updating TE as well |
 |
A beautiful new barnstar is released (((subst:The Anatomist Barnstar))) |
 |
Portal:Anatomy receives some attention, and two related portals are deleted (vale Human body and Cranial nerve portals) |
 |
Some things left out from past newsletters - A large amount of redirects are created to help link plural structures, and Cerebellum ([6]) and Hippocampus ([7]) are published in Wikiversity. |
Newsletter topic: anatomy and featured articles
I have been asked to write up something introducing the Featured article (FA) process to anatomy editors, but I took a more general approach to explaining why one might want to contribute featured content and the benefits to the editor and to Wikipedia. I also tried to address some misconceptions about the FA process, and give you a guide that is somewhat specific to health content should you decide to take the dive.
A vital purpose of Featured articles is to serve as examples for new and aspiring Wikipedia editors. FAs are often uniquely comprehensive for the Internet. They showcase some of our best articles, and can enhance Wikipedia's reputation if they are maintained to standard—but in an "anyone can edit" environment, they can easily fall out of standard if not maintained. Benefits to the writer include developing collaborative partnerships and learning new skills, while improving your writing and seeing it exposed to a broader audience—all that Wikipedia is about!
Looking more specifically at WP Anatomy's featured content, the Featured media is impressive and seems to be an Anatomy Project strength. The Anatomy WikiProject has tagged 4 FAs, 1 Featured list, and 30 Featured media. Working towards upgrading and maintaining older Featured articles could be a worthwhile goal. Immune system is a 2007 FA promotion, and bringing it up to date would make a nice collaboration between WikiProject Medicine and the Anatomy WikiProject. Hippocampus is another dated promotion that is almost 50% larger than when promoted, having taken on a bit of uncited text and new text that might benefit from a tune-up.
Whether tuning up an older FA at Featured article review, or attempting a new one to be reviewed at Featured article candidates, taking the plunge can be rewarding, and I hope the advice in my essay is helpful.
You can read the essay "Achieving excellence through featured content" here.
SandyGeorgia has been a regular FA reviewer at FAC and FAR since 2006, and has participated in thousands of nominations
How can I contribute?
- Ask questions! Talk with other editors, collaborate - and if you need help, ask at our project page!
- Continue to add content (and citations) to our articles
- Collaborate and discuss with other editors - many hands make light work!
- Find a space, task or type of article that you enjoy editing - there are lots of untended niches out there
This has been transcluded to the talk pages of all active WikiProject Anatomy users. To opt-out, remove your name from the mailing list
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for December 27[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pliny the Elder, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prina. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
WP 20[edit]
 |
Thank you for help with Stonecrop Gardens! - Happy Wikipedia 20, - proud of a little bit on the Main page today, and 5 years ago, and 10 years ago, look: create a new style - revive - complete! I sang in the revival mentioned. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:52, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Permission to use image[edit]
Hello,
Would I be able to use your image of the miller blade laryngoscopes for our page on WikEM.org?
Thanks for your consideration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elcatracho1992 (talk • contribs) 21:01, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Megacrania batesii[edit]
Hello! Your submission of Megacrania batesii at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SL93 (talk) 04:49, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Megacrania batesii[edit]
On 25 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Megacrania batesii, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the peppermint stick insect possesses an aposematic coloration and a robust chemical defense mechanism? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Megacrania batesii. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Megacrania batesii), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
—valereee (talk) 12:02, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Precious
glaciers and insects
Thank you for quality articles about nature, small insects such as Megacrania batesii, and large glaciers such as , Jacob sheep in the middle, for List of mountains of East Antarctica, supplying excellent photography, - Dave, you are an awesome Wikipedian!
You are recipient no. 2520 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:47, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for the award Gerda Arendt, and for taking the time to notice some of the articles (about obscure people, places and animals) I have worked on! DiverDave (talk) 00:59, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- You are very welcome, - I sort of came to praise someone for a first DYK, and then felt blessed finding a wealth of hidden treasures! I hope you don't mind that the award comes from the cabal of the outcast ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:03, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Today you can see Vision pictured (not by me), with Arik Brauer in the news, so art in Vienna twice --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:43, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- ... and today, before the below, Jerome Kohl, remembered in friendship - Your last insects made the stats, and I bet the ones below - with that great image! - will climb high as well. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:40, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for the award Gerda Arendt, and for taking the time to notice some of the articles (about obscure people, places and animals) I have worked on! DiverDave (talk) 00:59, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Calliphara nobilis[edit]
On 28 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Calliphara nobilis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that larvae of the mangrove jewel bug (pictured) feed only on the seeds of the river poison tree? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Calliphara nobilis. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Calliphara nobilis), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 12:01, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Tropicagama[edit]
On 1 February 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tropicagama, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the northern water dragon migrated from New Guinea into Wallacea less than one million years ago? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tropicagama. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tropicagama), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Captions[edit]
Hi Dave! A comment on the caption modifications you made here: complete sentences should have a period at the end, per Wikipedia's Manual of Style. Do you mind re-instating them, please? Thanks! MeegsC (talk) 18:30, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing out my error, MeegsC, and especially for doing this in a polite and constructive way! I took the opportunity to read the relevant section of the MoS, which states
Most captions are not complete sentences, but merely sentence fragments, which should not end with a period or full stop. If any complete sentence occurs in a caption, then all sentences, and any sentence fragments, in that caption should end with a period or full stop.
Upon closer examination, the captions are in fact short sentences and not mere phrases. I have restored the full stops, and expanded my fund of knowledge. Have a great day! DiverDave (talk) 18:52, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Great egret[edit]
Hi Dave, you made an edit on how to identify this species comparing it to snowy egret but you did not give a citation for it. Also why only compare it to snowy egret, across most of its range the confusion species would be little egret, including the America’s now, and intermediate egret, as well as more restricted species such as Chinese egret or Western reef egret. Quetzal1964 (talk) 11:11, 19 March 2021 (UTC) (also David)
- Thank you for pointing this out, Quetzal1964. The great egret has a worldwide distribution, and it should have occurred to me that it may be confused with other species in Europe/Africa/Asia. I have expanded the text and added an inline citation. The paragraph as it stands is far from exhaustive, as there are still other species that may be confused with the great egret. But the little egret and the juvenile little blue heron are so much smaller than the great egret, and the white morph of the reddish egret is so unusual as to be not worth mentioning IMHO. We can of course add these if you believe it would be helpful to the reader. DiverDave (talk) 05:20, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the response. Actually, the little egret is almost the same size as the snowy egret, they overlap in measurements. Snowy egret has occurred in Scotland, the only British record so far, a few years back but I didn’t go to see it having seen them in their native range. Little egret was proven to breed in Scotland for the first time last year, something I would never have expected when I was young.Quetzal1964 (talk) 08:35, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Yucatan woodpecker[edit]
Hi Dave: You've hit my watchlist again! ;) When you updated Yucatan woodpecker recently, I think you've defined two different references with the name – "eBird" (or maybe you named one and someone else had already named another one the same thing), which is causing an error message. Can you please take a look and see if you can sort it out? The error that's coming up says "Cite error: The named reference "eBird" was defined multiple times with different content." I don't want to step on whatever good work you're doing, so I'll leave it with you, if that's okay. Thanks! MeegsC (talk) 16:04, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks (again) for pointing out my error, MeegsC. It was indeed a duplicated citation; now corrected. DiverDave (talk) 17:49, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
The article Winston Lagoon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No references. Almost no incoming links. Low grade and poorly written. Seems non-notable. Very short. Perhaps any salvageable content could be relocated within "Heard Island" article.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Feline Hymnic (talk) 21:07, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Survey about How Historical Knowledge is Produced on Wikipedia[edit]
Hi DiverDave,
I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.
If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.eduApolo1991 (talk) 15:06, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Reminder: Survey about History on Wikipedia[edit]
Hi DiverDave,
I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.
If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 15:48, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Help with Far East Organization Article[edit]
I am an employee of Far East Organization, one of the largest private real estate developers in Singapore. I noticed that you are a member of Wikiproject: Southeast Asia and was wondering if you could review Requested Edits to the article, which have been pending since August 4.. Here is the link to my proposed changes. Talk:Far East Organization#Request Edits August 2021 Thank you.Myong001 (talk) 01:27, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 2[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Toledo, Oruro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bermejo.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:44, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 27[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Bosco, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Don Bosco School.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Aren't you the guy that got shot in the leg?[edit]
or who's leg is that in the Penetrating trauma article? Casint (talk) 04:33, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 18[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marshall Hall.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Grammar[edit]
Idle curiosity moment. I knew that the en-UK and en-US had many differences but the one you "corrected" is a new one to me. The "of" in The term stampede is usually used of animals that are fleeing a threat
is entirely correct in en-UK grammar. I'll let your version stand, though, as it is more likely to be understood by users of English as a second language. Just thought it might interest you to know that it wasn't some random historic vandalism. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 17:39, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Giriyak Stupa[edit]
On 3 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Giriyak Stupa, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that according to legend, Giriyak Stupa was constructed over the body of a dead goose? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Giriyak stupa. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Giriyak Stupa), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
BorgQueen (talk) 00:03, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Precious anniversary[edit]
| |
| Two years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:05, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Buchanania cochinchinensis[edit]
On 12 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Buchanania cochinchinensis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Buddha is said to have sat under a charoli tree (example pictured) at Bodh Gaya for seven days without eating, drinking, washing, excreting, or lying down? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Buchanania cochinchinensis. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Buchanania cochinchinensis), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
BorgQueen (talk) 12:02, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 24[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wager Island, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chono.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:34, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Wager Island[edit]
On 29 May 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Wager Island, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that of the approximately 140 men stranded after a shipwreck on Wager Island in 1741, only a few dozens returned alive to England? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wager Island. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Wager Island), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Ciprofol[edit]
Hello! Your submission of Ciprofol at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:57, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, are you still planning on pursuing this nomination and proposing a new hook? If a new hook is not proposed the nomination may be marked for closure. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 09:53, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the message, Narutolovehinata5. How about ALT1 ... that pain on injection and respiratory depression are less common with ciprofol than with propofol? DiverDave (talk) 19:16, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- It has to be in the nomination page, not here. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 04:34, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the message, Narutolovehinata5. How about ALT1 ... that pain on injection and respiratory depression are less common with ciprofol than with propofol? DiverDave (talk) 19:16, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Ciprofol[edit]
On 16 July 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ciprofol, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit have been sedated with ciprofol? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ciprofol. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ciprofol), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
—Kusma (talk) 00:03, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
October 2023 NPP Backlog Drive sign up[edit]
Hello! I noticed that you are signed up for the October 2023 NPP Backlog Drive. However, you're going to be unable to participate if you do not have the New Page Reviewer permission. If you are still interested in participating in the backlog drive, then I encourage you to request the permission at WP:PERM/NPR. I have, for the moment, removed you from the participants list as you not able to participate at this point in time. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:53, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
New page reviewer granted[edit]
Hi DiverDave. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:
- Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
- You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
- If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
- Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
- Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.
- Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:46, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Battle of Gaza (2007)[edit]
Not sure what happened, but a bunch of references on the page are now 404ing. I see number 65 and 67 like this but there could be more. MaskedSinger (talk) 08:39, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for noting this! I believe I have removed all of the dead links now: replaced with [citation needed] tags DiverDave (talk) 02:46, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- No problem :) MaskedSinger (talk) 08:38, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
CSD A1[edit]
Hi, I declined two of your nominations for WP:CSD#A1, Empire Estates and Equipment Solutions and Chris Utomi Nwabuoku, because both have sufficient context to identify who or what the article is about. That speedy deletion criterion is only appropriate when no reader could reasonably answer "what is this article about?", and is a much lower bar than notability or verifiability. Please make sure you're familiar with the speedy deletion criteria, as their correct use (and avoiding misuse) is an essential part of the new page patrol process, and feel free to ping me if you have any questions. Cheers, Complex/Rational 22:50, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the feedback; I will look more closely at the criteria.DiverDave (talk) 23:16, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
November Articles for creation backlog drive[edit]
Hello DiverDave:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.
You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
Collab?[edit]
Hi @DiverDave, I hope you are doing well. I am here after I found your name on the Copy editors guild list. Currently I am working on this particular project that contains a series of articles needing consistency. Most of them are fixed by me and the others involved in it but still there are some minute things and areas which are needed to be fixed. If you can help in any way by joining the project, it would be great. Thank you. (Please ping me if you are replying) 456legend(talk) 06:55, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive[edit]
| New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive |  |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Precious anniversary[edit]
| |
| Three years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:46, 25 January 2024 (UTC)