Welcome to my Talk page. Please note the following- I may not respond to any un-civil comments left here; in fact, I may summarily delete them. If you don't trust yourself to speak civilly, please feel free to chill out for a bit, and come back here when you feel you can speak to me civilly. You may wish to consider whether a discussion would be more productive at a specific article's Talk page, where other editors will more easily be able to view the conversation and offer feedback. Before starting a thread to discuss any removals of unsourced material from articles, please review WP:V and WP:BURDEN. I will expect any discussions to take those policies into consideration. Also, please note that I have already been the subject of an ANI discussion regarding my removal of uncited material; I will expect any discussions of such here to go beyond what was raised during that discussion. Please be aware that just because something is handled a certain way elsewhere on Wikipedia does not mean it is okay for it to be repeated; it is possible the matter was handled improperly at the location being used as a precedent. For more information, see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Thank you for your consideration and civility!

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109

This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

Hello, I'm taking up the offer to comment on the reversion of my edit on the Robert Maschio page. I was actually aiming for more neutrality with the edit, but can zoom out and see how it seems intended differently. I took what I have perceived as a wiki-standard in my 20 years on the site, and thought I was upholding it.

Quite many wiki-articles, especially about actors, uses the phrase "mostly known for" when someone is primarly recognized for a single or barely handful roles. To state "is known for" seems a rather non-neutral judgment when an actor has had, albeit lesser known, more than one single speaking part during their career.

To write "is mostly known for" can be, for perspective, acknowledging the primary recognition while not outruling their other work. "Is known for" can arguably be deemed non-neutral as it boldly dismisses the credibility of other works.

In any case, I won't insist on my suggestion for this particular article. Going forward, now interested in editing this phrasing out of other articles and see if their is further concensus. Thanks for correcting me! Arcsoda (talk) 19:24, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Arcsoda, thanks for reaching out to me with your concern. I'm dealing with a pretty bad cold right now, so I hope this will make sense... "Mostly known" begs the question of, "according to whom?" and would probably require a source that's made that claim. "Known" is less problematic in that we're not really saying how many people know him for it or how well relative to his other works, just that he's known for it. Honestly, the ideal solution is probably to remove the "known" phrasing altogether. "He played X in Y" or such conveys the same meaning without getting into the intricacies of whether it's their preeminent claim to fame. Hope this helps! DonIago (talk) 20:57, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Tarzan (1999 film) § Plot rewrite. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 05:57, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
61		Great American Boycott (talk)	Add sources
48		South Central Farm (talk)	Add sources
3		St. Louis Gateway Film Critics Association Awards 2008 (talk)	Add sources
8,053		Ryanair (talk)	Add sources
23		Jill Sobule (album) (talk)	Add sources
1,446		The Big Bopper (talk)	Add sources
20		Quinto Sol (talk)	Cleanup
579		Lifeboats of the Titanic (talk)	Cleanup
9		Punchbowl Boys High School (talk)	Cleanup
293		The Men Who Stare at Goats (talk)	Expand
17		Alchemy (film) (talk)	Expand
1,028		Operation Wetback (talk)	Expand
37		Neoclassical compound (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
83		Hybrid word (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
195		Henry Tingle Wilde (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
269		Antisemitism in the United States (talk)	Merge
334		Thermal energy storage (talk)	Merge
297		Koel (talk)	Merge
1,700		Black-body radiation (talk)	Wikify
202		Tommy Allsup (talk)	Wikify
72		Extraterrestrial UFO hypothesis (talk)	Wikify
4		Red Cross Sint Maarten (talk)	Orphan
3		Michael Friedman (photographer) (talk)	Orphan
2		Brian Belcher (talk)	Orphan
26		Always Running (talk)	Stub
57		I Am Joaquin (talk)	Stub
2		The Folk Years 2003–2003 (talk)	Stub
14		Eric Barba (talk)	Stub
70		Popeye Doyle (film) (talk)	Stub
93		The French Connection (book) (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:49, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
32		Los Four (talk)	Add sources
5		MANA, A National Latina Organization (talk)	Add sources
751		Roy E. Disney (talk)	Add sources
130		Univisium (talk)	Add sources
2,379		Walt Disney Animation Studios (talk)	Add sources
74		Jack Hannah (talk)	Add sources
371		Walt Disney Studios (Burbank) (talk)	Cleanup
93		Fire Island Pines, New York (talk)	Cleanup
76		Joe Grant (talk)	Cleanup
2,102		Veganism (talk)	Expand
38		Fractional ownership of aircraft (talk)	Expand
1,686		Tony Montana (talk)	Expand
5		Living Up the Street (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
212		Permanent makeup (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
362		Guinan (Star Trek) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
37		Kingdoms of Kalamar (talk)	Merge
94		Nagar parishad (talk)	Merge
35		Dallara F317 (talk)	Merge
2,609		A Good Person (talk)	Wikify
576		Cutting Crew (talk)	Wikify
9		Leal Garcia v. Texas (talk)	Wikify
5		Bonaverde (talk)	Orphan
1		Changera (talk)	Orphan
5		Anna Vasilievna Maraeva (talk)	Orphan
192		Flying Bark Productions (talk)	Stub
8		The Grey Lady (film) (talk)	Stub
5		Burrelton (talk)	Stub
122		Mikros Animation (talk)	Stub
42		Once Upon a Halloween (talk)	Stub
58		Roy Williams (artist) (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:10, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Doniago, It's nice to meet you. My name is Adam Nelson and I am Matthew Modine's representative. You can see this listed under his contacts on his official website here https://www.matthewmodine.com/contact.html. Matthew is also a close friend who married my wife and I. You can see support for this here: Twitter (X) Matthew retweeted the Worhousepr tweet: https://twitter.com/workhousepr/status/1770912311957442631 IMDB: Listed under Trivia Here: https://www.imdb.com/name/nm1122987/bio/ This is an important addition to his Personal biography as this story broke yesterday and ours was the first wedding that he served as a minister which is an important part of this worldwide press story: https://nypost.com/2024/03/21/entertainment/millie-bobby-brown-stranger-things-matthew-modine-to-officiate-jake-bongiovi-wedding/ From the New York Post story above, Matthew quotes: The “Oppenheimer” star revealed he officiated only one other wedding ceremony during the COVID-19 pandemic in upstate New York, which was outside and “beautiful.” The wedding story can also be seen in multiple outlets worldwide. Please keep this under his personal biography without removal. Thank you. WorkhouseNYC (talk) 19:17, 22 March 2024 (UTC) WorkhouseNYC (talk) 19:19, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No need to leave me this message as I'm watching your Talk page and have responded there. Cheers. DonIago (talk) 20:41, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Space marine on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the list of Christian theologians have to be referenced. I suggested this on the Talk page. However when I go to add a citation in edit mode after someone's name, I get sent to the columns template which does not allow me to add a citation. If you know how to add references in a column template, it would be great if you could show me how. I can't seem to do it with visual edit or edit source the way the columns are set up now. The second thing I would like to comment on is that I don't think all people in a list have to be bluelinked or have their own article. I think that WP:NOTESAL allows for the group as a whole to be notable and each individual does not need to be notable, meaning they each don't have to have their own article, just belong to a group that has been discussed as a group in sources. Any help with how to add references to column lists is appreciated.LPascal (talk) 02:16, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The reason why each individual should be sourced or bluelinked (I don't think I said they must be bluelinked, but if I did, then I spoke in error) is because entries in list articles are required to be verifiable. If an individual doesn't have a bluelink (meaning they're presumably notable enough for their own article), then sourcing is all we have as a means of establishing that they're considered significant.

I'm not sure why you'd be having trouble adding references using edit source. On my side of things I can just hit the "edit source" link and get the 'source code' for the list, so adding a reference would be as easy as just plugging in the citation at the end of the entry in question. You might need to ask at the WP:HELPDESK or such. DonIago (talk) 02:39, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]