Welcome

Hi Doprendek! welcome to Wikipedia!

Be bold in editing pages and don't let others scare you off! To sign your posts (for eg. on talk pages) use ~~~~ (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp.

I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. Drop us a note at Wikipedia:New user log. If you need help, you can drop a note on my talk page or use Wikipedia:New contributors' help page. You can also type ((helpme)) on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia! utcursch | talk 11:01, 24 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Good job providing citations here. Welcome. -Shootbamboo (talk) 23:42, 8 August 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Story Pirates, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: The Striking Viking Story Pirates. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 21:14, 17 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• The name of the organization changed, page The Striking Viking Story Pirates now a redirect. Doprendek (talk) 21:51, 17 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • That's not how we change article titles; you can't just copy and paste text from one title to another, because it then lacks the article history and thus the attributions to editors. Don't do any further work on it until I fix it. postdlf (talk) 22:13, 17 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • Ok, it's been fixed. You can resume editing at the new title Story Pirates now, and please read Wikipedia:Moving a page so you'll know what to do the next time. postdlf (talk) 22:23, 17 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
      • • I only did this after making a fairly long search through the reference sections, trying to figure out how to rename an article. I never would have guessed that the procedure was called "Moving an article". I'll go out on a limb and guess that I'm not the first person who had the same problem. FWIW, I had avoided renaming articles for a long time (like, years) for this reason; I went ahead on an article that wasn't of tip top importance (well, except maybe to the people in Story Pirates). Although I do vaguely remember doing it long ago, but forgot the procedure, and couldn't re-find it in Wikipedia how-to . So also FWIW, if I had to name one glaring problem with Wikipedia right now, it is the organization of how-to procedures, and the organization of the reference section in general. My browser is full of bookmarks to to pages in the reference section that I've learned I may never be able to find again if I have to start de novo. Oh, and while I'm at it, I suspect that one reason Wikipedia categories have a tendency to end up looking like this is because there is no easy way to go through existing taxonomic trees to find where to put something. Or maybe there is an easy way, and it's just too hard to find the how-to. ;) End rant. Doprendek (talk) 19:31, 19 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hurston-Wright Legacy Award (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Howard French and Austin Clarke

Medicine ball cabinet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Advisors

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:28, 11 November 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No, this is done on purpose

The problem is that the titles of the linked articles are wrong (existing article "Medicine ball cabinet" should be titled: Medicine Ball Cabinet, existing article "Hurston-Wright Legacy Award" should be titled: Hurston/Wright Legacy Award). Rather than put the incorrect spelling in the other articles, I created redirect pages. I know there is a way of renaming articles that involves creating a new article or something... but I can never find the correct procedure in Wikipedia's help procedure, and it would actually create more redirects, unless I went back and corrected spellings in all linked articles.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kościuszko Uprising, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Commonwealth of Poland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 12 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Foreign Exchange Management Act, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Foreign exchange (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's not "just a house", it's a museum featuring a Japanese Canadian's story. That's why it was in that category in the first place.Skookum1 (talk) 07:09, 23 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,

We have a shortcut for Ethnologue links.[1]

— kwami (talk) 06:53, 27 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Pat Conroy may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:49, 31 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Betsy Drake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanity Fair (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:01, 8 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rasputin (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 18 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Johnny Bench Award winners, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:10, 19 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Fianna Fáil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Telegraph

Operation Earnest Voice (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Telegraph

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 25 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have made some amendments to the split proposal you had placed for Paragon (diamond). Please refer to its talk page if you wish to take it further. Diptanshu^Talk 12:50, 4 July 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. I had to head off a couple of rather harsh edits, especially in the lead. I reverted 2. I thought to forstall any further edits which removed article material, I would put a cite needed tag just to shut them up. Totally concurred with wording and content. Unsure how much you have contributed, but it is a good and informative piece on a little-visited subject. Cheers! Irondome (talk) 21:35, 11 July 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Delvon Roe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BFA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:07, 1 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Gellhorn Prize winners, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 04:38, 10 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Michael VIII Palaiologos may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [http://www.wildwinds.com/coins/byz/michael_VIII/t.html Coinage featuring Michael VIII Palaiologos]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:38, 25 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FYI: Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2013_August_26#Category:LSD_users Zagalejo^^^ 00:21, 26 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Turner (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ITV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 27 February 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited HEICO, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Public corporation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 28 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of strikes may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[[Hilo Massacre]] (1938, ([[Territory of Hawaii]])

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:02, 4 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sjögren's syndrome, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Polymorphism and White cell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 1 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charlie Behan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Posthumous. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 10 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Doug Hogue, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Waivers. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 17 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on George Henry Tinkham requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 20:30, 8 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Edward Dickinson Baker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oratory. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 9 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Aloha, Doprendek! You have been invited to join WikiProject Hawaii, a collaborative effort which aims to create, expand, and maintain Hawaii-related articles. If you'd like to join, please sign up here. All kōkua is appreciated! Mahalo!

Would it make more sense to re-structure and rename Category:Years in Hawaii (and establishments, disestablishments, etc.) into Category:Years in the Kingdom of Hawaii, Category:Years in the Republic of Hawaii, Category:Years in the Territory of Hawaii and then Hawaii to clarify? There's a few debates about the Holy Roman Empire and Germany based on the same reasoning so it would make sense for a series of CFD discussions. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 21:53, 16 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On Oahu? Edit Wikipedia or Wikimedia sister projects? You are invited to help the Smithsonian Asian Pacific American Center with an Asian Pacific American edit-a-thon in Honolulu this September.

Aloha!

Last summer I moved to the Seattle area after 14 years in Kailua on Oahu. I immediately fell in with the Cascadia Wikimedians User Group as it formed, joined its board and became its first president as well as the GLAM representative for Washington State.

Recently, Adriel Luis, Curator (Digital & Emerging Media) at the Smithsonian Asian Pacific American Center, contacted me about setting up an edit-a-thon like the previous Wikipedia APA edit-a-thon. In addition to discussing one for Seattle, he wrote:

As I was working two jobs while I lived on Oahu, I did not have the opportunity to meet your or any other Wikipedians at the time. Hence, the reason why I am contacting you now.

If you would like to help, please contact me through one of these methods:

• Email me directly at peaceray@cascadia.wiki
• Use Special:EmailUser/Peaceray to email me
• Leave a message for me on my talk page.

Mahalo,
Peaceray

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bernard Avishai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dissent (magazine). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 13 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Crónica Digital requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 00:29, 1 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gabe Ikard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Redshirt. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 16 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lani Guinier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Financial aid. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 4 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Norman Wallace Lermond, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington State. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 1 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ishika Singh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tollywood. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You have the right to request speedy deletion of categories you created yourself, but there's no rule against having this category, even if the director doesn't have his own article. In fact, I think the category is all the more useful because of this, as the purpose of categories is to tie related articles together, and it might be hard to otherwise navigate from one related article to another. Do you want to reconsider? All the best, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 14:32, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Visiting Nurse Service of New York, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Medicare. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 18 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Milada Součková, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stream of consciousness. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 29 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Liberation (magazine), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liberation. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 17 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, thanks for your work on botanical articles. Please note that country-names are not normally linked. Tony (talk) 07:52, 27 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George W. Crockett, Jr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Bethel Baptist Church. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 9 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michael K. Lee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Musical. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 16 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

• Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Edward N. Cahn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Watershed. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 24 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Green box (container), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orange County. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 10 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. I saw you added categories relating to the establishment/disestablishment of this party. Do you have a source that states when it was founded and dissolved? Cheers, Number 57 11:38, 15 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Categorized per information in the article -- so if you have problems with sourcing of categorization you can extend it to the whole article Doprendek (talk) 00:07, 16 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for creating Florence Gladwell, Doprendek!

Wikipedia editor Fabrictramp just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

It would be great if you could add a bit to the Ng'endo Mwangi article citing that she was previously Florence Gladwell and abandoned the name. Thanks!

To reply, leave a comment on Fabrictramp's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hello, Doprendek. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FWIW, I removed the prod because I was able to source a bit about the company (i.e. not a scam or hoax). Is it notable? Hard to say. It's not mentioned a lot on the web, but for a company making a non-revolutionary testing product a decade ago, that's not surprising. No objections if you take it to AfD.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 02:53, 22 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Oceania/The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/The 5000 Challenge are up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. The Australia challenge would feed into the wider region one and potentially New Zealand could have a smaller challenge too. The main goal is content improvement, tackling stale old stubs and important content and improving sourcing/making more consistent but new articles are also welcome if sourced. I understand that this is a big goal for regular editors, especially being summertime where you are, but if you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Oceania and Australia like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1700 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for the region but fuelled by a series of contests to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. The Africa contest scaled worldwide would naturally provide great benefits to Oceania countries, particularly Australia and attract new editors. I would like some support from existing editors here to get the Challenges off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile and potentially bring about hundreds of improvements in a few weeks through a contest! Cheers.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Greetings. I am inviting you to participate in the conversation on the discussion of this topic in the article's talk page. Caballero/Historiador ^⎌ 14:07, 5 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re your comments at this link, the template on Talk:Worksoft is stating that an old article at Worksoft was deleted after discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worksoft. The template serves to point patrollers and others to the previous deletion discussion in case a newly-created version has the same issues. In this case, the old Worksoft article appears to have been about the company at https://www.worksoft.com/ rather than the Chinese company you've redirected the title to. Anomie⚔ 20:57, 5 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Refmex GL Glass, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mexcico. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 6 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I'm Mduvekot. Doprendek, thanks for creating Humanities New York!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Do you think you could find coverage in independent sources? The current ones all seem affiliated. Thanks,

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Mduvekot (talk) 00:02, 7 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Chemical Industry reads- "comprises the companies that produce industrial chemicals. Central to the modern world economy, it converts raw materials (oil, natural gas, air, water, metals, and minerals) into more than 70,000 different products.

The plastics industry contains some overlap, as most chemical companies produce plastic as well as other chemicals."

Pharmaceutical drugs aren't industrial chemicals....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 20:36, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@WilliamJE, it's a pity you didn't read Chemical Industry more carefully before posting this. See sciences], where it makes clear that pharmaceuticals are one type of chemical product. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:06, 16 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@BrownHairedGirl: It's a pity that you didn't check out this 'excluding formulated products such as pharmaceutical drugs and coatings' and why[2] it is based like that....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 18:36, 16 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@BrownHairedGirl: Talking about that life sciences section[3], it is totally unreferenced. Also at the end of the page is the list of chemical companies not one of which is pharmaceuticals....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:19, 16 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Sorry to be blunt, @WilliamJE, but go get a dictionary. This is very basic stuff: pharmaceuticals are a type of chemical product. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:27, 16 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• BrownHairedGirl (talk · contribs) WP has it otherwise. IN MULTIPLE places. Plus a major magazine on the field differentiates between the two. Oh and BTW, why are we here? You came to this old thread. I pointed you to an old thread that was deleted not here. Plus it was about this editor insisting to put Industry established categories plus Companies established on category pages when Industry established is a subcategory of Companies established, not whether the production of pharmaceuticals and production of petroleum products are the same type of business. We can both safely say this is a manufacturing company but why does this editor insist on putting this pages like 'Pharmecutical companies established in ???? in both manufacturing companies established and Companies established for the same year? He's avoiding the question and making personal attacks. What does that say?...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 20:21, 16 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,

Did you mean to put this edit there, or on the talk page? Adam9007 (talk) 01:13, 2 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

clearly in the lead sentence was created as a farmers Co-operative in 1914 - it did not become a conglomerate until after ceasing as a co-operative in 2001 - this is explained in the text of the article - cheers JarrahTree 13:51, 2 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• hmm well I don't think this should matter. You seem to be saying, should this describe the company *at the time of establishment* vs what it has *become*? If so, watch that you aren't opening a can of worms that will involve a mass turnover of existing predominant practice. I've done a lot of company establishments-year categories, and followed existing practice, where the clear preponderance (to the point where I couldn't think of an exception) was, No, it describes what company has become. Yes this is potentially ambiguous and yes it logically contradicts say "Company place of establishment" which is always the place at that time, but hey. Although more narrowly to your point "conglomerate" is NOT NECESSARILY distinct from a co-operative; "conglomerate" is descriptive, while co-operative is a legal form. Note in the Wesfarmers case they expand into media as early as 1924--so they are now fitting a description of a conglomerate although they presumably still have the co-operative form. Even more to the point: Are you sure the existing descriptor of Wesfarmers at the time of its inception ("to be focused on the provision of services and merchandise to the Western Australian rural community") doesn't already fit the definition of "conglomerate" (which merely means one business with holdings in diverse industries)? More generally, note that company descriptions in wikipedia categories generally don't track the legal form--with the exception of "Holding companies" for some reason, and it wasn't me who started that one. "Conglomerate" is sort of a special case since it is not an industry per se; I assume it was added (again, it wasn't me) to category descriptors to spare wikipedians from categorizing every damn industry in the particular conglomerate. That being said I'm not one who's against including companies under multiple industry categories where this makes sense (and again this followed existing practice on my part). What I HAVE been trying to do is get companies' years out of some generic "Companies" category dump and into subcategories which may be of some use. Doprendek (talk) 15:23, 2 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In answer to your argument - It does matter Wesfarmers was a notable and significant western australian historical co-operative. From trying to understand your long reply, Wesfarmers as a cooperative deserves a separate article from the conglomerate JarrahTree 09:06, 3 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• No, not really. What is the distinction you are making between a co-operative and a conglomerate? Co-operative is a legal form, conglomerate is a description. As I pointed out, one can even argue that it was a conglomerate from its start. Doprendek (talk) 16:22, 3 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm here because I have just been struck by another alteration by you. I have to say that (like the edit you have just made that brought me here) the last sentence above tells me you are confused. May I suggest you read your sentence beginning "No, not really" again and perhaps you will understand how strange it is. Incidentally conglomerate was a fashion that came in in the 1970s. Why are you taking it back to 1914 - I suppose just because you have established your own literal understanding of the terminology. A similar odd misunderstanding by you brought me here. Do you have much knowledge of the sphere in which you are editing? Eddaido (talk) 11:10, 22 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• No, I am not confused. No, a conglomerate is not a "fashion," it is a description of a type of company where multiple, often disparate industries are included under one ownership structure. Yes, I do not apologize for using a "literal understanding of the terminology"; that is because I believe words (and concepts) mean something, and are not open to whatever meaning one wants to give them. No, however, it is not "[my] own" definition, it is the definition of a conglomerate. Oh, and Wikipedia is an international site, defintions are not supposed to be determined by, for example in your case, the history of corporate forms in the United States; in fact one might say that conglomerates are the rule in major enterprises in Japan and India (to give two examples), and have been for some time, certainly in Japan. Doprendek (talk) 14:48, 22 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Well you are and you are also causing confusion by removing a vital part of the English language known as context. Your lack of knowledge is displayed again in your latest answer. Would you try to edit articles about nuclear fission or brain surgery when you are no specialist? Fine if you are - say - an experienced medical journalist but dangerous if you are not. Context, my friend, context — rip it out and you're lost. Eddaido (talk) 02:22, 23 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That's it, you've shown yourself to be nothing but a troll, just quit bothering me. Doprendek (talk) 04:16, 23 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Doprendek, I’ve noticed that you made a few useful edits to this article around the same time of last year and was wondering if you would care to offer your thoughts in its AfD? Thank you kindly.  Savvyjack23 (talk) 13:50, 15 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I saw you attempted to nominate the article LME, Inc. for deletion, but you failed to create the discussion page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LME, Inc. with your reasons for nominating the article. WP:AFDHOW explains how to complete a successful nomination (Step 2 is the part you failed to complete). I've removed the update to the log you added for now, you may add it back when you have finished creating the article's deletion discussion page. Iffy★Chat -- 17:06, 1 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Doprendek. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Windsor Mountain School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Great Barrington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:12, 7 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have nominated Jim Mahon for deletion and redirect. Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Mahon. Flibirigit (talk) 21:31, 26 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Qingjian realty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 17 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The various "in Russia" categories were renamed to "in the Russian Empire" as the result of the consensus reached in the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2018_January_20#Russia. Please do not change these categories without a further discussion. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 11:13, 20 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Since you apparently have decided that your understanding of the consensus is correct, please note that the categories listed below all need to be changed from redirects into regular categories as well:

• Category:1900s disestablishments in Russia
• Category:1900s establishments in Russia
• Category:1902 in Russia
• Category:1903 in Russia
• Category:1904 in Russia

--R'n'B (call me Russ) 10:51, 23 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David D. Doniger & Company, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sportswear (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 6 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

These are subcategories of 'Food and drink companies disestablished in'. I just wanted to point this out to you. Cheers!...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 23:37, 16 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I will report you if you again revert a correct edit of mine to a category page. As for claim 'But you are mass targeting my creations for change, leaving others intact, thereby creating inconsistencies.' It is bogus. I clean up categories routinely. Look2See1's edits I've reverted or fixed hundreds of. Your reverts of Pharmaceutical established categories. I've worked on them too. Here are 1[4], 2[5], 3 examples[6] since May. In April 2018 I fixed such categories over 10 times. Your claims are bogus. Fix your mistakes instead of making me to take you to ANI....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:42, 28 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:28, 28 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Hospitality companies established in the 2nd millennium, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 09:57, 30 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Seatrade Communications, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maritime (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 5 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Landstar System, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 30 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Is this how it works?

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the ((admin help)) template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

Today, while editing, and without making any changes in preferences, my wikipedia edit bar (which had appeared for years) disappeared, and will not come back. Also, a number of functions which again I had been using for years, related to categories, disappeared. I vaguely remember that I had set preferences related to categories; when I went to my preferences, though, nothing allows me to set/change these. I used to have options for e.g. speedy category deletion and others, but they are gone. I have received no notice of a violation or a rights change. I have tried a preferences default reset with changes back to previous preferences from scratch with no luck. Doprendek (talk) 03:26, 12 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I suspect - mw:Contributors/Projects/Removal_of_the_2006_wikitext_editor. I too miss it... Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 03:41, 12 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks. Any idea where the category options went to? Doprendek (talk) 04:30, 12 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Doprendek, can you be more specific? what exactly were you seeing with the category that you're not seeing now? –Ammarpad (talk) 07:55, 12 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

They were there so long I'm trying to recall. There were I believe four 'call for deletion' template buttons, categories and articles, each with both a speedy and regular option. I also remember setting preferences just for stuff dealing with categories, and I can't find these now. This was a long time ago, though. Doprendek (talk) 18:25, 12 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The delete options I remember as being in the menu options that include 'Edit source' and 'Move'; they were abbreviated, I think 'category for deletion' was 'cfd' maybe? Doprendek (talk) 18:29, 12 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Probably the "old" Twinkle - now it's different, you activate it in the Gadgets section of your preferences. Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 19:09, 13 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Doprendek, what you are describing has never been in the edit window for me. It all appears at the top of a page among the tabs, Any skin I use has tabs at the top. If you find tabs, the one that says "Page" has a drop down list for Move, History, Delete Page, Protect Page, Watch Page. Other tabs at the top are CSD (Speedy deletion), Prod (Prod for deletion), XFD (Nominate for Deletion), PP (Protect Page), Tag (Maintenance tags), Last (show most recent diff) and Unlink (unlink backlinks). It sounds to me like you're looking for your tabs. If nothing you do brings back those tabs, I suggest you post at WP:VPT where someone can assist you. — Maile (talk) 23:13, 13 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reactivated Twinkle, looks all set. Thanks!

Hello, Doprendek. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Doprendek. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Fictional characters of the Drug Enforcement Administration, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JDDJS (talk) 21:43, 28 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I noticed you've done some work on AccessApps. I'm just letting you know that I've proposed that this article be deleted.CircleGirl (talk) 03:13, 14 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Biotechnology companies disestablished in 1996, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:20, 28 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Populated places established in the 1110s, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Fayenatic London 14:27, 11 April 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Construction and civil engineering companies established in 1982 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:24, 1 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1991 disestablishments in Denmark requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:43, 6 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1982 disestablishments in Haiti requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:28, 9 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1808 establishments in New Hampshire requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:37, 12 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1982 in Haiti requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:16, 18 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Hospitality companies established in the 20th century requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:38, 24 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Hospitality companies established in the 19th century requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:41, 24 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Hospitality companies established in the 21st century requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:42, 24 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Biotechnology companies established in the 21st century requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:00, 24 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Biotechnology companies disestablished in the 21st century requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:44, 27 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Electronics companies disestablished in 1992 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:46, 5 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Move Monument to the Victims of the Intervention requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Atlantic306 (talk) 18:46, 9 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Banks disestablished in 1877 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:07, 23 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Banks disestablished in 1871 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:08, 23 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1892 establishments in Greece requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:43, 15 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Technology companies established in 1898 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:34, 1 January 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1898 in technology requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:30, 9 January 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi - I wasn't sure how to edit the page and am not sure where else to put this (found you through the page's edit history): the Category:Biotechnology companies established in 1971 page is currently missing one of the most important: Cetus Corporation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.194.200.47 (talk) 15:23, 13 January 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Telecommunications companies established in 1958 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:24, 14 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1968 establishments in Saskatchewan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:32, 11 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Doprendek! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:03, 12 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1968 in Saskatchewan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:55, 19 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Public utilities established in 1932 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:00, 15 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1934 in British India requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:20, 17 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Retail companies disestablished in 1951 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:19, 29 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Protected areas established in 1855 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:23, 18 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1951 establishments in Armenia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:18, 4 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1951 in Armenia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:13, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1883 establishments in Saskatchewan indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:26, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1883 in Saskatchewan indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:01, 3 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1874 in Latvia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:39, 5 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1880s establishments in Latvia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:44, 5 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1913 in Latvia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:51, 5 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1880s in Latvia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:41, 14 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1890s in Latvia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:42, 14 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Bangalore Bio-Cluster has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources to establish the existence or notability of this informal grouping of three educational institutions

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:28, 7 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Public utilities established in 1973 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:20, 22 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Entertainment companies disestablished in 1898 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 21:26, 4 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Consulting firms established in 1907 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:18, 9 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:2017 disestablishments in Jordan indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:05, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Finnish companies established in 1990 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:16, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Publishing companies disestablished in 1932 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:43, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1950s disestablishments in Newfoundland indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:39, 13 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1826 in the Southern Netherlands indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:46, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Maui County Police Department. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because significant portions have been removed as copyright violations. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 01:30, 15 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1896 establishments in Hawaii indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:53, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1896 in Hawaii indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:39, 3 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hawaii § Campaign to upload Lāhainā photographs.

A tag has been placed on Category:Consulting firms disestablished in 2017 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:47, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1982 disestablishments in West Virginia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:05, 19 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Hotels disestablished in 2023 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 12:59, 7 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1918 establishments in Suriname indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:52, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Holding companies established in 1918 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:52, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1918 in Suriname indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 15:01, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1897 establishments in Egypt indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:55, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1809 in Brazil indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:08, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1809 establishments in the Portuguese Empire indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:09, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1897 in Egypt indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:30, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The redirect (Instituto do Coração da Universidade de São Paulo has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 14 § (Instituto do Coração da Universidade de São Paulo until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 03:30, 14 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]