This user may have left Wikipedia. Dori has not edited Wikipedia since June of 2014. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Note: You can use the Post a comment link to post at the bottom and include a section name. Please sign your messages by typing ~~~~. I will probably reply at your own talk page, but I reserve the right to reply here :)

Someone removed my edits that differentiated needle-nose from long-nose pliers. The pliers labeled "needle nose" in the photograph are NOT needle nose. Needle-nose is a SPECIAL VARIATION of long-nose with an even THINNER "nose" made to access items through a small hole. I'd post PICTURES comparing the two, but someone stole my needle-nose pliers.

And here you guys are turning that theft into an opportunity to disseminate misinformation, GREAT JOB WIKIPEDIA. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.247.247.26 (talk) 04:00, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've started a discussion here. (Actually, it's a restart of a prior discussion that went cold; you can just scroll directly down to the first post I made today in that section if you want.) Can you offer your thoughts? I think it's very important. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 01:59, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

		The Content Creativity Barnstar
		On your contribution for the creation of many articles in wikipedia. Hopefully you'll come back. We need you!!! --sulmues (talk) 17:46, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SBC sculpture daytime.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add ((bots|deny=DASHBot)) to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:15, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SBC sculpture daytime.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add ((bots|deny=DASHBot)) to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:44, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Index of Albania-related articles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Couldn't this list easily be generated by a category? There is hardly a lead section also. This list seems to arbitrary. Just an FYI.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((dated prod)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((dated prod)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Devourer09 (t·c) 15:24, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:43, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 21:21, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that you will not longer be able to request restoration of the tools because of your prior inactivity. You have until December 30, 2012 to request restoration or else the policy will prevent you from doing so in the future; you would need to seek a new WP:RFA. Until December 30, you can file a request at WP:BN for review by the crats. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 04:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(delivered by mabdul 23:16, 3 December 2012 (UTC))[reply]

A tag has been placed on Kanuni requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
• disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. E4024 (talk) 22:47, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Përshëndetje. Unë jam një kujdestar. Një politikë e re në lidhje me heqjen e të "drejtave të avancuara" (administrator, burokrat, etj) u përshtat nga konsensusi i komunitetit kohët e fundit. Sipas kësaj politike, kujdestarët po rishikojnë aktivitetin e administratorëve në wikit me një politikë inaktiviteti.   Ju e arrini kriterin e inaktivitetit (pa redaktime ose hyrje për 2 vjet) në sqwiki, ku ju jeni administrator dhe burokrat. Meqënëse sqwiki nuk një rishikes të sajin të të drejtave të administratorëve, aplikohet ai global.   Nëse ju dëshironi të rimerrni të drejtat tuaja, ju duhet të njoftoni komunitetin tuaj që kujdestarët ju dërguan këtë informacion për inaktivitetin tuaj dhe ta diskutoni çështjen. Në përfundimin e diskutimit, nëse komuniteti do që ju të mbani të drejtat tuaja, ju lutemi kontaktoni me kujdestarët tek m:Stewards' noticeboard, dhe lidhni diskutimin e komunitetit lokal, ku ata shprehin dëshirën që ju të mbani të drejtat, dhe të tregojnë një kërkesë mbajtjen e të drejtave në vazhdim.   Ne kujdestarët do ti vlerësojmë përgjigjjet. Nëse nuk ka përgjigjje fare brenda një muaji, ne do të vazhdojmë me heqjen e të drejtave tuaja. Në rast dyshimi, ne do të vlerësojmë përgjigjjet dhe do ta referojmë vendimin komunitetit lokal për komente dhe rivlerësime. Nëse keni pyetje, ju lutemi na kontaktoni tek m:Stewards' noticeboard.   Të fala, Rschen7754 03:11, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nevin Meçaj is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nevin Meçaj until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 04:13, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Përshëndetje. Unë jam një kujdestar. Një politikë e re në lidhje me heqjen e të "drejtave të avancuara" (administrator, burokrat, etj) u përshtat nga konsensusi i komunitetit kohët e fundit. Sipas kësaj politike, kujdestarët po rishikojnë aktivitetin e administratorëve në wikit me një politikë inaktiviteti.

Ju e arrini kriterin e inaktivitetit (pa redaktime ose hyrje për 2 vjet) në sqwiktionary, ku ju jeni administrator. Meqënëse sqwiktionary nuk një rishikes të sajin të të drejtave të administratorëve, aplikohet ai global.

Nëse ju dëshironi të rimerrni të drejtat tuaja, ju duhet të njoftoni komunitetin tuaj që kujdestarët ju dërguan këtë informacion për inaktivitetin tuaj dhe ta diskutoni çështjen. Në përfundimin e diskutimit, nëse komuniteti do që ju të mbani të drejtat tuaja, ju lutemi kontaktoni me kujdestarët tek m:Stewards' noticeboard, dhe lidhni diskutimin e komunitetit lokal, ku ata shprehin dëshirën që ju të mbani të drejtat, dhe të tregojnë një kërkesë mbajtjen e të drejtave në vazhdim.

Ne kujdestarët do ti vlerësojmë përgjigjjet. Nëse nuk ka përgjigjje fare brenda një muaji, ne do të vazhdojmë me heqjen e të drejtave tuaja. Në rast dyshimi, ne do të vlerësojmë përgjigjjet dhe do ta referojmë vendimin komunitetit lokal për komente dhe rivlerësime. Nëse keni pyetje, ju lutemi na kontaktoni tek m:Stewards' noticeboard.

Të fala, Rschen7754 03:42, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Përshëndetje. Unë jam një kujdestar. Një politikë e re në lidhje me heqjen e të "drejtave të avancuara" (administrator, burokrat, etj) u përshtat nga konsensusi i komunitetit kohët e fundit. Sipas kësaj politike, kujdestarët po rishikojnë aktivitetin e administratorëve në wikit me një politikë inaktiviteti.

Ju e arrini kriterin e inaktivitetit (pa redaktime ose hyrje për 2 vjet) në sqwikiquote, ku ju jeni burokrat dhe administrator. Meqënëse sqwikibooks nuk një rishikes të sajin të të drejtave të administratorëve, aplikohet ai global.

Nëse ju dëshironi të rimerrni të drejtat tuaja, ju duhet të njoftoni komunitetin tuaj që kujdestarët ju dërguan këtë informacion për inaktivitetin tuaj dhe ta diskutoni çështjen. Në përfundimin e diskutimit, nëse komuniteti do që ju të mbani të drejtat tuaja, ju lutemi kontaktoni me kujdestarët tek m:Stewards' noticeboard, dhe lidhni diskutimin e komunitetit lokal, ku ata shprehin dëshirën që ju të mbani të drejtat, dhe të tregojnë një kërkesë mbajtjen e të drejtave në vazhdim.

Ne kujdestarët do ti vlerësojmë përgjigjjet. Nëse nuk ka përgjigjje fare brenda një muaji, ne do të vazhdojmë me heqjen e të drejtave tuaja. Në rast dyshimi, ne do të vlerësojmë përgjigjjet dhe do ta referojmë vendimin komunitetit lokal për komente dhe rivlerësime. Nëse keni pyetje, ju lutemi na kontaktoni tek m:Stewards' noticeboard.

Të fala, Rschen7754 07:11, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have found the titles for the final episodes of season 5 of Steven Universe called Familiar, Together Alone, and Escapism — Preceding unsigned comment added by Behljac (talk • contribs) 13:51, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m the operator of an already-existing account. I looked at your userpage and you said there were lots of edits on the pages in your watchlist that need to be reverted. I am a specialist in this job. Which pages do the need-to-be-reverted edits exist on? Thanks,183.192.60.206 (talk) 02:22, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Orthodox Christian. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 15#Orthodox Christian until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 09:11, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Timeline of Albanian history to 1993 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This page has been copied and expanded into Timeline of Albanian history. I have checked most of the entries and they seem to be near direct copies. I don't think we need a redirect from 'Timeline of Albanian history to 1993' so I am suggesting deletion. Dushan Jugum (talk) 23:32, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Template:Copy to Wiktionary has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 17:08, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Index of Albania-related articles, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Index of Albania-related articles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jumpin' At The Woodside.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]