Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10

Hey Dream Out Loud, instead of immediately trying to delete my first post to Wikipedia ever, maybe you would consider HELPING to make the entry encyclopedic - you know, like what a wiki is supposed to be instead of senior users throwing out delete requests? LelandWB (talk) 04:50, 13 February 2014 (UTC)LelandWB[reply]

Hello. I'm leaving this message for some information about the logo of the PATH system. I'm not quite sure if you were the person who made this logo so may I ask first if you were? I'm recently doing some researches on this logo and gathering informations. I would be so appreciated if you can leave me some messages on my talk page. Thank you so much. Leeleejo (talk) 19:02, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I love the new line icons for the list of Metro stations. Great job with them! I'm eventually going to try to return the list to featured list status, and I'd greatly appreciate your input. Cheers, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:19, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I appreciate it. I'd be glad to help you with getting the list back to FL status. I recently created the FL List of SEPTA Regional Rail stations and I'm currently working on another list which I hope to get to FL as well. –Dream out loud (talk) 01:32, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. The SEPTA and MARC lists look great, though it's too bad that the SEPTA list is too wide to be able to fit right-hand images like the Metro list. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:53, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and a comment on the SEPTA list. You might want to consider changing the links to the SEPTA pages for each station into inline external links in a separate column, like I've done in List of MBTA Commuter Rail stations and List of MBTA bus routes. It reduces the size of the reference list and places the external information in an easy-to-access location. I'll probably implement it on the Metro list soon. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:03, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've never seen references linked like that. Are you sure that doesn't go against guidelines like WP:EL or WP:REF? It seems like it would be a lot of work to create that extra column for 150+ rows, plus the issue of having a long reference list never came up during the FL nomination. –Dream out loud (talk) 03:18, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell, it's within guidelines. The information in the table is generally citeable from mass sources like maps, so having individual citations for every station or bus route doesn't help with actually sourcing the information. But there are details - like exact routes for bus routes, and driving directions and timetables for stations - that explicitly fall under WP:NOT, so there's a pretty good reason to have the information linked. While it's not a style appropriate for all or even many lists, I feel that it works rather well for transit lists, and the consensus on the original discussion was the same.

As for the details of implementation: it actually goes surprisingly quick when the list is already in wikitable format. I copy-pasted the MBTA CR list in about half an hour for a similar number of stations. The links are almost all identical, so the only part to change is the end. While it's not necessarily bad to have a very long reflist, it could in very long lists end up being a factor in page load time due to the large number of anchors. It's probably ultimately a matter of personal preference; as you can tell I'm fond of the inline style. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:01, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As can be seen on the map at http://www.wmata.com/rail/maps/map.cfm , the icon for the orange is white letters on orange background, not black on orange.Naraht (talk) 16:01, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just was reading some interview of you and another members of Wikiproject u2, and I saw that you were looking for new users to fill the list of members so they can help to increase the articles. I've been following U2 for almost 7 years, I'm now 18, so I'm sure I can help at least a little. So I need some answer. Please, reply to my talk page as soon as you reed this. Thank you and sorry for the bothers. kind regards.MissBono (talk) 14:32, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! This message is to inform you that Wikipedia:WikiProject U2 needs your input! Please join the discussion on the talk page!Miss Bono (talk) 12:27, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is an open invitation to join Wikipedia:WikiProject U2! If you would like to collaborate on articles and under this projects scope, you are encouraged to participate!

You may add yourself to our meber list below by clicking here!

Miss Bono (talk) 12:52, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion is needed at Joshua tree talk page. -- Robinlarson (talk) 20:27, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		The Good Article Barnstar
		For your contributions to bring Speed 2: Cruise Control (soundtrack) to Good Article status. Thanks, and keep up the good work! -- Khazar2 (talk) 18:45, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could you update File:Tube_map_thumbnail.png as shown on the Tube map article? Crookesmoor (talk) 09:48, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please, feel free to join this discussion   Miss Bono (zootalk) 17:53, 3 April 2013 (UTC) [reply]

You are receving this because your username is listed in Category:WikiProject U2 members or on our participants list. If you would like to stop these sorts of updates please remove the userbox from your profile and move your name down to the Inactive/former members section of the participants list.
Cheers.

–pjoef (talk • contribs) 09:34, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! This message is to inform you that Wikipedia:WikiProject U2 needs your input! Please, join this discussion on this talk page!

You may add yourself to our member list below by clicking here!

  Miss Bono (zootalk) 17:17, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zooropa (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crossfade (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dream out loud! You're invited to our next meeting for Wikipedia Meetup NYC on Sunday April 14 -this weekend- at Symposium Greek Restaurant @ 544 W 113th St (in the back room), on the Upper West Side in the Columbia University area.

Please sign up, and add your ideas to the agenda for Sunday. Thanks!

Delivered on behalf of User:Pharos, 17:59, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I noticed that you have a song at FAC and would like to know if you would like to review my FAC in return for a review on your article? Jona^{talk to me} 22:06, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look and give us your opinion on the WP U2 discussion. Thanks  Miss Bono (zootalk) 14:23, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The U2 WikiProject Newsletter Issue VIII - 1st May 2013 If you would like to contribute on the revamping of the WikiProject, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. You may also contact our project coordinator Miss Bono. If you would like to help out with future newsletters, please contact the Outreach Department.
Quote of the month “ You can cover the world with your thumb Still so big, so bright, so beautiful. ” — U2, "Stateless" U2 News Apr 28, 2013 – Promoter of U2’s Red Rocks concert Barry Fey dead at 73.[1] Apr 25, 2013 - Bono revealed the working title of the new album is "10 Reasons to Exist" The band have been recording in Dublin, New York and the South of France over the last few months. [2] Jan 2013 – New species of trapdoor spider Aptostichus bonoi named after Bono.[3] Nov 04, 2010 – U2, Gaga, Metallica, Swift Win Big at Billboard Touring Awards[4] Dec 14, 2009 – U2 Scores Top Tour of 2009, Second of Decade.[5] Mar 03, 2009 – New York names street 'U2 Way'.[6] Dec 12, 2008 – Nobel laureates crown U2's Bono 'man of peace'[7] Project News We are looking to update the Tasks section at the Main Page of WikiProject U2. Please, if you want to collaborate feel free to contact Miss Bono The Collaboration of the Fornight Department is now available. Feel free to visit it! The The Outreach Department is also available. Feel free to visit it! We have now the Morleigh Steinberg's article. Cleanup listing for WikiProject U2 is available. Slug (song) has been FA nominated by Dream out loud. Wide Awake in Europe has been GA nominated by Dream out loud. Cullen328 is working on an article about the controversial Vaillaincourt Fountain in San Francisco. U2 played at the fountain in 1987. Member News We have updated the Membership list. There are four new members this month. Picture of the month U2 performing at Charlottesville, VA on October 1, 2009, during their worldwide U2360º Tour, launched in support of the group's 2009 album.	From the Editors Welcome to the May edition of the WikiProject U2 Newsletter. This month's theme is No Line on the Horizon, the twelfth studio album by U2. The Album No Line on the Horizon was released on 27 February 2009. It marked the longest gap between studio albums of U2's career. The band originally intended to release the songs as two EPs, but later combined the material into a single record. The supporting U2 360° Tour, spanning 2009 to 2011, was the highest-grossing concert tour in history, with ticket sales over $736 million. The singles for this album were "Get on Your Boots", "Magnificent", "I'll Go Crazy If I Don't Go :Crazy Tonight" The Album's Cover The cover art for No Line on the Horizon is a photograph of Lake Constance, taken by Japanese photographer Hiroshi Sugimoto; titled Boden Sea, it is one of 200 pictures in his Seascapes collection. New Members Cullen328 Let's discuss it 22:10, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply] Unreal7 (talk · contribs) 12:01, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply] Teancum (talk · contribs) 14:08, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply] Fylbecatulous talk 12:08, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply] Did You Know? That the word "baby" is on Achtung Baby twenty-seven times. That Bono's first car was a secondhand Fiat Uno 127. He had an accident driving that car, crashing into a telegraph pole. That the full name of the song "United Colours" is "United Colours of :Plutonium"? That "Winter" and "White as Snow" were both written for the 2009 film Brothers? That "I Still Haven't Found What I'm Looking For" is the most covered U2 song?
Article Statistics Make visible or invisible by clicking [show] or [hide], respectively. Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/U2 articles by quality statistics	Notes Make visible or invisible by clicking [show] or [hide], respectively. ^ "Barry Fey, music promoter behind U2's Red Rocks concert, dies at 73". Ottawa Citizen. April 29, 2013. ^ Kelly, Jessica (25 April 2013). "Second U2 track leaked online: Bono revleaed the working title of the new album is "10 Reasons to Exist"". Dublin: Newstalk. ^ Coleman, Miriam (January 19, 2013). "Joshua Tree Spider Named After Bono: Taxonomist calls new species A. bonoi after U2 frontman". Rolling Stone. ^ Lipshutz, Jason (November 4, 2010). "U2, Gaga, Metallica, Swift Win Big at Billboard Touring Awards". Billboard. ^ McGee, Matt (December 14, 2009). "U2 Scores Top Tour of 2009, Second of Decade: Full recap of U2 appearances on Billboard's year-end of decade-end charts". @U2. ^ Reiss, Adam (March 3, 2009). "New York names street 'U2 Way'". CNN. ^ AFP (December 12, 2008). "Nobel laureates crown U2's Bono 'man of peace'". Google.
Written by Miss Bono.

Please, join this discussion. We are happy to hear new suggestions for next Newsletters. Thank you.  Miss Bono (zootalk) 15:53, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We apologize for any inconvenience that this may cost. Please, Take a look at the WP U2 Revamped New Barnstar and give us your opinion on the project discussion. Thanks  Miss Bono (zootalk) 18:56, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dream out loud. You have new messages at Talk:Duals.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

 Miss Bono (zootalk) 19:17, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Dream Out Loud. Can I ask you a personal question?? I promise is not too big.  Miss Bono (zootalk) 18:23, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Metro Transitway stations may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:06, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dream out loud. You have new messages at Lost on belmont's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Lost on Belmont ^3200N (talk) 21:58, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dream out loud. You have new messages at Koavf's talk page.
Message added 17:43, 23 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.[reply]

—Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:43, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	Philadelphia's Great American Wiknic at Penn Park
	You are invited to the Philadelphia edition of the Great American Wiknic taking place in Penn Park, on Saturday, June 22, 2013! We would love to see you there!--User:Ocaasi (talk)|))

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 770 Eastern Parkway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crown Heights (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:43, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!

Hi Dream out loud! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch (talk) 14:51, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dumb Ways to Die.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:13, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	Great American Wiknic NYC at Prospect Park
	You are invited to the Great American Wiknic NYC in Brooklyn's green and lovely Prospect Park, on this Saturday June 22! We would love to see you there, so sign up and bring something fun for the potluck :) -- User:Pharos (talk)

Hello, Dream out loud. You have new messages at Talk:Wide_Awake_in_Europe#Mercy_Song.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Miss Bono ^(zootalk) 12:52, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, never mind. I guess big guys don't have time for small people. Won't bother you again? Ms.Bono^(zootalk)☆ 13:35, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mark Fisher (architect) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ((((Other people|Mark Fisher))

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:33, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dream out loud. You have new messages at WP:CFDS.
Message added 22:57, 3 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:57, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Look, I said I'll never ever boterh you again, but it seems like nobody else can help me. What should I do to take One Tree Hill to TFA. Can you help me? Reply at my talk if possible, I don't have you on my watchlist. Thanks Miss Bono^(zootalk)☆ 19:01, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dream out loud. You have new messages at Talk:U2#Release_Dates.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Also, I don't know why, but check this out . I swear I did nothing.

Best!

Miss Bono ^[zootalk]☆ 14:55, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Wide Awake in Europe you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 19:07, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Wide Awake in Europe you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Wide Awake in Europe for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 16:18, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

shouldn't it be a B-Class. What do you think? Miss Bono ^[zootalk] 16:36, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dream out loud. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Speed 2: Cruise Control (soundtrack) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Miniapolis 22:39, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You got message! Miss Bono ^[zootalk] 12:24, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Grease 2 (soundtrack), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bob Morrison (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:02, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Grease 2.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:05, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Grease 2 soundtrack.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or provided a license tag. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, select the appropriate license tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you can't find a suitable license tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:06, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please join Wikipedia Takes Brooklyn scavenger hunt on September 7, 2013! Everyone gather at the Brooklyn Public Library to further Wikipedia's coverage of— photos and articles related to Brooklyn, its neighborhoods and the local landmarks. --EdwardsBot (talk)

The WikiProject Report would like to revisit WikiProject U2 for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. –Mabeenot (talk) 13:13, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'd really have enjoyed reading your answers and Y2kc's. Miss Bono ^{[hello, hello!]} 17:59, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Idlewild and Soak Zone.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Themeparkgc  Talk  22:53, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dream out loud, I've begun working on the copy-edit you requested at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page for the article U2 Live at Red Rocks: Under a Blood Red Sky. Please feel free to contact me and to correct or revert my edits if necessary. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 00:13, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dream out loud. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for U2 Live at Red Rocks: Under a Blood Red Sky at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 05:27, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Taco Bell logo.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 14:06, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that you changed Ohel (Chabad) to Ohel Chabad Lubavitch. Was this change a result of some renaming discussion? You didn't change the main Chabad page to Chabad Lubavitch. Thanks for enlightening me, Yoninah (talk) 21:04, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The edit summary of the move says "(Dream out loud moved page Ohel (Chabad) to Ohel Chabad Lubavitch: full name)". Could you show us why you say that the full name is "Ohel Chabad Lubavitch"? Debresser (talk) 23:58, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please join the Wikimedia NYC Meetup on October 5, 2013! Everyone gather at Jefferson Market Library to further Wikipedia's local outreach for education, museums, libraries and planning WikiConference USA. --Pharos (talk) 21:48, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedians are invited to the GLAM Café at the Chemical Heritage Foundation to meet, talk, and edit. We provide the space, the coffee, and the snacks: you provide ideas and enthusiasm! On the second Tuesday of each month, starting November 12, 2013.

Please join Wikipedia "Greenwich Village In The 60s" Editathon on November 2, 2013! Everyone gather at Jefferson Market Library to further Wikipedia's local outreach for Greenwich Village articles on the history and the community. --Pharos (talk) 21:40, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Issue IX: Rattle and Hum – 1st November 2013

From the editors Best quote Best picture Theme: Rattle and Hum Did you know...

In the news – U2 news Project news Member news New members Become a member

• Read this in full
• Archive
• Subscribe/Unsubscribe!

• Portal:U2

Miss Bono and myself have requested a portal peer review for Portal:U2.
We would appreciate any helpful advice at Wikipedia:Portal peer review/U2/archive1.

I would also like to remind all members of WikiProject U2 (and other interested editors) that U2 Live at Red Rocks: Under a Blood Red Sky (talk · edit · hist) has been put up for peer review (PR) by Dream out loud (t · c) on 10 November 2013; see discussion. Any feedback would be much appreciated!

Thanks in advance and happy editing,
pjoef (talk • contribs) 14:26, 16 November 2013 (UTC) Delivered by User:EdwardsBot on behalf of WikiProject U2. You are receiving this message because you are a volunteer at Wikipedia:Portal peer review, you have contributed to the development of the portal, or you are an active member of WikiProject U2. –pjoef (talk • contribs) 14:26, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Robocop logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 18:17, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please join Queens Open History Edit-a-Thon on December 6, 2013! Everyone gather at Queens Library to further Wikipedia's local outreach for borough articles on the history and the communities. Drop-ins welcome 10am-7pm!--Pharos (talk) ~~~~~

I am getting a Speedy delete notice (but none on page?), I take it this popped up due to the word "presents" not being capped in the new page I just wrote. You moved the page to the proper titling. Correct?

Jcooper1 (talk) 02:36, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, I originally nominated it because I didn't think there was an existing article for the album's artist. I found it eventually and discovered it simply wasn't linked, so I withdrew the nomination. –Dream out loud (talk) 02:51, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article From the Sky Down you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Diannaa -- Diannaa (talk) 18:51, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article From the Sky Down you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:From the Sky Down for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Diannaa -- Diannaa (talk) 20:41, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article From the Sky Down you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:From the Sky Down for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Diannaa -- Diannaa (talk) 20:22, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

loud dreams
Thank you for quality articles on songs, cinema, New York, Broadway, for U2 3D, for a user name with a message for the future and a clear user page, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:26, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A year ago, you were the 370th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:44, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seven years ago, you were recipient no. 370 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:34, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please join Wikipedia "Art and Feminism Editathon" @ Eyebeam on Saturday February 1, 2014, an event aimed at collaboratively expanding Wikipedia articles covering Art and Feminism, and the biographies of women artists! There are also regional events that day in Brooklyn, Westchester County, and the Hudson Valley. --Pharos (talk)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Speed 2: Cruise Control, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A Time to Kill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I am currently taking a WikiPedia based college class, and we were assigned to join a substantial WikiProject. I love U2, and thought this would be a fun one to work on. Any suggestions on where to start contributing? I've already done a bit of supplementing to early song articles. Thank you!C meindl (talk) 20:52, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to see you're interested in working on U2 articles! I haven't been too active on Wikipedia lately since I've been so busy with college classes, but I'm happy to provide suggestions. Are you looking to take GA articles to FA status or just improve stub articles? I can help you out with suggestions from there. –Dream out loud (talk) 05:42, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WTF? A new SR 812 was created a few years ago that has nothing to do with the former one. --NE2 19:13, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for my mistake. But please be a little more mature and civil than replying to people's misunderstandings with "WTF". And when an article has literally just a few words of prose with zero ciations or links, it's easy to make a mistake like that. –Dream out loud (talk) 19:36, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Upcoming Saturday events - March 1: Harlem History Editathon and March 8: NYU Law Editathon

You are invited to join upcoming Wikipedia "Editathons", where both experienced and new Wikipedia editors will collaboratively improve articles on a selected theme, on the following two Saturdays in March: Saturday March 1: Harlem History Editathon (RSVP), focusing on Harlem history, landmarks and biographies Saturday March 8: NYU Law Editathon (RSVP), focusing on innovation law and intellectual property (with social dinner afterward) I hope to see you there! Pharos (talk)

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by removing your name from this list.)

Thanks for uploading File:BestofBond1999.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:57, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user is removing Speedy deletion tag again and again, I warned him 1st, he again did so, you warned him, but he removed tag again. Now I have tagged a page again and put a last warning on his talk page. He didn't seem to get the point A.Minkowiski (talk) 16:05, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox venue has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:01, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trouble – Norwegian Live EP is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trouble – Norwegian Live EP until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Status (talk · contribs) 12:46, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Koyaanisqatsi poster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:41, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SEPTA Regional Rail logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:28, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey,

Some time ago you did some bang up work in helping maintain NPOV at SEPTA Regional Rail and the related Fox Chase Line article. Well, seems the editor(s) who seek to use the articles for soap boxing their grudges agains SEPTA are at it again, with the same sort of POV-pushing via WP:SYNTH and essay writing that was the problem before. I reverted at the main Regional Rail page, and tagged the Fox Chase Line page, but was hoping you could look over them as well for additional clean up; or some reason this POV pushing has really long gotten under my skin, and I don't know if I can properly give it an NPOV scrub objectively. Thanks in advance. oknazevad (talk) 03:38, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:U2nyd france.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:00, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:U2nyd japan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:00, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Home (2014 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable upcoming film

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY2008 13:26, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Drexel seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:21, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:U2gloria netherlands.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:28, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:U2gloria nz.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:28, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:U2rok.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:28, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah you kind of messed up the songs of innocence pages by saying it got mixed reviews and by deleting reviews my q magazine and absolute punk. I don't know why you did this but I think it's because you are a "U2" fan that doesn't like the album considering your name. Well I'm not going to fix the page because I don't feel like it, but don't just alter a page because of your feelings. Do something with your life please and stop being an unpleasant individual. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingramsay (talk • contribs) 19:07, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Kingramsay: I made no such edits to the Songs of Innocence (album) page - all I've done is fix the track times and add in a citation. I did not edit the reception section in anyway and if you don't believe me, feel free to check my edit history. If you want to be a respected editor on this site, you should stop falsely accusing editors of changing your edits and refrain from making immature, childish comments about my personal life. –Dream out loud (talk) 20:36, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Big Blue Bus logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:56, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the U2 3D page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:52, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dream out loud. You have new messages at BMacZero's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Thanks for uploading File:Tube map thumbnail.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 14:19, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WMATA icon has been nominated for merging with Template:Rail-interchange. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Jc86035 (talk • contributions) Use ((ping|Jc86035)) to reply to me 04:28, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re this, it wasn't a case of re-adding: it was never added in the first place. As per the FL instructions, after creating the nomination page, you need to transclude the discussion onto the FLC page, which wasn't done first time round. Good luck with the Nom. - SchroCat (talk) 23:00, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 27 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article List of MARC Train stations, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the newest MARC Train commuter rail station is not planned to open until 2040? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/List of MARC Train stations. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 08:02, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox rail line has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox rail service. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use ((re|Jc86035)) to reply to me 08:10, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dream out loud. The non-free use of this image in New York City Subway is being discussed at WP:NFCR#File:NYC Subway Map June 2015.jpg. Since this image was apparently uploaded as a replacement for File:NYC subway-4D.svg , an Common image which you have recently updated a few times, I was wondering if you could clarify whether a non-free version of the subway map is needed. Thanks in advance. - Marchjuly (talk) 04:57, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of Philadelphia has a discussion about selection and inclusion criteria. Two editors are discussing it, but we have divergent views. More opinions would be helpful. - SummerPhD^v2.0 13:11, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Drowning Man (U2 song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drowning Man (U2 song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 12:58, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Drexel seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:45, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Moby iTunes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Miami-Dade Transit metro stations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page First Street station. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have done a good job in renaming stations in the Category:RTD commuter rail stations to match the naming convention. Now you have to move everything in the Category:RTD light rail stations to complete the job. I wanted to fix Template:RTD stations, but I have to wait until everything has been standardized. Secondarywaltz (talk) 15:24, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Secondarywaltz: Would you like to assist me? Unfortunately all these moves have to be done manually since I don't have admin privledges. I can start working on it, but it's a very tedious task. –Dream out loud (talk) 10:29, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to have moved most of them, but very often you have changed more than just the suffix, so that it does not match the previous one. This has screwed things up, since the new name is unrecognized by succession templates. I will try to help you by fixing those - but later. Thanks. Secondarywaltz (talk) 14:26, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dumb Ways to Die.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. While it's a good thing to alert WikiProjects of discussions, please make more of an effort to make these notifications a little more neutral sounding. Leaving comments like this is clearly aimed to influence the reader to side with yourself in the discussions. This is called WP:CANVASSing, and is not allowed. The U2 WikiProject is pretty inactive, so its unlikely to make much of a difference this time, but please be more careful in the future. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 18:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your help would be very much appreciated. There has been an effort over the past several months to clean this up. You have recently reverted several pages back to pre-standard names. Please see WP:USSTATION - station articles where the station name is unique do not use a disambiguator like (Los Angeles Metro). It's just the name of the station with "station" at the end, the system name is only added when there is more than one station article within Wikipedia with the same name. Thanks. Lexlex (talk) 04:47, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am well aware of the standards at WP:USSTATION, please do not lecture me on what it says. Additionally, I have not reverted any pages back to pre-station names, so please do no accuse me of doing something I have not done. The move was made to disambiguate Fairview Heights station (Los Angeles Metro) from Fairview Heights station (MetroLink). Your edits will be reverted to comply the with standards, and I would appreciate your cooperation with this in the future. –Dream out loud (talk) 06:38, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for your help with Wikipedia! In future please comment to indicate what you're doing. Your work is appreciated by the team, but you must comment your work or it will be reverted if your intention can't be determined. We hope you enjoy your editing experience! Thanks from all of us! Lexlex (talk) 20:55, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You uploaded both album covers of the soundtrack of Koyaanisqatsi. However, as the topic of the article is not the soundtrack but the film, I don't think the images would help readers' understanding of the film, so omitting them would not result in bad effects on the readers. Allow me to remove them then? --George Ho (talk) 06:18, 17 June 2016 (UTC) @George Ho: Yes I think that's fine. I added those a long time ago, long before I was an experienced editor. Ideally, I think the soundtracks should have its own separate article, as there is just as much (if not more) coverage on the film's music than the film itself. –Dream out loud (talk) 10:20, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The First Time (U2 song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page All I Want Is You. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dream out loud! I noticed that you have written some WP:FLs on list of stations. I would very much value your review of my current FLC on List of Valley Metro Rail stations. If you have the chance and time, would you be able to take a look at the list and let me know if you have any comments or suggestions to improve it? I would appreciate it greatly, although understand if you are unable! Thanks, « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 22:56, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fox Chase Rapid Transit Line is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fox Chase Rapid Transit Line until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mackensen (talk) 23:43, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dream out loud.
You might want to comment at WP: Articles for deletion/Dahar (band) as the page creator simply removed your speedy template. I was gonna revert, but I dont think its worth the trouble due the AfD. Regards, 220 of ^Borg 09:01, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Funny though, they did that after they 'retired'. :-/ 220 of ^Borg 11:36, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I just reviewed List of Miami-Dade Transit metro stations which was a really excellent list. If you have a moment to review to provide feedback on List of United States military premier ensembles, it would be appreciated. LavaBaron (talk) 20:29, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Join us this Saturday (July 30) at the Philadelphia Wiknic, the "picnic anyone can edit". This is an opportunity to meet other local Wikipedians, have fun, and discuss potential projects.

The event is this Saturday, between 1pm-5pm at the Picnic Grove in Penn Park.

(To unsubscribe from future messages, remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiProject Philadelphia/Philadelphia meet-up invite list.)

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:21, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Great work on "Slug"—congratulations! Moisejp (talk) 14:13, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Dream out loud. I'm just posting to let you know that List of Miami-Dade Transit metro stations – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for September 19. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 02:29, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is there some reason you used disambiguation when you moved Summer–Best station (Buffalo Metro Rail) rather than simply Summer–Best station. I want to fix the messy succession box redirects you left behind and have to make sure this was done on purpose. Secondarywaltz (talk) 21:00, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• It was a mistake; feel free to be bold next time and fix it on your own. Go ahead and fix the sucession box links; I haven't had a chance to get to it yet. –Dream out loud (talk) 10:59, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There could be reasons that I can't see, but it's all cleaned up now. Thanks. Secondarywaltz (talk) 15:12, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dream out loud. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dream out loud. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.

• Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
• Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
• Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. — xaosflux ^Talk 19:00, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dream out loud,

Breaking the back of the backlog

We now have 817 New Page Reviewers! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog. Now it's time for action.

If each reviewer does only 10 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
Let's get that over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.

Second set of eyes

Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work. Read about it at the new Monitoring the system section in the tutorial.

Getting the tools we need - 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey: Please vote

With some tweaks to their look, and some additional features, Page Curation and New Pages Feed could easily be the best tools for patrollers and reviewers. We've listed most of what what we need at the 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey. Voting starts on 28 November - please turn out to make our bid the Foundation's top priority. Please help also by improving or commenting on our Wishlist entry at the Community Wishlist Survey. Many other important user suggestions are listed at at Page Curation.

---

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 26 November 2016 (UTC) .[reply]

New Page Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Hello Dream out loud,

Please help reduce the New Page backlog

This is our second request. The backlog is still growing. Your help is needed now - just a few minutes each day.

Getting the tools we need

ONLY TWO DAYS LEFT TO VOTE

• Improve the tools: Vote here.
• Reduce your review load: Vote here

---

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC) .[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Second Ave Subway CGI station.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 02:16, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I hope this doesn't feel out of the blue, and feel free to disregard if you don't have time. However, I noticed that you have helped shepherd many train station lists through the FLC process. I have recently created List of Nanjing Metro stations that has not gotten much attention, and would eventually like to bring it up to FL status. I've tried my best refining it to the best of my ability, but would appreciate a second set of eyes from a more experienced editor. Thank you in advance, and again, please don't feel obliged! Best, --haha169 (talk) 11:05, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Haha169: sorry for not replying sooner. I reviewed the list and it's really well done! I don't have too many critisms to share, but here's some feedback:

• Future start dates in the "Lines" section table should be noted as such (not just italisized); try something like "est." with the ((abbr)) template
• For stations with multiple platform types, note how/why a station can have more than one and to which lines the each platform type corresponds.
• Make sure table coding follows guidelines at MOS:DTAB.

If you can make these minor changes and nominate it for FLC, I'd be happy to support! –Dream out loud (talk) 11:32, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review! I haven't got access to a computer at the moment, but I'll implement your suggestions when I've got time before sending it to FLC in the coming months. Thank you again for taking the time to do a review, and for your support, I really appreciate it! --haha169 (talk) 12:17, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I went and tried implementing your suggestions yesterday, and just wanted to ask if I did everything correctly. I added an estimated abbreviation for future start dates, added notes for the three stations with different platform types, and read the accessibility guidelines by checking for color contrast and color-blindness, and adding alt-text for the icons in the table (alt-text for the images already exist). When you get the chance, could you please let me know if this is sufficient? Thank you again so much, I really appreciate your help! --haha169 (talk) 10:40, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, sorry for contacting you so many times! I finally felt ready to send this list to FLC! When you get the chance, could you please leave a review at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Nanjing Metro stations/archive1? Thank you so much! --haha169 (talk) 09:51, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Speed 2: Cruise Control has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 15:31, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Twofingered Typist: Thanks so much for your help with this article! –Dream out loud (talk) 11:33, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're very welcome. Happy to help. Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:18, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dream out loud,

A HUGE backlog

We now have 817 New Page Reviewers!
Most of us requested the user right at PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October.

The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to 70,000.

Second set of eyes

Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten.

Abuse

This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody, and

1. this very recent case of paid advertising by a Reviewer resulting in a community ban.
2. this case in January of paid advertising by a Reviewer, also resulting in a community ban.
3. This Reviewer is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.

Coordinator election[edit]

Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later.

---

Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

		The Music Barnstar
		Thank you for doing what I could not and getting Slug (song) to FA status. It was my biggest regret when I left Wikipedia, and it means a lot to finally see that star at the top of the article. Thank you. Melicans (talk, contributions) 20:20, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Melicans: thanks for the recognition. I was really determined to get it to FA as well and was happy to get it there. Let me know if you ever decide to return to editing here and I'd be happy to collaborate on another U2 article. –Dream out loud (talk) 09:46, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dream out loud,

Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed.

Still a MASSIVE backlog

We now have 817 New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced.
If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire.

---

Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm PRehse. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Dorothy Walker Bush, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Peter Rehse (talk) 09:05, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@PRehse: Why did you un-review the page and change the redirect? Dorothy Walker Bush should redirect to Dorothy Bush Koch, not the more general Bush family page. –Dream out loud (talk) 09:19, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I did not unreview not sure what happened there but Dorothy Walker Bush could be two people - the grandmother and the redirect you prefer. I chose an earlier redirect to the Bush family because of that. Please feel free to change it.Peter Rehse (talk) 09:27, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Really appreciate it, I had spotted it earlier in its previous bizarrely referenced form, and had been trying to rescue it (despite an attempt to revert back to the redirect mid-edit) as I'd found plenty of sources available on him. I'm sure his notability is just a wee bit borderline, but still, better than a lot of other people out there! Anyway, as I had pretty much reworked the article, I unmarked it for review so I'm glad someone else has checked it over now. Cheers! Mabalu (talk) 13:53, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! Looks pretty well-written to me, with some very reliable sources. –Dream out loud (talk) 14:26, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Rapunzel rsp front 96dpi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:58, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Marked Yacoub Shaheen as reviewed.--Wmdly (talk) 12:06, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Onel5969. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Steve Bays, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:47, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969: If you're going to unreview a page, then please explain why. Simply telling me that you unreviewed it is not helpful. –Dream out loud (talk) 11:56, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - My apologies. I didn't realize that another editor had reviewed it. I had reviewed it yesterday, reverting to the redirect, since, imho, he still doesn't have independent notability. When my edit was undone, I simply clicked the unreview link (thinking it was still my review), so that another editor might have a whack at it. I can't think of a single time when I've actually consciously "unreviewed" another editor's work. And if and when I do, rest assured I'll be certain to explain why. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:02, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dream out loud,

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 817 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just 55 reviews, the 22,000 backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Washington-Wabash CTA.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dream out loud, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

• The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
• Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.

Technology update:

• Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Wikipedia:Page Curation/Suggested improvements
• The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:
  • User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js adds a link to the new pages feed and page curation toolbar to your top toolbar on Wikipedia
  • User:The Earwig/copyvios.js adds a link in your side toolbox that will run the current page through

General project update:

• Following discussion at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers, Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Noticeboard has been marked as historical. Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers is currently the most active central discussion forum for the New Page Patrol project. To keep up to date on the most recent discussions you can add it to your watchlist or visit it periodically.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dream out loud, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

• The new page backlog is currently at 16,991 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.

Technology update:

• Rentier has created a NPP browser in WMF Labs that allows you to search new unreviewed pages using keywords and categories.

General project update:

• The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team is working with the community to implement the autoconfirmed article creation trial. The trial is currently set to start on 7 September 2017, pending final approval of the technical features.
• Please remember to focus on the quality of review: correct tagging of articles and not tagbombing are important. Searching for potential copyright violations is also important, and it can be aided by Earwig's Copyvio Detector, which can be added to your toolbar for ease of use with this user script.
• To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Girls Next Door.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dream out loud, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

• The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
• Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!

Technology update:

• The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: T175225

General project update:

• On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
• Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
• To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Hello Dream out loud, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

• The new page backlog is currently at 12,878 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
• We have successfully cleared the backlog of pages created by non-confirmed accounts before ACTRIAL. Thank you to everyone who participated in that drive.

Technology update:

• Primefac has created a script that will assist in requesting revision deletion for copyright violations that are often found in new pages. For more information see User:Primefac/revdel.

General project update:

• The Article Wizard has been updated and simplified to match the layout style of the new user landing page. If you have not yet seen it, take a look.
• To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Subway-Surface has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jc86035 (talk) 14:16, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Gallery at Market East.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Empire Andy Warhol.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dream out loud. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dream out loud, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

• The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
• Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!

Outreach and Invitations:

• If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with: ((subst:NPR invite)). Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.

New Year New Page Review Drive

• A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
• Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.

General project update:

• ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
• The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
• To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Hello Dream out loud, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!

We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!

The backlog drive will begin on January 1^st and run until January 29^th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.

Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:

• The total number of reviews completed for the month.
• The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.

NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Hello Dream out loud, thank you for your efforts in reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

• The new page backlog is currently at 3819 unreviewed articles, with a further 6660 unreviewed redirects.
• We are very close to eliminating the backlog completely; please help by reviewing a few extra articles each day!

New Year Backlog Drive results:

• We made massive progress during the recent four weeks of the NPP Backlog Drive, during which the backlog reduced by nearly six thousand articles and the length of the backlog by almost 3 months!

General project update:

• ACTRIAL will end it's initial phase on the 14th of March. Our goal is to reduce the backlog significantly below the 90 day index point by the 14th of March. Please consider helping with this goal by reviewing a few additional pages a day.
• Reviewing redirects is an important and necessary part of New Page Patrol. Please read the guideline on appropriate redirects for advice on reviewing redirects. Inappropriate redirects can be re-targeted or nominated for deletion at RfD.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months. (Purge)

Hello Dream out loud, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

June backlog drive

Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers.
Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.

New technology, new rules

• New features are shortly going to be added to the Special:NewPagesFeed which include a list of drafts for review, OTRS flags for COPYVIO, and more granular filter preferences. More details can be found at this page.
• Probationary permissions: Now that PERM has been configured to allow expiry dates to all minor user rights, new NPR flag holders may sometimes be limited in the first instance to 6 months during which their work will be assessed for both quality and quantity of their reviews. This will allow admins to accord the right in borderline cases rather than make a flat out rejection.
• Current reviewers who have had the flag for longer than 6 months but have not used the permissions since they were granted will have the flag removed, but may still request to have it granted again in the future, subject to the same probationary period, if they wish to become an active reviewer.

Editathons

• Editathons will continue through August. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

The Signpost

• The next issue of the monthly magazine will be out soon. The newspaper is an excellent way to stay up to date with news and new developments between our newsletters. If you have special messages to be published, or if you would like to submit an article (one about NPR perhaps?), don't hesitate to contact the editorial team here.

---

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Virgin Records.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months.

Hello Dream out loud, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

Backlog

As of 21 October 2018^[update], there are 3650 unreviewed articles and the backlog now stretches back 51 days.

Community Wishlist Proposal

• There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding the drafting of a Community Wishlist Proposal for the purpose of requesting bug fixes and missing/useful features to be added to the New Page Feed and Curation Toolbar.
• Please join the conversation as we only have until 29 October to draft this proposal!

Project updates

• ORES predictions are now built-in to the feed. These automatically predict the class of an article as well as whether it may be spam, vandalism, or an attack page, and can be filtered by these criteria now allowing reviewers to better target articles that they prefer to review.
• There are now tools being tested to automatically detect copyright violations in the feed. This detector may not be accurate all the time, though, so it shouldn't be relied on 100% and will only start working on new revisions to pages, not older pages in the backlog.

New scripts

• User:Enterprisey/cv-revdel.js^(info) — A new script created for quickly placing ((copyvio-revdel)) on a page.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 20:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Arkia logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Azerbaijan Airlines logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months.

Hello Dream out loud,

Community Wishlist Survey – NPP needs you – Vote NOW

• Community Wishlist Voting takes place 16 to 30 November for the Page Curation and New Pages Feed improvements, and other software requests. The NPP community is hoping for a good turnout in support of the requests to Santa for the tools we need. This is very important as we have been asking the Foundation for these upgrades for 4 years.

If this proposal does not make it into the top ten, it is likely that the tools will be given no support at all for the foreseeable future. So please put in a vote today.

We are counting on significant support not only from our own ranks, but from everyone who is concerned with maintaining a Wikipedia that is free of vandalism, promotion, flagrant financial exploitation and other pollution.

With all 650 reviewers voting for these urgently needed improvements, our requests would be unlikely to fail. See also The Signpost Special report: 'NPP: This could be heaven or this could be hell for new users – and for the reviewers', and if you are not sure what the wish list is all about, take a sneak peek at an article in this month's upcoming issue of The Signpost which unfortunately due to staff holidays and an impending US holiday will probably not be published until after voting has closed.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)}18:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dream out loud. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dream out loud. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dream out loud,

Reviewer of the Year

This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to Onel5969. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554 reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285 edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.

Thanks are also extended for their work to JTtheOG (15,059 reviews), Boleyn (12,760 reviews), Cwmhiraeth (9,001 reviews), Semmendinger (8,440 reviews), PRehse (8,092 reviews), Arthistorian1977 (5,306 reviews), Abishe (4,153 reviews), Barkeep49 (4,016 reviews), and Elmidae (3,615 reviews).
Cwmhiraeth, Semmendinger, Barkeep49, and Elmidae have been New Page Reviewers for less than a year — Barkeep49 for only seven months, while Boleyn, with an edit count of 250,000 since she joined Wikipedia in 2008, has been a bastion of New Page Patrol for many years.

See also the list of top 100 reviewers.

Less good news, and an appeal for some help

The backlog is now approaching 5,000, and still rising. There are around 640 holders of the NPR flag, most of whom appear to be inactive. The 10% of the reviewers who do 90% of the work could do with some support especially as some of them are now taking a well deserved break.

Really good news - NPR wins the Community Wishlist Survey 2019

At #1 position, the Community Wishlist poll closed on 3 December with a resounding success for NPP, reminding the WMF and the volunteer communities just how critical NPP is to maintaining a clean encyclopedia and the need for improved tools to do it. A big 'thank you' to everyone who supported the NPP proposals. See the results.

Training video

Due to a number of changes having been made to the feed since this three-minute video was created, we have been asked by the WMF for feedback on the video with a view to getting it brought up to date to reflect the new features of the system. Please leave your comments here, particularly mentioning how helpful you find it for new reviewers.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:59, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dord.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dream out loud,

News

• The WMF has announced that Google Translate is now available for translating articles through the content translation tool. This may result in an increase in machine translated articles in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to use the ((rough translation)) tag and gently remind (or inform) editors that translations from other language Wikipedia pages still require attribution per WP:TFOLWP.

Discussions of interest

• Two elements of CSD G6 have been split into their own criteria: R4 for redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons (Discussion), and G14 for disambiguation pages which disambiguate zero pages, or have "(disambiguation)" in the title but disambiguate a single page (Discussion).
• ((db-blankdraft)) was merged into G13 (Discussion)
• A discussion recently closed with no consensus on whether to create a subject-specific notability guideline for theatrical plays.
• There is an ongoing discussion on a proposal to create subject-specific notability guidelines for chemicals and organism taxa.

Reminders

• NPR is not a binary keep / delete process. In many cases a redirect may be appropriate. The deletion policy and its associated guideline clearly emphasise that not all unsuitable articles must be deleted. Redirects are not contentious. See a classic example of the templates to use. More templates are listed at the R template index. Reviewers who are not aware, do please take this into consideration before PROD, CSD, and especially AfD because not even all admins are aware of such policies, and many NAC do not have a full knowledge of them.

NPP Tools Report

• Superlinks – allows you to check an article's history, logs, talk page, NPP flowchart (on unpatrolled pages) and more without navigating away from the article itself.
• copyvio-check – automatically checks the copyvio percentage of new pages in the background and displays this info with a link to the report in the 'info' panel of the Page curation toolbar.
• The NPP flowchart now has clickable hyperlinks.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828
Looking for inspiration? There are approximately 1000 female biographies to review.
Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.

---

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dream out loud,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

Niharika Kohli, a product manager for the growth team, announced that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the project page on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:

• Allow filtering by no citations in page curation
• Not having CSD and PRODs automatically marked as reviewed, reflecting current consensus among reviewers and current Twinkle functionality.

Reliable Sources for NPP

Rosguill has been compiling a list of reliable sources across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the discussion about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.

Backlog drive coming soon

Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the New Page Patrol talk page.

News

• Following a request for comment, the subject-specific notability guideline for pornographic actors and models (WP:PORNBIO) was removed; in its place, editors should consult WP:ENT and WP:GNG.

Discussions of interest

• A request for bot approval for a bot to patrol two kinds of redirects
• There has been a lot discussion about Notability of Academics
• What, if anything, would a SNG for Softball look like

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7242 Low – 2393 High – 7250

---

Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk) at 19:17, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dream out loud,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

More new features are being added to the feed, including the important red alert for previously deleted pages. This will only work if it is selected in your filters. Best is to 'select all'. Do take a moment to check out all the new features if you have not already done so. If anything is not working as it should, please let us know at NPR. There is now also a live queue of AfC submissions in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to review AfCs, but bear in mind that NPP is an official process and policy and is more important.

QUALITY of REVIEWING

Articles are still not always being checked thoroughly enough. If you are not sure what to do, leave the article for a more experienced reviewer. Please be on the alert for any incongruities in patrolling and help your colleagues where possible; report patrollers and autopatrolled article creators who are ostensibly undeclared paid editors. The displayed ORES alerts offer a greater 'at-a-glance' overview, but the new challenges in detecting unwanted new content and sub-standard reviewing do not necessarily make patrolling any easier, nevertheless the work may have a renewed interest factor of a different kind. A vibrant community of reviewers is always ready to help at NPR.

Backlog

The backlog is still far too high at between 7,000 and 8,000. Of around 700 user rights holders, 80% of the reviewing is being done by just TWO users. In the light of more and more subtle advertising and undeclared paid editing, New Page Reviewing is becoming more critical than ever.

Move to draft

NPR is triage, it is not a clean up clinic. This move feature is not limited to bios so you may have to slightly re-edit the text in the template before you save the move. Anything that is not fit for mainspace but which might have some promise can be draftified - particularly very poor English and machine and other low quality translations.

Notifying users

Remember to use the message feature if you are just tagging an article for maintenance rather than deletion. Otherwise articles are likely to remain perma-tagged. Many creators are SPA and have no intention of returning to Wikipedia. Use the feature too for leaving a friendly note note for the author of a first article you found well made or interesting. Many have told us they find such comments particularly welcoming and encouraging.

PERM

Admins are now taking advantage of the new time-limited user rights feature. If you have recently been accorded NPR, do check your user rights to see if this affects you. Depending on your user account preferences, you may receive automated notifications of your rights changes. Requests for permissions are not mini-RfAs. Helpful comments are welcome if absolutely necessary, but the bot does a lot of the work and the final decision is reserved for admins who do thorough research anyway.

Other news

School and academic holidays will begin soon in various places around the Western world. Be on the lookout for the usual increase in hoax, attack, and other junk pages.

Our next newsletter might be announcing details of a possible election for co-ordinators of NPR. If you think you have what it takes to micro manage NPR, take a look at New Page Review Coordinators - it's a job that requires a lot of time and dedication.

---

Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Manos clapper.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dream out loud,

Backlog

Instead of reaching a magic 300 as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Coordinator

A proposal is taking place here to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR.

This month's refresher course

Why I Hate Speedy Deleters, a 2008 essay by long since retired Ballonman, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for making the occasional mistake while others can learn from their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading.

Deletion tags

Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.

Paid editing

Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines' (SNG). Alternatives to deletion

• Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves once more with notability guidelines for organisations and companies.
• Blank-and-Redirect is a solution anchored in policy. Please consider this alternative before PRODing or CSD. Note however, that users will often revert or usurp redirects to re-create deleted articles. Do regularly patrol the redirects in the feed.

Not English

• A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, and if they do have potential, tag as required, then move to draft. Modify the text of the template as appropriate before sending it.

Tools

Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent enhancements to the New Pages Feed and features in the Curation tool, and there are still more to come. Due to the wealth of information now displayed by ORES, reviewers are strongly encouraged to use the system now rather than Twinkle; it will also correctly populate the logs.

Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See User:SD0001/StubSorter.js, It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools.

Assessment: The script at User:Evad37/rater makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done.

DannyS712 bot III is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its patrol log.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dream out loud,

This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon.

Getting the queue to 0

There are now 817 holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action.
Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If each reviewer soon does only 2 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by every reviewer doing only 1 review every 2 days - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.
Want to join? Consider adding the NPP Pledge userbox.
Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some really cool awards.

Coordinator

Admin Barkeep49 has been officially invested as NPP/NPR coordinator by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers.

This month's refresher course

Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: This official Wikipedia article will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Wikipedia or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See The Hallmarks to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources.

Tools

• It is now possible to select new pages by date range. This was requested by reviewers who want to patrol from the middle of the list.
• It is now also possible for accredited reviewers to put any article back into the New Pages Feed for re-review. The link is under 'Tools' in the side bar.

Reviewer Feedback

Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. New Reviewer mentorship will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional peer review cohort for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch November 13.

Second set of eyes

• Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work, especially while some routine tagging for deletion can still be carried out by non NPR holders and inexperienced users. Read about it at the Monitoring the system section in the tutorial. If you come across such editors doing good work, don't hesitate to encourage them to apply for NPR.
• Do be sure to have our talk page on your watchlist. There are often items that require reviewers' special attention, such as to watch out for pages by known socks or disruptive editors, technical issues and new developments, and of course to provide advice for other reviewers.

Arbitration Committee

The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights.

Community Wish list

There is to be no wish list for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion.

---

To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Scrubs My Musical album.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer of the Year

This year's Reviewer of the Year is Rosguill. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.

Special commendation again goes to Onel5969 who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to Boleyn and JTtheOG who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.

Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.

Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.

Top 10 Reviewers over the last 365 days

Rank	Username	Num reviews	Log
1	Rosguill (talk)	47,395	Patrol Page Curation
2	Onel5969 (talk)	41,883	Patrol Page Curation
3	JTtheOG (talk)	11,493	Patrol Page Curation
4	Arthistorian1977 (talk)	5,562	Patrol Page Curation
5	DannyS712 (talk)	4,866	Patrol Page Curation
6	CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk)	3,995	Patrol Page Curation
7	DragonflySixtyseven (talk)	3,812	Patrol Page Curation
8	Boleyn (talk)	3,655	Patrol Page Curation
9	Ymblanter (talk)	3,553	Patrol Page Curation
10	Cwmhiraeth (talk)	3,522	Patrol Page Curation

(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)

Redirect autopatrol

A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by DannyS712 bot III.

Source Guide Discussion

Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.

This month's refresher course

While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:10, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Scope creep. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Sufi Mohamed Mizanur Rahman, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creep^Talk 13:05, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Dream out loud: Apparently if the article is under deletion, then it not reviewed, its left unreviwed. scope_creep^Talk 13:10, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Rosguill. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Audrey Doering, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:46, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ethiopian Airlines, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 13:03, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Nguyen QuocTrung: Please carefully review the edits before reverting because my edits were properly cited. (See citation #243 here, which cites this source that clearly states there are 125 aircraft in the fleet.) In the future, I would appreciate a personal message rather than a generic level 2 warning template on my talk page. I will leave it to you to reinstate my edits so the article is up to date. –Dream out loud (talk) 13:14, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the requested move of A Line (Blue) (Los Angeles Metro) and other Metro pages. Since you had some involvement with pages related to A Line (Blue) (Los Angeles Metro) and others, you might want to participate in the discussion if you wish to do so. Lexlex (talk) 11:36, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dream out loud,

Source Guide Discussion

The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.

Redirects

New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.

Discussions and Resources

• There is an ongoing discussion around changing notifications for new editors who attempt to write articles.
• A recent discussion of whether Michelin starred restraunts are notable was archived without closure.
• A resource page with links pertinent for reviewers was created this month.
• A proposal to increase the scope of G5 was withdrawn.

Refresher

Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

The file File:Friends (logo).png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Superseded by File:Friends_logo.svg. Not in use and will not be used.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:21, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Spring Garden station (disambiguation2). Since you had some involvement with the Spring Garden station (disambiguation2) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC678 20:18, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I proposed deletion on File:IWF NZ.jpg and File:IWF US.jpg. If left uncontested for more than seven days, the images will be deleted. You can remove the tags if you would like to contest the deletion proposal. --George Ho (talk) 23:01, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dream out loud,

Your help can make a difference

NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.

Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate

In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.

Discussions and Resources

• A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
• Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
• A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
• Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dream out loud,

Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.

Rank	Username	Num reviews	Log
1	DannyS712 bot III (talk)	67,552	Patrol Page Curation
2	Rosguill (talk)	63,821	Patrol Page Curation
3	John B123 (talk)	21,697	Patrol Page Curation
4	Onel5969 (talk)	19,879	Patrol Page Curation
5	JTtheOG (talk)	12,901	Patrol Page Curation
6	Mcampany (talk)	9,103	Patrol Page Curation
7	DragonflySixtyseven (talk)	6,401	Patrol Page Curation
8	Mccapra (talk)	4,918	Patrol Page Curation
9	Hughesdarren (talk)	4,520	Patrol Page Curation
10	Utopes (talk)	3,958	Patrol Page Curation

Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here