Start a new discussion thread

For doing translations to English I recommend using a user draft like you did for User:Harry Riddle17/Ministry of Cyber and national digital matters of Israel (rather than translating directly to main space). For translations to Hebrew, do the same on Hebrew Wikipedia. —teb728 t c 10:05, 28 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Ministry of Cyber and National Digital Matters, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 20:43, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please read this and note that the established style of post-nominals in an article cannot be changed without discussion and consensus. I have reverted your amendment at Winston Churchill where the small format has been in use for a long time. Thanks. No Great Shaker (talk) 11:30, 7 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I apologize. Thank you. Duke of Somewhere (talk) 12:00, 7 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Alon Ushpiz, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 12:56, 24 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear Duke of Somewhere,

I'm reaching out to invite you to participate in a research session because you're an English Wikipedia editor who works with media files—either regularly or occasionally. If you (or any other media editors who see this!) are interested in participating in an anonymous interview—for which you will be compensated—please first fill out this short survey in which we ask you a few questions about working with media. At the end, we ask for an email address that we can use to contact you if you are selected for an interview. If selected, we will follow up with an email invitation to select a day/time to participate. As a thank you for your time and insights, we are able to offer interview participants a gift card in compensation for participation.

You can complete the survey on any internet-capable device, but in order to participate in the interview, you will need access to a computer and internet connection fast enough to support video calls.

Thank you!

(MRaish (WMF) (talk) 16:52, 5 March 2021 (UTC))Reply[reply]

This survey will be conducted via Google Forms, which may subject it to additional terms. For more information about privacy and data-handling, see the survey privacy statement. Of course, please feel free to remove this message.

Hello, Duke of Somewhere. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ministry of Cyber and National Digital Matters, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:03, 7 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ken Tony was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Inline citations would be helpful.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ministry of Cyber and National Digital Matters and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ministry of Cyber and National Digital Matters, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ken Tony ^{Shall we discuss?} 14:34, 8 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Duke of Somewhere! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ken Tony Shall we discuss? 14:34, 8 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Duke of Somewhere. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alon Ushpiz, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 26 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, thanks for you work. Please don't link years, dates, or commonly known words. See WP:OVERLINK. Tony (talk) 01:26, 16 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK, sorry. Is there any specific page in which I have done that? Duke of Somewhere (talk) 05:04, 17 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart‎, you may be blocked from editing. –Davey2010^Talk 13:22, 1 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I am not engaged in a content dispute of any kind. I aim towards making Wikipedia a more comfortable place and thus I added an Infobox so users could read about Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart more easily. Could you please explain how my actions harmed Wikipedia? Duke of Somewhere (talk) 15:20, 1 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, The article states and I quote "Please do not add an infobox, per the consensus established on the Talk page, in Talk:Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart/Archive 8, Talk:Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart/Archive 10, Talk:Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart/Archive 12, and Talk:Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart/Archive 13." yet you chose to ignore that and insert one anyway

Your edits do harm Wikipedia tho as by you adding something you know not to add you're bringing editors back to either revert you or to air their objections on the talkpage ... and those exact editors could of been improving articles for our readers prior to coming to you. Thanks. –Davey2010^Talk 17:04, 1 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please accept my apologies. I did not know that there was a discussion nor that the said consensus was established. Duke of Somewhere (talk) 18:11, 1 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ministry of Cyber and National Digital Matters, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 01:38, 8 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello

I have published articles on Wikipedia listing the Earls during the reigns of medieval English kings starting with William the Conqueror.

The lists are for the purpose of showing readers who were the individuals who were Earls during each reign.

The articles are simply lists with links to Wikipedia articles about each of the Earldoms referred to and each of the individual Earls listed.

Recently I published the last of these lists for the Earls during the reign of Richard III.

That page has been moved to Draft because, as I understand it, it doesn't contain enough in-line references: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:List_of_earls_in_the_reign_of_Richard_III_of_England

Could you please assist me to have this draft moved back to article status.

I would also like to join the Wikipedia:WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage.

My email address is: johnhewison@yahoo.com.au

Unst50 (talk) 06:05, 22 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello,

I am very honoured that you came to for help, as I was not long ago in a similar situation.

From what I saw, I can tell you that you indeed need to find proof for this names. What you can do, is look at the Earls' articles, and try and find proof that they existed.

Regarding the WikiProject, I do not know how to join.

Sincerely,

Duke of Somewhere (talk) 09:46, 22 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place ((Ds/aware)) on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Additionally, editors may not edit material related to the Arab-Israeli conflict topic area in articles if they have fewer than 500 edits. Your edit to Tourism in Israel violated that restriction. Please gain experience in less contentious topics to gain an understanding of our content policies until you qualify for editing in the Arab-Israeli conflict topic area. Thank you, nableezy - 15:06, 27 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Duke of Somewhere! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:Local Embassy, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 6 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:Local Embassy.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:00, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]