Hello, I'm LizardJr8. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to DrLupo—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. LizardJr8 (talk) 02:27, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at C. J. Stroud. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automaticallyreverted.
If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place ((Help me)) on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: C. J. Stroud was changed by Dylan.mcqueerver (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.938252 on 2024-01-14T02:41:13+00:00
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)). — Newslingertalk 07:28, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]